Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/a-2530-3297
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy using a novel double-lumen tapered dilator combined with a 22-G needle
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided hepaticogastrostomy (HGS) can be indicated for failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Recently, various transendoscopic ultrasonography/endosonography-created route procedures have been developed, such as antegrade bile duct stone removal and stricture management [1]. These procedures may be mainly indicated for benign biliary disease. Compared with malignant biliary disease, EUS-HGS might be challenging in cases of benign biliary disease because the intrahepatic bile duct is not very dilated. Indeed, compared with a meta-analysis of EUS-HGS for malignant biliary disease [2], the technical success rate might be lower for benign biliary disease [3]. A 22 G needle may improve the technical success of bile duct puncturing. However, because a 0.018-inch guidewire, which has little stiffness, should be used, device insertion into the biliary tract may be challenging. To overcome this, a novel dilation device (Meissa; Japan Lifeline, Tokyo, Japan) has been developed ([Fig. 1]). This device has a 2.3-Fr tip and a maximum diameter of 7.4 Fr. In addition, a 2-cm side hole is provided from the tip. Contrast medium injection, aspiration of bile juice, and 0.025-inch guidewire insertion can be performed. Therefore, if this device is used, the double-guidewire technique can be performed without additional device exchange with a 0.018-inch guidewire. A challenging case of EUS-HGS due to a non-dilated bile duct is described.


An 80-year-old man was referred to our hospital due to acute cholangitis caused by a common bile duct stone. He underwent distal gastrectomy with a Roux-en-Y anastomosis. Stone removal was then performed through an enteroscopic approach in another hospital but failed. Therefore, EUS-HGS was attempted. Since the diameter of the intrahepatic bile duct was only 1 mm ([Fig. 2], arrow), a 22 G needle was selected as the puncture needle. The intrahepatic bile duct was successfully punctured and contrast medium was also injected. Then, a 0.018-inch guidewire was inserted ([Fig. 3]). Next, insertion of the novel dilation device was attempted, and it was easily inserted into the biliary tract. Subsequently, bile juice was aspirated and contrast medium was injected. On cholangiography, a common bile duct stone was observed. A 0.025-inch guidewire was inserted through the side hole of the novel dilator ([Fig. 4]). After tract dilation, an 8.5-Fr stent delivery system was easily inserted and successfully deployed from the intrahepatic bile duct to the stomach ([Fig. 5]) without any adverse events ([Video 1]). After the cholangitis resolved, antegrade removal of the stone was successfully performed.








Quality:
In conclusion, this dilation device may be useful for EUS-HGS using a 22 G needle combined with a 0.018-inch guidewire. Additional cases are needed to further evaluate this device.
Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AS_2AH
E-Videos is an open access online section of the journal Endoscopy, reporting on interesting cases and new techniques in gastroenterological endoscopy. All papers include a high-quality video and are published with a Creative Commons CC-BY license. Endoscopy E-Videos qualify for HINARI discounts and waivers and eligibility is automatically checked during the submission process. We grant 100% waivers to articles whose corresponding authors are based in Group A countries and 50% waivers to those who are based in Group B countries as classified by Research4Life (see: https://www.research4life.org/access/eligibility/).
This section has its own submission website at https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/e-videos.
#
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
-
References
- 1 Isayama H, Nakai Y, Matsuda K. et al. Proposal of classification and terminology of interventional endoscopic ultrasonography/endosonography. Dig Endosc 2025; 37: 5-17
- 2 Binda C, Dajti E, Giuffrida P. et al. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy: a meta-regression analysis. Endoscopy 2024; 56: 694-705
- 3 Kamal F, Khan MA, Lee-Smith W. et al. Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided biliary drainage for benign biliary obstruction – A systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Ultrasound 2023; 12: 228-236
Correspondence
Publication History
Article published online:
18 February 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Isayama H, Nakai Y, Matsuda K. et al. Proposal of classification and terminology of interventional endoscopic ultrasonography/endosonography. Dig Endosc 2025; 37: 5-17
- 2 Binda C, Dajti E, Giuffrida P. et al. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy: a meta-regression analysis. Endoscopy 2024; 56: 694-705
- 3 Kamal F, Khan MA, Lee-Smith W. et al. Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided biliary drainage for benign biliary obstruction – A systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Ultrasound 2023; 12: 228-236









