RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/a-2778-8916
Increased Time from Onset of Symptoms to Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction is Associated with More Intra-Articular Pathology
Autor*innen
Abstract
This cohort study aimed to identify whether time greater than 3 months between the onset of new symptoms of instability after primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) and subsequent revision ACLR influences outcomes of revision surgery. We hypothesized greater than 3 months from onset of symptoms to revision ACLR is associated with increased intra-articular damage and poorer outcomes following revision ACLR. A retrospective chart review was conducted to identify patients who underwent revision ACLR at a large tertiary referral institution between 2008 and 2019. Demographic, surgical, and postsurgical data were collected. Patients who underwent revision ACLR within 3 months of documented graft symptomology were defined as the Early Revision group, and patients who underwent revision ACLR at or greater than 3 months after onset of graft symptomology were defined as the Late Revision group. Demographic data, intraoperative findings, subsequent graft failure, and patient-reported outcomes were compared between the groups. A total of 74 patients met inclusion criteria. Patients in the Late Revision group were more likely to have cartilage damage in the patella, trochlea, medial tibial plateau, lateral femoral condyle, and lateral tibial plateau. Patients in the Late Revision group were also more likely to have concomitant lateral meniscus tears. Medial meniscus tears identified at time of surgery in this group were also less likely to be deemed repairable. No significant differences were noted in postoperative Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores, Marx Activity scores, or ACL graft retear risk based on the time from injury to surgery. Undergoing revision ACLR more than 3 months after graft tear is associated with more severe articular cartilage damage, more frequent lateral meniscus pathology, and a greater incidence of irreparable medial meniscus tears. No significant differences in patient-reported outcomes or revision graft failure risk were observed.
Level of Evidence III
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 12. Juli 2025
Angenommen: 23. Dezember 2025
Accepted Manuscript online:
02. Januar 2026
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
20. Januar 2026
© 2026. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Gans I, Retzky JS, Jones LC, Tanaka MJ. Epidemiology of recurrent anterior cruciate ligament injuries in national collegiate athletic association sports: the injury surveillance program, 2004–2014. Orthop J Sports Med 2018; 6 (06) 2325967118777823
- 2 Dodwell ER, Lamont LE, Green DW, Pan TJ, Marx RG, Lyman S. 20 years of pediatric anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in New York State. Am J Sports Med 2014; 42 (03) 675-680
- 3 Griffin LY, Agel J, Albohm MJ. et al. Noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injuries: risk factors and prevention strategies. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2000; 8 (03) 141-150
- 4 Wiggins AJ, Grandhi RK, Schneider DK, Stanfield D, Webster KE, Myer GD. Risk of secondary injury in younger athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 2016; 44 (07) 1861-1876
- 5 Wright RW, Huston LJ, Spindler KP. et al; MARS Group. Descriptive epidemiology of the multicenter ACL revision study (Mars) cohort. Am J Sports Med 2010; 38 (10) 1979-1986
- 6 Wright MARS Group. Meniscal and articular cartilage predictors of clinical outcome after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2016; 44 (07) 1671-1679
- 7 Wright R. Mars Group. Meniscal and articular cartilage predictors of outcome following revision ACL reconstruction: a 6-year follow-up study. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine 2020; 8 (7_suppl6): 2325967120S0036
- 8 Ohly NE, Murray IR, Keating JF. Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: timing of surgery and the incidence of meniscal tears and degenerative change. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89 (08) 1051-1054
- 9 Prodromidis AD, Drosatou C, Thivaios GC, Zreik N, Charalambous CP. Timing of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and relationship with meniscal tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 2021; 49 (09) 2551-2562
- 10 Forsythe B, Lu Y, Agarwalla A. et al. Delaying ACL reconstruction beyond 6 months from injury impacts likelihood for clinically significant outcome improvement. Knee 2021; 33: 290-297
- 11 Snaebjörnsson T, Hamrin Senorski E, Svantesson E. et al. Graft fixation and. JBJS Open Access 2019; 4 (04) e0037
- 12 Krutsch W, Zellner J, Baumann F, Pfeifer C, Nerlich M, Angele P. Timing of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction within the first year after trauma and its influence on treatment of cartilage and meniscus pathology. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017; 25 (02) 418-425
- 13 Slattery C, Kweon CY. Classifications in brief: outerbridge classification of chondral lesions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2018; 476 (10) 2101-2104
- 14 Roos EM, Lohmander LS. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): from joint injury to osteoarthritis. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003; 1: 64
- 15 Sri-Ram K, Salmon LJ, Pinczewski LA, Roe JP. The incidence of secondary pathology after anterior cruciate ligament rupture in 5086 patients requiring ligament reconstruction. Bone Joint J 2013; 95-B (01) 59-64
- 16 Allen CR, Anderson AF, Cooper DE. et al; MARS Group. Surgical predictors of clinical outcomes after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2017; 45 (11) 2586-2594
- 17 Magnussen RA, Borchers JR, Pedroza AD. et al; MARS Group. Risk factors and predictors of significant chondral surface change from primary to revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a moon and mars cohort study. Am J Sports Med 2018; 46 (03) 557-564
- 18 Cristiani R, Janarv PM, Engström B, Edman G, Forssblad M, Stålman A. Delayed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction increases the risk of abnormal prereconstruction laxity, cartilage, and medial meniscus injuries. Arthroscopy 2021; 37 (04) 1214-1220
- 19 Vial BJ, Kohner AB, Shybut TB. Higher incidence of complete lateral meniscal root tears in revision compared with primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 2021; 3 (02) e367-e372
- 20 Sanders TL, Pareek A, Hewett TE. et al. Long-term rate of graft failure after ACL reconstruction: a geographic population cohort analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017; 25 (01) 222-228
- 21 Maletis GB, Inacio MC, Funahashi TT. Risk factors associated with revision and contralateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions in the Kaiser Permanente ACLR registry. Am J Sports Med 2015; 43 (03) 641-647