Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Arthrofibrosis

Abstract

Arthrofibrosis is a common issue that can occur after a primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and is a significant cause of patient dissatisfaction. As the annual incidence of TKA in the United States rises, the prevalence of arthrofibrosis will rise. The prevalence of this outcome has been reported between 1.3 and 5.3%. The range of values is attributed to the varying quantitative thresholds of flexion and/or extension loss used to define arthrofibrosis. This causes a significant burden on the healthcare system, with a reported 27.5% of the 90-day readmissions after TKA due to arthrofibrosis. This can lead to debilitating results for the affected patients with pain, abnormal gait, fatigue, and difficulty rising from the seated position. The definition of stiffness has changed over the years. This underscores the increasing expectations that both surgeons and patients have for total knee replacements. Management of arthrofibrosis includes both nonoperative and operative modalities. The treatment algorithm includes physical therapy and manipulation under anesthesia (MUA). Physical therapy is most used, while revision arthroplasty is typically reserved as a last resort.

Keywords

revision - TKA - arthrofibrosis - stiffness

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 17. Oktober 2025

Angenommen: 23. Dezember 2025

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
29. Januar 2026

• References

• 1 Cheuy VA, Foran JRH, Paxton RJ, Bade MJ, Zeni JA, Stevens-Lapsley JE. Arthrofibrosis Associated With Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (08) 2604-2611
• 2 Rockov ZA, Byrne CT, Rezzadeh KT. et al. Revision total knee arthroplasty for arthrofibrosis improves range of motion. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2023; 31 (05) 1859-1864
• 3 Nicholls DW, Dorr LD. Revision surgery for stiff total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1990; 5: S73-S77
• 4 Christensen CP, Crawford JJ, Olin MD, Vail TP. Revision of the stiff total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2002; a 17 (04) 409-415
• 5 Yercan HS, Sugun TS, Bussiere C, Ait Si Selmi T, Davies A, Neyret P. Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty: prevalence, management and outcomes. Knee 2006; 13 (02) 111-117
• 6 Ramos MS, Pasqualini I, Surace PA, Molloy RM, Deren ME, Piuzzi NS. Arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty: a critical analysis review. JBJS Rev 2023; 11 (12) 00140
• 7 Magit D, Wolff A, Sutton K, Medvecky MJ. Arthrofibrosis of the knee. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2007; 15 (11) 682-694
• 8 Stephenson JJ, Quimbo RA, Gu T. Knee-attributable medical costs and risk of re-surgery among patients utilizing non-surgical treatment options for knee arthrofibrosis in a managed care population. Curr Med Res Opin 2010; 26 (05) 1109-1118
• 9 Gillespie MJ, Friedland J, Dehaven KE. Arthrofibrosis: etiology,classification, histopathology, and treatment. Oper Tech Sports Med 1998; 6 (02) 102-110
• 10 Freeman TA, Parvizi J, Della Valle CJ, Steinbeck MJ. Reactive oxygen and nitrogen species induce protein and DNA modifications driving arthrofibrosis following total knee arthroplasty. Fibrogenesis Tissue Repair 2009; 2 (01) 5
• 11 Faust I, Traut P, Nolting F. et al. Human xylosyltransferases–mediators of arthrofibrosis? New pathomechanistic insights into arthrofibrotic remodeling after knee replacement therapy. Sci Rep 2015; 5 (01) 12537
• 12 Watson RS, Gouze E, Levings PP. et al. Gene delivery of TGF-β1 induces arthrofibrosis and chondrometaplasia of synovium in vivo. Lab Invest 2010; 90 (11) 1615-1627
• 13 Hold GL, Untiveros P, Saunders KA, El-Omar EM. Role of host genetics in fibrosis. Fibrogenesis Tissue Repair 2009; 2 (01) 6
• 14 Black DW. Treatment of knee arthrofibrosis and quadriceps insufficiency after patellar tendon repair: a case report including use of the Graston technique. Int J Ther Massage Bodywork 2010; 3 (02) 14-21
• 15 Pariente GM, Lombardi Jr AV, Berend KR, Mallory TH, Adams JB. Manipulation with prolonged epidural analgesia for treatment of TKA complicated by arthrofibrosis. Surg Technol Int 2006; 15: 221-224
• 16 Ritter MA, Stringer EA. Predictive range of motion after total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1979; (143) 115-119
• 17 Montgomery III WH, Insall JN, Haas SB, Becker MS, Windsor RE. Primary total knee arthroplasty in stiff and ankylosed knees. Am J Knee Surg 1998; 11 (01) 20-23
• 18 Figgie III HE, Goldberg VM, Heiple KG, Moller III HS, Gordon NH. The influence of tibial-patellofemoral location on function of the knee in patients with the posterior stabilized condylar knee prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986; 68 (07) 1035-1040
• 19 Shoji H, Solomonow M, Yoshino S, D'Ambrosia R, Dabezies E. Factors affecting postoperative flexion in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 1990; 13 (06) 643-649
• 20 Bengs BC, Scott RD. The effect of patellar thickness on intraoperative knee flexion and patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2006; 21 (05) 650-655
• 21 Berger RA, Crossett LS, Jacobs JJ, Rubash HE. Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; (356) 144-153
• 22 Roper GE, Bloemke AD, Roberts CC, Spangehl MJ, Clarke HD. Analysis of tibial component rotation following total knee arthroplasty using 3D high definition computed tomography. J Arthroplasty 2013; 28 (08) 106-111
• 23 Meneghini RM, Mont MA, Backstein DB, Bourne RB, Dennis DA, Scuderi GR. Development of a modern knee society radiographic evaluation system and methodology for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30 (12) 2311-2314
• 24 Hartman CW, Ting NT, Moric M, Berger RA, Rosenberg AG, Della Valle CJ. Revision total knee arthroplasty for stiffness. J Arthroplasty 2010; 25 (06) 62-66
• 25 Garvin KL, Scuderi G, Insall JN. Evolution of the quadriceps snip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995; (321) 131-137
• 26 Coonse K, Adams JB. A new operative approach to the knee joint. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1943; 77: 344-347
• 27 Whiteside LA, Ohl MD. Tibial tubercle osteotomy for exposure of the difficult total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990; (260) 6-9
• 28 DeHaan A, Shukla S, Anderson M, Ries M. Tibial tubercle osteotomy to aid exposure for revision total knee arthroplasty. JBJS Essent Surg Tech 2016; 6 (03) e32
• 29 Windsor RE, Insall JN. Exposure in revision total knee arthroplasty. Tech Orthop 1988; 3 (02) 1-4
• 30 Lavernia C, Contreras JS, Alcerro JC. The peel in total knee revision: exposure in the difficult knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469 (01) 146-153
• 31 Bingham JS, Bukowski BR, Wyles CC, Pareek A, Berry DJ, Abdel MP. Rotating-hinge revision total knee arthroplasty for treatment of severe arthrofibrosis. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34 (7S): S271-S276
• 32 Liow MHL, Flevas DA, Braun S, Nocon A, Lee GC, Sculco PK. TKAF Consortium. Rotating hinge revision total knee arthroplasty provides greater arc of motion gains for patients who have severe arthrofibrosis. J Arthroplasty 2025; 40 (01) 198-202
• 33 Pun SY, Ries MD. Effect of gender and preoperative diagnosis on results of revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008; 466 (11) 2701-2705
• 34 Kim GK, Mortazavi SMJ, Parvizi J, Purtill JJ. Revision for stiffness following TKA: a predictable procedure?. Knee 2012; 19 (04) 332-334
• 35 Rutherford RW, Jennings JM, Levy DL, Parisi TJ, Martin JR, Dennis DA. Revision total knee arthroplasty for arthrofibrosis. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33 (7S): S177-S181
• 36 Moya-Angeler J, Bas MA, Cooper HJ, Hepinstall MS, Rodriguez JA, Scuderi GR. Revision arthroplasty for the management of stiffness after primary TKA. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (06) 1935-1939
• 37 Scuderi GR. The stiff total knee arthroplasty: causality and solution. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20 (4, suppl 2): 23-26