3-Tesla Imaging of the Wrist and Hand: Techniques and Applications

ABSTRACT

MR imaging of the wrist is complicated by its size and small critical ligamentous structures, such as the triangular fibrocartilage complex, intrinsic and extrinsic radiocarpal ligaments. 3-T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with its nearly linear increase in signal-to-noise ratio allows for imaging the wrist with small fields of view and high spatial resolution, which in turn has potential to improve visualization of these small ligaments. Dedicated radiofrequency coils and appropriate imaging tools are required to optimize the potential of high field imaging of the wrist. Early results suggest improvement in diagnostic accuracy for the wrist when compared with 1.5 T in small studies; as larger series are acquired this will certainly become more evident. As experience with 3 T for the wrist and hand grows, it is becoming clear that this is the new standard for MR imaging of these small joints.

Wrist - high field MRI - TFCC - ligament

REFERENCES

• 1 Mosher T J. Musculoskeletal imaging at 3T: current techniques and future applications.  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2006;  14(1) 63-76
• 2 Ramnath R R. 3T MR imaging of the musculoskeletal system (Part II): clinical applications.  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2006;  14(1) 41-62
• 3 Ramnath R R. 3T MR imaging of the musculoskeletal system (Part I): considerations, coils, and challenges.  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2006;  14(1) 27-40
• 4 Barth M M, Smith M P, Pedrosa I, Lenkinski R E, Rofsky N M. Body MR imaging at 3.0 T: understanding the opportunities and challenges.  Radiographics. 2007;  27(5) 1445-1462 discussion 1462-1464
• 5 Bolog N, Nanz D, Weishaupt D. Musculoskeletal MR imaging at 3.0 T: current status and future perspectives.  Eur Radiol. 2006;  16(6) 1298-1307
• 6 Amrami K K. Radiology corner: basic principles of MRI for hand surgeons.  J Am Soc Surg Hand. 2005;  5(2) 81-86
• 7 Anderson M L, Skinner J A, Felmlee J P, Berger R A, Amrami K K. Diagnostic comparison of 1.5T and 3.0T pre-operative MRI of the wrist in patients with ulnar sided wrist pain.  J Hand Surg [Am]. , In press
• 8 Gold G E, Han E, Stainsby J, Wright G, Brittain J, Beaulieu C. Musculoskeletal MRI at 3.0 T: relaxation times and image contrast.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;  183(2) 343-351
• 9 Kuhl C K, Traber F, Schild H H. Whole-body high-field-strength (3.0-T) MR imaging in clinical practice. Part I Technical considerations and clinical applications.  Radiology. 2008;  246(3) 675-696
• 10 Tropp J. Image brightening in samples of high dielectric constant.  J Magn Reson. 2004;  167(1) 12-24
• 11 Bittersohl B, Huang T, Schneider E et al.. High-resolution MRI of the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) at 3T: comparison of surface coil and volume coil.  J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;  26(3) 701-707
• 12 Kocharian A, Adkins M C, Amrami K K et al.. Wrist: improved MR imaging with optimized transmit-receive coil design.  Radiology. 2002;  223(3) 870-876
• 13 Romaneehsen B, Oberholzer K, Muller L P, Kreitner K F. Rapid musculoskeletal magnetic resonance imaging using integrated parallel acquisition techniques (IPAT)—initial experiences.  RoFo. 2003;  175(9) 1193-1197
• 14 Amrami K K. Magnetic resonance arthrography of the wrist: case presentation and discussion.  J Hand Surg [Am]. 2006;  31(4) 669-672
• 15 Masi J N, Newitt D, Sell C A et al.. Optimization of gadodiamide concentration for MR arthrography at 3 T.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;  184(6) 1754-1761
• 16 Cunningham P M, Law M, Schweitzer M E. High-field MRI.  Orthop Clin North Am. 2006;  37(3) 321-329
• 17 Ganapathi M, Joseph G, Savage R, Jones A R, Timms B, Lyons K. MRI susceptibility artefacts related to scaphoid screws: the effect of screw type, screw orientation and imaging parameters.  J Hand Surg [Br]. 2002;  27(2) 165-170
• 18 Lenk S, Ludescher B, Martirosan P, Schick F, Claussen C D, Schlemmer H P. 3.0 T high-resolution MR imaging of carpal ligaments and TFCC.  RoFo. 2004;  176(5) 664-667
• 19 Sasao S, Beppu M, Kihara H, Hirata K, Takagi M. An anatomical study of the ligaments of the ulnar compartment of the wrist.  Hand Surg. 2003;  8(2) 219-226
• 20 Tay S C, Tomita K, Berger R A. The “ulnar fovea sign” for defining ulnar wrist pain: an analysis of sensitivity and specificity.  J Hand Surg [Am]. 2007;  32(4) 438-444
• 21 Steinbach L S, Palmer W E, Schweitzer M E. Special focus session. MR arthrography.  Radiographics. 2002;  22(5) 1223-1246
• 22 Anderson S E, Steinbach L S, Stauffer E, Voegelin E. MRI for differentiating ganglion and synovitis in the chronic painful wrist.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;  186(3) 812-818
• 23 Potter H G, Asnis-Ernberg L, Weiland A J, Hotchkiss R N, Peterson M G, McCormack Jr R R. The utility of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of the triangular fibrocartilage complex of the wrist.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;  79(11) 1675-1684
• 24 Hobby J L, Tom B D, Bearcroft P W, Dixon A K. Magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist: diagnostic performance statistics.  Clin Radiol. 2001;  56(1) 50-57
• 25 Potter H G, Weiland A J. Magnetic resonance imaging of triangular fibrocartilage complex lesions.  J Hand Surg [Am]. 2002;  27(2) 363-364 , author reply 364
• 26 Oneson S R, Timins M E, Scales L M, Erickson S J, Chamoy L. MR imaging diagnosis of triangular fibrocartilage pathology with arthroscopic correlation.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;  168(6) 1513-1518
• 27 Gilula L A. Carpal injuries: analytic approach and case exercises.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1979;  133(3) 503-517
• 28 Gilula L A, Weeks P M. Post-traumatic ligamentous instabilities of the wrist.  Radiology. 1978;  129(3) 641-651
• 29 Ragheb D, Stanley A, Gentili A, Hughes T, Chung C B. MR imaging of the finger tendons: normal anatomy and commonly encountered pathology.  Eur J Radiol. 2005;  56(3) 296-306
• 30 Hinke D H, Erickson S J, Chamoy L, Timins M E. Ulnar collateral ligament of the thumb: MR findings in cadavers, volunteers, and patients with ligamentous injury (gamekeeper's thumb).  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;  163(6) 1431-1434
• 31 Imaeda T, Nakamura R, Shionoya K, Makino N. Ulnar impaction syndrome: MR imaging findings.  Radiology. 1996;  201(2) 495-500
• 32 Jarvik J G, Comstock B A, Heagerty P J et al.. Magnetic resonance imaging compared with electrodiagnostic studies in patients with suspected carpal tunnel syndrome: predicting symptoms, function, and surgical benefit at 1 year.  J Neurosurg. 2008;  108(3) 541-550
• 33 Amrami K K, Bishop A T, Berger R A. Radiology corner: imaging soft-tissue tumors of the hand and wrist: case presentation and discussion.  J Am Soc Surg Hand. 2005;  5(4) 186-192
• 34 Singh A K, Davis T R, Dawson J S, Oni J A, Downing N D. Gadolinium enhanced MR assessment of proximal fragment vascularity in nonunions after scaphoid fracture: does it predict the outcome of reconstructive surgery?.  J Hand Surg [Br]. 2004;  29(5) 444-448
• 35 Golimbu C N, Firooznia H, Rafii M. Avascular necrosis of carpal bones.  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 1995;  3(2) 281-303
• 36 Breitenseher M J, Metz V M, Gilula L A et al.. Radiographically occult scaphoid fractures: value of MR imaging in detection. [see comment].  Radiology. 1997;  203(1) 245-250
• 37 Amrami K K. Radiology corner: diagnosing radiographically occult scaphoid fracture—what's the best second test?.  J Am Soc Surg Hand. 2005;  5(3) 134-138
• 38 Schirmer C, Scheel A K, Althoff C E et al.. Diagnostic quality and scoring of synovitis, tenosynovitis and erosions in low-field MRI of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with conventional MRI.  Ann Rheum Dis. 2007;  66(4) 522-529