Distraction Osteogenesis of the Cleft Maxilla

ABSTRACT

Distraction osteogenesis is a method of enhancing bony deficiencies of the hypoplastic cleft maxilla. Whether it is the result of inherited growth deficiency or of iatrogenic causes from operative intervention, 20 to 25% of cleft maxilla patients require maxillary advancement. Traditionally, this has been done by standard orthognathic surgery at varying LeFort levels. Predictable results have been achieved with standard techniques in minor to moderate maxillary hypoplasia; however, limited advancement and relapse is common in severe cases. Distraction osteogenesis has improved results in these patients by allowing soft tissue relaxation and gradual bone generation. Therefore, greater movement of the craniofacial skeleton is possible in severe cases of maxillary retrusion with lower relapse rates.

Distraction osteogenesis - cleft maxilla - le fort 1

REFERENCES

• 1 Samman N, Tong A C, Cheung D L, Tideman H. Analysis of 300 dentofacial deformities in Hong Kong.  Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1992;  7 181-185
• 2 Rosenstein S, Kernahan D, Dado D, Grasseschi M, Griffith B H. Orthognathic surgery in cleft patients treated by early bone grafting.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;  87 835-892
• 3 Ross R B. Treatment variables affecting facial growth in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate.  Cleft Palate J. 1987;  24 5-77
• 4 Posnick J C, Tompson B. Cleft-orthognathic surgery: complications and long-term results.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;  96 255-266
• 5 Pierce G F, Tarpley J E, Yanagihara D, Mustoe T A, Fox G M, Thomason A. Platelet-derived growth factor (BB homodimer), transforming growth factor-beta 1, and basic fibroblast growth factor in dermal wound healing: neovessel and matrix formation and cessation of repair.  Am J Pathol. 1992;  140 1375-1388
• 6 Singare S, Li D, Liu Y, Wu Z, Wang J. The effect of latency on bone lengthening force and bone mineralization: an investigation using strain gauge mounted on internal distractor device.  Biomed Eng Online. 2006;  5 18
• 7 Paccione M F, Mehrara B J, Warren S M et al.. Rat mandibular distraction osteogenesis: latency, rate, and rhythm determine the adaptive response.  J Craniofac Surg. 2001;  12 175-182
• 8 Rachmiel A, Potparic Z, Jackson I T et al.. Midface advancement by gradual distraction.  Br J Plast Surg. 1993;  46 201-207
• 9 Rowe N M, Mehrara B J, Dudziak M E et al.. Rat mandibular distraction osteogenesis: Part 1. Histology and radiographic analysis.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;  102 2022-2032