Download PDF
Endoscopy 2009; 41(7): 617
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1214914
Correction

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Mixed-histologic-type submucosal invasive gastric cancer as a risk factor for lymph node metastasis: feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection

N.  Hanaoka1 , S.  Tanabe1 , T.  Mikami2 , I.  Okayasu2 , K.  Saigenji1
  • 1Department of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara-City, Kanagawa, Japan
  • 2Department of Pathology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara-City, Kanagawa, Japan
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
08 July 2009 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Correction to:

Mixed-histologic-type submucosal invasive gastric cancer as a risk factor for lymph node metastasis: feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissectionEndoscopy 2009; 41(05): 427-432
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1214495

Hanaoka N et al. Mixed-histologic-type submucosal invasive gastric cancer as a risk factor for lymph node metastasis: feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 427 – 432.

We would like to apologize to the authors for this error.

p. 429

Relation between histologic type and lymph node metastasis

The prevalence of lymph node metastasis was highest in undifferentiated-type-predominant mixed type (C) (P < 0.001 vs. A, P = 0.019 vs. B, and P = 0.0029 vs. D) (Table 3).
Should read: The prevalence of lymph node metastasis was highest in undifferentiated-type-predominant mixed type (C) P < 0.001 vs. A, P = 0.013 vs. B, and P = 0.003 vs. D) (Table 3).

p. 430

Relations of histologic type and tumor size to lymphatic invasion

The prevalence of lymphatic invasion was highest in undifferentiated-type-predominant mixed type (C) (P < 0.001 vs. A, P = 0.02 vs. B, and P = 0.03 vs. D).
Should read: The prevalence of lymphatic invasion was highest in undifferentiated-type-predominant mixed type (C) (P < 0.001 vs. A, P = 0.019 vs. B, and P = 0.029 vs. D).