Skull Base 2009; 19(6): 387-399
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1224773
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

© Thieme Medical Publishers

Comparative Analysis of Extensions of Transbasal Approaches: Effect on Access to Midline and Paramedian Structures

Pakrit Jittapiromsak1 , Anhua Wu1 , Pushpa Deshmukh1 , Iman Feiz-Erfan1 , Peter Nakaji1 , Robert F. Spetzler1 , Mark C. Preul1
  • 1Division of Neurological Surgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
26. Mai 2009 (online)

ABSTRACT

We sought to quantitate the effect of extensions of transbasal approaches (TBAs) on midline and paramedian targets of the cranial base. Eight silicone-injected cadaveric heads were dissected with extensions of TBA level I removal of the orbital bar. Objective measures were the comparisons of the accessibility of midline and paramedian targets with progressive dissections by level II detachment of the medial canthal ligaments and removal of the nasal bone and by level III removal of the lateral orbital walls with lateral orbital retraction. Mean areas of freedom increased for most targets with progressive bone removal. For midline targets, the most effective freedom increment was at the pituitary gland (level II: 28.8%, p = 0.05; level III: 107.1%, p < 0.001). For paramedian targets, the best freedom increment was for the foramen rotundum (level II: 56.4%; level III: 134.5%, all p < 0.001). Extensions of the TBA can increase the surgical corridor to midline and paramedian structures, especially for pituitary and maxillary regions. Level II exposure offers no clear benefit for most targets except the foramen rotundum. With level III exposure, all targets are effectively exposed compared with levels I and II.

REFERENCES

Mark C PreulM.D. 

c/o Neuroscience Publications; Barrow Neurological Institute

350 W. Thomas Road, Phoenix, AZ 85013

eMail: mark.preul@chw.edu