Stellenwert der Magnetresonanztomografie in der Diagnostik der Endometriose

Zusammenfassung

Die Endometriose ist eine Erkrankung des Uterus, bei der es zu Absiedlungen von endometriumähnlichem Gewebe außerhalb des Endometriums kommt. Die Endometriose ist nach den Uterusmyomen die häufigste benigne chronische Erkrankung junger Frauen mit erheblichen Auswirkungen auf deren Lebensqualität. Die vermutete Prävalenz liegt bei 10 %. Neben dem Uterus, den Ovarien und den Parametrien sind klinisch wichtige Lokalisationen der pelvinen extragenitalen Endometriose das Septum rektovaginale, der Douglas’sche Raum, das Ligamentum sacrouterinum, das Rektum und Sigma, die Harnblase mit Ureteren und das Peritoneum. Die häufigste Lokalisation der extrapelvinen Endometriose ist die Abdominalwand. Das MRT gehört heute zum festen Bestandteil in der Diagnostik der Endometriose. Limitationen bestehen im Nachweis peritonealer Manifestationen der Endometriose und in der exakten Definition der Infiltrationstiefe von Endometrioseläsionen im Bereich des Intestinaltrakts und der Harnblase.

Abstract

Endometriosis is a disease of the uterus with displacement of endometrium-like tissue outside the endometrium. Endometriosis is a common benign chronic often debilitating disease that primarily affects young woman. The estimated prevalence is about 10 %. In addition to the uterus and ovaries, clinically important localisations are the rectovaginal space, rectum, sigmoid colon, urinary bladder, ureter and peritoneum. The most common localisation outside the pelvis is the abdominal wall. Today, MRI is one of the most important tools in the diagnosis of endometriosis. The detection of peritoneal manifestations and the exact definition of the depth of infiltration in the rectum, sigmoid colon and bladder walls are limitations of MRI.

uterus - pelvis - ovary - MR imaging - endometriosis

Literatur

• 1 Bulun S E. Endometriosis.  N Engl J Med. 2009;  360 268-279
• 2 Leyendecker G, Wildt L, Mall G. The pathophysiology of endometriosis and adenomyosis: tissue injury and repair.  Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009;  280 529-538
• 3 Reese K A, Reddy S, Rock J A. Endometriosis in an adolescent population: the Emory experience.  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 1996;  9 125-128
• 4 Laufer M R, Goitein L, Bush M et al. Prevalence of endometriosis in adolescent girls with chronic pelvic pain not responding to conventional therapy.  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 1997;  10 199-202
• 5 Ebert A D, Fuhr N, David M et al. Histological confirmation of endometriosis in a 9-year-old girl suffering from unexplained cyclic pelvic pain since her eighth year of life.  Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2009;  67 158-161
• 6 Mechsner S, Schwarz J, Thode J et al. Growth-associated protein 43-positive sensory nerve fibers accompanied by immature vessels are located in or near peritoneal endometriotic lesions.  Fertil Steril. 2007;  88 581-587
• 7 Noel J C, Chapron C, Bucella D et al. Estrogen and progesterone receptors in smooth muscle component of deep infiltrating endometriosis.  Fertil Steril. 2010;  93 1774-1777
• 8 Anaf V, Simon P, Fayt I et al. Smooth muscles are frequent components of endometriotic lesions.  Hum Reprod. 2000;  15 767-771
• 9 Nisolle M, Casanas-Roux F, Anaf V et al. Morphometric study of the stromal vascularization in peritoneal endometriosis.  Fertil Steril. 1993;  59 681-684
• 10 Ballard K, Lowton K, Wright J. What’s the delay? A qualitative study of women’s experiences of reaching a diagnosis of endometriosis.  Fertil Steril. 2006;  86 1296-1301
• 11 Schindler A E. Epidemiologie, Pathogenese und Diagnostik der Endometriose.  J Fertil Reprod. 2007;  17 22-27
• 12 Halis G, Mechsner S, Ebert A D. Diagnose und Therapie der tief-infiltrierenden Endometriose.  Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010;  107 446-456
• 13 Tuttlies F KJ, Ulrich U, Possover M et al. ENZIAN-Klassifikation zur Diskussion gestellt: Eine neue differenzierte Klassifikation der tief infiltrierenden Endometriose.  J Gynäkol Endokrinol. 2008;  18 7-13
• 14 Noel J C, Chapron C, Fayt I et al. Lymph node involvement and lymphovascular invasion in deep infiltrating rectosigmoid endometriosis.  Fertil Steril. 2008;  89 1069-1072
• 15 Scarmato V J, Levine M S, Herlinger H et al. Ileal endometriosis: radiographic findings in five cases.  Radiology. 2000;  214 509-512
• 16 Schneider A, Touloupidis S, Papatsoris A G et al. Endometriosis of the urinary tract in women of reproductive age.  Int J Urol. 2006;  13 902-904
• 17 Kataoka M L, Togashi K, Yamaoka T et al. Posterior cul-de-sac obliteration associated with endometriosis: MR imaging evaluation.  Radiology. 2005;  234 815-823
• 18 Redwine D B. The distribution of endometriosis in the pelvis by age groups and fertility.  Fertil Steril. 1987;  47 173-175
• 19 Vercellini P, Chapron C, Fedele L et al. Evidence for asymmetric distribution of sciatic nerve endometriosis.  Obstet Gynecol. 2003;  102 383-387
• 20 Chapron C, Chopin N, Borghese B et al. Deeply infiltrating endometriosis: pathogenetic implications of the anatomical distribution.  Hum Reprod. 2006;  21 1839-1845
• 21 Goldsmith P J, Ahmad N, Dasgupta D et al. Case hepatic endometriosis: a continuing diagnostic dilemma.  HPB Surg. 2009;  2009 407 206
• 22 Tuech J J, Rousselet M C, Boyer J et al. Endometrial cyst of the liver: case report and review.  Fertil Steril. 2003;  79 1234-1236
• 23 Verbeke C, Harle M, Sturm J. Cystic endometriosis of the upper abdominal organs. Report on three cases and review of the literature.  Pathol Res Pract. 1996;  192 300-304 ; discussion 305
• 24 Giudice L C. Clinical practice. Endometriosis.  N Engl J Med. 2010;  362 2389-2398
• 25 Tamai K, Togashi K, Ito T et al. MR imaging findings of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathologic features and diagnostic pitfalls.  Radiographics. 2005;  25 21-40
• 26 Hornstein M D, Gleason R E, Orav J et al. The reproducibility of the revised American Fertility Society classification of endometriosis.  Fertil Steril. 1993;  59 1015-1021
• 27 Rock J A. The revised American Fertility Society classification of endometriosis: reproducibility of scoring. ZOLADEX Endometriosis Study Group.  Fertil Steril. 1995;  63 1108-1110
• 28 Wiegerinck M A, Van Dop P A, Brosens I A. The staging of peritoneal endometriosis by the type of active lesion in addition to the revised American Fertility Society classification.  Fertil Steril. 1993;  60 461-464
• 29 Schultes G. Classification of endometriosis.  Wien Med Wochenschr. 1999;  149 361-365
• 30 Tuttlies F, Keckstein J, Ulrich U et al. ENZIAN-score, a classification of deep infiltrating endometriosis.  Zentralbl Gynakol. 2005;  127 275-281
• 31 Anaf V, Chapron C, El Nakadi I et al. Pain, mast cells, and nerves in peritoneal, ovarian, and deep infiltrating endometriosis.  Fertil Steril. 2006;  86 1336-1343
• 32 Takeuchi M, Matsuzaki K, Nishitani H. Manifestations of the female reproductive organs on MR images: changes induced by various physiologic states.  Radiographics. 2010;  30 1147
• 33 Hottat N, Larrousse C, Anaf V et al. Endometriosis: contribution of 3.0-T pelvic MR imaging in preoperative assessment – initial results.  Radiology. 2009;  253 126-134
• 34 Sugimura K, Okizuka H, Imaoka I et al. Pelvic endometriosis: detection and diagnosis with chemical shift MR imaging.  Radiology. 1993;  188 435-438
• 35 Kier R, Smith R C, McCarthy S M. Value of lipid- and water-suppression MR images in distinguishing between blood and lipid within ovarian masses.  Am J Roentgenol. 1992;  158 321-325
• 36 Tanaka Y O, Itai Y, Anno I et al. MR staging of pelvic endometriosis: role of fat-suppression T 1-weighted images.  Radiat Med. 1996;  14 111-116
• 37 Del Frate C, Girometti R, Pittino M et al. Deep retroperitoneal pelvic endometriosis: MR imaging appearance with laparoscopic correlation.  Radiographics. 2006;  26 1705-1718
• 38 Takeuchi M, Matsuzaki K, Uehara H et al. Malignant transformation of pelvic endometriosis: MR imaging findings and pathologic correlation.  Radiographics. 2006;  26 407-417
• 39 Bazot M, Darai E, Hourani R et al. Deep pelvic endometriosis: MR imaging for diagnosis and prediction of extension of disease.  Radiology. 2004;  232 379-389
• 40 Bazot M, Lafont C, Rouzier R et al. Diagnostic accuracy of physical examination, transvaginal sonography, rectal endoscopic sonography, and magnetic resonance imaging to diagnose deep infiltrating endometriosis.  Fertil Steril. 2009;  92 1825-1833
• 41 Bazot M, Malzy P, Cortez A et al. Accuracy of transvaginal sonography and rectal endoscopic sonography in the diagnosis of deep infiltrating endometriosis.  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;  30 994-1001
• 42 Reinhold C, Tafazoli F, Mehio A et al. Uterine adenomyosis: endovaginal US and MR imaging features with histopathologic correlation.  Radiographics. 1999;  19 Spec No S147-S160
• 43 Bazot M, Cortez A, Darai E et al. Ultrasonography compared with magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathology.  Hum Reprod. 2001;  16 2427-2433
• 44 Reinhold C, Atri M, Mehio A et al. Diffuse uterine adenomyosis: morphologic criteria and diagnostic accuracy of endovaginal sonography.  Radiology. 1995;  197 609-614
• 45 Brosens J J, Souza N M, Barker F G et al. Endovaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of adenomyosis uteri: identifying the predictive characteristics.  Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995;  102 471-474
• 46 Reinhold de C, McCarthy S, Bret P M et al. Diffuse adenomyosis: comparison of endovaginal US and MR imaging with histopathologic correlation.  Radiology. 1996;  199 151-158
• 47 Dueholm M, Lundorf E, Hansen E S et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis.  Fertil Steril. 2001;  76 588-594
• 48 Siedler D, Laing F C, Jeffrey Jr R B et al. Uterine adenomyosis. A difficult sonographic diagnosis.  J Ultrasound Med. 1987;  6 345-349
• 49 Atri M, Reinhold C, Mehio A R et al. Adenomyosis: US features with histologic correlation in an in-vitro study.  Radiology. 2000;  215 783-790
• 50 Reinhold C, Tafazoli F, Wang L. Imaging features of adenomyosis.  Hum Reprod Update. 1998;  4 337-349
• 51 Levgur M. Diagnosis of adenomyosis: a review.  J Reprod Med. 2007;  52 177-193
• 52 Ascher S M, Arnold L L, Patt R H et al. Adenomyosis: prospective comparison of MR imaging and transvaginal sonography.  Radiology. 1994;  190 803-806
• 53 Somigliana E, Infantino M, Candiani M et al. Association rate between deep peritoneal endometriosis and other forms of the disease: pathogenetic implications.  Hum Reprod. 2004;  19 168-171
• 54 Ghezzi F, Raio L, Cromi A et al. ”Kissing ovaries”: a sonographic sign of moderate to severe endometriosis.  Fertil Steril. 2005;  83 143-147
• 55 Bazot M, Thomassin I, Hourani R et al. Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal sonography for deep pelvic endometriosis.  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;  24 180-185
• 56 Hudelist G, Oberwinkler K H, Singer C F et al. Combination of transvaginal sonography and clinical examination for preoperative diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis.  Hum Reprod. 2009;  24 1018-1024
• 57 Mangler M, Loddenkemper C, Lanowska M et al. Histopathology-based combined surgical approach to rectovaginal endometriosis.  Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008;  103 59-64
• 58 Donnez J, Spada F, Squifflet J et al. Bladder endometriosis must be considered as bladder adenomyosis.  Fertil Steril. 2000;  74 1175-1181
• 59 Hudelist G, Tuttlies F, Rauter G et al. Can transvaginal sonography predict infiltration depth in patients with deep infiltrating endometriosis of the rectum?.  Hum Reprod. 2009;  24 1012-1017
• 60 Perez-Utrilla Perez M, Aguilera Bazan A, Alonso Dorrego J M et al. Urinary tract endometriosis: clinical, diagnostic, and therapeutic aspects.  Urology. 2009;  73 47-51
• 61 Seracchioli R, Mabrouk M, Montanari G et al. Conservative laparoscopic management of urinary tract endometriosis (UTE): surgical outcome and long-term follow-up.  Fertil Steril. 2010;  94 856-861
• 62 Blanco R G, Parithivel V S, Shah A K et al. Abdominal wall endometriomas.  Am J Surg. 2003;  185 596-598
• 63 Horton J D, Dezee K J, Ahnfeldt E P et al. Abdominal wall endometriosis: a surgeon’s perspective and review of 445 cases.  Am J Surg. 2008;  196 207-212
• 64 Paspulati R M, Dalal T A. Imaging of complications following gynecologic surgery.  Radiographics. 2010;  30 625-642
• 65 Mechsner S, Bartley J, Infanger M et al. Clinical management and immunohistochemical analysis of umbilical endometriosis.  Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009;  280 235-242