Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1247480
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart ˙ New York
Operative Therapie des Nierenzellkarzinoms
Surgical Treatment for Renal Cell CarcinomaPublication History
2009
2009
Publication Date:
26 July 2010 (online)
Zusammenfassung
Das Nierenzellkarzinom ist chemoresistent und strahlenresistent, damit bleibt als einzige potenziell kurative Therapieoption die chirurgische Exzision des Tumors entweder als radikale Tumornephrektomie oder als organerhaltende Tumorexzision. Dank der verbesserten radiologischen Bildgebung werden heutzutage bis zu 75 % der Nierentumoren inzidentell im asymptomatischen Stadium entdeckt. Die 10-Jahres-tumorspezifischen Überlebensraten liegen für organbegrenzte Tumoren (T1, T2) nach R0-Exzision über 90 %. Auch lokal fortgeschrittene Tumoren (T3) können mit 5-Jahres-tumorspezifischen Überlebensraten > 65 % behandelt werden. Im Falle von Nierentumoren in einer Einzelniere oder synchron in beiden Nieren sind gute funktionelle und onkologische Langzeitergebnisse durch einen organerhaltenden Eingriff (imperative Indikation) erreichbar. Tumoren in T1a-Stadien (Tumorgröße < 4 cm) lassen sich meist organerhaltend exzidieren, auch wenn eine gesunde Gegenniere existiert (elektive Indikation), da der organerhaltende Eingriff langfristig die Nierenfunktion sichert. Minimalinvasive Verfahren bieten die Möglichkeit, auch multimorbide Patienten operativ zu kurieren. Welches operative Verfahren letztendlich angewandt wird, ist zum einen abhängig von Größe und Lokalisation des Tumors und zum anderen von Indikationsstellung (elektiv oder imperativ), Alter und Allgemeinzustand des Patienten und Präferenz des Operateurs.
Abstract
Renal cell carcinoma is chemoresistent and radio-therapy so that surgical tumour excision of the tumor is the only potentially curative option, either as radical nephrectomy or as nephron sparing surgery. As a result of continuously improving radiological imaging modalities, renal tumours are nowadays detected incidentally at an asymptomatic stage in up to 75 %. The ten-year cancer-specific survival for organ-confined disease (T1, T2) after R0-excision is > 90 %. Moreover, locally extending renal tumours (T3) can be treated successfully with five-year survival rates of > 65 %. In case of tumours in a single kidney or synchronous bilateral tumours, good functional and oncological long-term results can be achieved by nephron sparing surgery (imperative indication). T1 renal cell cancer (tumour size < 7 cm ) should be treated by nephron sparing surgery, even if the contralateral kidney is normal, because since this nephron-sparing approach ensures maximal renal reserve in the long term follow up. Minimally invasive techniques offer treatment also for multi-morbide patients. Which approach is to be selected depends on size and location of the tumour as well as on indication (elective or imperative), age and general health of the patient and the surgeon’s preference.
Schlüsselwörter
Nierenzellkarzinom - operative Therapie - organerhaltende Nierentumorchirurgie - minimalinvasive Therapie - onkologisches und funktionelles Outcome
Key words
renal cell carcinoma - surgical treatment - nephron-sparing surgery - minimal-invasive therapy - oncological and functional outcome
Literatur
- 1 Becker F, Siemer S, Hack M et al. Excellent long-term cancer control with elective nephron-sparing surgery for selected renal cell carcinomas measuring more than 4 cm. Eur Urol. 2006; 49 1058-1063
- 2 Belldegrun A, Tsui K H, de Kernion J B et al. Efficacy of nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma: analysis based on the new 1997 tumor-node-metastasis staging system. J Clin Oncol. 1999; 17 2868-2875
- 3 Clayman R V, Kavoussi L R, Soper N J et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report. J Urol. 1991; 146 278-282
- 4 Desai M M, Aron M, Gill I S. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic cryoablation for the small renal tumor. Urology. 2005; 66 23-28
- 5 Fergany A F, Saad I R, Woo L et al. Open partial nephrectomy for tumor in a solitary kidney: experience with 400 cases. J Urol. 2006; 175 1630-1633
- 6 Flanigan R C, Mickisch G, Sylvester R et al. Cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with metastatic renal cancer: A combined analysis. J Urol. 2004; 171 1071-1076
- 7 Gettman M T, Blute M L, Chow G K et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: technique and initial clinical experience with DaVinci robotic system. Urology. 2004; 64 914-918
- 8 Ghavamian R, Cheville J C, Lohse C M et al. Renal cell carcinoma in the solitary kidney: an analysis of complications and outcome after nephron sparing surgery. aaaaa. 2002; 168 454-459
- 9 Go A S, Chertow G M, Fan D et al. Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351 1296-1305
- 10 Hwang J J, Walther M M, Pautler S E et al. Radio frequency ablation of small renal tumors: intermediate results. J Urol. 2004; 171 1814-1818
- 11 Jemal A, Murray T, Ward E et al. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005; 55 10-30
- 12 Kletscher B A, Qian J, Bostwick D G et al. Prospective analysis of multifocality in renal cell carcinoma: influence of histological pattern, grade, number, size, volume and deoxyribonucleic acid ploidy. J Urol. 1995; 153 904-906
-
13 Krebs in Deutschland 2003 – 2004. Häufigkeiten und Trends. 6. überarbeitete Auflage. Robert Koch-Institut, Hrsg. und die Gesellschaft der epidemiologischen Krebsregister in Deutschland e. V., Hrsg. Berlin: 2008
- 14 Kunkle D A, Egleston B L, Uzzo R G. Excise, ablate or observe: the small renal mass dilemma – a meta-analysis and review. J Urol. 2008; 179 1227-1233
- 15 Lane B R, Gill I S. 5-year outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Urol. 2007; 177 70-74
- 16 Leibovich B C, Blute M L, Cheville J C et al. Nephron sparing surgery for appropriately selected renal cell carcinoma between 4 and 7 cm results in outcome similar to radical nephrectomy. J Urol. 2004; 171 1066-1070
- 17 Link R E, Bhayani S B, Allaf M E et al. Exploring the learning curve, pathological outcomes and perioperative morbidity of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy performed for renal mass. J Urol. 2005; 173 1690-1694
- 18 Ljungberg B, Hanbury D C, Kuczyk M A et al. Renal Cell Carcinoma Guidelines. Eur Urol. 2007; 51 1502-1510
- 19 Pahernik S, Gillitzer R, Thüroff J W. Surgical atlas. Cone / wedge resection of renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int. 2004; 93 639-654
- 20 Pahernik S, Roos F, Wiesner C et al. Nephron sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma in a solitary kidney. World J Urol. 2007; 25 513-517
- 21 Pahernik S, Roos F, Hampel C et al. Nephron sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma with normal contralateral kidney: 25 years of experience. J Urol. 2006; 175 2027-2031
- 22 Pantuck A J, Zisman A, Belldegrun A S. The changing natural history of renal cell carcinoma. J Urol. 2001; 166 1611-1623
- 23 Perez-Farinos N, Lopez-Abente G, Pastor-Barriuso R. Time trend and age-period-cohort effect on kidney cancer mortality in Europe, 1981–2000. BMC Public Health. 2006; 6 119
- 24 Rassweiler J J, Abbou C, Janetschek G et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: The European experience. Urol Clin North Am. 2000; 27 721-736
- 25 Robson C J, Churchill B M, Anderson W. The results of radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol. 1969; 101 297-301
- 26 Wille A H, Roigas J, Deger S et al. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: techniques, results and oncological outcome in 125 consecutive cases. Eur Urol. 2004; 45 483-489
- 27 Zisman A, Wieder J A, Pantuck A J et al. Renal cell carcinoma with tumor thrombus extension: Biology, role of nephrectomy and response to immunotherapy. J Urol. 2003; 169 909-916
- 28 Roos F C, Brenner W, Thürhoff J W et al. Ist die organerhaltende Therapie beim Nierenzellkarzinom der Standard?. Onkologe. 2009; , DOI: 10.1007/s00761-009-1757-2
Dr. med. F. C. Roos
Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie · Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
Langenbeckstraße 1
55101 Mainz
Phone: 0 61 31 / 17 71 83
Fax: 0 61 31 / 17 64 15
Email: frederik.roos@gmx.de