“Are You Looking at Me?” The Influence of Gaze on Frequent Conversation Partners' Management of Interaction with Adults with Acquired Hearing Impairment

ABSTRACT

This article presents findings from a larger conversation analysis study of interactional management by adults with severe or profound acquired hearing impairment and their experienced communication partners. It addresses how some partners display a consistent orientation toward their hearing-impaired cointeractants' need for visual speech information. These partners monitor their cointeractants' gaze direction and hence their availability as recipients of their talk. They time their talk in such a way that important components of their talk coincide with the availability of their hearing-impaired cointeractants' gaze. Where necessary, they secure their cointeractants' gaze by using conversational gaze-soliciting strategies such as speech disfluencies and gestures. On listening, the self-repairs by partners that constitute or result from these strategies might easily be thought to arise from problems of production alone. However, detailed visual examination of the data reveals the function of these self-initiated self-repairs by partners and underlines the importance of visual analysis to a full understanding of the management of interaction.

Hearing impairment - gaze - conversational repair - gesture - conversation analysis

REFERENCES

• 1 Caissie R, Dawe A, Donovan C, Brooks H, MacDonald S. Conversational performance of adults with a hearing loss.  Journal of the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology. 1998;  31 45-67
• 2 Caissie R, Gibson C. The effectiveness of repair strategies used by people with hearing losses and their conversational partners.  Volta Review. 1997;  99(4) 203-218
• 3 Tye-Murray N, Witt S, Schum L. Effects of talker familiarity on communication breakdown in conversations with adult cochlear implant users.  Ear Hear. 1995;  16(5) 459-469
• 4 Wilson J, Hickson L, Worrall L. Use of communication strategies by adults with hearing impairment.  Asia Pacific J Speech Lang Hear. 1998;  3 29-41
• 5 Tye-Murray N, Witt S. Conversational moves and conversational styles of adult cochlear-implant users.  J Acad Rehabil Audiol. 1996;  29 11-25
• 6 Pichora-Fuller M, Johnson C, Roodenburg J. The discrepancy between hearing impairment and handicap in the elderly: balancing transaction and interaction in conversation.  J Appl Commun Res. 1998;  26(1) 99-119
• 7 Villaume W, Brown M, Darling R et al.. Presbycusis and conversation: elderly interactants adjusting to multiple hearing losses.  Res Lang Soc Interact. 1997;  30(3) 235-262
• 8 Erber N, Lind C. Communication therapy: theory and practice.  Journal of the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology. 1994;  27 267-287
• 9 Schegloff E A, Jefferson G, Sacks H. The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation.  Language. 1977;  53 361-382
• 10 Lind C, Hickson L, Erber N. Conversation repair and acquired hearing impairment: a preliminary quantitative clinical study.  Aust N Z J Audiol. 2004;  26(1) 40-52
• 11 Skelt L. See what I mean: Hearing loss, gaze and repair in conversation. Unpublished PhD thesis. Canberra, Australia; The Australian National University 2006
• 12 Heritage J. Conversation analysis: methodological aspects. In: Quasthoff U Aspects of Oral Communication. Berlin, Germany; Walter de Gruyter 1995: 391-419
• 13 Heritage J. Conversation analysis at century's end: practices of talk-in-interaction, their distributions, and their outcomes.  Res Lang Soc Interact. 1999;  32(2) 69-76
• 14 Jefferson G. Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In: Lerner G Conversation Analysis—Studies from the First Generation. Philadelphia, PA; John Benjamins 2004: 16-31
• 15 Goodwin C. Conversational Organization—Interaction between Speakers and Hearers. New York, NY; Academic Press 1996
• 16 Ewertsen H, Nielsen H. Comparative analysis of audiovisual, auditive and visual perception of speech.  Acta Otolaryngol. 1971;  72(3) 201-205
• 17 Lind C, Erber N, Doyle J. Effects of related and unrelated questions on the speechreading of sentences.  Aust N Z J Audiol. 1999;  26(1) 40-52
• 18 Goodwin C. The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In: Psathas G Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York, NY; Irvington 1979: 13-25
• 19 Goodwin C. Restarts, pauses and the achievement of a state of mutual gaze at turn-beginning.  Sociological Enquiry. 1980;  50(4) 272-302
• 20 Clark H. Speaking in time.  Speech Commun. 2002;  36 5-13
• 21 Lerner G. Selecting next speaker: the context-sensitive operation of a context-free organization.  Lang Soc. 2003;  32 177-201
• 22 Gardner R. When Listeners Talk: Response Tokens and Listener Stance. Philadelphia, PA; John Benjamins 2001
• 23 Goodwin C. Gesture as a resource for the organization of mutual orientation.  Semiotica. 1986;  62(1/2) 29-49
• 24 Heath C. Talk and recipiency: sequential organization in speech and body movement. In: Heritage J Structures of Social Action—Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Press 1984: 247-265
• 25 Heath C. Body Movement and Speech in Medical Interaction. Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Press 1986
• 26 Jefferson G. On exposed and embedded correction in conversation. In: Lee G Talk and Social Organization. Clevedon, United Kingdom; Multilingual Matters 1987: 86-100
• 27 Skelt L. Damage control: closing problematic sequences in hearing-impaired interaction.  Australian Review of Applied Linguistics. 2007;  30(3) 34.1-34.5
• 28 Kendon A. Some functions of gaze direction in social interaction.  Acta Psychol (Amst). 1967;  26 22-63
• 29 Schegloff E. Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation.  Lang Soc. 2000;  29 1-63

APPENDIX A Key to Symbols Used in Transcriptions

Talk

• [ ] Square brackets mark simultaneous talk.

• = Equal signs between units mark contiguous talk.

• (0.5) Silences, measured in tenths of a second, appear in parentheses.

• (.) A brief silence, or micropause, is represented by a period in parentheses.

• . A period indicates a falling terminal pitch contour.

• , A comma indicates a slightly rising terminal pitch contour, indicating that talk is hearably incomplete.

• ¿ A Spanish question mark indicates a midrising terminal pitch contour.

• ? A question mark indicates a high-rising terminal pitch contour.

• ah Underlining indicates stress.

• : Colons indicate sound stretch.

• ↑↓ Upward or downward arrows indicate a marked change in pitch.

• LOUD Talk that is louder than surrounding talk is capitalized.

• °soft° Talk that is softer than surrounding talk is enclosed by degree signs.

• ca- An abrupt cutoff is represented by a hyphen.

• .hh audible in-breaths are represented by two h's preceded by a period.

• () Talk enclosed in parentheses shows an inadequate hearing by transcribers.

• → A horizontal arrow marks relevant self-initiated self-repair and gaze.

Gaze and Gesture

• The first letter of the relevant participant's name marks each line of gaze or gesture transcript; gaze transcript is indicated by g, and gesture, body movement, and other relevant details are indicated by o.

• A line of X's (XXXXX) represents gaze at partner.

• A line of hyphens (- - -) represents gaze away from partner.

• A line of commas (,,,,,) represents transition between the two states.

• P represents a pointing gesture.