Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1255755
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York
Colon tumors and colonoscopy
Publication History
Publication Date:
11 November 2010 (online)
Introduction
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cancer in Europe. To reduce its incidence and related mortality, prevention of CRC by population screening is advised in most countries. Colonoscopy is the most accurate technique for the detection of cancer as well as its precursor lesions, adenomas, in the entire colon. However, colonoscopy is not infallible. Back-to-back colonoscopy studies have demonstrated considerable adenoma miss rates, and in retrospective series colonoscopy did not fully protect for right-sided CRC. Quality assurance of colonoscopy and advanced endoscopic imaging for the detection of colorectal polyps were important topics at this year’s Digestive Disease Week (DDW 2010, 1 – 5 May, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA), and key presented studies are discussed below.
References
- 1 Atkin W S, Cuzick J, Duffy S W. et al . UK flexible sigmoidoscopy screening trial: colorectal cancer incidence and mortality rates at 11 years after a single screening examination. Gastroenterology. 2010; 138 S53
- 2 Mellen J, Aye L, Borsatto R. et al . Is a 3rd clearing colonoscopy necessary in patients stratified as low risk at screening examination?. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 71 AB115
- 3 Diamond S, Gupta M, Holub J L. et al . Adenoma detection rate during screening colonoscopy increases with each decade of life over 50. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 71 AB129
- 4 Tang R S, Savides T J, Muthusamy V R. et al . Quality of colonoscopy withdrawal technique and variability in adenoma detection rates: is technique more important than time?. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 71 AB116
- 5 Baltz J, Lee V D, Patrie J T. et al . Rates of polyp and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy are not significantly affected by time of day. Gastroenterology. 2010; 138 S57
- 6 Van Putten P G, Ter Borg F, Adang R. et al . Nurse endoscopists performing colonoscopy: a prospective study on quality and patient experiences. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 71 AB130
- 7 Leung J W, Toomsen L, Mann S K. et al . Chromoendoscopy (Indigo Carmine) combined with warm water infusion in lieu of air insufflation (water method) during insertion enhanced adenoma detection in screening and surveillance colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 71 AB107
- 8 East J E, Suzuki N, Guenther T. et al . Narrow band imaging (NBI) for adenoma detection in high risk patients: a randomised, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 71 AB142
- 9 Rastogi A, Early D S, Gupta N. et al . A multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing standard definition white light (SDWL), high definition white light (HDWL) and narrow band imaging (NBI) colonoscopy for the detection of colon polyps and real time prediction of histology. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 71 AB142
- 10 Kuiper T, Van Den Broek F J, Naber A H. et al . Endoscopic tri-modal imaging (ETMI) for the detection and classification of early colorectal neoplasia: a multi-center randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 71 AB142
- 11 Hewett D G, Rex D K. Cap-fitted colonoscopy reduces adenoma miss rates: a randomized tandem study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 71 AB142-AB143
- 12 Togashi K, Sunada K, Naoyuki N. et al . Use of flexible spectral-imaging color enhancement for identification of colorectal cancer with deep invasion. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 71 AB143
- 13 Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y. Prospective randomized comparison of cold snare polypectomy and conventional polypectomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 71 AB127
- 14 Moss A, Bourke M J, Williams S J. et al . Predictors of therapeutic success for endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) and large sessile colonic polyps: results of the prospective, multicenter Australian Colonic EMR (ACE) study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 71 AB111
- 15 Moss A, Bourke M J, Metz A J. Modification of submucosal (SM) injection solution significantly improves technical outcomes in colonic endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): a randomized, double-blind controlled trial of succinylated gelatin (SG) versus normal saline for EMR of laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) and large sessile lesions of the colon. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 71 AB112-AB113
- 16 Takeuchi Y, Hanaoka N, Ishihara R. et al . Efficacy of an electrosurgical Endo-Knife with a water-jet function (Flush Knife) for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection of superficial colorectal neoplasms: a final report of a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 71 AB112
E. DekkerMD, PhD
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Academic Medical Center
P.O. Box 22660
1100 DD Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Fax: +31-20-6917033
Email: e.dekker@amc.uva.nl