Background and study aim: Endoscopic therapy of brisk upper gastrointestinal bleeding remains challenging. A proprietary nanopowder (TC-325) has been proven to be effective in high pressure bleeding from external wounds. The efficacy and safety of TC-325 were assessed in a survival gastrointestinal bleeding animal model.
Method: 10 animals were randomized to treatment or sham. All animals received intravenous antibiotics, H2-blockers and heparin (activated clotting time 2 × normal). In a sterile laparotomy the gastroepiploic vessels were dissected, inserted through a 1-cm gastrotomy, and freely exposed in the gastric lumen, and the exposed vessel lacerated by needle knife. The treatment group received TC-325 by a modified delivery catheter while the sham group received no endoscopic treatment. Time to hemostasis, and mortality at 60 minutes, 24 hours, 48 hours, and 7 days were noted. Necropsy was performed in all animals.
Results: Spurting arterial bleeding was achieved in all animals. No control animal showed hemostasis within the first hour compared with 100 % (5 / 5) in the treatment arm (mean 13.8 minutes, P < 0.0079). Durable hemostasis was achieved with no evidence of rebleeding after 1 and 24 hours in 80 % (4 / 5) of the treated animals compared with none in the control group (P < 0.0098). None of the control animals survived more than 6 hours. Necropsy at 1 week in treated animals revealed healed gastrotomy without foreign body granuloma or embolization to the lung or brain.
Conclusion: TC-325 is safe and highly effective in achieving hemostasis in an anticoagulated severe arterial gastrointestinal bleeding animal model.
References
1
Palmer K.
Acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage.
Br Med Bull.
2007;
83
307-324
2
Fallah M A, Prakash C, Edmundowicz S.
Acute gastrointestinal bleeding.
Med Clin North Am.
2000;
84
1183-1208
3
Gupta P K, Fleischer D E.
Nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Med Clin North Am.
1993;
77
973-992
4
Yavorski R T, Wong R K, Maydonovitch C et al.
Analysis of 3,294 cases of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in military medical facilities.
Am J Gastroenterol.
1995;
90
568-573
5
Alam H B, Burris D, DaCorta J A, Rhee P.
Hemorrhage control in the battlefield: role of new hemostatic agents.
Mil Med.
2005;
170
63-69
6
Carraway J W, Kent D, Young K et al.
Comparison of a new mineral based hemostatic agent to a commercially available granular zeolite agent for hemostasis in a swine model of lethal extremity arterial hemorrhage.
Resuscitation.
2008;
78
230-235. Epub 2008 May 15
7
Kheirabadi B S, Edens J W, Terrazas I B et al.
Comparison of new hemostatic granules/powders with currently deployed hemostatic products in a lethal model of extremity arterial hemorrhage in swine.
J Trauma.
2009;
66
316-326; discussion 327 – 328
8
Ward K R, Tiba M H, Holbert W H et al.
Comparison of a new hemostatic agent to current combat hemostatic agents in a swine model of lethal extremity arterial hemorrhage.
J Trauma.
2007;
63
276-283; discussion 283 – 284
9 Institute for Laboratory Animal Research, Commission on Life Sciences, National Research Council .Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. 1966
10
Pfau P R, Cooper G S, Carlson M D et al.
Success and shortcomings of a clinical care pathway in the management of acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Am J Gastroenterol.
2004;
99
425-431
11
Forrest J A, Finlayson N D, Shearman D J.
Endoscopy in gastrointestinal bleeding.
Lancet.
1974;
17
394-397
12
Chung S S, Lau J Y, Sung J J et al.
Randomised comparison between adrenaline injection alone and adrenaline injection plus heat probe treatment for actively bleeding ulcers.
BMJ.
1997;
314
1307-1311
13
Kumar P, Fleischer D E.
Thermal therapy for gastrointestinal bleeding.
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am.
1997;
7
593-609
14
Havanond C, Havanond P.
Argon plasma coagulation therapy for acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
2005;
Apr 18; 2
CD003791
15
Gevers A M, De Goede E, Simoens M et al.
A randomized trial comparing injection therapy with hemoclip and with injection combined with hemoclip for bleeding ulcers.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2002;
55
466-469
16
Laine L, McQuaid K R.
Endoscopic therapy for bleeding ulcers: an evidence-based approach based on meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol.
2009;
7
33-47; quiz 1 – 2. Epub 2008 Aug 16
17
Vergara M, Calvet X, Gisbert J P.
Epinephrine injection versus epinephrine injection and a second endoscopic method in high risk bleeding ulcers.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
2007;
Apr 18; 2
CD005584
18
Lin H J, Perng C L, Sun I C et al.
Endoscopic haemoclip versus heater probe thermocoagulation plus hypertonic saline-epinephrine injection for peptic ulcer bleeding.
Dig Liver Dis.
2003;
35
898-902
S. A. GidayMD
Johns Hopkins Hospital Division of Gastroenterology
1830 East Monument Street, Room 424 Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
Fax: +1-410-614-2490
Email: sgiday1@jhmi.edu