Download PDF
Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2010; 53(3): 95-96
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1263198
Correspondence

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Comment to the article:

Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
07 September 2010 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Arts MP, Brand R, van den Akker ME, Koes BW, Bartels RH, Peul WC; Leiden – The Hague Spine Intervention Prognostic Study Group (SIPS). Tubular Discectomy vs. Conventional Microdiscectomy for Sciatica: A Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA2009 Jul 8; 302 (2): 149–158

References

  • 1 Parikh K, Tomasino A, Knopman J. et al . Operative results and learning curve: microscope-assisted tubular microsurgery for 1- and 2-level discectomies and laminectomies.  Neurosurg Focus. 2008;  25 (2) E14
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Tomasino A, Parikh K, Steinberger J. et al . Tubular microsurgery for lumbar discectomies and laminectomies in obese patients: operative results and outcome.  Spine. 2009 Aug 15;  34 (18) E664-E672
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Schwender JD, Holly LT, Rouben DP. et al . Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): technical feasibility and initial results.  J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005;  18 S1-S6
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Jang JS, Lee SH. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with ipsilateral pedicle screw and contralateral facet screw fixation.  J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;  3 218-223
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Villavicencio AT, Burneikiene S, Nelson EL. et al . Safety of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and intervertebral recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2.  J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;  3 436-443
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Deutsch H, Musacchio MJ. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral pedicle screw fixation.  Neurosurg Focus. 2006;  20 E10
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Beringer WF, Mobasser JP. Unilateral pedicle screw instrumentation for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.  Neurosurg Focus. 2006;  20 E4
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Anand N, Hamilton JF, Perri B. et al . Cantilever TLIF with structural allograft and RhBMP2 for correction and maintenance of segmental sagittal lordosis: long-term clinical, radiographic, and functional outcome.  Spine. 2006;  31 E748-E753
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Scheufler KM, Dohmen H, Vougioukas VI. Percutaneous transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar instability.  Neurosurgery. 2007;  60 203-212
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Joseph V, Rampersaud YR. Heterotopic bone formation with the use of rhBMP2 in posterior minimal access interbody fusion: a CT analysis.  Spine. 2007;  32 2885-2890
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Ray Wu, Fraser J, Hartl R. Minimal Access versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Meta-Analysis of Fusion Rates.. AOSpine Global Spine Congress, San Francisco, CA, June 24–26; 2009
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 12 Tsutsumimoto T. et al . Mini-Open vs. Journal Title: Conventional Open Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis. Comparison of the Paraspinal Muscle Damage and Slip Reduction.  Spine. 2009;  34 (18) 1923-1928
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar

Roger HärtlMD 

Starr Building, Room 651

525 East 68th Street,

Box 99 New York

10021 New York, USA