Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2011; 119(6): 366-369
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1267183
Article

© J. A. Barth Verlag in Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Comparison of HbA1c and OGTT Criteria to Diagnose Diabetes Among Chinese

X. L. Dong1 , 2 , Y. Liu2 , Y. Sun1 , C. Sun2 , F. M. Fu1 , 2 , S. L. Wang2 , L. Chen1
  • 1Department of Endocrinology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
  • 2Jinan Central Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
Further Information

Publication History

received 23.08.2010 first decision 23.08.2010

accepted 09.09.2010

Publication Date:
19 November 2010 (online)

Abstract

Objective: To examine the sensitivity and specificity of HbA1c testing for the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes in high-risk adults in China and to compare the cardiaovascular risk factors between 2 groups of patients with glycemic status classified by the 2 different tests.

Research design and method: From a cross-sectional survey of prevalence of diabetes in China, we selected adults from the Jinan area of Shandong without known diabetes who underwent OGTT and HbA1c testing on the same day. Cardiovascular risk factors (blood pressure, body mass index, lipid levels) were compared among the subjects divided into 4 groups according to the 2 diabetes diagnostic criteria: true-diabetes, HbA1c-diagnosed diabetes, OGTT-diagnosed diabetes, and nondiabetes.

Results: Among 701 subjects, 65 cases of diabetes were diagnosed by HbA1c ≥6.5% and 94 cases by OGTT. Comparing with OGTT,the sensitivity with level of HbA1c >6.5% was 48.2% and the specificity 97.8%. In total, 30.7% of subjects with HbA1c ≥6.5% were not classified as having diabetes by OGTT criteria, and 52% of subjects with diabetes according to OGTT criteria would be considered nondiabetic by HbA1c recommended criteria. The OGTT- and HbA1c-diabetes groups showed the same cardiovascular risk factors, the levels of which were higher than that for the nondiabetes group.

Conclusions: We found high specificity and low sensitivity with use of HbA1c level ≥6.5% to diagnose diabetes mellitus. The HbA1c test and OGTT did not reach full concordance. The 2 diagnostic criteria reflect similar levels of cardiovascular risk factors.

References

  • 1 Pradhan AD, Rifai N, Buring JE. et al . Hemoglobin A1c predicts diabetes but not cardiovascular disease in nondiabetic women.  Am J Med. 2007;  120 720-727
  • 2 Droumaguet C, Balkau B, Simon D. et al The DESIR Study Group . Use of HbA1c in predicting progression to diabetes in French men and women: data from an Epidemiological Study on the Insulin Resistance Syndrome (DESIR).  Diabetes Care. 2006;  29 1619-1625
  • 3 Inoue K, Matsumoto M, Kobayashi Y. The combination of fasting plasma glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin predicts type 2 diabetes in Japanese workers.  Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2007;  77 451-458
  • 4 Selvin E, Coresh J, Golden SH. et al . Glycemic control and coronary heart disease risk in persons with and without diabetes: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.  Arch Intern Med. 2005;  165 1910-1916
  • 5 Selvin E, Coresh J, Shahar E. et al . Glycaemia (haemoglobin A1c) and incident ischaemic stroke: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study.  Lancet Neurol. 2005;  4 821-826
  • 6 Levitan EB, Liu S, Stampfer MJ. et al . HbA1C measured in stored erythrocytes and mortality rate among middle-aged and older women.  Diabetologia. 2008;  51 267-275
  • 7 Nathan DM, Turgeon H, Regan S. Relationship between glycated haemoglobin levels and mean glucose levels over time.  Diabetologia. 2007;  50 2239-2244
  • 8 Nathan DM, Kuenen J, Borg R. et al The A1c-Derived Average Glucose (ADAG) Study Group . Translating the A1C assay into estimated average glucose values.  Diabetes Care. 2008;  31 1473-1478
  • 9 American Diabetes Association . Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus.  Diabetes Care. 2010 January;  33 S62-S69
  • 10 Yang W, Lu J, Weng J. et al China National Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders Study Group . Prevalence of diabetes among men and women in China.  N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar 25;  362 (12) 1090-1101
  • 11 American Diabetes Association . Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes.  Diabetes Care. 2009 January;  32 S13-S61 DOI: doi:10.2337/dc09-S013
  • 12 Pan XR, Yang WY, Li GW. et al . Prevalence of diabetes and its risk factors in China, 1994.  Diabetes Care. 1997;  20 1664-1669
  • 13 Gu D, Reynolds K, Duan X. et al . Prevalence of diabetes and impaired fasting glucose in the Chinese adult population: International Collaborative Study of Cardiovascular Disease in Asia (InterASIA).  Diabetologia. 2003;  46 1190-1198
  • 14 Jia WP, Pang C, Chen L. et al . Epidemiological characteristics of diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose regulation in a Chinese adult population: the Shanghai Diabetes Studies, a cross-sectional 3-year follow-up study in Shanghai urban communities.  Diabetologia. 2007;  50 286-292
  • 15 DECODE Study Group on behalf of the European Diabetes Epidemiology Study Group . Will new diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus change phenotype of patients with diabetes? Reanalysis of European epidemiological data.  BMJ. 1998;  317 371-375
  • 16 DECODE Study Group . Glucose tolerance and cardiovascular mortality: comparison of fasting and 2-h diagnostic criteria.  Arch Intern Med. 2001;  161 397-405
  • 17 Herman WH, Dungan KM, Wolffenbuttel BHR. et al . Racial and ethnic differences in mean plasma glucose, hemoglobin A1c, and 1, 5-anhydroglucitol in over 2000 patients with type 2 diabetes.  J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;  94 1689-1694
  • 18 Herman WH, Ma Y, Uwaifo G. et al . Differences in A1C by race and ethnicity among patients with impaired glucose tolerance in the diabetes prevention program.  Diabetes Care. 2007;  30 2453-2457
  • 19 Cohen RM. A1C: does one size fit all?.  Diabetes Care. 2007;  30 2756-2758
  • 20 Christensen DL, Witte DR, Kaduka L. et al . Moving to an A1C-Based Diagnosis of Diabetes Has a Different Impact on Prevalence in Different Ethnic Groups.  Diabetes Care. 2010 Mar;  33 580-582
  • 21 Kramer CK, Araneta MRG, Barrett-Connor E. et al . A1C and Diabetes Diagnosis: The Rancho Bernardo Study.  Diabetes Care. 2010 January;  33 101-103
  • 22 Cowie CC, Rust KF, Byrd-Holt DD. et al . Prevalence of Diabetes and High Risk for Diabetes Using A1C Criteria in the US Population in 1988–2006.  Diabetes Care. 2010 Mar;  33 562-568
  • 23 Woodward M, Zhang X, Barzi F. et al Asia Pacific Cohort Studies Collaboration . The effects of diabetes on the risks of major cardiovascular diseases and death in the Asia-Pacific region.  Diabetes Care. 2003 Feb;  26 (2) 360-366
  • 24 Gerstein HC. Is glucose a continuous risk factor for cardiovascular mortality?.  Diabetes Care. 1999;  22 659-660
  • 25 Stettler C, Allemann S, Juni P. et al . Glycemic control and macrovascular disease in types 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus: meta-analysis of randomized trials.  Am Heart J. 2006;  152 27-38
  • 26 International Expert Committee . International Expert Committee report on the role of the A1C assay in the diagnosis of diabetes.  Diabetes Care. 2009 Jul;  32 (7) 1327-1334 Epub 2009 Jun 5

Correspondence

L. Chen

Department of Endocrinology

Qilu Hospital

Shandong University

Cultural West Road 107

250012 Jinan City

Shandong

China

Phone: 86/130/06 596 179

Fax: 86/531/82 169 408

Email: dxljinan2007@163.com