Am J Perinatol 2011; 28(6): 425-430
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1268712
© Thieme Medical Publishers

Performance of Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Prediction Equations in Preeclamptic Patients

Arnold B. Alper1 , Yeonjoo Yi2 , 3 , Mahfuz Rahman1 , Larry S. Webber3 , Laura Magee4 , Peter von Dadelszen4 , Gabriella Pridjian5 , Abimbola Aina-Mumuney6 , George Saade7 , Jamie Morgan7 , Bahij Nuwayhid8 , Michael Belfort9 , Jules Puschett1
  • 1Department of Medicine (Section of Nephrology), Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
  • 2Social Science Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
  • 3Department of Biostatistics, Tulane University School of Public Health, New Orleans, Louisiana
  • 4Population, Policy, and Aging Center, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  • 5Department Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
  • 6Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
  • 7Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas
  • 8Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Texas Tech-El Paso School of Medicine, El Paso, Texas
  • 9Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
18 November 2010 (online)

Preview

ABSTRACT

Accurate estimation of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in patients with preeclampsia requires the collection of a 24-hour urine and can have important therapeutic and diagnostic implications. This procedure is often difficult or impossible to accomplish in this patient group. In this study, the Cockcroft-Gault, the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD), and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) formulas were evaluated for their accuracy in determining GFR in the setting of preeclampsia. The estimated GFRs calculated from the above formulas were compared with the creatinine clearance values obtained from a 24-hour urine collections in 543 preeclamptic patients recruited from several large hospitals. Additionally, a set of new equations, preeclampsia GFR (PGFR), based on ethnicity, was created. The Cockcroft-Gault, MDRD, and CKD-EPI formulas were inaccurate in predicting GFR and both were significantly less accurate than PGFR. The latter formula provided an estimated GFR that was much closer to the creatinine clearance. Current GFR estimation equations based on serum creatinine values in nonpregnant patients are not reliable measures of renal function in patients with preeclampsia. The use of a new formula (PGFR) is recommended.

REFERENCES

Jules PuschettM.D. 

Texas A&M Health Science Center, College of Medicine/Scott & White

2401 S. 31st Street, Medical Education Building, 407 L, Temple, TX 76508

Email: jpuschett@swmail.sw.org