Computerized Physician Order Entry Reduces Medication Turnaround Time of Labor Induction Agents

ABSTRACT

We sought to determine whether computerized physician order entry (CPOE) improves the induction agent turnaround time on the labor and delivery unit (L&D) compared with paper-based order entry (PBOE). We conducted a retrospective study of singleton, term pregnancies admitted to L&D for induction of labor. Outcomes of women who delivered 3 months before or 3 months after universal CPOE implementation were compared including induction agent turnaround time. The induction agent turnaround time was significantly shorter in the CPOE group (n = 83) compared with PBOE group (n = 71) [71 (range 8 to 411) versus 100 (2 to 442) minutes, p = 0.004]. There were no differences in cesarean section rate or length of hospital stay. After controlling for time of day of induction, induction agent, and type of order entry, CPOE continued to significantly decrease the induction agent turnaround time by 25 minutes (p = 0.042). CPOE improved the process of induction of labor and efficiency of care of pregnant women.

KEYWORDS

Computerized physician order entry - medication turnaround time - labor induction

REFERENCES

• 1 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists .Induction of Labor. ACOG Practice Bulletin 107. Washington, DC: ACOG;
• 2 Wakefield M. President's advisory commission on consumer protection and quality in the health care industry. Available at: http://www.hcqualitycommission.gov/final/ Accessed July 18, 1998
• 3 Lindenauer P K, Ling D, Pekow P S et al.. Physician characteristics, attitudes, and use of computerized order entry.  J Hosp Med. 2006;  1 221-230
• 4 Stone W M, Smith B E, Shaft J D, Nelson R D, Money S R. Impact of a computerized physician order-entry system.  J Am Coll Surg. 2009;  208 960-967 discussion 967-969
• 5 Weir C R, Staggers N, Phansalkar S. The state of the evidence for computerized provider order entry: a systematic review and analysis of the quality of the literature.  Int J Med Inform. 2009;  78 365-374
• 6 Niazkhani Z, Pirnejad H, Berg M, Aarts J. The impact of computerized provider order entry systems on inpatient clinical workflow: a literature review.  J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009;  16 539-549
• 7 Lehman M L, Brill J H, Skarulis P C, Keller D, Lee C. Physician order entry impact on drug turn-around times.  Proc AMIA Symp. 2001;  359-363
• 8 Mekhjian H S, Kumar R R, Kuehn L et al.. Immediate benefits realized following implementation of physician order entry at an academic medical center.  J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002;  9 529-539
• 9 Cordero L, Kuehn L, Kumar R R, Mekhjian H S. Impact of computerized physician order entry on clinical practice in a newborn intensive care unit.  J Perinatol. 2004;  24 88-93
• 10 Jensen J. The effects of computerized provider order entry on medication turn-around time: a time-to-first dose study at the Providence Portland Medical Center.  AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006;  384-388
• 11 Wietholter J, Sitterson S, Allison S. Effects of computerized prescriber order entry on pharmacy order-processing time.  Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2009;  66 1394-1398
• 12 Vincent W R, Martin C A, Winstead P S, Smith K M, Gatz J, Lewis D A. Effects of a pharmacist-to-dose computerized request on promptness of antimicrobial therapy.  J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009;  16 47-53
• 13 Institute of Medicine .Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 2001
• 14 Lucas R, Farley H, Twanmoh J, Urumov A, Evans B, Olsen N. Measuring the opportunity loss of time spent boarding admitted patients in the emergency department: a multihospital analysis.  J Healthc Manag. 2009;  54 117-124 discussion 124-125
• 15 Albers L L, Schiff M, Gorwoda J G. The length of active labor in normal pregnancies.  Obstet Gynecol. 1996;  87 355-359