Literatur
- 1
Einstein A J, Henzlova M J, Rajagopalan S.
Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed
tomography coronary angiography.
JAMA.
2007;
298
317-323
- 2
Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R et al.
Radiation dose associated with common CT examinations and the associated lifetime
attributable risk of cancer.
ArchIntMed.
2009;
169
2078-2086
- 3
Rumberger J A, Schwartz R S, Simons D B et al.
Relation of coronary calcium determined by electron beam computed tomography and lumen
narrowing determined by autopsy.
Am J Cardiol.
1994;
73
1169-1173
- 4
Budoff M J, Georgiou D, Brody A et al.
Ultrafast computed tomography as a diagnostic modality in the detection of coronary
artery disease: a multicenter study.
Circulation.
1996;
93
898-904
- 5
Sangiorgi G, Rumberger J A, Severson A et al.
Arterial calcification and not lumen stenosis is highly correlated with atherosclerotic
plaque burden in humans: a histologic study of 723 coronary artery segments using
nondecalcifying methodology.
J Am Coll Cardiol.
1998;
31
126-133
- 6
Rumberger J A, Simons D B, Fitzpatrick L A et al.
Coronary artery calcium area by electron beam computed tomography and coronary atherosclerotic
plaque area. A histopathologic correlative study.
Circulation.
1995;
92
2157-2162
- 7
Gschnitzer H, Stöger A, Friedrich G et al.
Electron beam computed tomography detects calcifications but not plaque burden: an
in vitro comparison with intravascular ultrasound.
Circulation.
1999;
100
I-230
- 8
Rumberger J A, Behrenbeck T, Breen J F et al.
Coronary calcification by electron beam computed tomography and obstructive coronary
artery disease: a model for costs and effectiveness of diagnosis as compared with
conventional cardiac testing methods.
J Am Coll Cardiol.
1999;
33
453-462
- 9
Rumberger J A, Sheedy P F, Breen J F et al.
Electron beam computed tomographic coronary calcium score cut-points and severity
of associated angiographic lumen stenosis.
J Am Coll Cardiol.
1997;
29
1542-1548
- 10
Gottlieb I, Miller J M, Arbab-Zadeh A et al.
The absence of coronary calcification does not exclude obstructive coronary artery
disease or the need for revascularization in patients referred for conventional coronary
angiography.
J Am Coll Cardiol.
2010;
55
627-634
- 11
Haberl R, Becker A, Leber A et al.
Correlation of coronary calcification and angiographically documented stenoses in
patients with suspected coronary artery disease: results of 1,764 patients.
J Am Coll Cardiol.
2001;
37
451-457
- 12
Schmermund A, Möhlenkamp S, Berenbein S et al.
Population-based assessment of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis using electron-beam
computed tomography.
Atherosclerosis.
2006;
185
177-182
- 13
Rumberger J A, Sheedy P F, Breen J F et al.
EBCT coronary calcium score cutpoints and severity of associated angiographic lumen
stenosis.
J Am Coll Cardiol.
1997;
29
1542-1548
- 14
Budoff M J, Daimond G A, Raggi P et al.
Continous probalistic prediction of angiographically significant coronary artery disease
using EBT.
Circulation.
2002;
105
1791-1796
- 15
Möhlenkamp S, Lehmann N, Schmermund A et al.
EBT-based coronary calcium quantities predict future hard events in symptomatic males
with advanced coronary artery disease – a 5 year follow-up study.
Eur Heart J.
2003;
24
845-854
- 16
He Z X, Hedrick T D, Pratt C M et al.
Severity of coronary artery calcification by EBCT predicts silent myocardial ischemia.
Circulation.
2000;
101
244-251
- 17
Möhlenkamp S, Schmermund A, Kerkhoff G et al.
Prognostischer Nutzen der nicht-invasive bestimmten koronaren Plaquelast bei Patienten
mit Risikofaktoren.
Z Kardiol.
2003;
92
351-361
- 18
Schmermund A, Bailey K, Rumberger J A et al.
An algorithm for non-invasive identification of angiographic three-vessel and/or left
main coronary artery disease in symptomatic patients on the basis of cardiac and EBCT
calcium scores.
J Am Coll Cardiol.
1999;
33
444-452
- 19
Schmermund A, Baumgart D, Adamzik M et al.
Comparison of EBCT and IVUS in detecting calcified and non-calcified plaques in patients
with acute coronary syndromes and no or minimal to moderate angiographic coronary
artery disease.
Am J Cardiol.
1998;
81
141-146
- 20
Sarwar A, Shaw L J, Shapiro M D et al.
Diagnostic and prognostic value of absence of coronary calcification.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging.
2009;
2
675-688
- 21
Michos E D, Nasir K, Braunstein J B et al.
Framingham risk equation underestimates subclinical atherosclerosis risk in asymptomatic
women.
Atherosclerosis.
2006;
184
201-206
- 22
Lakoski S G, Greenland P, Wong N D et al.
Coronary artery calcium scores and risk for cardiovascular events in women classified
as ’low risk’ based on Framingham risk score: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis
(MESA).
Arch Intern Med.
2007;
167
2437-2442
- 23
Greenland P, LaBree L, Azen S P et al.
Coronary artery calcium score combined with Framingham score for risk prediction in
asymptomatic individuals.
JAMA.
2004;
291
210-215
- 24
McClelland R L, Chung H, Detrano R et al.
Distribution of coronary artery calcium by race, gender and age: results from the
Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA).
Circulation.
2006;
113
30-37
- 25
Oudkerk M, Stillman A E, Halliburton S S et al.
Coronary artery calcium screening: current status and recommendations from the European
Society of Cardiac radiology and North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging.
Int J Cardiovasc imaging.
2008;
24
645-671
- 26
Blaha M, Budoff M J, Shaw L J et al.
Absence of coronary artery calcification and all-cause mortality.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging.
2009;
2
692-700
- 27
Detrano R, Guerci A D, Carr J J et al.
Coronary calcium as a predictor of coronary events in four racial or ethnic groups.
N Engl J Med.
2008;
358
1336-1345
- 28
Greenland P, Bonow R O, Brundage B H et al.
ACCF/AHA 2007 clinical expert consensus document on coronary artery calcium scoring
by computed tomography in global cardiovascular risk assessment and in the evaluation
of patients with chest pain.
J Am Coll Cardiol.
2007;
49
378-402
- 29
Mc Cullough P A, Chinnaiyan K M.
Annual progression of coronary calcification in trials of preventive therapies: a
systematic review.
Arch Intern Med.
2009;
169
2064-2070
- 30
Maintz D, Seifarth H et al.
64-slice multidetector coronary CT angiography: in vitro evaluation of 68 different
stents.
Eur Radiol.
2006;
16
818-826
- 31
Cademartiri F, Mollet N R et al.
Improving diagnostic accuracy of MDCT coronary angiography in patients with mild heart
rhythm irregularities using ECG editing.
AJR.
2006;
186
634-638
- 32
Ropers U, Ropers D, Pflederer T et al.
Influence of heart rate on the diagnostic accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography.
J Am Coll Cardiol.
2007;
50
2393-2398
- 33
Achenbach S, Ropers D, Kuettner A et al.
Contrast-enhanced coronary artery visualization by dual-source computed tomography
– Initial experience.
European Journal of Radiology.
2006;
57
331-335
- 34
Leber A W, Johnson T, Becker A.
Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source multi-slice CT-coronary angiography in patients
with an intermediate pretest likelihood for coronary artery disease.
Eur Heart J.
2007;
28
2354-2360
- 35
Artmann A, Enayati S, Ratzenböck M et al.
Bildqualität von CT-Angiografien der Koronararterien in Abhängigkeit vom Ausmaß der
Koronarverkalkungen bei Einsatz eines Dual-Source-CTs.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
2009;
181
863-869
- 36
Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Leschka S et al.
Low-dose CT coronary angiography in the step-and-shoot mode: diagnostic performance.
Heart.
2008;
94
1132-1137
- 37
Leschka L, Stolzmann P, Desbiolles L et al.
Diagnostic accuracy of high-pitch dual sourceCT for the assessment of coronary stenoses:
first experience.
Eur Radiol.
2009;
19
2896-2903
- 38
Alkadhi H, Scheffel H, Desbiolles L et al.
Dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography: influence of obesity, calcium
load, and heart rate on diagnostic accuracy.
Eur Heart J.
2008;
29
766-776
- 39
Mowatt G, Cook J A, Hillis G S et al.
64-Slice computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis and assessment of coronary
artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Heart.
2008;
94
1386-1393
- 40
Budoff M J, Achenbach S, Blumenthal R S et al.
Assessment of coronary artery disease by cardiac computed tomography: a statement
from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention,
Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Committee on Cardiac Imaging,
Council on Clinical Cardiology.
Circulation.
2006;
114
1761-179
- 41
Patel M R, Hendel R C, Kramer C M et al.
ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed
tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
J Am Coll Cardiol.
2006;
48
1475-1497
- 42
Pugliese F, Mollet N R et al.
Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive 64-slice CT coronary angiography in patients with
stable angina pectoris.
Eur Radiol.
2006;
16
575-582
- 43
Nikolaou K, Knez A et al.
Accuracy of 64-MDCT in the diagnosis of ischemic heart disease.
AJR.
2006;
186
1659-1668
- 44
Leschka S, Wildermuth S et al.
Noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-section CT: effect of average heart rate
and heart rate variability on image quality.
Radiology.
2006;
241
378-385
- 45
Pannu H K, Jacobs J E et al.
Coronary CT angiography with 64-MDCT: assessment of vessel visibility.
AJR.
2006;
186
341-345
- 46
Nieman K, Pattynama P M, Rensing B J.
Evaluation of patients after coronary artery bypass surgery: angiographic assessment
of grafts and coronary arteries.
Radiology.
2003;
229
749-756
- 47
Frazier A A, Qureshi F et al.
Coronary artery bypass grafts: assessment with multidetector CT in the early and late
postoperative settings.
Radiographics.
2005;
25
881-896
- 48
Moore R, Sampson C et al.
Coronary artery bypass graft imaging using ECG-gated multislice computed tomography:
comparison with catheter angiography.
Clin Radiol.
2005;
60
990-998
- 49
Budoff M J, Dowe D, Jollis J et al.
Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography
for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery
disease.
J Am Coll Cardiol.
2008;
52
1724-1732
- 50
Dewey M, Vavere A L, Arbab-Zadeh A et al.
Patient characteristic as predictors of image quality and diagnostic accuracy of MDCT
compared with conventional coronary angiography for detecting coronarystenoses: CORE-64
multicenter international trail.
AJR.
2010;
194
93-10
- 51
Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A et al.
Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience.
Eur Heart J.
2005;
26
1482
- 52
Leber A W, Knez A, Ziegler von F et al.
Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed
tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular
ultrasound.
J Am Coll Cardiol.
2005;
46
147
- 53
Raff G L, Gallagher M J, O’Neill W W et al.
Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed
tomography.
J Am Coll Cardiol.
2005;
46
552
- 54
Kopp A F, Schroeder S, Kuettner A et al.
Non-invasive coronary angiography with high resolution multidetector-row CT. Results
in 102 patients.
Eur Heart J.
2002;
23
1714-1725
- 55
Budoff M J, Dowe D, Jollis J G et al.
(ACCURACY trial): Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed
tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals
without known coronary artery disease.
J Am Coll Cardiol.
2008;
52
1724-32
- 56
Miller J M, Rochitte C E, Dewey M et al.
Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT (Core 64).
N Engl J Med.
2008;
359
2324-36
- 57
Dewey M, Zimmermann E, Deissenrieder F et al.
Noninvasive coronary angiography by 320-row CT with lower radiation exposure and maintained
diagnostic accuracy.
Circulation.
2009;
120
867-875
- 58
Meijboom W B, Meijs M FL, Schuijf J D et al.
Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice CT coronary angiography.
J Am Coll Cardiol.
2008;
52
2135-2144
- 59
Maffei E, Palumbo A, Martini C et al.
Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice CT coronary angiography in a large population of patients
without revascularization: registry data and review of multicenter trial.
Radiol med.
2010;
115
368-384
- 60
Raff G L, Abidov A, Achenbach S et al.
SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary CT angiography.
Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography.
2009;
3
122-136
- 61
Achenbach S.
Assessing the prognostic value of coronary CT angiography.
J Am Coll Cardiol.
2008;
52
1344-1346
- 62
Min J K, Hachamovitch R, Rozanski A et al.
Clinical benefits of non-invasive testing:coronary computed tomography angiography
as a test case.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging.
2010;
3
305-315
- 63
Tamarappoo B K, Dey D, Nakazato R et al.
Comparison of the extent and severity of myocardial perfusion defects measured by
CT coronary angiography and SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging.
2010;
3
1010-1019
- 64
Kirsch J, Araoz P A, Steinberg F B et al.
Prevalence and significance of incidental extracardiac findings at 64-multidetector
coronary CTA.
J Thorac Imaging.
2007;
22
330-334
- 65
Hoffmann U, Bamberg F, Chae C U et al.
Coronary computed tomography for early triage of patients with acute chest pain (ROMICAT
trial).
J Am Coll Cardiol.
2009;
53
1642-1650
- 66
Roguin A, Abadi S, Engel A et al.
Novel method for real-time hybrid cardiac CT and coronary angiography image registration:
visualising beyond luminology, proof-of-concept.
Eurointervention.
2009;
4
648-53
- 67
Litmanovich D, Zamboni G A, Hauser T H et al.
ECG-gated chest CT angiography with 64-MDCT and triphasic IV contrast administration
regimen in patients with acute non-specific chest pain.
Eur Radiol.
2008;
18
308-317
- 68
Rubinshtein R, Halon D A, Caspar T et al.
Impact of 64-slice cardiac CT angiography on clinical decision-making in emergency
department patients with chest pain of possible myocardial ischemic origin.
Am J Cardiol.
2007;
100
1522-1526
- 69
Schertler T, Scheffel H, Frauenfelder T et al.
Dual-source computed tomography in patients with acute chest pain:feasibility and
image quality.
Eur Radiol.
2007;
17
3179-3188
- 70
Vrachliotis T G, Bis K G, Haidary A et al.
Atypical chest pain: coronary, aortic, and pulmonary vasculature enhancement at biphasic
single-injection 64-section CT angiography.
Radiology.
2007;
243
368-376
- 71
Kim S Y, Seo J B et al.
Coronary artery anomalies: classification and ECG-gated multidetector row CT findings
with angiographic correlation.
Radiographics.
2006;
26
317-334
- 72
Cademartiri F, La Grutta L, Malago R et al.
Prevalence of anatomical variants and coronary anomalies in 543 consecutive patients
studied with 64-slice CT coronary angiography.
Radiol Med.
2008;
113
363-375
- 73
Pichler P, Loewe C, Roedler S et al.
Detection of high-grade stenoses with multislice computed tomography in heart transplant
patients.
J Heart Lung Transplant.
2008;
27
310-316
- 74
Feuchtner G M, Dichtl W, Muller S et al.
64-MDCT for diagnosis of aortic regurgitation in patients referred to CT coronary
angiography.
Am J Roentgenol.
2008;
191
W1-W7
- 75
Alkadhi H, Desbiolles L, Husmann L et al.
Aortic regurgitation: assessment with 64-section CT.
Radiology.
2007;
245
111-121
- 76
Jassal D S, Shapiro M D, Neilan T G et al.
64-slice MDCT for detection of aortic regurgitation and quantification of severity.
Invest Radiol.
2007;
42
507-512
- 77
Blanke P, Siepe M, Reinöhl J et al.
Assessment of aortic annulus dimensions for Edwards SAPIEN transapical heart valve
implantation by computed tomography: calculating average diameter using a virtual
ring method.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg.
2010;
38
750-758
- 78
Ben-Dor I, Waksman R, Hanna N N et al.
Utility of radiologic review for noncardiac findings on MSCT in patients with severe
aortic stenosis evaluated for transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Am J Cardiol.
2010;
105
1461-1464
- 79
Koos R, Mahnken A H, Dohmen G et al.
Association of aortic valve calcification severity with the degree of aortic regurgitation
after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Int J Cardiol.
2010;
(in press)
- 80
Schuijf J D, Pundziute G, Jukema J W et al.
Evaluation of patients with previous coronary stent implantation with 64-section CT.
Radiology.
2007;
245
416-423
- 81
Carbone I, Francone M, Algeri E et al.
Non-invasive evaluation of coronary artery stent patency with retrospectively ECG-gated-64-slice
CT angiography.
Eur Radiol.
2008;
18
234-243
- 82
Carraba N, Bamoshmoosh M, Carusi L M et al.
Usefulness of 64-slice MDCT for detecting drug eluting in-stent restenosis.
Am J Cardiol.
2007;
100
1754-1758
- 83
Das K M, El-Menyar A A, Salm A M et al.
Contrast-enhanced 64-section coronary MDCT angiography versus conventional coronary
angiography for stent assessment.
Radiology.
2007;
245
424-432
- 84
Hecht H S, Zaric M, Jelnin V et al.
Usefulness of 64-detector CT angiography for diagnosing in-stent restenosis in native
coronary arteries.
Am J Cardiol.
2008;
101
820-824
- 85
Manghat N, Van Lingen R, Hewson P et al.
Usefulness of 64-detector row CT for evaluation of intracoronary stents in symptomatic
patients with suspected in-stent restenosis.
Am J Cardiol.
2008;
101
1567-1573
- 86
Feuchtner G, Jodocy D, Klauser A et al.
radiation dose reduction by using 100-kVtube voltage in cardiac 64-slice computed
tomography: a comparative study.
European J of Radiology.
2010;
75
e51-e56
- 87
The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.
ICRP publication 103.
Ann ICRP.
2007;
37
1-332
- 88
Achenbach S, Marwan M, Ropers D et al.
Coronary computed tomography angiography with a consistent dose below 1 mSv using
prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition.
Eur Heart J.
2010;
31
340-346
- 89
Alkadhi H, Stolzmann P, Scheffel H et al.
Radiation dose of cardiac dual-source CT: the effect of tailoring the protocol to
patient-specific parameters.
Eur J Radiol.
2008;
68
385-391
- 90
Einstein A J, Elliston C D, Arai A E et al.
Radiation dose from single-heartbeat coronary CT angiography performed with a 320-detector
row volume scanner.
Radiology.
2010;
254
698-706
- 91
Faulkner K, Werduch A.
An estimate of the collective dose to the European population from cardiac X-ray procedures.
Br J Radiol.
2008;
81
955-962
- 92
Goetti R, Leschka S, Baumuller S et al.
Low dose high-pitch spiral acquisition 128-slice dual-source computed tomography for
the evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft patency.
Invest Radiol.
2010;
45
324-330
- 93
Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hermann F et al.
Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography.
JAMA.
2009;
301
500-507
- 94
Hirai N, Horiguchi J, Fujioka C et al.
Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated 64-detector coronary CT angiography: assessment
of image quality, stenosis, and radiation dose.
Radiology.
2008;
248
424-430
- 95
Leschka S, Stolzmann P, Schmid F T et al.
Low kilovoltage cardiac dual-source CT: attenuation, noise, and radiation dose.
Eur Radiol.
2008;
18
1809-1817
- 96
Leschka L, Stolzmann P, Desbiolles L et al.
Diagnostic accuracy of high-pitch dual-source CT for the assessment of coronary stenoses:
first experience.
Eur Radiol.
2009;
19
2896-2903
- 97
Lell M, Marwan M, Schepis T et al.
Prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition for coronary CT angiography
using dual source CT: technique and initial experience.
Eur Radiol.
2009;
19
2576-2583
- 98
Arnoldi E, Johnson T R, Rist C et al.
Adequate image quality with reduced radiation dose in prospectively triggered coronary
CTA compared with retrospective techniques.
Eur Radiol.
2009;
19
2147-2155
- 99
Rybicki F J, Otero H J, Steigner M L et al.
Initial evaluation of coronary images from 320-detector row computed tomography.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging.
2008;
24
535-546
- 100
Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Leschka S et al.
Low-dose CT coronary angiography in the step-and-shoot mode: diagnostic performance.
Heart.
2008;
94
1132-1137
- 101
Stolzmann P, Leschka S, Betschart T et al.
Radiation dose values for various coronary calcium scoring protocols in dual-source
CT.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging.
2009;
25
443-451
- 102
Stolzmann P, Leschka S, Scheffel H et al.
Dual-source CT in step-and-shoot mode: noninvasive coronary angiography with low radiation
dose.
Radiology.
2008;
249
71-80
- 103
Zimmermann E, Dewey M.
Whole heart 320-row computed tomography: reducton of radiation dose via prior coronary
calcium scanning.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
2011;
183
54-59
- 104
Ketelsen D, Buchgeister M, Fenchel M et al.
Estamation of radiation exposure of prospectively triggered 128-slice computed tomography
coronary angiography.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
2010;
182
1105-1109
Prim. Univ. Prof. Dr. Klaus Hergan
Paracelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität, Univ. Institut für Radiologie, Salzburger
Landeskliniken
Müllner Hauptstrasse 48
5020 Salzburg
Österreich
Email: k.hergan@salk.at
