Download PDF
Hebamme 2012; 25(1): 6-14
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1286167
Schwangerschaft
Gestationsdiabetes
Hippokrates Verlag in MVS Medizinverlage Stuttgart GmbH & Co. KG Stuttgart

Praktische Umsetzung der neuen Leitlinie zur Diagnostik und Therapie des Gestationsdiabetes

Ute Schäfer-Graf
1   Berliner Diabeteszentrum für Schwangere, Klinik für Gynäkologie u. Geburtshilfe St. Joseph Krankenhaus
,
Helmut Kleinwechter
,
Franz Kainer
,
M Sorger
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
19 March 2012 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Die Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe und die Deutsche Diabetesgesellschaft haben im August 2011 eine evidenzbasierte Leitlinie zum Gestationsdiabetes verabschiedet. Die Überarbeitung war notwendig, weil neue Daten aus randomisierten Therapiestudien und zur Diagnostik des GDM berücksichtigt werden mussten.

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 PanelIAoDaPSGC. International Association of Diabetes and Pregancy Study Groups Recommendations on the Diagnosis and Classification of Hyperglycemia in Pregnancy. Diabetes Care 2010; 33: 676-682
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Association AD. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes – 2011. DIABETES CARE 2011; 34 (1): S11-S61
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Kerner W, Brückel J. Definition, Klassifikation und Diagnostik des Diabetes mellitus. Diabetologe 2010; 5 (Suppl): S109-S112
    Thieme ConnectSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Balsells M, Garcia-Patterson A, Gich I, Corcoy R. Maternal and fetal outcome in women with type 2 versus type 1 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and metanalysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009; 94: 4284-4291
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Füchtenbusch M, Wentzel A, Petruschke T. Gestationsdiabetes – Screening in Deutschland – landesweiter Survey (Abstract). Diabetologie Stoffwechsel 2009; 4: S16
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 6 Gambino R, Piscitelli J, Ackattupathil T, Theriault J, Andrin R, Sanfilippo M, Etienne M. Acidification of blood is superior to sodium fluoride alone as an inhibitor of glycolysis. Clin Chem 2009; 55 (5): 1019-1021
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Metzger B, Lowe L, Dyer A, Trimble E, Chaovarindr U, Coustan D, Hadden D, McCance D, Hod M, McIntyre H, Oats J, Persson B, Rogers M, Sacks D. Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. NEJM 2008; 358: 2061-2063
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Schaefer-Graf U, Hartmann R, Kleinwechter H, Demandt N, Sorger M, Klavehn S, Vetter K, Kjos S. Postpartum oral glucose tolerance testing in women after gestational diabetes. Diabetes 56 (Suppl. 01) 2008; A494
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 9 Medicine Io. Weight gain during pregnancy: Reexamining the guidelines. Washington D: Ed. The National Academies Press; 2009
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 10 Crowther C, Hiller J, Moss J, McPhee A, Jeffries W, Robinson J. Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcome. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 2477-2486
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Landon M, Spong C, Thorn E, Carpenter M, Ramin S, Casy B. A multicenter, randomized trial of treatment for mild gestational diabetes. NEJM 2009; 361: 1339-1348
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Buchanan TA, Kjos SL, Montoro MN, Wu P, Madrilejo NG, Gonzalez M, Nunez V, Pantoja PM, Xiang A. Use of fetal ultrasound to select metabolic therapy for pregnancies complicated by mild gestational diabetes. Diabetes Care 1994; 17: 275-283
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Kjos S, Schaefer-Graf U, Sardesi S, Peters R, Buley A, Xiang A, Byrne J, Sutherland C, Montoro M, Buchanan T. A randomized controlled trial using glycemic plus fetal ultrasound parameters versus glycemic parameters to determine insulin therapy in gestational diabetes with fasting hyperglycemia. Diabetes Care 2001; 24: 1904-1910
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Schaefer-Graf U, Kjos S, Fauzan O, Bühling K, Siebert G, Bührer C, Ladendorf B, Dudenhausen J, Vetter K. A randomized trial evaluating a predominately fetal growth-based strategy to guide management of gestational diabetes in Caucasian women. Diabetes Care 2004; 27: 297-302
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Kjos S, Schaefer-Graf U. Modified therapy for gestational diabetes using high-risk and low-risk fetal abdominal circumference growth to select srtrict versus relaxed matrenal glycemic target. Diabetes Care 2007; 30: S200-205
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Bonomo M, Cetin T, Pisoni M, Faden D, Mion E, Taricco E, Nobile de Santis M, Radaelli T, Motta G, Costa M, Solerte L, Morabito A. Flexible treatment of gestational diabetes modulated on ultrasound evaluation of intrauterine growth: a controlled randamized clinical trial. Diabetes Metab 2004; 30: 237-244, 2004
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 O’Sullivan E, Avalos G, O’Reilly M, Dennedy M, Gaffney G, Dunne F. Atlantic Diabetes in Pregnancy (DIP): the prevalence and outcomes of gestational diabetes mellitus using new diagnostic criteria. Diabetologia 2011;
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 18 Lapolla A, Dalfrà M, Ragazzi E, De Cata A, Fedele D. New International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) recommendations for diagnosing gestational diabetes compared with former criteria: a retrospective study on pregnancy outcome. Diabet Med 2011; 28 (9): 1074-1077
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Moses R, Morris G, Petocz P, San Gil DG. G: The impact of potential new diagnostic criteria on the prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus in Australia. Med J Aust 2011; 194 (7): 338-340
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 20 Freckmann G, Baumstark A et al. System accuracy evaluation of 27 blood glucose monitoring systems according to DIN EN ISO 15197. Diabetes Technol Ther 2010; 12 (3): 221-231
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Schaefer-Graf UM, Hartmann R, Pawliczak J, Passow D, Abou-Dakn M, Vetter K, Kordonouri O. Breastfeeding and childhood overweight in children from mothers with gestational diabetes. Diabetes Care 2005; 29: 1105-1107
    Search in Google Scholar