Radiographic Sizing for Meniscal Transplantation Using 3-D CT Reconstruction

Abstract

In meniscus transplantation, allograft size mismatch causes increased contact pressures and early degeneration of the knee. The purpose of this study is to compare the accuracy and reliability of sizing the tibial plateau using three-dimensional (3-D) computed tomography (CT) scans versus plain radiographs (XR). Anteroposterior (AP) and lateral XR as well as CT with 3-D reconstructions were performed on 16 cadaveric knees. Sagittal and coronal dimensions of the hemiplateaus were measured on each imaging modality and then on the disarticulated specimens. CT estimates of plateau size were closer to anatomic measurements compared with radiographic estimates in all dimensions and these differences were statistically significant (p < 0.0001). CT scan fell within 5 mm of anatomic measurements 100% of the time versus 76.5% for XR and within 2 mm 71.9% of the time versus 34.4%. The proportion of CT measurements within 2 mm of actual values was significantly higher for CT for the lateral meniscus on AP (p = 0.0011) and lateral (p = 0.0039) views. 3-D CT has less error in measurement of the tibial plateau than XR and estimates were more likely to be within 2 and 5 mm of actual size. This may decrease the likelihood of allograft size mismatch.

Keywords

meniscus - allograft - transplant - meniscectomy - knee

• References

• 1 Allen PR, Denham RA, Swan AV. Late degenerative changes after meniscectomy. Factors affecting the knee after operation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1984; 66 (5) 666-671
• 2 Fairbank TJ. Knee joint changes after meniscectomy. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1948; 30B (4) 664-670
• 3 Garrett JC, Steensen RN. Meniscal transplantation in the human knee: a preliminary report. Arthroscopy 1991; 7 (1) 57-62
• 4 Graf Jr KW, Sekiya JK, Wojtys EM ; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. Long-term results after combined medial meniscal allograft transplantation and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: minimum 8.5-year follow-up study. Arthroscopy 2004; 20 (2) 129-140
• 5 Hommen JP, Applegate GR, Del Pizzo W. Meniscus allograft transplantation: ten-year results of cryopreserved allografts. Arthroscopy 2007; 23 (4) 388-393
• 6 Stollsteimer GT, Shelton WR, Dukes A, Bomboy AL. Meniscal allograft transplantation: a 1- to 5-year follow-up of 22 patients. Arthroscopy 2000; 16 (4) 343-347
• 7 Verdonk PC, Demurie A, Almqvist KF, Veys EM, Verbruggen G, Verdonk R. Transplantation of viable meniscal allograft. Survivorship analysis and clinical outcome of one hundred cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87 (4) 715-724
• 8 Wirth CJ, Peters G, Milachowski KA, Weismeier KG, Kohn D. Long-term results of meniscal allograft transplantation. Am J Sports Med 2002; 30 (2) 174-181
• 9 Lazović D, Wirth CJ, Knösel T, Gossé F, Maschek HG. [Meniscus replacement using incongruent transplants—an experimental study]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 1997; 135 (2) 131-137
• 10 Sekaran SV, Hull ML, Howell SM. Nonanatomic location of the posterior horn of a medial meniscal autograft implanted in a cadaveric knee adversely affects the pressure distribution on the tibial plateau. Am J Sports Med 2002; 30 (1) 74-82
• 11 Dienst M, Greis PE, Ellis BJ, Bachus KN, Burks RT. Effect of lateral meniscal allograft sizing on contact mechanics of the lateral tibial plateau: an experimental study in human cadaveric knee joints. Am J Sports Med 2007; 35 (1) 34-42
• 12 Paletta Jr GA, Manning T, Snell E, Parker R, Bergfeld J. The effect of allograft meniscal replacement on intraarticular contact area and pressures in the human knee. A biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med 1997; 25 (5) 692-698
• 13 McDermott ID, Sharifi F, Bull AM, Gupte CM, Thomas RW, Amis AA. An anatomical study of meniscal allograft sizing. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2004; 12 (2) 130-135
• 14 Pollard ME, Kang Q, Berg EE. Radiographic sizing for meniscal transplantation. Arthroscopy 1995; 11 (6) 684-687
• 15 Shaffer B, Kennedy S, Klimkiewicz J, Yao L. Preoperative sizing of meniscal allografts in meniscus transplantation. Am J Sports Med 2000; 28 (4) 524-533
• 16 Johnson DL, Swenson TM, Livesay GA, Aizawa H, Fu FH, Harner CD. Insertion-site anatomy of the human menisci: gross, arthroscopic, and topographical anatomy as a basis for meniscal transplantation. Arthroscopy 1995; 11 (4) 386-394
• 17 Urban Jr WP, Nyland J, Caborn DN, Johnson DL. The radiographic position of medial and lateral meniscal horns as a basis for meniscal reconstruction. Arthroscopy 1999; 15 (2) 147-154
• 18 Amis AA, Jakob RP. Anterior cruciate ligament graft positioning, tensioning and twisting. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1998; 6 (Suppl 1) S2-S12
• 19 Howell SM, Taylor MA. Failure of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament due to impingement by the intercondylar roof. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993; 75 (7) 1044-1055
• 20 Khalfayan EE, Sharkey PF, Alexander AH, Bruckner JD, Bynum EB. The relationship between tunnel placement and clinical results after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 1996; 24 (3) 335-341
• 21 Hoser C, Tecklenburg K, Kuenzel KH, Fink C. Postoperative evaluation of femoral tunnel position in ACL reconstruction: plain radiography versus computed tomography. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2005; 13 (4) 256-262
• 22 Prodromos CC, Joyce BT, Keller BL, Murphy BJ, Shi K. Magnetic resonance imaging measurement of the contralateral normal meniscus is a more accurate method of determining meniscal allograft size than radiographic measurement of the recipient tibial plateau. Arthroscopy 2007; 23 (11) 1174-1179 ; e1
• 23 Carpenter JE, Wojtys EM, Huston LJ, Crabbe JP, Aisen AM. Preoperative sizing of meniscal allografts. Arthroscopy 1993; 9: 344