Abstract
Two bioequivalence studies were carried out in healthy volunteers in order to compare
the rate and extent of absorption of two dosage forms (film-coated tablet and orodispersible
tablet) of oral olanzapine (CAS 132539-06-1) 10 mg test formulations and the respective
brand formulations as reference. Twenty and twenty-six subjects were administered
olanzapine film-coated tablet or orodispersible tablet of test and reference formulations
in an open-label, randomised, fasting, two-period, two-sequence, crossover study.
Blood samples were taken before and within 240 h after drug administration. Plasma
concentrations were determined by LC/MS/MS. Log-transformed AUC and Cmax values were tested for bioequivalence based on the ratios of the geometric means
(test/reference). tmax was analysed nonparametrically. The 90% confidence intervals of the geometric mean
values for the test/reference ratios for AUC0−t and Cmax were within the bioequivalence acceptance range of 80–125%. It may be therefore concluded
that the test formulations of olanzapine 10 mg film-coated tablet and orodispersible
tablet are bioequivalent to the reference products and can be prescribed interchangeably.
Key words
Atypical antipsychotic - Bioequivalence - CAS 132539-06-1 - Healthy volunteers - Olanzapine,
tablet - Pharmacokinetics