Ultraschall in der Medizin - European Journal of Ultrasound, Table of Contents Ultraschall Med 2012; 33(2): 122-134DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1299075 Continuing Education © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York Doppler-Sonografie in der Geburtshilfe Doppler Ultrasound in Obstetrics H. Steiner , I. Haberlehner , T. Jaeger Recommend Article Abstract Buy Article Full Text References References 1 Baschat A. Fetal growth restriction – from observation to intervention. J Perinat Med 2010; 38: 239-246 2 Pijnenborg R, Bland JM, Robertson WB et al. Uteroplacental arterial changes related to interstitial trophoblast migration in early human pregnancy. Placenta 1983; 4: 397-413 3 Bilardo CM, Wolf H, Stigter RH et al. Relationship between monitoring parameters and perinatal outcome in severe, early intrauterine growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 23: 119-125 4 Steiner H, Schneider KTM. Dopplersonographie in der Geburtshilfe und Gynäkologie. 2. Aufl. Springer Verlag; 5 Crombach G, Vetter K. Intrauterine Wachstumsrestriktion II. Gynäkologe 2007; 12: 938-996 6 Aquilina J, Harrington K. Pregnancy hypertension and uterine artery Doppler ultrasound. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 1996; 8: 435-440 7 Ahmet A, Baschat AA, Hecher K. Fetal Growth Restriction due to Placental Disease. Semin Perinatol 2004; 28: 67-80 8 Baschat AA, Harman C. Venous Doppler in the assessment of fetal cardiovascular status. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2006; 18: 156-163 9 Baschat AA, Gembruch U, Weiner CP et al. Qualitative venous Doppler waveform analysis improve prediction of critical perinatal outcomes in premature growth-restricted fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 22: 240-245 10 Bellotti M, Pennati G, De Gasperi C et al. Simultaneous measurements of umbilical venous, fetal hepatic, and ductus venousus blood flow in growth-restricted human fetuses. AM J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190: 1347-1358 11 Degani S. Evaluation of Fetal Cerebrovascular cirulation and brain developement: the role of ultrasound and Doppler. Semin Perinatol 2009; 33: 259-269 12 Standards in der Perinatalmedizin – Dopplersonographie in der Schwangerschaft DEGUM III. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 2003; 63: 21-25 13 Maiz N, Plaseccia W, Dagklis T et al. Ductus venosus Doppler in fetuses with cardiac defects and increate nuca translucenc thickness. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 31: 256-260 14 Oh C, Harman C, Baschat AA. Abnormal first trimester ductus venosus blood flow: a risk factor for advers outcome infetuses with normal nuchal translucency. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 30: 192-196 15 Maiz N, Valencia C, Kagan KO et al. Ductus venosus Doppler screening for trisomie 21, 18, 13 and Turner syndrome at 11–13 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33: 512-517 16 Bilardo CM, Müller MA, Zikulnig L et al. Ductus venosus studies in foetuses at high risk for chromosomal or heart abnormalities:relationship with nuchal translucency measurement and fetal outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 17: 288-294 17 Kiserud T. Physiology of the fetal circulation. Semin fetal neonat 2005; 10: 493-503 18 Leitlinien der Arbeitsgemeinschaft für maternofetale Medizin der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe (DGGG) Register Nr. 015/019. 19 Auqilina J, Barnett A, Thompson O et al. Comprehensive analysis of uterine artery flow velocity waveforms for the prediction of preeclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 16: 163-170 20 Plasencia W, Maiz N, Poon L et al. Uterine artery Doppler at 11+0 to 13+6 weeks and 21+0 to 24+6 weeks in the prediction of preeclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 32: 138-146 21 Fayyad AM, Harrington KF. Prediciton and prevention of preeclampsia and IUGR. Early Human Dev 2005; 81: 865-876 22 Bujold E, Morency AM, Roberge S et al. Acetylsalicyclic acid for the prevention of preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction in woman with abnormal uterine artery Doppler: a systemativ review and meta-analysis. J Obstet Gynecol Can 2009; 31: 818-826 23 Akolekar R, Bower S, Flack N et al. Prediction of misscarriage and stillbirth at 11-13 weeks and the contribution of chorionic villus sampling. Prenat Diagn 2011; 31: 38-45 24 Akolekar R, Syngelaki A, Sarquis R et al. Prediction of early, intermediate and late pre-eclampsia from maternal factors, biophysical and biochemical marcers at 11–13 weeks. Prenat Diagn 2011; 31 (01) 66-74 25 Nicolaides KH. A model for a new pyramid of prenatal care based on the 11 to 13 weeks`assessment. Prenat Diagn 2011; 31: 3-6 26 Crombach G. Intrauterine Wachstumsrestriktion I. Gynäkologe 2007; 40: 891-902 27 Hecher K et al. Monitoring of fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction: a longitudinal study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 18: 564-570 28 Westergaard HB, Langhoff-Roos XXX, Lingman G et al. A critical appraisal of the use of umbilical artery Doppler ultrasound in high risk pregnancies: use of meta-analyses in evidence- based obstetrics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 17: 466-476 29 Kennelly MM, Farah N, Turner MJ et al. Aortic isthmus Doppler velocimetry: role in assessment of preterm fetal growth restriciton. Prenat Diagn 2010; 30: 395-401 30 The GRIT Study Group. A randomised trial of time delivery for the compromised preterm fetus: short term outcomes and Bayesian interpretation. BJOG: an international Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2003; 110: 27-32 31 Thronton JG, Hornbuckle J, Vail A et al. Infant wellbeing at 2 years of age in the Growth Restriction Intervention Trial multicentred randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004; 364: 513-520 32 Samson J, Block D, Mari G. Middle cerebral artery Doppler for managing fetal anemia. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2010; 53: 851-857 33 Mari G , for the Collaborative Group for Doppler Asessment of the Blood Velocit in Anemic Fetuses Noninvasive diagnosis Doppler ultrasonography of fetal anemia due to maternal red cell alloimmunization. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 9-14 34 Oepkes X et al. Doppler Ultrasonography versus Amniocentesisto predict fetal anemia. New Engl J Med 2006; 355: 156-164 35 Nicolaides KH, Thilaganathan B, Rodeck CH et al. Erythroblastosis and reticulocytosis in anemic fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 159: 1063-1065