J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2012; 73(02): 117-120
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1301395
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Volumetric Measurement of Vestibular Schwannoma Tumour Growth Following Partial Resection: Predictors for Recurrence

Siavosh Vakilian
1   Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
,
Luis Souhami
1   Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
,
Denis Melançon
2   Department of Radiology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
,
Anthony Zeitouni
3   Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

14 June 2011

11 October 2011

Publication Date:
06 February 2012 (online)

Abstract

Vestibular schwannomas (VS) have a higher risk of recurrence following subtotal resection than following near-total resection. We measured tumor remnant growth volumetrically in an attempt to determine potential predictors for postoperative recurrence following subtotal resection. We reviewed the charts of patients who had undergone VS surgery between 1998 and 2007. Thirty patients had an incomplete resection. The principal outcome measure was change in tumor volume (TV) on serial imaging. At a median follow-up of 6.8 years, volumetric measurements showed that 12 patients (40%) developed further tumor growth, while 18 patients remained with stable residual disease. The median rate of growth was 0.53 cm3/year. Two-dimensional measurements confirmed growth in only eight of these patients. The postoperative residual TV correlated significantly with subsequent tumor growth (p = 0.038). All patients with residual volumes in excess of 2.5 cm3 exhibited recurrence. On univariate analysis, only postoperative TV was significantly associated with growth. Median time to failure was 21.5 months. This is the first report of volumetric measurements of VS tumor growth postoperatively. Volumetric measurements appear to be superior to two-dimensional measurements in documenting VS growth and patients with residual tumors >2.5 cm3 have a significantly higher rate of recurrence.

 
  • References

  • 1 Silverstein H, McDaniel A, Norrell H, Wazen J. Conservative management of acoustic neuroma in the elderly patient. Laryngoscope 1985; 95 (7 Pt 1) 766-770
  • 2 Kemink JL, Langman AW, Niparko JK, Graham MD. Operative management of acoustic neuromas: the priority of neurologic function over complete resection. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991; 104 (1) 96-99
  • 3 Comey CH, Jannetta PJ, Sheptak PE, Joh HD, Burkhart LE. Staged removal of acoustic tumors: techniques and lessons learned from a series of 83 patients. Neurosurgery 1995; 37 (5) 915-920, discussion 920–921
  • 4 Roberson Jr JB, Brackmann DE, Hitselberger WE. Acoustic neuroma recurrence after suboccipital resection: management with translabyrinthine resection. Am J Otol 1996; 17 (2) 307-311
  • 5 El-Kashlan HK, Zeitoun H, Arts HA, Hoff JT, Telian SA. Recurrence of acoustic neuroma after incomplete resection. Am J Otol 2000; 21 (3) 389-392
  • 6 Bloch DC, Oghalai JS, Jackler RK, Osofsky M, Pitts LH. The fate of the tumor remnant after less-than-complete acoustic neuroma resection. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 130 (1) 104-112
  • 7 Iwai Y, Yamanaka K, Ishiguro T. Surgery combined with radiosurgery of large acoustic neuromas. Surg Neurol 2003; 59 (4) 283-289, discussion 289–291