Speech-Language Pathologists and the Common Core Standards Initiative: An Opportunity for Leadership and Organizational Change

Jennifer Dunkle; Perry Flynn

doi:10.1055/s-0032-1310311

Seminars in Speech and Language, Table of Contents

Semin Speech Lang 2012; 33(02): 102-110
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1310311

Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Speech-Language Pathologists and the Common Core Standards Initiative: An Opportunity for Leadership and Organizational Change

Jennifer Dunkle

¹The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio;

,

Perry Flynn

²Department of Public Instruction in the area of Speech-Language Pathology, and Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of North Carolina, Greensboro, North Carolina.

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

The Common Core State Standards initiative within public school education is designed to provide uniform guidelines for academic standards, including more explicit language targets. Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) are highly qualified language experts who may find new leadership roles within their clinical practice using the Common Core Standards. However, determining its usage by SLPs in clinical practice needs to be examined. This article seeks to discover the social context of organizations and organizational change in relation to clinical practice. Specifically, this article presents the diffusion of innovations theory to explain how initiatives move from ideas to institutionalization and the importance of social context in which these initiatives are introduced. Next, the values of both SLPs and organizations will be discussed. Finally, this article provides information on how to affect organizational change through the value of an affirmative, socially based theoretical perspective and methodology, appreciative inquiry.

Keywords

speech-language pathologists - organizational change - appreciative inquiry - common core standards - leadership

Full Text

References

References
1 Byng S, Cairns D, Duchan J. Values in practice and practising values. J Commun Disord 2002; 35: 89-106
2 Common Core State Standards Initiative. Available at: http://www.corestandards.org . January 11, 2012
3 Dingfelder HE, Mandell DS. Bridging the research-to-practice gap in autism intervention: an application of diffusion of innovation theory. J Autism Dev Disord 2011; 41: 597-609
4 Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations. 5th ed. New York, NY: Free Press; 2003
5 Hepworth D, Larsen J. Direct social work practice: theory and skills. Homework, IL: Dorsey Press; 1982. 20. Cited by: Bying S, Caine D, Duchan J. Values in practice and practicing values. J Commun Disord 2002; 35: 89–106
6 Blood GW, Ridenour JS, Thomas EA, Qualls CD, Hammer CS. Predicting job satisfaction among speech-language pathologists working in public schools. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2002; 33: 282-290
7 Fimian MJ, Lieberman RJ, Fastenau PS. Development and validation of an instrument to measure occupational stress in speech-language pathologists. J Speech Hear Res 1991; 34: 439-446
8 Harris SF, Prater MA, Dyches TT, Heath MA. Job stress of school-based speech-language pathologists. Comm Disord Q 2009; 30: 103-111
9 Edgar DL, Rosa-Lugo LI. The critical shortage of speech-language pathologists in the public school setting: features of the work environment that affect recruitment and retention. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2007; 38: 31-46
10 Hutchins TL, Howard M, Prelock PA, Belin G. Retention of school-based SLPs: Relationship among caseload size, workload satisfaction, job satisfaction, and best practice. Comm Disord Q 2010; 3: 139-154
11 Pezzei C, Oratio AR. A multivariate analysis of the Job Satisfaction of public school speech-language pathologists. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 1991; 22: 139-146
12 Crow S, MacLeod B, Trott J. A change would do you good [Recorded by Sheryl Crow]. On Sheryl Crow [CD]. Santa Monica, CA: A&M Records; 1996
13 Heath C, Heath D. Switch: How to Change Things When Change Is Hard. New York, NY: Broadway Books; 2010
14 Rodríguez-Carvajal R, Moreno-Jiménez B, de Rivas-Hermosilla S , et al. Positive psychology at work: Mutual gains for individuals and organizations. Rev Psicol Trab Organ 2010; 26: 235-253
15 Cooperrider DL, Whitney D, Stavros JM. Essentials of Appreciative Inquiry. Brunswick, OH: Crown Custom Publishing, Inc.; 2008
16 Calabrese RL, Zepeda SJ, Peters AL. An appreciative inquiry into educational administration doctoral programs: stories from doctoral students at three universities. J Res Leadership Educ 2007; 2: 1-29
17 Barrett F. Creating appreciative learning cultures. Organ Dyn 1995; 24: 36-49
18 Seligman MEP, Csikszentmihalyi M. Positive psychology. An introduction. Am Psychol 2000; 55: 5-14
19 Whitney D, Trosten-Bloom A. The Power of Appreciative Inquiry: A Practical Guide to Positive Change. 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler; 2010
20 Cooperrider D, Srivastva S. Appreciative inquiry in organizational life. In: Srivastva S, Cooperrider DL, eds. Appreciative Management and Leadership: The Power of Positive Thought and Action in Organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc.; 2000