Synlett 2013; 24(6): 741-746
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1318332
letter
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

An Efficient Strategy for Protecting Dihydroxyl Groups of Catechols

Wei-Bin Huang
a   School of Pharmacy, East China University of Science & Technology, Campus P. O. Box 363, 130 Meilong Road, Shanghai 200237, P. R. of China   Fax: +86(21)64253314   Email: jyf@ecust.edu.cn
,
Ying Guo
a   School of Pharmacy, East China University of Science & Technology, Campus P. O. Box 363, 130 Meilong Road, Shanghai 200237, P. R. of China   Fax: +86(21)64253314   Email: jyf@ecust.edu.cn
,
Jian-An Jiang
a   School of Pharmacy, East China University of Science & Technology, Campus P. O. Box 363, 130 Meilong Road, Shanghai 200237, P. R. of China   Fax: +86(21)64253314   Email: jyf@ecust.edu.cn
,
Xian-Dao Pan
b   Institute of Meteria Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, 1 Xiannongtan Street, Beijing 100050, P. R. of China
,
Dao-Hua Liao
a   School of Pharmacy, East China University of Science & Technology, Campus P. O. Box 363, 130 Meilong Road, Shanghai 200237, P. R. of China   Fax: +86(21)64253314   Email: jyf@ecust.edu.cn
,
Ya-Fei Ji*
a   School of Pharmacy, East China University of Science & Technology, Campus P. O. Box 363, 130 Meilong Road, Shanghai 200237, P. R. of China   Fax: +86(21)64253314   Email: jyf@ecust.edu.cn
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 15 January 2013

Accepted after revision: 11 February 2013

Publication Date:
11 March 2013 (online)


Abstract

A novel strategy for protecting dihydroxyl groups of catechols has been developed. Base-mediated cyclizations of catechols with 1,3-dibromopropane provided the corresponding benzo[b]1,4-dioxepans, and herefrom the protecting group was easily cleaved by aluminum chloride. The preparation of the antibacterial and antifungal agent 4-(2-aminothiazol-4-yl)benzene-1,2-diol from catechol reliably verified its availability amenable to various harsh reaction conditions.

Supporting Information

 
  • References and Notes

  • 2 Smith RV, Velagapudi RB, McLean AM, Wilcox RE. J. Med. Chem. 1985; 28: 613
  • 3 Liedhegner EA. S, Steller KM, Mieyal JJ. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2011; 24: 1644
  • 4 Guay DR. P. Pharmacotherapy 1999; 19: 6
  • 5 Holm KJ, Spencer CM. Drugs 1999; 58: 159
  • 6 Fitton A, Benfield P. Drugs 1990; 39: 308
  • 7 O’Donnell J, Zeppenfeld D, McConnell E, Pena S, Nedergaard M. Neurochem. Res. 2012; 37: 2496
    • 8a DeBernardis JF, Arendsen DL, Kyncl JJ, Kerkman DJ. J. Med. Chem. 1987; 30: 178
    • 8b Sit S.-Y, Xie K, Jacutin-Porte S, Taber MT, Gulwadi AG, Korpinen CD, Burris KD, Molski TF, Ryan E, Xu C, Wong H, Zhu J, Krishnananthan S, Gao Q, Verdoorn T, Johnson G. J. Med. Chem. 2002; 45: 3660
    • 10a Cabezon B, Quesada E, Esperanza S, Torres T. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2000; 2767
    • 10b Madrona A, Pereira-Caro G, Mateos R, Rodriguez G, Trujillo M, Fernandez-Bolanos J, Espartero JL. Molecules 2009; 14: 1762
  • 12 Alig L, Alsenz J, Andjelkovic M, Bendels S, Benardeau A, Bleicher K, Bourson A, David-Pierson P, Guba W, Hildbrand S, Kube D, Lubbers T, Mayweg AV, Narquizian R, Neidhart W, Nettekoven M, Plancher J.-M, Rocha C, Rogers-Evans M, Rover S, Schneider G, Taylor S, Waldmeier P. J. Med. Chem. 2008; 51: 2115
  • 14 Ariza X, Pineda O, Vilarrasa J, Shipps GW, Ma Y, Dai X. Org. Lett. 2001; 3: 1399
  • 15 Kaupp G, Naimi-Jamal MR, Stepanenko V. Chem. Eur. J. 2003; 9: 4156
  • 18 Bernini R, Cacchi S, Fabrizi G, Filisti E. Org. Lett. 2008; 10: 3457
  • 20 Narayana B, Raj KK. V, Ashalatha BV. Phosphorus, Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem. 2006; 181: 1381
  • 22 Huang W.-B, Du C.-Y, Jiang J.-A, Ji Y.-F. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2012; 38 in press; DOI: 10.1007/s11164-012-0804-6
  • 23 Malecha JW, Noble SA, Wiley BM, Hoffman TZ, Bonnefous C, Sertic M, Wash PL, Smith ND, Hassig CA, Scranton SA, Payne JE, Hager J. US 2007/0027184A1, 2007 ; Chem. Abstr. 2007, 146, 206220
  • 24 General Cyclization Procedure To EtOH (15 mL) were added in turn catechols 1 (5.0 mmol), K2CO3 (2.42 g, 17.5 mmol) and 1,3-dibromopropane (0.66 mL, 6.5 mmol), then the mixture was heated at reflux for 5 h. The resulting mixture was filtered and concentrated to acquire the crude product, the purification of which by column chromatography afforded the corresponding product 2 with PE–EtOAc (30:1, v/v) as eluents. Representative Compound 2a Colorless liquid, 0.69 g (92% yield). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 2.19 (quint, J = 5.6 Hz, 2 H, CH2), 4.22 (t, J = 5.6 Hz, 4 H, CH2), 6.90–6.95 (m, 2 H, Ar), 6.96–7.01 (m, 2 H, Ar) ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 31.9, 70.5 (2 C), 121.6 (2 C), 123.3 (2 C), 151.2 (2 C) ppm. ESI-HRMS: m/z [M + H+] calcd for C9H11O2: 151.0759; found: 151.0757
  • 25 General Deprotection Procedure A solution of benzo[b]1,4-dioxepans 2 (3.0 mmol) in benzene (10 mL) was treated by anhyd AlCl3 (1.20 g, 9.0 mmol), and the mixture was heated to reflux for specified time. Then, the reaction mixture was quenched by sat. aq NH4Cl (20 mL), and the aqueous phase was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 10 mL). The combined organic phase was washed by sat. brine (2 × 20 mL) and concentrated to provide the crude product, the purification of which by column chromatography afforded the corresponding product 1 with PE–EtOAc (10:1, v/v) as eluents.
  • 26 Olah GA, Prakash GK. S, Iyer PS, Tashiro M, Yamato T. J. Org. Chem. 1987; 52: 1881
  • 27 Synthetic Procedures for Compounds 4–6 Compound 4 Bromine (0.17 mL, 3.4 mmol, dissolved in 2 mL EtOH) was added dropwise to a stirred solution of 3 (0.50 g, 2.6 mmol) in EtOH (8 mL), and the mixture was stirred at r.t. for 1 h. Then, the solvent was removed to get the crude product, the purification of which by column chromatography afforded the pure product 4 with PE–CH2Cl2 (15:1, v/v) as eluents; white solid; mp 72–74 °C; 0.62 g (88% yield). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 2.25 (quint, J = 5.6 Hz, 2 H, CH2), 4.28 (t, J = 5.6 Hz, 2 H, CH2), 4.34 (t, J = 5.6 Hz, 2 H, CH2), 4.37 (s, 2 H, CH2), 7.00 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1 H, Ar), 7.57 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1 H, Ar), 7.60 (s, 1 H, Ar) ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 30.79, 30.81, 70.2, 70.4, 121.6, 122.7, 124.7, 129.1, 150.6, 156.0, 189.8 ppm. ESI-HRMS: m/z [M + H+] calcd for C11H12O3Br: 270.9970; found: 270.9975. Compound 5 A solution of 4 (0.54 g, 2.0 mmol) and thiourea (0.18 g, 2.4 mmol) in absolute EtOH (12 mL) was refluxed for 2 h. After removal of the solvent, the residue was treated with aq NaOH (1 mol/L, 10 mL), and extracted with EtOAc (3 × 10 mL). The combined organic phase was concentrated to provide the crude product, the purification of which by column chromatography afforded the pure product 5 with PE–EtOAc (4:1, v/v) as eluents; light yellow solid; mp 174–177 °C, 0.46 g (92% yield). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 2.20 (quint, J = 5.2 Hz, 2 H, CH2), 4.22 (t, J = 5.2 Hz, 4 H, CH2), 5.05 (s, 2 H, NH2), 6.60 (s, 1 H, thiazole), 6.97 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1 H, Ar), 7.34 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1 H, Ar), 7.40 (s, 1 H, Ar) ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 31.8, 70.6 (2 C), 102.1, 119.3, 121.1, 121.7, 130.3, 150.5, 151.0, 151.2, 167.1. ESI-HRMS: m/z [M + H+] calcd for C12H13N2O2S: 249.0698; found: 209.0693. Compound 6 A solution of 5 (0.40 g, 1.6 mmol) in benzene (8 mL) was treated by anhyd AlCl3 (0.64 g, 4.8 mmol), and the mixture was heated to reflux for 10 h. Then, the mixture was quenched by sat. aq NH4Cl (20 mL). Then aq NaOH (1 mol/L) was added to keep pH 7. The aqueous phase was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 20 mL). The combined organic phase was washed by sat. brine (2 × 20 mL), and then concentrated to provide the crude product, the purification of which by column chromatography afforded the pure product 6 with PE–EtOAc (2:1, v/v) as eluents; yellow solid; mp 228–231 °C; 0.28 g (84% yield). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d 6): δ = 6.64 (s, 1 H, thiazole), 6.69 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H, Ar), 6.92 (s, 2 H, OH), 7.06 (dd, J 1 = 8.0 Hz, J 2 = 2.0 Hz, 1 H, Ar), 7.19 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1 H, Ar), 8.90 (s, 2 H, NH2) ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d 6): δ = 98.3, 113.3, 115.4, 116.9, 126.8, 144.8, 144.9, 150.3, 167.7 ppm. ESI-HRMS: m/z [M + H+] calcd for C9H9N2O2S: 209.0385; found: 209.0381.