Download PDF
Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2012; 16(03): 205-216
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1320125
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Imaging in Total Ankle Replacement

Anthony R. Cadden
1   Figtree Private Hospital, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
31 July 2012 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Total ankle replacement is becoming a more popular option in the treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis. Appropriate imaging plays an important role in surgical planning, considering the overall foot alignment for optimal outcomes after surgery. Preoperative imaging includes weightbearing views of the foot and ankle, as well as an adjunct computed tomography scan. Imaging the painful ankle postsurgery often involves multiple modalities to define the underlying pathology and determine the appropriate management. Suggested imaging sequences are discussed.

Keywords

total ankle arthroplasty - total ankle replacement - imaging
 

  • References

  • 1 Fuchs S, Sandmann C, Skwara A, Chylarecki C. Quality of life 20 years after arthrodesis of the ankle. A study of adjacent joints. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003; 85 (7) 994-998
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Demottaz JD, Mazur JM, Thomas WH, Sledge CB, Simon SR. Clinical study of total ankle replacement with gait analysis. A preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1979; 61 (7) 976-988
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Kitaoka HB, Patzer GL, Ilstrup DM, Wallrichs SL. Survivorship analysis of the Mayo total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1994; 76 (7) 974-979
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Fevang BT, Lie SA, Havelin LI, Brun JG, Skredderstuen A, Furnes O. 257 ankle arthroplasties performed in Norway between 1994 and 2005. Acta Orthop 2007; 78 (5) 575-583
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Henricson A, Skoog A, Carlsson A. The Swedish Ankle Arthroplasty Register: An analysis of 531 arthroplasties between 1993 and 2005. Acta Orthop 2007; 78 (5) 569-574
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Hosman AH, Mason RB, Hobbs T, Rothwell AG. A New Zealand national joint registry review of 202 total ankle replacements followed for up to 6 years. Acta Orthop 2007; 78 (5) 584-591
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Labek G, Klaus H, Schlichtherle R, Williams A, Agreiter M. Revision rates after total ankle arthroplasty in sample-based clinical studies and national registries. Foot Ankle Int 2011; 32 (8) 740-745
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Wood PL, Deakin S. Total ankle replacement. The results in 200 ankles. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003; 85 (3) 334-341
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Kim BS, Choi WJ, Kim YS, Lee JW. Total ankle replacement in moderate to severe varus deformity of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009; 91 (9) 1183-1190
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Barg A, Knupp M, Anderson AE, Hintermann B. Total ankle replacement in obese patients: component stability, weight change, and functional outcome in 118 consecutive patients. Foot Ankle Int 2011; 32 (10) 925-932
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Gould JS, Alvine FG, Mann RA, Sanders RW, Walling AK. Total ankle replacement: a surgical discussion. Part I. Replacement systems, indications, and contraindications. Am J Orthop 2000; 29 (8) 604-609
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Saltzman CL. Perspective on total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Clin 2000; 5 (4) 761-775
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Neufeld SK, Lee TH. Total ankle arthroplasty: indications, results, and biomechanical rationale. Am J Orthop 2000; 29 (8) 593-602
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Rodriguez D, Bevernage BD, Maldague P, Deleu PA, Tribak K, Leemrijse T. Medium term follow-up of the AES ankle prosthesis: high rate of asymptomatic osteolysis. Foot Ankle Surg 2010; 16 (2) 54-60
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Lee KB, Cho YJ, Park JK, Song EK, Yoon TR, Seon JK. Heterotopic ossification after primary total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93 (8) 751-758
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Stufkens SA, Barg A, Bolliger L, Stucinskas J, Knupp M, Hintermann B. Measurement of the medial distal tibial angle. Foot Ankle Int 2011; 32 (3) 288-293
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Hintermann B, Valderrabano V, Dereymaeker G, Dick W. The HINTEGRA ankle: rationale and short-term results of 122 consecutive ankles. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; (424) 57-68
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Buechel Sr FF, Buechel Jr FF, Pappas MJ. Ten-year evaluation of cementless Buechel-Pappas meniscal bearing total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Int 2003; 24 (6) 462-472
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Pyevich MT, Saltzman CL, Callaghan JJ, Alvine FG. Total ankle arthroplasty: a unique design. Two- to twelve-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998; 80 (10) 1410-1420
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Doets HC, Brand R, Nelissen RG. Total ankle arthroplasty in inflammatory joint disease with use of two mobile-bearing designs. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88 (6) 1272-1284
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 McGarvey WC, Clanton TO, Lunz D. Malleolar fracture after total ankle arthroplasty: a comparison of two designs. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; (424) 104-110
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Kurup HV, Taylor GR. Medial impingement after ankle replacement. Int Orthop 2008; 32 (2) 243-246
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Nelissen RG, Doets HC, Valstar ER. Early migration of the tibial component of the Buechel-Pappas total ankle prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 448: 146-151
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Hanna RS, Haddad SL, Lazarus ML. Evaluation of periprosthetic lucency after total ankle arthroplasty: helical CT versus conventional radiography. Foot Ankle Int 2007; 28 (8) 921-926
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Bonnin M, Judet T, Colombier JA, Buscayret F, Graveleau N, Piriou P. Midterm results of the Salto Total Ankle Prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; (424) 6-18
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Buechel Sr FF, Buechel Jr FF, Pappas MJ. Twenty-year evaluation of cementless mobile-bearing total ankle replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; (424) 19-26
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Wood PL, Prem H, Sutton C. Total ankle replacement: medium-term results in 200 Scandinavian total ankle replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008; 90 (5) 605-609
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Besse JL, Brito N, Lienhart C. Clinical evaluation and radiographic assessment of bone lysis of the AES total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Int 2009; 30 (10) 964-975
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Kokkonen A, Ikävalko M, Tiihonen R, Kautiainen H, Belt EA. High rate of osteolytic lesions in medium-term followup after the AES total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Int 2011; 32 (2) 168-175
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC. “Modes of failure” of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1979; (141) 17-27
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley Jr LH. Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1973; 55 (8) 1629-1632
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Barg A, Elsner A, Anderson AE, Hintermann B. The effect of three-component total ankle replacement malalignment on clinical outcome: pain relief and functional outcome in 317 consecutive patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93 (21) 1969-1978
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Love C, Tomas MB, Marwin SE, Pugliese PV, Palestro CJ. Role of nuclear medicine in diagnosis of the infected joint replacement. Radiographics 2001; 21 (5) 1229-1238
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Hayter CL, Koff MF, Shah P, Koch KM, Miller TT, Potter HG. MRI after arthroplasty: comparison of MAVRIC and conventional fast spin-echo techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197 (3) W405-W411
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Chen CA, Chen W, Goodman SB , et al. New MR imaging methods for metallic implants in the knee: artifact correction and clinical impact. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011; 33 (5) 1121-1127
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar