Download PDF
J Knee Surg 2013; 26(02): 139-144
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1324811
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Hamstring Pain and Muscle Strains Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing Hamstring Graft Harvest Techniques

Peter D'Alessandro
1   Department of Orthopaedics, Fremantle Hospital, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia
2   School of Surgery, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
,
Giulia Wake
3   Department of Mathematics, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
,
Peter Annear
4   Department of Orthopaedics, Perth Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Centre, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

27 February 2012

23 June 2012

Publication Date:
10 September 2012 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

There is limited information in the literature regarding hamstring pain and muscle strains in patients following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using hamstring autograft. We sought to investigate whether dividing hamstring tendons distal to the musculotendinous junction rather than forcefully stripping tendons away from the muscle belly during graft harvest resulted in a lower incidence of hamstring pain, muscle strains, and leg flexion strength deficit following commencement of sport-specific training postoperatively. Patients were randomized to either the “Cut” or “Push” groups of hamstring tendon harvesting. All other operative techniques were uniform. A total of 34 (cut = 20, push = 14) patients had a mean follow-up of 30 months, and assessments were conducted by a blinded single practitioner. A customized hamstring strain questionnaire and visual analogue pain score provided information for the study's primary focus: evaluation of postoperative hamstring pain and muscle strains. Leg flexion strength was also measured and a full knee assessment was conducted. The Cincinnati sports activity rating scale (SARS) was used to account for varying degrees of sporting participation and intensity since reconstruction. The “Cut” group's mean visual analogue score was 10.05 mm, significantly lower than the “Push” group (24.66 mm, p = 0.0398). The Cut group also recorded a significant reduction in the incidence of hamstring strains following ACL reconstruction (5/20 patients 25%) compared with the Push group (7/14 patients 50%, p = 0.045). There was no difference in leg flexion strength between the groups. Of the patients who reported hamstring strains, there was no significant difference in the mean Cincinnati SARS between the groups, nor any difference in overall knee function. The incidence of hamstring pain and muscle strains was significantly reduced in patients receiving the “cut” technique of harvesting hamstring tendons in ACL reconstruction surgery, a difference that was not attributable to a lower level of sporting activity.

Keywords

ACL reconstruction - hamstring graft - hamstring strains - muscle pain - donor site morbidity
 

  • References

  • 1 Brown Jr CH, Steiner ME, Carson EW. The use of hamstring tendons for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Technique and results. Clin Sports Med 1993; 12 (4) 723-756
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Hiemstra LA, Webber S, MacDonald PB, Kriellaars DJ. Knee strength deficits after hamstring tendon and patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32 (8) 1472-1479 Aug.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Kartus J, Movin T, Karlsson J. Donor-site morbidity and anterior knee problems after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autografts. Arthroscopy 2001; 17 (9) 971-980
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Weiler A, Hoffmann RF, Stähelin AC, Bail HJ, Siepe CJ, Südkamp NP. Hamstring tendon fixation using interference screws: a biomechanical study in calf tibial bone. Arthroscopy 1998; 14 (1) 29-37
    Google Scholar
  • 5 West RV, Harner CD. Graft selection in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2005; 13 (3) 197-207 May-Jun
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Keays SL, Bullock-Saxton J, Keays AC, Newcombe P. Muscle strength and function before and after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using semitendonosus and gracilis. Knee 2001; 8 (3) 229-234 Oct
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Kramer J, Nusca D, Fowler P, Webster-Bogaert S. Knee flexor and extensor strength during concentric and eccentric muscle actions after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the semitendinosus tendon and ligament augmentation device. Am J Sports Med 1993; 21 (2) 285-291
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Marder RA, Raskind JR, Carroll M. Prospective evaluation of arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Patellar tendon versus semitendinosus and gracilis tendons. Am J Sports Med 1991; 19 (5) 478-484
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Nakamura N, Horibe S, Sasaki S , et al. Evaluation of active knee flexion and hamstring strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendons. Arthroscopy 2002; 18 (6) 598-602
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Heijne A, Werner S. A 2-year follow-up of rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction using patellar tendon or hamstring tendon grafts: a prospective randomised outcome study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2010; 18 (6) 805-813
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Ageberg E, Roos HP, Silbernagel KG, Thomeé R, Roos EM. Knee extension and flexion muscle power after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon graft or hamstring tendons graft: a cross-sectional comparison 3 years post surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2009; 17 (2) 162-169
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Ardern CL, Webster KE, Taylor NF, Feller JA. Hamstring strength recovery after hamstring tendon harvest for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison between graft types. Arthroscopy 2010; 26 (4) 462-469
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Giron F, Aglietti P, Cuomo P, Mondanelli N, Ciardullo A. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with double-looped semitendinosus and gracilis tendon graft directly fixed to cortical bone: 5-year results. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2005; 13 (2) 81-91 Mar
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Marcacci M, Zaffagnini S, Iacono F , et al. Intra- and extra-articular anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction utilizing autogeneous semitendinosus and gracilis tendons: 5-year clinical results. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2003; 11 (1) 2-8 Jan.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Ohkoshi Y, Inoue C, Yamane S, Hashimoto T, Ishida R. Changes in muscle strength properties caused by harvesting of autogenous semitendinosus tendon for reconstruction of contralateral anterior cruciate ligament. Arthroscopy 1998; 14 (6) 580-584 Sept
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Simonian PT, Harrison SD, Cooley VJ, Escabedo EM, Deneka DA, Larson RV. Assessment of morbidity of semitendinosus and gracilis tendon harvest for ACL reconstruction. Am J Knee Surg 1997; 10 (2) 54-59 Spring
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Scranton Jr PE, Bagenstose JE, Lantz BA, Friedman MJ, Khalfayan EE, Auld MK. Quadruple hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a multicenter study. Arthroscopy 2002; 18 (7) 715-724
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Verrall GM, Slavotinek JP, Barnes PG, Fon GT, Spriggins AJ. Clinical risk factors for hamstring muscle strain injury: a prospective study with correlation of injury by magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Sports Med 2001; 35 (6) 435-439 , discussion 440
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Elliott MC, Zarins B, Powell JW, Kenyon CD. Hamstring muscle strains in professional football players: a 10-year review. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39 (4) 843-850
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 de Visser HM, Reijman M, Heijboer MP, Bos PK. Risk factors of recurrent hamstring injuries: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med 2012; 46 (2) 124-130
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Feller JA, Webster KE. A randomized comparison of patellar tendon and hamstring tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2003; 31 (4) 564-573
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Anderson A, Clancy W, Daniel D , et al. (1993). Knee Ligament Standard Evaluation Score. International Knee Documentation Committee.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Lysholm J, Tegner Y. Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop 1982; 198: 43-49
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain. Lancet 1974; 2 (7889) 1127-1131
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Brukner P, Khan K. Clinical Sports Medicine. 2nd ed. Sydney, Australia: McGraw-Hill; 2003
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Cross MJ, Roger G, Kujawa P, Anderson IF. Regeneration of the semitendinosus and gracilis tendons following their transection for repair of the anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 1992; 20 (2) 221-223
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Ma CB, Keifa E, Dunn W, Fu FH, Harner CD. Can pre-operative measures predict quadruple hamstring graft diameter?. Knee 2010; 17 (1) 81-83
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Boisvert CB, Aubin ME, DeAngelis N. Relationship between anthropometric measurements and hamstring autograft diameter in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Orthop 2011; 40 (6) 293-295
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Eriksson K . (2001). Thesis: On the semitendinosus tendon in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Karolinska Institutet. Pp 5–43
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Eriksson K, Hamberg P, Jansson E, Larsson H, Shalabi A, Wredmark T. Semitendinosus muscle in ACL surgery: Morphology and function. Arthroscopy 2001; 17 (8) 808-817
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Eriksson K, Kindblom LG, Hamberg P, Larsson H, Wredmark T. The semitendinosus tendon regenerates after resection: a morphologic and MRI analysis in 6 patients after resection for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Acta Orthop Scand 2001; 72 (4) 379-384
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Eriksson K, Larsson H, Wredmark T, Hamberg P. Semitendinosus tendon regeneration after harvesting for ACL reconstruction. A prospective MRI study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1999; 7 (4) 220-225
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Papandrea P, Vulpiani MC, Ferretti A, Conteduca F. Regeneration of the semitendinosus tendon harvested for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Evaluation using ultrasonography. Am J Sports Med 2000; 28 (4) 556-561 Jul/Aug
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Rispoli DM, Sanders TG, Miller MD, Morrison WB. Magnetic resonance imaging at different time periods following hamstring harvest for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2001; 17 (1) 2-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Irie K, Tomatsu T. Atrophy of semitzendinosus and gracilis and flexor mechanism function after hamstring tendon harvest for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Orthopedics 2002; 25 (5) 491-495
    PubMedGoogle Scholar