Download PDF
Endoscopy 2013; 45(04): 292-295
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1326286
Endoscopy essentials
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Small-bowel enteroscopy

L. B. Gerson
  Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Redwood City, California, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
25 February 2013 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints
Endoscopy Essentials

Reviews in the Endoscopy Essentials series cite publications from the past year which, in the authors’ opinion, reflect the state-of-the-art in endoscopy. Alongside a short summary of each paper, authors explain why they consider their selected articles to be of importance.

 

  • References

  • 1 Sanaka MR, Navaneethan U, Kosuru B et al. Antegrade is more effective than retrograde enteroscopy for evaluation and management of suspected small-bowel disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 10: 910-916
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Pasha SF, Leighton JA, Das A et al. Double-balloon enteroscopy and capsule endoscopy have comparable diagnostic yield in small-bowel disease: a meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 6: 671-676
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Teshima CW, Kuipers EJ, van Zanten SV et al. Double balloon enteroscopy and capsule endoscopy for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: an updated meta-analysis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 26: 796-801
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Gerson LB, Batenic MA, Newsom SL et al. Long-term outcomes after double-balloon enteroscopy for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009; 7: 664-669
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Yamamoto H, Kita H, Sunada K et al. Clinical outcomes of double-balloon endoscopy for the diagnosis and treatment of small-intestinal diseases. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 2: 1010-1016
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Messer I, May A, Manner H et al. Prospective, randomized, single-center trial comparing double-balloon enteroscopy and spiral enteroscopy in patients with suspected small-bowel disorders. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 241-249
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 May A, Manner H, Aschmoneit I et al. Prospective, cross-over, single-center trial comparing oral double-balloon enteroscopy and oral spiral enteroscopy in patients with suspected small-bowel vascular malformations. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 477-483
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 May A, Nachbar L, Schneider M et al. Push-and-pull enteroscopy using the double-balloon technique: method of assessing depth of insertion and training of the enteroscopy technique using the Erlangen Endo-Trainer. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 66-70
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Akerman PA, Agrawal D, Cantero D et al. Spiral enteroscopy with the new DSB overtube: a novel technique for deep peroral small-bowel intubation. Endoscopy 2008; 40: 974-978
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 May A, Farber M, Aschmoneit I et al. Prospective multicenter trial comparing push-and-pull enteroscopy with the single- and double-balloon techniques in patients with small-bowel disorders. Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105: 575-581
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Samaha E, Rahmi G, Landi B et al. Long-term outcome of patients treated with double balloon enteroscopy for small bowel vascular lesions. Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107: 240-246
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Cirulli A, Liso A, D’Ovidio F et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor serum levels are elevated in patients with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia. Acta Haematol 2003; 110: 29-32
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Veyradier A, Balian A, Wolf M et al. Abnormal von Willebrand factor in bleeding angiodysplasias of the digestive tract. Gastroenterology 2001; 120: 346-353
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Arakawa D, Ohmiya N, Nakamura M et al. Outcome after enteroscopy for patients with obscure GI bleeding: diagnostic comparison between double-balloon endoscopy and videocapsule endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 866-874
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Nardone G, Rocco A, Balzano T et al. The efficacy of octreotide therapy in chronic bleeding due to vascular abnormalities of the gastrointestinal tract. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1999; 13: 1429-1436
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Ge ZZ, Chen HM, Gao YJ et al. Efficacy of thalidomide for refractory gastrointestinal bleeding from vascular malformation. Gastroenterology 2011; 141: 1629-1637
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Williamson JB, Judah JR, Gaidos JK et al. Prospective evaluation of the long-term outcomes after deep small-bowel spiral enteroscopy in patients with obscure GI bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 771-778
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Shinozaki S, Yamamoto H, Yano T et al. Long-term outcome of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding investigated by double-balloon endoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 8: 151-158
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Robinson CA, Jackson C, Condon D et al. Impact of inpatient status and gender on small-bowel capsule endoscopy findings. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 1061-1066
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Efthymiou M, Desmond PV, Brown G et al. SINGLE-01: a randomized, controlled trial comparing the efficacy and depth of insertion of single- and double-balloon enteroscopy by using a novel method to determine insertion depth. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 972-980
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Takano N, Yamada A, Watabe H et al. Single-balloon versus double-balloon endoscopy for achieving total enteroscopy: a randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 734-739
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Domagk D, Mensink P, Aktas H et al. Single- vs. double-balloon enteroscopy in small-bowel diagnostics: a randomized multicenter trial. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 472-476
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar