Key words
breast - optical imaging - hemodynamic changes
Introduction
In Western societies breast cancer is the most common malignancy in females [1].
The size of the primary tumor closely correlates with the presence of metastatic disease,
and the prognosis of women with breast cancer is better the earlier the cancer is
detected [2]
[3]
[4]
[5]. An imaging test for breast cancer should therefore detect lesions early, when they
are still small. Moreover, the method should have sufficient specificity to reduce
the need for additional diagnostic tests. All currently available imaging modalities
have limitations, fueling the search for alternative techniques.
Optical near-infrared (NIR) imaging of the breast is one of several diagnostic approaches
that have been pursued to improve the diagnosis of breast cancer [6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]. While established techniques for breast imaging, including mammography, ultrasound
and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), mainly rely on the assessment of morphology,
optical imaging also provides physiologic information, including information at the
cellular and molecular level [15]
[16]. The hemoglobin concentration, oxygen saturation, and water and collagen content
of the breast can be evaluated using optical imaging. Optical imaging therefore has
the potential to become a valuable alternative or adjunct to established breast imaging
modalities [17]
[18].
Optical methods were first used to visualize breast cancer in the 1920 s, but these
attempts ultimately failed. The method was abandoned until the advent of diffuse optical
imaging (DOI), which rekindled interest in optical imaging, giving rise to promising
developments in recent years. Optical imaging can be performed employing endogenous
contrast or exogenous contrast such as indocyanine green (ICG). DOI without the use
of exogenous dyes most commonly measures contrasts resulting from differences in oxyhemoglobin
and deoxyhemoglobin concentrations. These two redox forms of hemoglobin are the strong
absorbers of NIR light in biological tissues, and this fact can be used to identify
tissues with increased hemoglobin concentrations, such as tissues with malignant angiogenesis
[19].
Initial work on DOI aimed at improving the spatial resolution of static tissue contrasts,
while recently there has been an increasing interest in functional imaging. The NIRx
system we use at our department additionally allows highly time-resolved acquisition
and allows for rapid measurement of hemodynamic changes over time. A possible approach
for improving breast cancer detection by DOI uses differences in the hemodynamic response
to changes in intrathoracic pressure between malignant and normal breast tissue. The
feasibility of this concept has been shown in studies of a few patients [20]
[21].
The aim of our study was to verify these initial observations in a prospective patient
population and to test whether DOI using Valsalva maneuver can help in detecting breast
cancer and differentiating between malignant and benign breast lesions.
Materials and Method
The prospective study was approved by the ethics committee of our institution. Women
with a suspicious finding at breast imaging that was confirmed by subsequent biopsy
were included after giving written informed consent. Breast ultrasound was performed
in all patients, mammography in 29 cases, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of
the breast in 25 women. Histological workup was performed after imaging. The exclusion
criteria were breast biopsy within six week before optical imaging was scheduled,
focal lesion near the chest wall, and history of breast cancer with suspected ipsilateral
recurrence.
Between November 2008 and December 2009, a total of 30 women underwent optical imaging.
They had a mean age of 53 years (range, 28 – 78 years). Histopathology of biopsy specimens
demonstrated a malignant breast lesion in 19 cases and a benign lesion in 11 cases.
Diffuse optical imaging was performed using a DYNOT 232 tomographic system from NIRx
Medizintechnik GmbH (Berlin, Germany). The system has been described in detail elsewhere
[6]. Briefly, the DYNOT 232 is a continuous-wave system that uses near infrared light
at two wavelengths, 760 and 830 nm. The frequency-modulated light is emitted into
the breast tissue by means of 31 optodes, which can both emit and detect light. This
results in a total of 961 source-detector combinations – so-called optical channels
– each of which is read out once approx. every 500 ms. Using the DYNOT system, the
entire breast volume is thus sampled at a rate of about 2 Hz. The optodes are mounted
on a rigid, breast-shaped plastic cup arranged in four concentric rings, and protrusion
of the fibers allows adjustment to individual breast size. The breast cup is integrated
into an aperture of the patient table and can be horizontally and vertically adjusted.
For optical imaging, the patient is positioned prone with the breast to be imaged
hanging into the optode holder through the table aperture. After attachment of the
light-guiding fibers and a short automatic calibration step, the breast is scanned
at rest (baseline). This step takes approx. 5 min, during which the patient is requested
to lie still. The baseline scan is followed by imaging during increased intrathoracic
pressure induced by three Valsalva breathing maneuvers. The commands for the Valsalva
maneuvers are given at intervals of 2 min. The Valsalva maneuver involves forced expiration
against a closed mouth and nose for 15 sec. Before the examination, the maneuver was
explained in detail and practiced with the patient. Optical measurement was performed
continuously for a total period of approx. 15 min.
The acquired raw data sets were preprocessed using the NAVI software package (NIRx
Medical Technologies, LLC. (NY, USA)). First, the data were smoothed with a low-pass
filter of 0.15 Hz to minimize motion artifacts and high-frequency noise. Optical channels
with a variation coefficient of more than 25 % in the baseline examination were excluded
from the reconstruction process. The data were then automatically reconstructed by
the NAVI software as temporally resolved three-dimensional volumes of changes in the
concentrations of oxygenated and deoxygenated hemoglobin relative to baseline concentrations.
In this process, the breast volume is represented by a finite-element grid with 2243
nodes, which is the same for all patients and which was then interpolated to 14,000
isometric volume cubes (voxels) for display and data export. For further evaluation,
the extracted time course of relative hemoglobin changes in each voxel of the breast
volume during the second Valsalva maneuver was analyzed using customized Matlab scripts
(The Mathworks, Inc., Natick, USA). The time courses were additionally filtered with
a 0.07 Hz low-pass Butterworth filter and normalized to the maximum of the mean time
course of each patient to account for inter-subject variability in overall signal
intensity. A signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was calculated for every voxel as the quotient
of the signal intensity at the maximum of the mean time course and the standard deviation
over the baseline period. Voxels with SNR< 1 were excluded from further analysis and
mapping. Regions of interest (ROIs) were manually selected in the approximated location
of the lesion corresponding to palpation and MRI or mammography. The parameters determined
from each time course included full width at half maximum (FWHM), peak amplitude (PA),
and time to ten (TTT), [Fig. 1]. To overcome inter-subject variability in overall blood flow, the reference time
point t = 0 was set to the zero of the linear regression of the increasing slope of
the mean time course of each breast. The PA was measured from the minimum (base point)
of the increasing slope. For display, the mean time courses in the ROI and the residual
benign tissue were vertically aligned at the base point ([Fig. 1], [2], [3], [4]). Each of the three calculated parameters was color-coded and displayed in two planes
of the breast (craniocaudal and mediolateral-oblique planes, similar to mammograms)
([Fig. 5], [6], [7]).
Fig. 1 Visualization of an exemplary calculation of the three different parameters full
width at half maximum (FWHM), time to ten (TTT), and peak amplitude (PA).
Abb. 1 Modell einer exemplarischen Berechnung der 3 verschiedenen Parameter Full Width at
Half Maximum (FWHM), Time to Ten (TTT) und Peak Amplitude (PA).
Fig. 2 Individual time curves for patients with a malignant breast lesion (n = 10): Mean
time curve over the malignant lesion (ROI, solid lines) and benign surrounding breast
parenchyma (dashed lines) for oxygenated (red) and deoxygenated (blue) hemoglobin,
respectively.
Abb. 2 Individuelle Zeitkurven für Patienten mit malignen Brustläsionen (n = 10):Gemittelte
Zeitkurve über die maligne Läsioen (ROI, durchgezogene Linien) und benignes Umgebungsgewebe
(gestrichelte Linien) für oxygeniertes (rot) und desoxygeniertes (blau) Hämoglobin.
Fig. 3 Mean time curves with standard error of mean of 10 malignant lesions and surrounding
benign breast parenchyma (black) for oxygenated (left, red) and deoxygenated (right,
blue) hemoglobin, respectively. FWHM values are depicted with dashed lines.
Abb. 3 Gemittelte Zeitkurven mit mittlerer Standardabweichung von 10 malignen Läsionen und
benignem Umgebungsgewebe (schwarz) für oxygeniertes (links, rot) und desoxygeniertes
(rechts, blau) Hämoglobin. FWHM-Werte sind durch gestrichelte Linien gekennzeichnet.
Fig. 4 Mean time curves with standard error of mean of benign lesions and surrounding benign
breast parenchyma (black) for oxygenated (left, red) and deoxygenated (right, blue)
hemoglobin, respectively. FWHM values are depicted with dashed lines.
Abb. 4 Gemittelte Zeitkurven mit mittlerer Standardabweichung von benignen Läsionen und
benignem Umgebungsgewebe (schwarz) für oxygeniertes (links, rot) und desoxygeniertes
(rechts, blau) Hämoglobin. FWHM-Werte sind durch gestrichelte Linien gekennzeichnet.
Fig. 5 Patient with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) with a maximum diameter of 27 mm. a Mammography in superoinferior and mediolateral planes. b, c Optical mammography. FWHM of oxygenated hemoglobin b and FWHM of deoxygenated hemoglobin c. The color scale represents relative differences in hemoglobin concentrations in
arbitrary units.
Abb. 5 Patientin mit IDC (invasiv duktales Karzinom) mit einem maximalen Durchmesser von
27 mm. a Mammografie in kraniokaudaler und mediolateraler Ausrichtung; optische Tomografie.
b FWHM-Modell bei oxygeniertem Hämoglobin. c FWHM-Modell bei oxygeniertem Hämoglobin. Die Farbskala gibt die Hämoglobinkonzentrationsunterschiede
farbkodiert wieder.
Fig. 6 Patient with IDC with a maximum diameter of 26 mm. a Contrast-enhanced MRI. b Optical imaging with display of the peak amplitude (PA) of oxygenated hemoglobin
changes. The color scale represents differences in hemoglobin concentrations.
Abb. 6 Patientin mit IDC (invasiv duktales Mammakarzinom) mit einem maximalen Durchmesser
von 26 mm. a Kontrastmittelgestützte MRT. b Optische Tomografie mit PA-Modell bei oxygeniertem Hämoglobin. Die Farbskala gibt
die Hämoglobinkonzentrationsunterschiede farbkodiert wieder.
Fig. 7 Patient with DCIS of the left breast (maximal diameter: 80 mm). a Imponing as hypervasculated lesion in the MRI; b corresponding focal region in the TTT analysis where 10 % of the maximum amplitude
are reached sooner.
Abb. 7 Patientin mit DCIS der linken Brust (maximaler Diameter: 80 mm). a In der MRT als hypervaskularisierte Läsion imponierend. b Korrespondierende fokale Region in der TTT-Auswertung, bei der 10 % des Amplitudenmaximums
schneller erreicht werden.
These parametric maps were evaluated separately and in a blinded fashion by a radiologist
and a nuclear medicine specialist, both with breast imaging experience. The results
were documented using a standardized evaluation form. The readers had the following
options: predefined lesion present (yes/no) for assessment of sensitivity; additional
lesions present (yes/no) for assessment of specificity; and visibility score of predefined
lesion (not visible; visible but poorer color contrast compared with other lesions;
visible color contrast comparable to that of other lesions; visible).
Statistical analysis was performed using PASW (IBM, USA) including an ROC analysis
and a concordance analysis using Cohen’s kappa.
Results
The raw optical imaging data of 10 of the 30 patients examined showed severe artifacts
(motion artifacts due to interruption of skin-fiber coupling) or inadequate Valsalva
maneuver. As a result, only twenty patients were included in the analysis, ten with
benign breast lesions (six fibroadenomas [24 mm, 10 – 52 mm]; three fibrocystic changes;
one pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia, [44 mm]) and ten patients with malignant
lesions (six invasive ductal carcinomas [24 mm, 8 – 40 mm]; one ductal carcinoma in
situ [80 mm]; two metaplastic carcinomas [19 mm, 37 mm]; one T-cell lymphoma [35 mm]).
In the patients included in the analysis, an adequately performed Valsalva maneuver
resulted in a marked increase in light absorption in all cases ([Fig. 2], [3], [4]). This corresponded to a marked increase in reconstructed relative concentrations
of oxygenated and deoxygenated hemoglobin in breast tissue compared to baseline concentrations.
The detection rates achieved by the two readers ranged from 50 % to 90 % ([Table 1], [Fig. 5], [6]). The detection rate was highest (90 %, 80 %) for the analysis of the PA of oxygenated
hemoglobin and lowest for TTT analysis of both oxygenated (60 %, 50 %) and deoxygenated
hemoglobin (60 %, 60 %).
Table 1
Detection rate of predefined malignant lesions (n = 10).
Tab. 1 Detektionsraten prädefinierter maligner Läsionen (n = 10).
|
parameter
|
form of hemoglobin
|
reader
|
detection of malignant lesions (n = 10)
|
concordance
|
|
TTT
|
oxyhemoglobin
|
1
|
60 %
|
0.800
|
|
2
|
50 %
|
|
deoxyhemoglobin
|
1
|
60 %
|
0.583
|
|
2
|
60 %
|
|
FWHM
|
oxyhemoglobin
|
1
|
70 %
|
1.000
|
|
2
|
70 %
|
|
deoxyhemoglobin
|
1
|
70 %
|
0.524
|
|
2
|
60 %
|
|
PA
|
oxyhemoglobin
|
1
|
90 %
|
0.615
|
|
2
|
80 %
|
|
deoxyhemoglobin
|
1
|
80 %
|
0.737
|
|
2
|
70 %
|
False-positive classifications of predefined benign lesions were least common for
the evaluation of FWHM (14.3 %, 14.3 %) but much higher for the other two parameters
([Table 2]). Additional lesions were most commonly identified when PA was used (80 % and 90 %
of cases). The detection of additional lesions was lower for TTT and FWHM (60 – 65 %
and 55 – 70 %, respectively). If one interpreted the detection of additional lesions
as the method’s specificity, PA analysis by the second reader would yield a specificity
of less than 10 %, for instance. Concordance between the two readers for the detection
of the predefined lesion and for the detection of additional lesions was moderate
to satisfactory (0.479 to 1).
Table 2
Predefined benign breast lesions classified as false positive (n = 7) and additional
false-positive lesions.
Tab. 2 Prädefinierte benigne Läsionen, die als falsch positiv klassifiziert wurden (n = 7),
und falsch positive Zusatzläsionen.
|
parameter
|
form of hemoglobin
|
reader
|
detection of benign lesions (n = 7)
|
concordance
|
additional lesions in all patients (n = 20)
|
concordance
|
|
TTT
|
oxyhemoglobin
|
1
|
57.1 %
|
0.696
|
65 %
|
0.560
|
|
2
|
71.4 %
|
65 %
|
|
deoxyhemoglobin
|
1
|
14.3 %
|
0.364
|
60 %
|
0.681
|
|
2
|
42.9 %
|
65 %
|
|
FWHM
|
oxyhemoglobin
|
1
|
14.3 %
|
1.000
|
65 %
|
0.681
|
|
2
|
14.3 %
|
60 %
|
|
deoxyhemoglobin
|
1
|
57.1 %
|
0.364
|
70 %
|
0.479
|
|
2
|
85.7 %
|
55 %
|
|
PA
|
oxyhemoglobin
|
1
|
71.4 %
|
0.588
|
80 %
|
0.615
|
|
2
|
85.7 %
|
90 %
|
|
deoxyhemoglobin
|
1
|
100 %
|
n/a
|
85 %
|
1.000
|
|
2
|
85.7 %
|
n/a
|
85 %
|
ROC analysis revealed AUC values ranging from 0.393 – 0.779 ([Table 3]). None of the parameters analyzed differed significantly from random probability.
The highest AUC value was identified for FWHM analysis of oxyhemoglobin concentrations,
which tended to be above the 50 % chance level and almost reached statistical significance
(p < 0.057).
Table 3
AUC analysis in 17 lesions (10 malignant/7 benign lesions).
Tab. 3 AUC-Analyse von 17 Läsionen (10 maligne/7 benigne Läsionen).
|
parameter
|
form of hemoglobin
|
reader
|
AUC
|
significance
|
|
TTT
|
oxyhemoglobin
|
1
|
0.514
|
0.922
|
|
2
|
0.393
|
0.464
|
|
deoxyhemoglobin
|
1
|
0.729
|
0.118
|
|
2
|
0.586
|
0.558
|
|
FWHM
|
oxyhemoglobin
|
1
|
0.779
|
0.057
|
|
2
|
0.779
|
0.057
|
|
deoxyhemoglobin
|
1
|
0.564
|
0.661
|
|
2
|
0.421
|
0.591
|
|
PA
|
oxyhemoglobin
|
1
|
0.593
|
0.526
|
|
2
|
0.471
|
0.495
|
|
deoxyhemoglobin
|
1
|
0.400
|
0.845
|
|
2
|
0.421
|
0.591
|
Analysis of lesion visibility showed that the optimal situation of a clear-cut lesion,
i. e., one that dominates other lesions in the breast parenchyma, is only present
in 20 – 40 % of patients with breast cancer ([Table 4]).
Table 4
Visibility of predefined malignant lesions (n = 10) based on visual scores (VS): I,
predefined lesion not visible; II, predefined lesion visible but poorer color contrast
compared with other lesions; III, predefined lesion visible with color contrast comparable
to that of other lesions; IV, predefined lesion dominates the display.
Tab. 4 Sichtbarkeit prädefinierter maligner Läsionen (n = 10), basierend auf den Visual
Scores (VS): I: prädefinierte Läsion nicht sichtbar; II, prädefinierte Läsionen sichtbar,
aber schwächerer Farbkontrast verglichen mit anderen Läsionen; III, prädefinierte
Läsionen sichtbar mit Farbkontrast, vergleichbar mit anderen Läsionen; IV, prädefinierte
Läsionen dominieren die Aufnahme.
|
parameter
|
form of hemoglobin
|
reader
|
VS I
|
VS II
|
VS III
|
VS IV
|
concordance
|
|
TTT
|
oxyhemoglobin
|
1
|
40 %
|
20 %
|
20 %
|
20 %
|
0.571
|
|
2
|
50 %
|
0 %
|
10 %
|
40 %
|
|
deoxyhemoglobin
|
1
|
40 %
|
10 %
|
20 %
|
30 %
|
0.565
|
|
2
|
40 %
|
10 %
|
10 %
|
40 %
|
|
FWHM
|
oxyhemoglobin
|
1
|
30 %
|
30 %
|
20 %
|
20 %
|
0.467
|
|
2
|
30 %
|
20 %
|
0 %
|
50 %
|
|
deoxyhemoglobin
|
1
|
30 %
|
20 %
|
20 %
|
30 %
|
0.444
|
|
2
|
30 %
|
0 %
|
20 %
|
50 %
|
|
PA
|
oxyhemoglobin
|
1
|
10 %
|
50 %
|
20 %
|
20 %
|
0.146
|
|
2
|
20 %
|
0 %
|
60 %
|
20 %
|
|
deoxyhemoglobin
|
1
|
20 %
|
20 %
|
40 %
|
20 %
|
0.737
|
|
2
|
30 %
|
20 %
|
20 %
|
30 %
|
Discussion
Over the last 20 to 30 years, many countries have introduced screening programs to
reduce breast cancer mortality. In Germany, for example, breast cancer screening was
introduced in 2006 [22]
[23]
[24]. The wider use of imaging modalities in the screening setting has also led to a
greater awareness of the advantages and disadvantages of each imaging modality. Mammography
is still the gold standard of breast imaging. However, it exposes women to ionizing
radiation and can induce radiogenic DNA changes, which in turn may cause carcinogenic
mutations [25]. MRI involves no radiation exposure and has the highest sensitivity of all imaging
modalities used for breast cancer detection. However, its specificity is relatively
poor [26]. MRI is still too expensive for use as a screening modality. Breast ultrasound is
inexpensive but highly examiner-dependent [27], and it has very limited diagnostic accuracy in breast examinations [28].
Widely accepted advantages of optical imaging include the absence of radiation exposure
and its relatively low cost [20] based on the relatively low investment cost of the components required to perform
optical imaging.
Some studies use an extrinsic contrast agent such as ICG or Omocianine as a dye to
enhance contrasts in optical imaging [6]
[29]. The possible advantages of using extrinsic contrast make optical imaging more complex
and may represent a disadvantage for its use as a screening tool, which should be
very easy to handle. Interestingly, the signal change measured after an adequately
performed Valsalva maneuver is comparable to the change in absorption seen after bolus
administration of 25 mg of the extrinsic dye ICG [6].
For use in screening programs, it would be desirable to perform optical imaging without
using an extrinsic dye. Breast screening requires not only high sensitivity but also
high specificity to avoid too many false-positive results, which could lead to invasive
interventions [30]. Summarizing prior studies according to Grosenick et al. it seems unlikely that
this goal will be reached by optical mammography based on intrinsic contrast alone
in a conceivable time [30]. In an attempt to overcome the previous limitations, we tried a new approach amplifying
the intrinsic contrast with a Valsalva maneuver in our study.
Near-infrared imaging using intrinsic contrasts can exploit differences in hemoglobin
concentrations resulting from the abnormal vascular architecture of neoangiogenic
vessels to identify malignant tumors [20]. Tumor vessels are disorganized, functionally abnormal, and hyperpermeable [31]. How this affects hemodynamics is still largely unknown and may be expected to differ
among tumor types. Some authors assume that resistance to blood flow is increased
in a malignant tumor resulting in sluggish changes in blood flow [20]
[32]
[33]. Following a Valsalva maneuver it is expected that the increase in hemoglobin concentration
lasts longer in the tumorous area compared to benign tissue.
Other investigators attach more importance to an increased vascular density in tumors,
which may underlie the high perfusion of some tumor entities [34]
[35]. As a result, malignant lesions show a faster amplitude increase following administration
of an extrinsic contrast agent, while benign lesions such as fibroadenomas will show
delayed enhancement [36].
A delayed response to changes in blood flow in malignant tumors is expected to result
in a greater full width at half maximum. Among the parameters analyzed in our study,
FWHM had the highest AUC value, and the p-value almost reached statistical significance.
The assumption of higher vascular density and short circuits in malignant tumors,
leading to higher perfusion of the tumor might correspond with changes in the magnitude
of the peak amplitude and its slope. However, in our study, neither analysis using
PA or TTT resulted in a lesion detection rate that was significantly different from
random probability.
Overall, the detection rates we achieved using the DYNOT 232 system are comparable
to the detection rates reported for optical imaging in other studies, which are on
the order of 85 % [37]. In a study investigating optical imaging of the breast with the contrast agent
ICG, Schneider et al. reached a sensitivity of 85.7 % and a specificity of 87.5 %
for malignant lesions with a time-to-peak-based analysis of the amplitude of the increasing
signal after ICG injection [6]. Using Omocianine-enhanced optical mammography in the fluorescence mode, Poellinger
et al. reached a detection rate of 55.6 % for all dose groups, with detection rates
of up to 100 % for special dose groups [19]. The rate of false-positive lesions was 17.6 %. In the absorption mode the detection
rate for malignant target lesions was 44.4 %. The false-positive rate for benign lesions
was 11.8 %. In another study using ICG, Poellinger et al. analyzed optical mammography
in the fluorescence mode and achieved a mean sensitivity of 92 % and a mean specificity
of 75 % [29].
A considerable drawback of using the Valsalva maneuver is that there is very wide
interindividual variation in how it is performed. In our study, each patient was instructed
carefully and practiced the maneuver repeatedly before being examined. Nevertheless,
one-third of the examinations were not analyzable due to signal artifacts and inadequate
Valsalva maneuvers. In some patients, inspiratory motion might have resulted in detachment
of the optodes from the skin. In other patients, we did not observe the expected increase
in oxyhemoglobin and deoxyhemoglobin but instead saw a signal drop, suggesting that
Valsalva maneuvers induced a decrease rather than increase in intrathoracic pressure.
It appears very difficult to standardize Valsalva maneuvers. A standardized analysis
of all patients including patients with inadequately performed Valsalva maneuver would
lead to a significant decrease in sensitivity, since tumors in these patients could
not be visualized correctly. Also, the overall specificity could become worse.
If we only look at the patients with analyzable examinations, the sensitivity appears
to be acceptable. However, the rate of false-positive additional lesions is unacceptably
high. These false-positive lesions result in extremely low specificities (roughly
estimated < 10 %). The appearance of many circumscribed regions with larger FWHM and
increased peak amplitude or short TTT within the breast suggests that the delayed
hemodynamic response and increase in amplitude assumed to suggest malignant breast
lesions does not appear to be confined to malignant breast tissue.
The two studies suggesting that the hemodynamic changes induced by Valsalva maneuver
have potential for contributing to the detection of malignant breast lesions also
used the NIRx tomography system. Different from our study, however, both of these
studies imaged both breasts simultaneously. In their feasibility study, Schmitz et
al. used 32 emission and detection optodes and two wavelengths (760 nm and 830 nm).
Flexman et al. used 32 emission and 64 detector optodes and also two wavelengths (765 nm
and 835 nm), investigating two patients with breast cancer and one healthy woman.
The imaging data were processed using a threshold for changes in hemoglobin as a basis
for three-dimensional visualization. Using individual thresholds – 4 % hemoglobin
change in one woman and 18 % change in the other woman – the authors identified breast
cancer and showed that no increase in hemoglobin occurred during the maneuver in the
healthy control subject. Schmitz et al. found a higher hemoglobin concentration in
malignant areas compared to the contralateral healthy breast and non-diseased tissue
in the tumor-bearing breast. The increase persisted for some time after the Valsalva
maneuver. As a result, the return to the baseline hemoglobin concentration was markedly
delayed in areas of breast cancer compared with the healthy breast.
Our study investigated changes in hemodynamics in a larger group of patients for the
first time. The images generated by optical tomography were analyzed by two blinded
readers. We used a standardized approach for analysis, while Flexman et al. used individual
thresholds in their two patients and the healthy subject.
Schmitz et al. and Flexman et al. evaluated delayed return to baseline following Valsalva
maneuver for identifying breast lesions. Such a delay is also reflected in the parameters
we analyzed. FWHM is a measure of amplitude width, which means that higher values
correspond with delayed return to baseline. Nevertheless, there appear to be too many
other factors that affect hemodynamics after a Valsalva maneuver, precluding its use
for specific detection of malignant breast lesions. Moreover, the Valsalva maneuver
is subject to great interindividual variation. Schmitz et al. also mentioned that
the reliability of this parameter crucially relies on how accurately the patient can
perform the Valsalva maneuver.
Our study is limited by the fact that we performed optical imaging of only one breast.
Abnormalities in vascular architecture and hemodynamics, however, may extend far beyond
the actual lesion, also affecting adjacent healthy breast parenchyma. Our observation
that the readers in our study identified numerous additional breast lesions suggests
that even optical imaging of both breasts would not have helped in accurately locating
a lesion within the breast. A further study might investigate whether evaluation of
hemodynamics by optical imaging can differentiate the whole breasts with malignant
lesions (instead of differentiating the lesion only) from normal breasts or breasts
with benign lesions. This question cannot be answered by our study. However, in patients
with bilateral cancer, imaging of both breasts would not contribute to better detection
as no differences would be apparent.
A general limitation of the approach under investigation is that changes in vascular
function and hemodynamics in malignant breast lesions are not yet fully understood.
All we have at present are hypotheses, making it very difficult to establish valid
models for interpreting the results of optical imaging.
Conclusion
Dynamic optical NIR imaging using the Valsalva maneuver to enhance intrinsic contrast
shows acceptable sensitivity. However, due to its very low specificity, this method
does not appear to be a suitable candidate for breast imaging. A major drawback of
the method is the difficulty to standardize the Valsalva maneuver resulting in a high
number of artifacts. In a clinical setting inadequately performed Valsalva maneuvers
can lead to a decrease in sensitivity, since one-third of the performed examinations
could not be further analyzed.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under grants
R41CA096102 and R01CA066184, by the U. S. Army under grant DAMD017-03-C-0018, and
by the New York State Department of Health. Some of the devices used in this research
are a product of NIRx Medical Technologies, LLC.