Key words
breast - optical imaging - hemodynamic changes
Introduction
In Western societies breast cancer is the most common malignancy in females [1].
The size of the primary tumor closely correlates with the presence of metastatic disease, and the prognosis of women with breast cancer is better the earlier the cancer is detected [2]
[3]
[4]
[5]. An imaging test for breast cancer should therefore detect lesions early, when they are still small. Moreover, the method should have sufficient specificity to reduce the need for additional diagnostic tests. All currently available imaging modalities have limitations, fueling the search for alternative techniques.
Optical near-infrared (NIR) imaging of the breast is one of several diagnostic approaches that have been pursued to improve the diagnosis of breast cancer [6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]. While established techniques for breast imaging, including mammography, ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), mainly rely on the assessment of morphology, optical imaging also provides physiologic information, including information at the cellular and molecular level [15]
[16]. The hemoglobin concentration, oxygen saturation, and water and collagen content of the breast can be evaluated using optical imaging. Optical imaging therefore has the potential to become a valuable alternative or adjunct to established breast imaging modalities [17]
[18].
Optical methods were first used to visualize breast cancer in the 1920 s, but these attempts ultimately failed. The method was abandoned until the advent of diffuse optical imaging (DOI), which rekindled interest in optical imaging, giving rise to promising developments in recent years. Optical imaging can be performed employing endogenous contrast or exogenous contrast such as indocyanine green (ICG). DOI without the use of exogenous dyes most commonly measures contrasts resulting from differences in oxyhemoglobin and deoxyhemoglobin concentrations. These two redox forms of hemoglobin are the strong absorbers of NIR light in biological tissues, and this fact can be used to identify tissues with increased hemoglobin concentrations, such as tissues with malignant angiogenesis [19].
Initial work on DOI aimed at improving the spatial resolution of static tissue contrasts, while recently there has been an increasing interest in functional imaging. The NIRx system we use at our department additionally allows highly time-resolved acquisition and allows for rapid measurement of hemodynamic changes over time. A possible approach for improving breast cancer detection by DOI uses differences in the hemodynamic response to changes in intrathoracic pressure between malignant and normal breast tissue. The feasibility of this concept has been shown in studies of a few patients [20]
[21].
The aim of our study was to verify these initial observations in a prospective patient population and to test whether DOI using Valsalva maneuver can help in detecting breast cancer and differentiating between malignant and benign breast lesions.
Materials and Method
The prospective study was approved by the ethics committee of our institution. Women with a suspicious finding at breast imaging that was confirmed by subsequent biopsy were included after giving written informed consent. Breast ultrasound was performed in all patients, mammography in 29 cases, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast in 25 women. Histological workup was performed after imaging. The exclusion criteria were breast biopsy within six week before optical imaging was scheduled, focal lesion near the chest wall, and history of breast cancer with suspected ipsilateral recurrence.
Between November 2008 and December 2009, a total of 30 women underwent optical imaging. They had a mean age of 53 years (range, 28 – 78 years). Histopathology of biopsy specimens demonstrated a malignant breast lesion in 19 cases and a benign lesion in 11 cases.
Diffuse optical imaging was performed using a DYNOT 232 tomographic system from NIRx Medizintechnik GmbH (Berlin, Germany). The system has been described in detail elsewhere [6]. Briefly, the DYNOT 232 is a continuous-wave system that uses near infrared light at two wavelengths, 760 and 830 nm. The frequency-modulated light is emitted into the breast tissue by means of 31 optodes, which can both emit and detect light. This results in a total of 961 source-detector combinations – so-called optical channels – each of which is read out once approx. every 500 ms. Using the DYNOT system, the entire breast volume is thus sampled at a rate of about 2 Hz. The optodes are mounted on a rigid, breast-shaped plastic cup arranged in four concentric rings, and protrusion of the fibers allows adjustment to individual breast size. The breast cup is integrated into an aperture of the patient table and can be horizontally and vertically adjusted. For optical imaging, the patient is positioned prone with the breast to be imaged hanging into the optode holder through the table aperture. After attachment of the light-guiding fibers and a short automatic calibration step, the breast is scanned at rest (baseline). This step takes approx. 5 min, during which the patient is requested to lie still. The baseline scan is followed by imaging during increased intrathoracic pressure induced by three Valsalva breathing maneuvers. The commands for the Valsalva maneuvers are given at intervals of 2 min. The Valsalva maneuver involves forced expiration against a closed mouth and nose for 15 sec. Before the examination, the maneuver was explained in detail and practiced with the patient. Optical measurement was performed continuously for a total period of approx. 15 min.
The acquired raw data sets were preprocessed using the NAVI software package (NIRx Medical Technologies, LLC. (NY, USA)). First, the data were smoothed with a low-pass filter of 0.15 Hz to minimize motion artifacts and high-frequency noise. Optical channels with a variation coefficient of more than 25 % in the baseline examination were excluded from the reconstruction process. The data were then automatically reconstructed by the NAVI software as temporally resolved three-dimensional volumes of changes in the concentrations of oxygenated and deoxygenated hemoglobin relative to baseline concentrations. In this process, the breast volume is represented by a finite-element grid with 2243 nodes, which is the same for all patients and which was then interpolated to 14,000 isometric volume cubes (voxels) for display and data export. For further evaluation, the extracted time course of relative hemoglobin changes in each voxel of the breast volume during the second Valsalva maneuver was analyzed using customized Matlab scripts (The Mathworks, Inc., Natick, USA). The time courses were additionally filtered with a 0.07 Hz low-pass Butterworth filter and normalized to the maximum of the mean time course of each patient to account for inter-subject variability in overall signal intensity. A signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was calculated for every voxel as the quotient of the signal intensity at the maximum of the mean time course and the standard deviation over the baseline period. Voxels with SNR< 1 were excluded from further analysis and mapping. Regions of interest (ROIs) were manually selected in the approximated location of the lesion corresponding to palpation and MRI or mammography. The parameters determined from each time course included full width at half maximum (FWHM), peak amplitude (PA), and time to ten (TTT), [Fig. 1]. To overcome inter-subject variability in overall blood flow, the reference time point t = 0 was set to the zero of the linear regression of the increasing slope of the mean time course of each breast. The PA was measured from the minimum (base point) of the increasing slope. For display, the mean time courses in the ROI and the residual benign tissue were vertically aligned at the base point ([Fig. 1], [2], [3], [4]). Each of the three calculated parameters was color-coded and displayed in two planes of the breast (craniocaudal and mediolateral-oblique planes, similar to mammograms) ([Fig. 5], [6], [7]).
Fig. 1 Visualization of an exemplary calculation of the three different parameters full width at half maximum (FWHM), time to ten (TTT), and peak amplitude (PA).
Abb. 1 Modell einer exemplarischen Berechnung der 3 verschiedenen Parameter Full Width at Half Maximum (FWHM), Time to Ten (TTT) und Peak Amplitude (PA).
Fig. 2 Individual time curves for patients with a malignant breast lesion (n = 10): Mean time curve over the malignant lesion (ROI, solid lines) and benign surrounding breast parenchyma (dashed lines) for oxygenated (red) and deoxygenated (blue) hemoglobin, respectively.
Abb. 2 Individuelle Zeitkurven für Patienten mit malignen Brustläsionen (n = 10):Gemittelte Zeitkurve über die maligne Läsioen (ROI, durchgezogene Linien) und benignes Umgebungsgewebe (gestrichelte Linien) für oxygeniertes (rot) und desoxygeniertes (blau) Hämoglobin.
Fig. 3 Mean time curves with standard error of mean of 10 malignant lesions and surrounding benign breast parenchyma (black) for oxygenated (left, red) and deoxygenated (right, blue) hemoglobin, respectively. FWHM values are depicted with dashed lines.
Abb. 3 Gemittelte Zeitkurven mit mittlerer Standardabweichung von 10 malignen Läsionen und benignem Umgebungsgewebe (schwarz) für oxygeniertes (links, rot) und desoxygeniertes (rechts, blau) Hämoglobin. FWHM-Werte sind durch gestrichelte Linien gekennzeichnet.
Fig. 4 Mean time curves with standard error of mean of benign lesions and surrounding benign breast parenchyma (black) for oxygenated (left, red) and deoxygenated (right, blue) hemoglobin, respectively. FWHM values are depicted with dashed lines.
Abb. 4 Gemittelte Zeitkurven mit mittlerer Standardabweichung von benignen Läsionen und benignem Umgebungsgewebe (schwarz) für oxygeniertes (links, rot) und desoxygeniertes (rechts, blau) Hämoglobin. FWHM-Werte sind durch gestrichelte Linien gekennzeichnet.
Fig. 5 Patient with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) with a maximum diameter of 27 mm. a Mammography in superoinferior and mediolateral planes. b, c Optical mammography. FWHM of oxygenated hemoglobin b and FWHM of deoxygenated hemoglobin c. The color scale represents relative differences in hemoglobin concentrations in arbitrary units.
Abb. 5 Patientin mit IDC (invasiv duktales Karzinom) mit einem maximalen Durchmesser von 27 mm. a Mammografie in kraniokaudaler und mediolateraler Ausrichtung; optische Tomografie. b FWHM-Modell bei oxygeniertem Hämoglobin. c FWHM-Modell bei oxygeniertem Hämoglobin. Die Farbskala gibt die Hämoglobinkonzentrationsunterschiede farbkodiert wieder.
Fig. 6 Patient with IDC with a maximum diameter of 26 mm. a Contrast-enhanced MRI. b Optical imaging with display of the peak amplitude (PA) of oxygenated hemoglobin changes. The color scale represents differences in hemoglobin concentrations.
Abb. 6 Patientin mit IDC (invasiv duktales Mammakarzinom) mit einem maximalen Durchmesser von 26 mm. a Kontrastmittelgestützte MRT. b Optische Tomografie mit PA-Modell bei oxygeniertem Hämoglobin. Die Farbskala gibt die Hämoglobinkonzentrationsunterschiede farbkodiert wieder.
Fig. 7 Patient with DCIS of the left breast (maximal diameter: 80 mm). a Imponing as hypervasculated lesion in the MRI; b corresponding focal region in the TTT analysis where 10 % of the maximum amplitude are reached sooner.
Abb. 7 Patientin mit DCIS der linken Brust (maximaler Diameter: 80 mm). a In der MRT als hypervaskularisierte Läsion imponierend. b Korrespondierende fokale Region in der TTT-Auswertung, bei der 10 % des Amplitudenmaximums schneller erreicht werden.
These parametric maps were evaluated separately and in a blinded fashion by a radiologist and a nuclear medicine specialist, both with breast imaging experience. The results were documented using a standardized evaluation form. The readers had the following options: predefined lesion present (yes/no) for assessment of sensitivity; additional lesions present (yes/no) for assessment of specificity; and visibility score of predefined lesion (not visible; visible but poorer color contrast compared with other lesions; visible color contrast comparable to that of other lesions; visible).
Statistical analysis was performed using PASW (IBM, USA) including an ROC analysis and a concordance analysis using Cohen’s kappa.
Results
The raw optical imaging data of 10 of the 30 patients examined showed severe artifacts (motion artifacts due to interruption of skin-fiber coupling) or inadequate Valsalva maneuver. As a result, only twenty patients were included in the analysis, ten with benign breast lesions (six fibroadenomas [24 mm, 10 – 52 mm]; three fibrocystic changes; one pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia, [44 mm]) and ten patients with malignant lesions (six invasive ductal carcinomas [24 mm, 8 – 40 mm]; one ductal carcinoma in situ [80 mm]; two metaplastic carcinomas [19 mm, 37 mm]; one T-cell lymphoma [35 mm]).
In the patients included in the analysis, an adequately performed Valsalva maneuver resulted in a marked increase in light absorption in all cases ([Fig. 2], [3], [4]). This corresponded to a marked increase in reconstructed relative concentrations of oxygenated and deoxygenated hemoglobin in breast tissue compared to baseline concentrations.
The detection rates achieved by the two readers ranged from 50 % to 90 % ([Table 1], [Fig. 5], [6]). The detection rate was highest (90 %, 80 %) for the analysis of the PA of oxygenated hemoglobin and lowest for TTT analysis of both oxygenated (60 %, 50 %) and deoxygenated hemoglobin (60 %, 60 %).
Table 1
Detection rate of predefined malignant lesions (n = 10).
Tab. 1 Detektionsraten prädefinierter maligner Läsionen (n = 10).
parameter
|
form of hemoglobin
|
reader
|
detection of malignant lesions (n = 10)
|
concordance
|
TTT
|
oxyhemoglobin
|
1
|
60 %
|
0.800
|
2
|
50 %
|
deoxyhemoglobin
|
1
|
60 %
|
0.583
|
2
|
60 %
|
FWHM
|
oxyhemoglobin
|
1
|
70 %
|
1.000
|
2
|
70 %
|
deoxyhemoglobin
|
1
|
70 %
|
0.524
|
2
|
60 %
|
PA
|
oxyhemoglobin
|
1
|
90 %
|
0.615
|
2
|
80 %
|
deoxyhemoglobin
|
1
|
80 %
|
0.737
|
2
|
70 %
|
False-positive classifications of predefined benign lesions were least common for the evaluation of FWHM (14.3 %, 14.3 %) but much higher for the other two parameters ([Table 2]). Additional lesions were most commonly identified when PA was used (80 % and 90 % of cases). The detection of additional lesions was lower for TTT and FWHM (60 – 65 % and 55 – 70 %, respectively). If one interpreted the detection of additional lesions as the method’s specificity, PA analysis by the second reader would yield a specificity of less than 10 %, for instance. Concordance between the two readers for the detection of the predefined lesion and for the detection of additional lesions was moderate to satisfactory (0.479 to 1).
Table 2
Predefined benign breast lesions classified as false positive (n = 7) and additional false-positive lesions.
Tab. 2 Prädefinierte benigne Läsionen, die als falsch positiv klassifiziert wurden (n = 7), und falsch positive Zusatzläsionen.
parameter
|
form of hemoglobin
|
reader
|
detection of benign lesions (n = 7)
|
concordance
|
additional lesions in all patients (n = 20)
|
concordance
|
TTT
|
oxyhemoglobin
|
1
|
57.1 %
|
0.696
|
65 %
|
0.560
|
2
|
71.4 %
|
65 %
|
deoxyhemoglobin
|
1
|
14.3 %
|
0.364
|
60 %
|
0.681
|
2
|
42.9 %
|
65 %
|
FWHM
|
oxyhemoglobin
|
1
|
14.3 %
|
1.000
|
65 %
|
0.681
|
2
|
14.3 %
|
60 %
|
deoxyhemoglobin
|
1
|
57.1 %
|
0.364
|
70 %
|
0.479
|
2
|
85.7 %
|
55 %
|
PA
|
oxyhemoglobin
|
1
|
71.4 %
|
0.588
|
80 %
|
0.615
|
2
|
85.7 %
|
90 %
|
deoxyhemoglobin
|
1
|
100 %
|
n/a
|
85 %
|
1.000
|
2
|
85.7 %
|
n/a
|
85 %
|
ROC analysis revealed AUC values ranging from 0.393 – 0.779 ([Table 3]). None of the parameters analyzed differed significantly from random probability. The highest AUC value was identified for FWHM analysis of oxyhemoglobin concentrations, which tended to be above the 50 % chance level and almost reached statistical significance (p < 0.057).
Table 3
AUC analysis in 17 lesions (10 malignant/7 benign lesions).
Tab. 3 AUC-Analyse von 17 Läsionen (10 maligne/7 benigne Läsionen).
parameter
|
form of hemoglobin
|
reader
|
AUC
|
significance
|
TTT
|
oxyhemoglobin
|
1
|
0.514
|
0.922
|
2
|
0.393
|
0.464
|
deoxyhemoglobin
|
1
|
0.729
|
0.118
|
2
|
0.586
|
0.558
|
FWHM
|
oxyhemoglobin
|
1
|
0.779
|
0.057
|
2
|
0.779
|
0.057
|
deoxyhemoglobin
|
1
|
0.564
|
0.661
|
2
|
0.421
|
0.591
|
PA
|
oxyhemoglobin
|
1
|
0.593
|
0.526
|
2
|
0.471
|
0.495
|
deoxyhemoglobin
|
1
|
0.400
|
0.845
|
2
|
0.421
|
0.591
|
Analysis of lesion visibility showed that the optimal situation of a clear-cut lesion, i. e., one that dominates other lesions in the breast parenchyma, is only present in 20 – 40 % of patients with breast cancer ([Table 4]).
Table 4
Visibility of predefined malignant lesions (n = 10) based on visual scores (VS): I, predefined lesion not visible; II, predefined lesion visible but poorer color contrast compared with other lesions; III, predefined lesion visible with color contrast comparable to that of other lesions; IV, predefined lesion dominates the display.
Tab. 4 Sichtbarkeit prädefinierter maligner Läsionen (n = 10), basierend auf den Visual Scores (VS): I: prädefinierte Läsion nicht sichtbar; II, prädefinierte Läsionen sichtbar, aber schwächerer Farbkontrast verglichen mit anderen Läsionen; III, prädefinierte Läsionen sichtbar mit Farbkontrast, vergleichbar mit anderen Läsionen; IV, prädefinierte Läsionen dominieren die Aufnahme.
parameter
|
form of hemoglobin
|
reader
|
VS I
|
VS II
|
VS III
|
VS IV
|
concordance
|
TTT
|
oxyhemoglobin
|
1
|
40 %
|
20 %
|
20 %
|
20 %
|
0.571
|
2
|
50 %
|
0 %
|
10 %
|
40 %
|
deoxyhemoglobin
|
1
|
40 %
|
10 %
|
20 %
|
30 %
|
0.565
|
2
|
40 %
|
10 %
|
10 %
|
40 %
|
FWHM
|
oxyhemoglobin
|
1
|
30 %
|
30 %
|
20 %
|
20 %
|
0.467
|
2
|
30 %
|
20 %
|
0 %
|
50 %
|
deoxyhemoglobin
|
1
|
30 %
|
20 %
|
20 %
|
30 %
|
0.444
|
2
|
30 %
|
0 %
|
20 %
|
50 %
|
PA
|
oxyhemoglobin
|
1
|
10 %
|
50 %
|
20 %
|
20 %
|
0.146
|
2
|
20 %
|
0 %
|
60 %
|
20 %
|
deoxyhemoglobin
|
1
|
20 %
|
20 %
|
40 %
|
20 %
|
0.737
|
2
|
30 %
|
20 %
|
20 %
|
30 %
|
Discussion
Over the last 20 to 30 years, many countries have introduced screening programs to reduce breast cancer mortality. In Germany, for example, breast cancer screening was introduced in 2006 [22]
[23]
[24]. The wider use of imaging modalities in the screening setting has also led to a greater awareness of the advantages and disadvantages of each imaging modality. Mammography is still the gold standard of breast imaging. However, it exposes women to ionizing radiation and can induce radiogenic DNA changes, which in turn may cause carcinogenic mutations [25]. MRI involves no radiation exposure and has the highest sensitivity of all imaging modalities used for breast cancer detection. However, its specificity is relatively poor [26]. MRI is still too expensive for use as a screening modality. Breast ultrasound is inexpensive but highly examiner-dependent [27], and it has very limited diagnostic accuracy in breast examinations [28].
Widely accepted advantages of optical imaging include the absence of radiation exposure and its relatively low cost [20] based on the relatively low investment cost of the components required to perform optical imaging.
Some studies use an extrinsic contrast agent such as ICG or Omocianine as a dye to enhance contrasts in optical imaging [6]
[29]. The possible advantages of using extrinsic contrast make optical imaging more complex and may represent a disadvantage for its use as a screening tool, which should be very easy to handle. Interestingly, the signal change measured after an adequately performed Valsalva maneuver is comparable to the change in absorption seen after bolus administration of 25 mg of the extrinsic dye ICG [6].
For use in screening programs, it would be desirable to perform optical imaging without using an extrinsic dye. Breast screening requires not only high sensitivity but also high specificity to avoid too many false-positive results, which could lead to invasive interventions [30]. Summarizing prior studies according to Grosenick et al. it seems unlikely that this goal will be reached by optical mammography based on intrinsic contrast alone in a conceivable time [30]. In an attempt to overcome the previous limitations, we tried a new approach amplifying the intrinsic contrast with a Valsalva maneuver in our study.
Near-infrared imaging using intrinsic contrasts can exploit differences in hemoglobin concentrations resulting from the abnormal vascular architecture of neoangiogenic vessels to identify malignant tumors [20]. Tumor vessels are disorganized, functionally abnormal, and hyperpermeable [31]. How this affects hemodynamics is still largely unknown and may be expected to differ among tumor types. Some authors assume that resistance to blood flow is increased in a malignant tumor resulting in sluggish changes in blood flow [20]
[32]
[33]. Following a Valsalva maneuver it is expected that the increase in hemoglobin concentration lasts longer in the tumorous area compared to benign tissue.
Other investigators attach more importance to an increased vascular density in tumors, which may underlie the high perfusion of some tumor entities [34]
[35]. As a result, malignant lesions show a faster amplitude increase following administration of an extrinsic contrast agent, while benign lesions such as fibroadenomas will show delayed enhancement [36].
A delayed response to changes in blood flow in malignant tumors is expected to result in a greater full width at half maximum. Among the parameters analyzed in our study, FWHM had the highest AUC value, and the p-value almost reached statistical significance.
The assumption of higher vascular density and short circuits in malignant tumors, leading to higher perfusion of the tumor might correspond with changes in the magnitude of the peak amplitude and its slope. However, in our study, neither analysis using PA or TTT resulted in a lesion detection rate that was significantly different from random probability.
Overall, the detection rates we achieved using the DYNOT 232 system are comparable to the detection rates reported for optical imaging in other studies, which are on the order of 85 % [37]. In a study investigating optical imaging of the breast with the contrast agent ICG, Schneider et al. reached a sensitivity of 85.7 % and a specificity of 87.5 % for malignant lesions with a time-to-peak-based analysis of the amplitude of the increasing signal after ICG injection [6]. Using Omocianine-enhanced optical mammography in the fluorescence mode, Poellinger et al. reached a detection rate of 55.6 % for all dose groups, with detection rates of up to 100 % for special dose groups [19]. The rate of false-positive lesions was 17.6 %. In the absorption mode the detection rate for malignant target lesions was 44.4 %. The false-positive rate for benign lesions was 11.8 %. In another study using ICG, Poellinger et al. analyzed optical mammography in the fluorescence mode and achieved a mean sensitivity of 92 % and a mean specificity of 75 % [29].
A considerable drawback of using the Valsalva maneuver is that there is very wide interindividual variation in how it is performed. In our study, each patient was instructed carefully and practiced the maneuver repeatedly before being examined. Nevertheless, one-third of the examinations were not analyzable due to signal artifacts and inadequate Valsalva maneuvers. In some patients, inspiratory motion might have resulted in detachment of the optodes from the skin. In other patients, we did not observe the expected increase in oxyhemoglobin and deoxyhemoglobin but instead saw a signal drop, suggesting that Valsalva maneuvers induced a decrease rather than increase in intrathoracic pressure. It appears very difficult to standardize Valsalva maneuvers. A standardized analysis of all patients including patients with inadequately performed Valsalva maneuver would lead to a significant decrease in sensitivity, since tumors in these patients could not be visualized correctly. Also, the overall specificity could become worse.
If we only look at the patients with analyzable examinations, the sensitivity appears to be acceptable. However, the rate of false-positive additional lesions is unacceptably high. These false-positive lesions result in extremely low specificities (roughly estimated < 10 %). The appearance of many circumscribed regions with larger FWHM and increased peak amplitude or short TTT within the breast suggests that the delayed hemodynamic response and increase in amplitude assumed to suggest malignant breast lesions does not appear to be confined to malignant breast tissue.
The two studies suggesting that the hemodynamic changes induced by Valsalva maneuver have potential for contributing to the detection of malignant breast lesions also used the NIRx tomography system. Different from our study, however, both of these studies imaged both breasts simultaneously. In their feasibility study, Schmitz et al. used 32 emission and detection optodes and two wavelengths (760 nm and 830 nm). Flexman et al. used 32 emission and 64 detector optodes and also two wavelengths (765 nm and 835 nm), investigating two patients with breast cancer and one healthy woman. The imaging data were processed using a threshold for changes in hemoglobin as a basis for three-dimensional visualization. Using individual thresholds – 4 % hemoglobin change in one woman and 18 % change in the other woman – the authors identified breast cancer and showed that no increase in hemoglobin occurred during the maneuver in the healthy control subject. Schmitz et al. found a higher hemoglobin concentration in malignant areas compared to the contralateral healthy breast and non-diseased tissue in the tumor-bearing breast. The increase persisted for some time after the Valsalva maneuver. As a result, the return to the baseline hemoglobin concentration was markedly delayed in areas of breast cancer compared with the healthy breast.
Our study investigated changes in hemodynamics in a larger group of patients for the first time. The images generated by optical tomography were analyzed by two blinded readers. We used a standardized approach for analysis, while Flexman et al. used individual thresholds in their two patients and the healthy subject.
Schmitz et al. and Flexman et al. evaluated delayed return to baseline following Valsalva maneuver for identifying breast lesions. Such a delay is also reflected in the parameters we analyzed. FWHM is a measure of amplitude width, which means that higher values correspond with delayed return to baseline. Nevertheless, there appear to be too many other factors that affect hemodynamics after a Valsalva maneuver, precluding its use for specific detection of malignant breast lesions. Moreover, the Valsalva maneuver is subject to great interindividual variation. Schmitz et al. also mentioned that the reliability of this parameter crucially relies on how accurately the patient can perform the Valsalva maneuver.
Our study is limited by the fact that we performed optical imaging of only one breast. Abnormalities in vascular architecture and hemodynamics, however, may extend far beyond the actual lesion, also affecting adjacent healthy breast parenchyma. Our observation that the readers in our study identified numerous additional breast lesions suggests that even optical imaging of both breasts would not have helped in accurately locating a lesion within the breast. A further study might investigate whether evaluation of hemodynamics by optical imaging can differentiate the whole breasts with malignant lesions (instead of differentiating the lesion only) from normal breasts or breasts with benign lesions. This question cannot be answered by our study. However, in patients with bilateral cancer, imaging of both breasts would not contribute to better detection as no differences would be apparent.
A general limitation of the approach under investigation is that changes in vascular function and hemodynamics in malignant breast lesions are not yet fully understood. All we have at present are hypotheses, making it very difficult to establish valid models for interpreting the results of optical imaging.
Conclusion
Dynamic optical NIR imaging using the Valsalva maneuver to enhance intrinsic contrast shows acceptable sensitivity. However, due to its very low specificity, this method does not appear to be a suitable candidate for breast imaging. A major drawback of the method is the difficulty to standardize the Valsalva maneuver resulting in a high number of artifacts. In a clinical setting inadequately performed Valsalva maneuvers can lead to a decrease in sensitivity, since one-third of the performed examinations could not be further analyzed.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under grants R41CA096102 and R01CA066184, by the U. S. Army under grant DAMD017-03-C-0018, and by the New York State Department of Health. Some of the devices used in this research are a product of NIRx Medical Technologies, LLC.