Leave-one-out Procedure in the Validation of Elimination Rate Constant Analysis

T. Grabowski; J. J. Jaroszewski; M. Sasinowska-Motyl

doi:10.1055/s-0032-1331194

Arzneimittelforschung, Table of Contents

Arzneimittelforschung 2012; 62(12): 682-689
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1331194

Original Article

Leave-one-out Procedure in the Validation of Elimination Rate Constant Analysis

T. Grabowski

¹Polpharma Biologics, Gdańsk, Poland

,

J. J. Jaroszewski

²Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Warmia and Mazury, Poland

,

M. Sasinowska-Motyl

³Department of Pharmacodynamics, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Many registration agencies and other organizations define how to calculate the elimination rate constant (k_el) value. No validation procedures have been introduced to verify the correct selection of the concentration-time (C–T) points used for the k_el calculation. The purpose of this paper is to discover whether k_el analysis can be subjected to the condensed validation procedure and what acceptance criteria should be adopted for such a procedure. For the analysis, data collected during bioequivalence studies of 4 drugs were selected, including 2 highly lipophilic drugs (itraconazole, atorvastatin) and 2 weakly lipophilic drugs (trimetazidine, perindopril). Pharmacokinetic calculations were performed with the use of WinNonlin Professional v 5.3. Internal validation of the k_el analysis using leave-one-out cross-validation was performed. The present analysis proves that the C–T selection process for the k_el calculations cannot be automated. In each of the analysed data series there were such C–T sequences that did not meet even one of the validation criteria. This paper proposes 3 validation criteria which need to be met in order to confirm the optimal selection of C–T data to calculate k_el: Q ²≥0.6, R²≥ 0.85, Q ²–R²<0.3, were Q ² – squared cross-validated correlation coefficient, R² – coefficient of determination). Application of the validation procedure for the k_el analysis under discussion proves the accuracy of the calculations, even if repeated k_el analysis is based on a different sequence of points in the elimination phase.

Key words

leave one out - validation - elimination rate - GLP

Full Text

References

References
1 EMEA . Guidelines for the conduct of bioequivalence studies for veterinary medicinal products. 2001; 1-11
2 WHO . Annex 7 Multisource (generic) pharmaceutical products: guidelines on registration requirements to establish interchangeability. WHO Technical Report Series, No. 937, 2006; 347-390
3 FDA . Guidance for Industry Safety, Efficacy, and Pharmacokinetic Studies to Support Marketing of Immune Globulin Intravenous (Human) as Replacement Therapy for Primary Humoral Immunodeficiency. 2008; 1-17
4 HC . Guidance for Industry Preparation of Veterinary Abbreviated New Drug Submissions – Generic Drugs. 2010; 1-71
5 FDA . Bioequivalence Guidance. 2006; 1-28
6 Mirfazaelian A, Mahmoudian M. A simple pharmacokinetics subroutine for modeling double peak phenomenon. Biopharm Drug Dispos 2006; 27: 119-124
7 Wang R, Yuan LG, He LM et al. Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of valnemulin in broiler chickens. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2011; 34: 247-251
8 EMA . Guideline On The Investigation Of Bioequivalence. 2010; 1-27
9 FDA . Guidance for Industry Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies for Orally Administered Drug Products – General Considerations. 2003; 1-26
10 OECD . OECD Series On Principles Of Good Laboratory Practice And Compliance Monitoring Number 10 GLP Consensus Document The Application Of The Principles Of GLP To Computerized Systems Environment Monograph No. 116. 1995; 1-15
11 OECD . OECD Series On Principles Of Good Laboratory Practice And Compliance Monitoring. Number 1. OECD Principles on Good Laboratory Practice (as revised in 1997). 1998; 1-39
12 FDA . Bioresearch Monitoring Good Laboratory Practice Compliance Program 7348.808 (Nonclinical Laboratories). 2001; 1-37
13 FDA . Manual Of Policies And Procedures. Inspections of Clinical Facilities and Analytical Laboratories Conducting Bioequivalence Studies Submitted in ANDAs. 2001; 1-5
14 NCBI. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pccompound 2011
15 FDA . Guidance for Industry. Bioanalytical Method Validation 2001; 1-25
16 EMA . Guideline On Validation Of Bioanalytical Methods. Doc. Ref: EMEA/CHMP/EWP/192217/2009. 2009; 1-17
17 Kubinyi H. QSAR: Hansch analysis and related approaches. Methods and principles 1993; Vol 1 Wiley-VCH. 20-190
18 WHO . Guidance document on the validation of (quantitative) structure-activity relationships (Q)SAR] models. WHO, ENV/JM/MONO(2007)2. 2007; 2-135
19 Honda N, Nakade S, Kasai H et al. Population pharmacokinetics of landiolol hydrochloride in healthy subjects. Drug Metab and Pharmacokinet 2008; 23: 447-455
20 Pratim RP, Paul S, Mitra I et al. On two novel parameters for validation of predictive QSAR models. Molecules 2009; 14: 1660-1701
21 Kito S, Satsuma A, Ishikura T et al. Application of neural network to estimation of catalyst deactivation in methanol conversion. Catal Today 2004; 97: 41-47
22 Shimamura K, Wajima T, Yano Y. Pharmacokinetic prediction for intravenous beta-lactam antibiotics in pediatric patients. J Pharmaceut Sci 2007; 96: 3125-3139
23 Burger D, Ewings F, Kabamba D et al. Limited sampling models to predict the pharmacokinetics of nevirapine, stavudine, and lamivudine in HIV-infected children treated with pediatric fixed-dose combination tablets. Ther Drug Monit 2010; 32: 369-372