Gender Differences in Mitral Valve Surgery

Abstract

Background Knowledge regarding gender-specific mitral valve (MV) pathology and postoperative outcome is rare. We herein describe a single-center experience focusing on gender differences in MV surgery.

Materials and Methods A total of 3,761 patients underwent minimal invasive MV surgery at our institution between 1999 and 2011. Demographic data, pre-, intra-, and postoperative characteristics have been collected, including details on MV pathology and surgical technique. Patient data have been analyzed with consideration of gender-specific differences.

Results The cohort consisted of 2,124 male (56.5%; 58.8 ± 12.5 years) and 1,637 female (43.5%; 64.5 ± 13 years) patients. Mitral regurgitation was observed equally in women (91.3%) and men (92.4%). Additional MV stenosis has been diagnosed in 2.7% of men but in 13.9% of women (p < 0.001). Calcification of the posterior MV leaflet showed a similar trend: 20.1% in women compared with 6.5% in men. Prolapse of the posterior leaflet was present predominantly in men with 63.1 versus 35.7% in women (p < 0.001). Distinct MV repair differences were retrospectively detected between genders: posterior mitral leaflet resection was performed in 17.9% of men versus 10.1% of women; posterior mitral leaflet chordae replacement was performed in 39.3% of men compared with 20.4% of women. Prosthetic MV replacement was necessary in 26.8% of women compared with only 10.7% of men. Concomitant tricuspid valve surgery was mostly performed in women (14.4 versus 8.2%). Male patients showed a significant better postoperative long-term survival than females, with 96, 89, and 72% compared with 92, 82, and 58% after 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively (p < 0.0001).

Conclusion Substantial gender-specific differences regarding MV pathology, operative strategy, and long-term outcome are present that need to be addressed in clinical practice.

Keywords

mitral valve - valve repair - gender

• References

• 1 Enriquez-Sarano M, Akins CW, Vahanian A. Mitral regurgitation. Lancet 2009; 373 (9672) 1382-1394
• 2 Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Kanu C , et al; American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines; Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions; Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Acc/aha 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: A report of the american college of cardiology/american heart association task force on practice guidelines (writing committee to revise the 1998 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease): Developed in collaboration with the society of cardiovascular anesthesiologists: Endorsed by the society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions and the society of thoracic surgeons. Circulation 2006; 114 (5) e84-e231
• 3 Wilcken DE. Genes, gender and geometry and the prolapsing mitral valve. Aust N Z J Med 1992; 22 (5, Suppl) 556-561
• 4 Mohr FW, Falk V, Diegeler A, Walther T, van Son JA, Autschbach R. Minimally invasive port-access mitral valve surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998; 115 (3) 567-574 , discussion 574–576
• 5 Seeburger J, Borger MA, Falk V , et al. Minimal invasive mitral valve repair for mitral regurgitation: results of 1339 consecutive patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008; 34 (4) 760-765
• 6 Carpentier A. Cardiac valve surgery—the “French correction”. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1983; 86 (3) 323-337
• 7 Glower DD, Bashore TM, Harrison JK, Wang A, Gehrig T, Rankin JS. Pure annular dilation as a cause of mitral regurgitation: a clinically distinct entity of female heart disease. J Heart Valve Dis 2009; 18 (3) 284-288
• 8 Akram MR, Chan T, McAuliffe S, Chenzbraun A. Non-rheumatic annular mitral stenosis: prevalence and characteristics. Eur J Echocardiogr 2009; 10 (1) 103-105
• 9 Akrami R, Hazay N, Höppner S, Kalmar P. [Energy and nitrogen balance in patients with mitral valve prostheses]. Infusionsther Klin Ernahr 1980; 7 (2) 57-63
• 10 Antonini-Canterin F, Capanna M, Manfroni A , et al. Association between mitral annular calcium and carotid artery stenosis and role of age and gender. Am J Cardiol 2001; 88 (5) 581-583
• 11 Tenenbaum A, Fisman EZ, Pines A , et al. Gender paradox in cardiac calcium deposits in middle-aged and elderly patients: mitral annular and coronary calcifications interrelationship. Maturitas 2000; 36 (1) 35-42
• 12 Davutoglu V, Yilmaz M, Soydinc S , et al. Mitral annular calcification is associated with osteoporosis in women. Am Heart J 2004; 147 (6) 1113-1116
• 13 Rankin JS, Hammill BG, Ferguson Jr TB , et al. Determinants of operative mortality in valvular heart surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006; 131 (3) 547-557
• 14 Regitz-Zagrosek V, Oertelt-Prigione S, Seeland U, Hetzer R. Sex and gender differences in myocardial hypertrophy and heart failure. Circ J 2010; 74 (7) 1265-1273
• 15 Beutner F, Teupser D, Gielen S , et al. Rationale and design of the Leipzig (LIFE) Heart Study: phenotyping and cardiovascular characteristics of patients with coronary artery disease. PLoS ONE 2011; 6 (12) e29070