Ultraschall Emissionen: Thermische (TI) und mechanische (MI) Indizes

C. Kollmann; G. ter Haar; L. Doležal; M. Hennerici; K. Å. Salvesen; L. Valentin

doi:10.1055/s-0033-1335843

Ultraschall in der Medizin - European Journal of Ultrasound, Inhaltsverzeichnis

Ultraschall Med 2013; 34(5): 422-434
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1335843

Fort- und Weiterbildung

Ultraschall Emissionen: Thermische (TI) und mechanische (MI) Indizes

Autor*innen

C. Kollmann

¹Center for Medical Physics & Biomedical Engineering, Medical University Vienna
G. ter Haar

²Physics Department, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton
L. Doležal

³Institute of Biophysics, Medical Faculty of Palacký University, Olomouc
M. Hennerici

⁴Neurologische Universitätsklinik, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim
K. Å. Salvesen

⁵National Center for Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim
L. Valentin

⁶Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Malmö University Hospital, Malmö

Abstract

Volltext

Referenzen

Literatur
1 American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM), National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA). Standard for Real-time Display of Thermal and Mechanical Acoustic Output Indices on Diagnostic Ultrasound Equipment. 1st rev. Laurel, MD: American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine; Rosslyn, VA: National Electrical Manufacturers Association; 1998. US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, 1993, Revised 510(k) Diagnostic Ultrasound Guidance for 1993.
2 IEC 62359. Ultrasonics – Field characterization – Test methods for the determination of thermal and mechanical indices related to medical diagnostic ultrasonic fields. International Standard IEC 62359 Ed.2.0, Geneva: 2010-10.
3 Abbott JG. Rationale and derivation of MI and TI: a review. Ultrasound Med Biol 1999; 25: 431-441
4 Martin K. The acoustic safety of new ultrasound technologies. Ultrasound 2010; 18: 110-118
5 National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Exposure criteria for medical diagnostic ultrasound: I. Criteria based on thermal mechanisms. NCRP Report No. 113 Bethesda MD: NCRP; 1992
6 Ter HG. Results of a Survey of Exposure Conditions used in Ultrasound Scans in the UK, February 2007. Ultrasound 2008; 16: 110-113
7 BMUS. Guidelines for the safe use of diagnostic ultrasound equipment. Safety Group of the British Medical Ultrasound Society. 2009 www.bmus.org
8 ECMUS Safety committee. Clinical Safety Statement for Diagnostic Ultrasound. EFSUMB. www.efsumb.org
9 ECMUS. Safety committee Guidelines. EFSUMB. www.efsumb.org
10 Maršál K. The output display standard: has it missed its target?. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 25: 211-4
11 Sheiner E, Shoham-Vardi I, Abramowicz JS. What do clinical users know regarding safety of ultrasound during pregnancy?. J Ultrasound Med 2007; 26: 319-325
12 Akhtar W, Arain MA, Ali A et al. Ultrasound biosafety during pregnancy: what do operators know in the developing world?: national survey findings from Pakistan. J Ultrasound Med 2011; 30: 981-985
13 Houston LE, Allsworth J, Macones GA. Ultrasound is safe... right? Resident and maternal-fetal medicine fellow knowledge regarding obstetric ultrasound safety. J Ultrasound Med 2011; 30: 21-27