Download PDF
Suchttherapie 2013; 14(02): 72-77
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1341513
Schwerpunktthema
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Verbesserung bei Patienten durch den Community Reinforcement Approach: Effekte auf Zufriedenheit und psychiatrische Symptome

Patients’ Improvements with the Community Reinforcement Approach: Effects on Satisfaction and Psychiatric Symptoms
H. G. Roozen
1   Tranzo/Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
2   Novadic-Kentron, Department of Research and Development, Vught, The Netherlands
,
P. G. J. Greeven
2   Novadic-Kentron, Department of Research and Development, Vught, The Netherlands
,
B. A. G. Dijkstra
2   Novadic-Kentron, Department of Research and Development, Vught, The Netherlands
,
G. Bischof
3   Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universität zu Lübeck
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
14 May 2013 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Patienten mit Suchterkrankungen weisen ein eingeschränktes Wohlbefinden auf. Eine Querschnittsstudie mit einem Prä-Post-Behandlungsdesign wurde durchgeführt, um Behandlungs­effekte des Community Reinforcement Approach (CRA) hinsichtlich Zufriedenheit und psychia­trischer Symptome zu erfassen. Die mehrdimen­sionale CRA-Zufriedenheitsskala (CRA-ZS) wurde eingesetzt, um Zufriedenheit mit verschiedenen Lebensbereichen zu erfassen. Zusätzlich wurden psychiatrische Symptome mit der Depression Anxiety Stress Skalen (DASS-21) und dem Brief Symp­tom Inventory (BSI) erfasst. Alle Erhebungsinstrumente erschienen sensitiv zur Identifikation von Veränderungen zwischen Baseline und Follow-up. Es ergaben sich keine alters-, geschlechts- oder Alkohol/Drogengruppenspezifischen Effekte auf die CRA-ZS-Outcomes und psychiatrischen Erhebungen. Es zeigte sich ein negativer Zusammenhang zwischen psychiatrischen Symptomen und Zufriedenheit in verschiedenen Lebensbereichen. Patienten mit ausgeprägten psychiatrischen Symptomen zur Baseline berichteten vergleichsweise niedrigere Baseline- und Follow-up-Werte auf der CRA-ZS gegenüber Patienten mit initial niedrigen psychiatrischen Symptomen. Neben Erhebungsinstrumenten zur Erfassung psychiatrischer Beschwerden erscheint die CRA-ZS eine interessante Möglichkeit zur Anwendung in Behandlungsevaluationen darzustellen.

Abstract

Patients with substance use disorders are associated with impaired well-being. A cross sectional study with a pre- post treatment design was carried out to examine the value of the Community Reinforcement Approach (CRA) in relation to treatment outcome in terms of satisfaction and psychiatric symptoms. The multidimensional CRA-Happiness Scale (CRA-HS) was employed to measure satisfaction on several life areas. Additionally, psychiatric symptoms, by means of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21) and Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), were measured. All instruments appeared to be “sensitive” to detect changes between baseline and follow-up measurement. There were no age, sex and alcohol/drug group effects on the CRA-HS outcomes and psychiatric measures. It was confirmed that psychiatric symptoms were inversely related with satisfaction on life areas. Patients with high baseline levels of psychiatric symptoms reported relatively lower baseline and follow-up scores on the CRA-HS than patients with low initial levels of psychiatric symptoms. Next to instruments that capture psychiatric complaints, the CRA-HS seems to be an interesting option to adopt in program evaluations.

Schlüsselwörter

CRA Zufriedenheitsskala - Alkoholabhängigkeit - Sucht - Community Reinforcement Approach - Erhebungsinstrument - Evaluation

Key words

CRA happiness scale - alcohol dependence - addiction - community reinforcement approach - assessment - evaluation
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Finney J, Monahan S. The cost-effectiveness of treatment for alcoholism: a second approximation. J Stud Alcohol 1996; 57: 229-243
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Miller WR, Wilbourne PL, Hettema JE. What works? A summary of alcohol treatment outcome research. In: Handbook of alcoholism treatment outcome research. Hester RK, Miller WR. eds. Boston: Allyn and Bacon; 2003: 13-63
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Miller WR, Zweben J, Johnson WR. Evidence-based treatment: Why, what, where, when, and how?. J Subst Abuse Treat 2005; 29: 267-276
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bischof G. Effektivität von Psychotherapie bei Suchterkrankungen. Suchttherapie 2010; 11: 158-165
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Meyers RJ, Smith JE. CRA-Manual zur Behandlung der Alkoholabhängigkeit. Erfolgreicher behandeln durch positive Verstärkung im sozialen Bereich, 3. ed. Bonn: Psychiatrie-Verlag; 2009
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Hunt G, Azrin N. A community-reinforcement approach to alcoholism. Behavior Research and Therapy 1973; 11: 91-104
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Donovan D, Mattson ME, Cisler RA et al. Quality of life as an outcome measure in alcoholism treatment research. J Stud Alcohol 2005; 15: 119-139
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Conway K, Compton W, Stinson F et al. Lifetime comorbidity of DSM-IV mood and anxiety disorders and specific drug use disorders: Results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. J Clin Psychiatry 2006; 67: 247-257
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Regier DA, Farmer ME, Rae DS et al. Comorbidity of mental disorders with alcohol and other drug abuse: results from the Epidemiologic Catchment Area (ECA) Study. JAMA 1990; 264: 2511-2518
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Regier DA, Myers JK, Kramer M et al. The NIMH Epidemiologic Catchment Area Program – Historical context, major objectives, and study population characteristics. Archives of General Psychiatry 1984; 41: 934-941
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Bijl R, Ravelli A. Current and residual functional disability associated with psychopathology: findings from the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study (NEMESIS). Psychological Medicine 2000; 30: 657-668
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Ormel J, VonKorff M, Ustun T et al. Common mental disorders and disability across cultures. Results from the WHO collaborative study on psychological problems in general health care. JAMA 1994; 272: 1741-1748
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Dijkstra BAG, Roozen HG. Patients’ Improvements Measured With the Pleasant Activities List and the Community Reinforcement Approach Happiness Scale: Preliminary Results. Addictive Disorders & Their Treatment 2012; 11: 6-13
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Roozen HG, Meyers RJ, Smith JE. Community Reinforcement Approach: Klinische procedures voor de behandeling van alcohol- en drugverslaving. Utrecht: Bohn Stafleu & van Loghum; 2013
    Google Scholar
  • 15 American Psychiatric Association . Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Fourth Edition Text revision. 2000. . Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association;
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH. The strucuture of negative emotional states – Comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (CASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety inventories. Behaviour Research and Therapy 1995; 33: 335-343
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Beurs Ed, Dyck Rv, Marquenie LA et al. De DASS: een vragenlijst voor het meten van depressie, angst en stress. Gedragstherapie 2001; 34: 35-53
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Derogatis L, Melisaratos N. The Brief Symptom Inventory: An introductory report. Psychological Medicine 1983; 13: 595-605
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Beurs Ed. Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI): Het aanbevolen instrument voor Routine Outcome Monitoring (ROM) 2010. Leiden: PITS Testuitgeverij; 2010
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Beurs Ed, Zitman F. De Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI). De betrouwbaarheid en validiteit van een handzaam alternatief voor de SCL-90. Leiden: LUMC; 2005
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum; Associates. 1988
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Cohen J. The Earth is round (p<0.05. American Psychologist 1994; 49: 997-1003
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Bickman L, Salzer M. Measuring quality in mental health services. Eval Rev 1997; 21: 285-291
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Young A, Sullivan G, Burnam M et al. Measuring the quality of outpatient treatment for schizophrenia. Archives of General Psychiatry 1998; 55: 611-617
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar