Semin intervent Radiol 2013; 30(02): 114-120
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1342951
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Lung Cancer Screening

Antonio Gutierrez
1   Department of Radiological Sciences, Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
,
Robert Suh
1   Department of Radiological Sciences, Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
,
Fereidoun Abtin
1   Department of Radiological Sciences, Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
,
Scott Genshaft
1   Department of Radiological Sciences, Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
,
Kathleen Brown
1   Department of Radiological Sciences, Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
28 May 2013 (online)

Abstract

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death. Although smoking prevention and cessation programs have decreased lung cancer mortality, there remains a large at-risk population. Dismal long-term survival rates persist despite improvements in diagnosis, staging, and treatment. Early efforts to identify an effective screening test have been unsuccessful. Recent advances in multidetector computed tomography have allowed screening studies using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) to be performed. This set the stage for the National Lung Screening Trial that found that annual LDCT screening benefits individuals at high risk for lung cancer. An understanding of the harmful effects of lung cancer screening is required to help maximize the benefits and decrease the risks of a lung cancer screening program. Although many questions remain regarding LDCT screening, a comprehensive lung cancer screening program of high-risk individuals will increase detection of preclinical and potentially curable disease, creating a new model of lung cancer surveillance and management.

 
  • References

  • 1 Travis WD, Brambilla E, Müller-Hermelink HK, Harris CC , eds. Pathology and genetics of tumours of the lung, pleura, thymus and heart. In: World Health Organization Classification of Tumours. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2004
  • 2 Herbst RS, Heymach JV, Lippman SM. Lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2008; 359 (13) 1367-1380
  • 3 Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin 2010; 60 (5) 277-300
  • 4 Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 2012; 62 (1) 10-29
  • 5 American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures 2012. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2012
  • 6 Estimates of funding for various research, condition, and disease category (RCDC). Available at: http://report.nih.gov/categorical_spending.aspx . Accessed January 3, 2013
  • 7 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health. The Health Consequences of Smoking: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: CDC; 2004
  • 8 Jemal A, Thun MJ, Ries LA , et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2005, featuring trends in lung cancer, tobacco use, and tobacco control. J Natl Cancer Inst 2008; 100 (23) 1672-1694
  • 9 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Cigarette smoking among adults and trends in smoking cessation—United States, 2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2009; 58 (44) 1227-1232
  • 10 Crispo A, Brennan P, Jöckel KH , et al. The cumulative risk of lung cancer among current, ex- and never-smokers in European men. Br J Cancer 2004; 91 (7) 1280-1286
  • 11 Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M , et al, eds. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2009 (Vintage 2009 Populations), National Cancer Institute. Available at: http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2009_pops09/ , based on November 2011 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER Web site, 2012
  • 12 Melamed MR. Lung cancer screening results in the National Cancer Institute New York study. Cancer 2000; 89 (11, Suppl): 2356-2362
  • 13 Tockman MS. Survival and mortality from lung cancer in a screened population: The Johns Hopkins Study. Chest 1986; 89 (4, Suppl): 324S-325S
  • 14 Fontana RS, Sanderson DR, Woolner LB , et al. Screening for lung cancer. A critique of the Mayo Lung Project. Cancer 1991; 67 (4, Suppl): 1155-1164
  • 15 Marcus PM, Bergstralh EJ, Fagerstrom RM , et al. Lung cancer mortality in the Mayo Lung Project: impact of extended follow-up. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000; 92 (16) 1308-1316
  • 16 Kubík A, Polák J. Lung cancer detection. Results of a randomized prospective study in Czechoslovakia. Cancer 1986; 57 (12) 2427-2437
  • 17 Kubík AK, Parkin DM, Zatloukal P. Czech Study on Lung Cancer Screening: post-trial follow-up of lung cancer deaths up to year 15 since enrollment. Cancer 2000; 89 (11, Suppl): 2363-2368
  • 18 Sone S, Li F, Yang ZG , et al. Results of three-year mass screening programme for lung cancer using mobile low-dose spiral computed tomography scanner. Br J Cancer 2001; 84 (1) 25-32
  • 19 Nawa T, Nakagawa T, Kusano S, Kawasaki Y, Sugawara Y, Nakata H. Lung cancer screening using low-dose spiral CT: results of baseline and 1-year follow-up studies. Chest 2002; 122 (1) 15-20
  • 20 Sobue T, Moriyama N, Kaneko M , et al. Screening for lung cancer with low-dose helical computed tomography: anti-lung cancer association project. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20 (4) 911-920
  • 21 Henschke CI, McCauley DI, Yankelevitz DF , et al. Early Lung Cancer Action Project: overall design and findings from baseline screening. Lancet 1999; 354 (9173) 99-105
  • 22 Henschke CI, Naidich DP, Yankelevitz DF , et al. Early lung cancer action project: initial findings on repeat screenings. Cancer 2001; 92 (1) 153-159
  • 23 Swensen SJ, Jett JR, Sloan JA , et al. Screening for lung cancer with low-dose spiral computed tomography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002; 165 (4) 508-513
  • 24 Swensen SJ, Jett JR, Hartman TE , et al. CT screening for lung cancer: five-year prospective experience. Radiology 2005; 235 (1) 259-265
  • 25 Diederich S, Wormanns D, Semik M , et al. Screening for early lung cancer with low-dose spiral CT: prevalence in 817 asymptomatic smokers. Radiology 2002; 222 (3) 773-781
  • 26 Aberle DR, Berg CD, Black WC , et al; National Lung Screening Trial Research Team. The National Lung Screening Trial: overview and study design. Radiology 2011; 258 (1) 243-253
  • 27 Aberle DR, Berg CD, Black WC , et al; National Lung Screening Trial Research Team. The National Lung Screening Trial: overview and study design. Radiology 2011; 258 (1) 243-253
  • 28 Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD , et al; National Lung Screening Trial Research Team. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 2011; 365 (5) 395-409
  • 29 Tabar L, Vitak B, Yen MFA, Chen HHT, Smith RA, Duffy SW. Number needed to screen: lives saved over 20 years of follow-up in mammographic screening. J Med Screen 2004; 11 (3) 126-129
  • 30 Richardson A. Screening and the number needed to treat. J Med Screen 2001; 8 (3) 125-127
  • 31 Montes RP. The cost of CT screening: year gained via lung cancer screening could cost $38,000. Cancer Lett 2011; 37 (26) 15-16
  • 32 Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R , et al. Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med 2009; 169 (22) 2078-2086
  • 33 Brenner DJ. Radiation risks potentially associated with low-dose CT screening of adult smokers for lung cancer. Radiology 2004; 231 (2) 440-445
  • 34 Larke FJ, Kruger RL, Cagnon CH , et al. Estimated radiation dose associated with low-dose chest CT of average-size participants in the National Lung Screening Trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197 (5) 1165-1169
  • 35 van Klaveren RJ, Oudkerk M, Prokop M , et al. Management of lung nodules detected by volume CT scanning. N Engl J Med 2009; 361 (23) 2221-2229
  • 36 Sakr WA, Grignon DJ, Haas GP, Heilbrun LK, Pontes JE, Crissman JD. Age and racial distribution of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Eur Urol 1996; 30 (2) 138-144
  • 37 Stamatiou K, Alevizos A, Agapitos E, Sofras F. Incidence of impalpable carcinoma of the prostate and of non-malignant and precarcinomatous lesions in Greek male population: an autopsy study. Prostate 2006; 66 (12) 1319-1328
  • 38 Harach HR, Franssila KO, Wasenius VM. Occult papillary carcinoma of the thyroid. A “normal” finding in Finland. A systematic autopsy study. Cancer 1985; 56 (3) 531-538
  • 39 McFarlane MJ, Feinstein AR, Wells CK. Clinical features of lung cancers discovered as a postmortem “surprise”. Chest 1986; 90 (4) 520-523
  • 40 Welch HG, Black WC. Overdiagnosis in cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010; 102 (9) 605-613
  • 41 Takashima S, Maruyama Y, Hasegawa M , et al. CT findings and progression of small peripheral lung neoplasms having a replacement growth pattern. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180 (3) 817-826
  • 42 Stuber J, Galea S, Link BG. Smoking and the emergence of a stigmatized social status. Soc Sci Med 2008; 67 (3) 420-430
  • 43 Keeley B, Wright L, Condit CM. Functions of health fatalism: fatalistic talk as face saving, uncertainty management, stress relief and sense making. Sociol Health Illn 2009; 31 (5) 734-747
  • 44 Niederdeppe J, Levy AG. Fatalistic beliefs about cancer prevention and three prevention behaviors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007; 16 (5) 998-1003
  • 45 Silvestri GA, Nietert PJ, Zoller J, Carter C, Bradford D. Attitudes towards screening for lung cancer among smokers and their non-smoking counterparts. Thorax 2007; 62 (2) 126-130
  • 46 Tod AM, Craven J, Allmark P. Diagnostic delay in lung cancer: a qualitative study. J Adv Nurs 2008; 61 (3) 336-343
  • 47 Tod AM, Joanne R. Overcoming delay in the diagnosis of lung cancer: a qualitative study. Nurs Stand 2010; 24 (31) 35-43
  • 48 Rutten LF, Hesse BW, Moser RP, McCaul KD, Rothman AJ. Public perceptions of cancer prevention, screening, and survival: comparison with state-of-science evidence for colon, skin, and lung cancer. J Cancer Educ 2009; 24 (1) 40-48
  • 49 Finney Rutten LJ, Augustson EM, Moser RP, Beckjord EB, Hesse BW. Smoking knowledge and behavior in the United States: sociodemographic, smoking status, and geographic patterns. Nicotine Tob Res 2008; 10 (10) 1559-1570
  • 50 George M, Margolis ML. Race and lung cancer surgery—a qualitative analysis of relevant beliefs and management preferences. Oncol Nurs Forum 2010; 37 (6) 740-748
  • 51 Walsh MC, Trentham-Dietz A, Schroepfer TA , et al. Cancer information sources used by patients to inform and influence treatment decisions. J Health Commun 2010; 15 (4) 445-463
  • 52 Woloshin S, Schwartz LM, Welch HG. The risk of death by age, sex, and smoking status in the United States: putting health risks in context. J Natl Cancer Inst 2008; 100 (12) 845-853
  • 53 Young RP, Hopkins RJ, Hay BA , et al. A gene-based risk score for lung cancer susceptibility in smokers and ex-smokers. Postgrad Med J 2009; 85 (1008) 515-524
  • 54 Punturieri A, Szabo E, Croxton TL, Shapiro SD, Dubinett SM. Lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: needs and opportunities for integrated research. J Natl Cancer Inst 2009; 101 (8) 554-559
  • 55 Young RP, Hopkins RJ, Christmas T, Black PN, Metcalf P, Gamble GD. COPD prevalence is increased in lung cancer, independent of age, sex and smoking history. Eur Respir J 2009; 34 (2) 380-386
  • 56 de Torres JP, Bastarrika G, Wisnivesky JP , et al. Assessing the relationship between lung cancer risk and emphysema detected on low-dose CT of the chest. Chest 2007; 132 (6) 1932-1938
  • 57 Wilson DO, Weissfeld JL, Balkan A , et al. Association of radiographic emphysema and airflow obstruction with lung cancer. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2008; 178 (7) 738-744
  • 58 American Lung Association providing guidance on lung cancer screening to patients and physicians. Available at: http://www.lung.org/lung-disease/lung-cancer/lung-cancer-screening-guidelines/lung-cancer-screening.pdf . Accessed January 7, 2013