DMW – Klinischer Fortschritt, Table of Contents Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2013; 138(31/32): 1582-1584DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1343258 Nephrologie | Commentary Nephrologie, Rheumatologie © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York Standards und Perspektiven in der Behandlung der Lupusnephritis Standards and perspectives in the treatment of lupus nephritis H.-J. Anders 1 Nephrologisches Zentrum, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, Klinikum der Universität München – Campus Innenstadt › Author Affiliations Recommend Article Abstract Buy Article Schlüsselwörter SchlüsselwörterLupusnephritis Keywords Keywordslupus nephritis Full Text References Literatur 1 Appel GB, Contreras G, Dooley MA et al. Mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclophosphamide for induction treatment of lupus nephritis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2009; 20: 1103-1112 2 Bertsias GK, Tektonidou M, Amoura Z et al. Joint European League Against Rheumatism and European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association (EULAR/ERA-EDTA) recommendations for the management of adult and paediatric lupus nephritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2012; 71: 1771-1782 3 Contreras G, Pardo V, Leclercq B et al. Sequential therapies for proliferative lupus nephritis. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 971-980 4 Dooley MA, Houssiau F, Aranow C et al. Effect of belimumab treatment on renal outcomes: results from the phase 3 belimumab clinical trials in patients with SLE. Lupus 2013; 22: 63-72 5 Dooley MA, Jayne D, Ginzler EM et al. Mycophenolate versus azathioprine as maintenance therapy for lupus nephritis. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 1886-1895 6 Flanc RS, Roberts MA, Strippoli GF et al. Treatment of diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Kidney Dis 2004; 43: 197-208 7 Hahn BH, McMahon MA, Wilkinson A et al. American College of Rheumatology guidelines for screening, treatment, and management of lupus nephritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2012; 64: 797-808 8 Houssiau FA, D'Cruz D, Sangle S et al. Azathioprine versus mycophenolate mofetil for long-term immunosuppression in lupus nephritis: results from the MAINTAIN Nephritis Trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2010; 69: 2083-2089 9 Houssiau FA, Vasconcelos C, D'Cruz D et al. The 10-year follow-up data of the Euro-Lupus Nephritis Trial comparing low-dose and high-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide. Ann Rheum Dis 2010; 69: 61-64 10 Kahlenberg JM, Kaplan MJ. The interplay of inflammation and cardiovascular disease in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Res Ther 2011; 13: 203 doi: 11 Pons-Estel GJ, Alarcon GS, McGwin Jr G et al. Protective effect of hydroxychloroquine on renal damage in patients with lupus nephritis: LXV, data from a multiethnic US cohort. Arthritis Rheum 2009; 61: 830-839 12 Rovin BH, Furie R, Latinis K et al. Efficacy and safety of rituximab in patients with active proliferative lupus nephritis: the Lupus Nephritis Assessment with Rituximab study. Arthritis Rheum 2012; 64: 1215-1226 13 Weening JJ, D'Agati VD, Schwartz MM et al. The classification of glomerulonephritis in systemic lupus erythematosus revisited. J Am Soc Nephrol 2004; 15: 241-250 14 Weidenbusch M, Römmele C, Schröttle A et al. Beyond the LUNAR trial. Efficacy of rituximab in refractory lupus nephritis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2013; 28: 106-111 15 Wofsy D, Hillson JL, Diamond B. Abatacept for lupus nephritis: alternative definitions of complete response support conflicting conclusions. Arthritis Rheum 2012; 64: 3660-3665