Width of the Cervical Intervertebral Neuroforamina After Total Disc Replacement with the Cerkinetic Prosthesis: A Three-Dimensional Simulation Using a Computer-Aided Design Model

Abstract

Introduction Physiological cervical intervertebral motion inherently induces a neuroforaminal volume change. Integration of an artificial motion component within this intervertebral kinematic system may cause neuroforamina to lose their ability for continuous and instantaneous volume adaptation, inducing foraminal stenosis. The purpose of the current study is to virtually simulate a newly developed cervical total disc replacement (TDR) to evaluate the neuroforaminal dimensions at rest and during motion.

Materials and Methods In a three-dimensional computer-aided design model of the spine, the Cerkinetic (OrthoKinematica Ltd., Haifa, Israel) TDR was virtually implanted at the C5–C6 disc space. The TDR consists of a bearing mechanism with an elliptical protuberance and a recess, allowing a progressive increase of the intervertebral axial spacing in all three dimensions and in line with flexion and extension. Translations are performed in accordance with the physiological forces influencing the disc space and spinal continuum. The minimal proximal neuroforaminal width was defined and evaluated at rest and motion.

Results A progressive increase (15.2% at 6 degrees) in flexion and a decrease (12.3% at 6 degrees) in extension of the neuroforaminal width were observed. With axial motion, a progressive increase (44.6% at 6 degrees) of the right neuroforamen width as well as a decrease of the left neuroforamen width (15.3% at 6 degrees) were seen.

Conclusion The TDR under investigation simulates the intervertebral kinematics, allowing a physiological adjustment of the facet joints in rest and motion. This preserves the ability of the neuroforamina to maintain their capability of changing their dimensions.

Keywords

cervical disc prosthesis - intervertebral foramen - CAD simulation - cervical arthroplasty

• References

• 1 Ebraheim NA, An HS, Xu R, Ahmad M, Yeasting RA. The quantitative anatomy of the cervical nerve root groove and the intervertebral foramen. Spine 1996; 21 (14) 1619-1623
• 2 Yoo JU, Zou D, Edwards WT, Bayley J, Yuan HA. Effect of cervical spine motion on the neuroforaminal dimensions of human cervical spine. Spine 1992; 17 (10) 1131-1136
• 3 Muhle C, Resnick D, Ahn JM, Südmeyer M, Heller M. In vivo changes in the neuroforaminal size at flexion-extension and axial rotation of the cervical spine in healthy persons examined using kinematic magnetic resonance imaging. Spine 2001; 26 (13) E287-E293
• 4 Nuckley DJ, Konodi MA, Raynak GC, Ching RP, Mirza SK. Neural space integrity of the lower cervical spine: effect of normal range of motion. Spine 2002; 27 (6) 587-595
• 5 Panjabi MM, Crisco JJ, Vasavada A , et al. Mechanical properties of the human cervical spine as shown by three-dimensional load-displacement curves. Spine 2001; 26 (24) 2692-2700
• 6 Faizan A, Goel VK, Garfin SR , et al. Do design variations in the artificial disc influence cervical spine biomechanics? A finite element investigation. Eur Spine J 2012; 21 (Suppl. 05) S653-S662