Feasibility of Using External Jugular Vein and Its Branches as Y- and X-Shaped Vein Grafts for Bridging of Arterial Defects and Providing Additional Arterial Sources for Free Flap Applications in Rat Model

Abstract

Background Venous grafting has been widely used in microsurgical training. Different types of vascular grafts have been described in experimental models. In this study we describe for the first time the Y- and X-shaped vein grafts (YVG, XVG) with accompanying drain-out branches as a new tool for the microsurgical training and free flap applications in rats.

Methods Twelve adult male Lewis rats were used in this study. The dissections were performed to determine the average diameter and harvestable length of vein grafts in eight rats. In four rats vein grafts were applied for bridging of the common carotid artery gap, whereas the drain-out branches were used as the arterial source for single and bilateral free groin flap applications. The venous anastomoses of groin flaps were performed in end-to-end fashion to the external jugular vein and its branches. The patency of anastomoses was checked 72 hours after repair.

Results The average length of the harvestable vein branches ranged between 5.2 to 11.8 mm. The average surgery time for repair of the arterial gap with the vein grafts was 40 minutes. The ischemia time for single and bilateral groin flap transfer using YVG and XVG was 30 and 70 minutes, respectively. The patency of the interpositional vein graft was 100%. Flap survival rates were 50%.

Conclusions These vein grafts can be used as an alternative technique for reconstruction of tissue defects that require arterial gap repair with single or multiple free flap applications and also as a new microsurgical training model.

Keywords

interpositional vein grafting - X-shaped vein graft - Y-shaped vein graft - experimental vein grafting - bridging arterial defects

• References

• 1 Blain B, Zhang F, Jones M , et al. Vascular grafts in the rat model: an anatomic study. Microsurgery 2001; 21 (3) 80-83
• 2 Tsao CK, Chen HC, Chen HT, Coskunfirat OK. Using a Y-shaped vein graft with drain-out branches to provide additional arterial sources for free flap reconstruction in injured lower extremities. Chang Gung Med J 2003; 26 (11) 813-821
• 3 Jones NF, Jupiter JB. The use of Y-shaped interposition vein grafts in multiple digit replantations. J Hand Surg Am 1985; 10 (5) 675-678
• 4 Stevanovic MV, Vucetic C, Bumbasirevic M, Vuckovic C. Avulsion injuries of the thumb. Plast Reconstr Surg 1991; 87 (6) 1099-1104
• 5 Germann G, Steinau HU. The clinical reliability of vein grafts in free-flap transfer. J Reconstr Microsurg 1996; 12 (1) 11-17
• 6 Elliot D, Meyer M. The use of the veins of the thenar eminence in digital revascularization and replantation. J Hand Surg [Br] 1993; 18 (2) 163-164
• 7 Nazzal MM, Hoballah JJ, Jacobovicz C , et al. A comparative evaluation of femorofemoral crossover bypass and iliofemoral bypass for unilateral iliac artery occlusive disease. Angiology 1998; 49 (4) 259-265
• 8 Bergsma TM, Grandjean JG, Voors AA, Boonstra PW, den Heyer P, Ebels T. Low recurrence of angina pectoris after coronary artery bypass graft surgery with bilateral internal thoracic and right gastroepiploic arteries. Circulation 1998; 97 (24) 2402-2405
• 9 Nasir S, Aydin MA, Karahan N, Demiryürek D, Sargon M. New microvenous anastomosis model for microsurgical training: external jugular vein. J Reconstr Microsurg 2006; 22 (8) 625-630
• 10 Simsek T, Aksakal IA, Eroglu L. The Y-V-I principle for salvaging distal digit replantation. J Reconstr Microsurg 2011; 27 (5) 309-312
• 11 Karacalar A, Demir A, Güneren E. A pedicle-lengthening technique for free latissimus dorsi muscle flaps: the “Y-V-I” principle. J Reconstr Microsurg 2005; 21 (3) 173-178
• 12 Zhang F, Ho PR, Chin BT, Ozek C, Buncke HJ, Lineaweaver WC. Effect of vein grafting on the survival of microvascularly transplanted muscle flaps. Microsurgery 1996; 17 (9) 512-516
• 13 LaSalle AJ, Brewster DC, Corson JD, Darling RC. Femoropopliteal composite bypass grafts: current status. Surgery 1982; 92 (1) 36-39
• 14 Reichle FA, Rankin KP, Tyson RR, Finestone AJ, Shuman C. Long-term results of 474 arterial reconstructions for severely ischemic limbs: a fourteen year follow-up. Surgery 1979; 85 (1) 93-100
• 15 R, Terzis J. Vascular grafts, in Reconstructive Microsurgery. Boston, Little-Brown, 1977. , pp 90–92.
• 16 Buncke HJ, Alpert B, Shah KG. Microvascular grafting. Clin Plast Surg 1978; 5 (2) 185-194
• 17 Alpert BS, Buncke HJ, Brownstein M. Replacement of damaged arteries and veins with vein grafts when replanting crushed, amputated fingers. Plast Reconstr Surg 1978; 61 (1) 17-22
• 18 Cooney III WP. Revascularization and replantation after upper extremity trauma: experience with interposition artery and vein grafts. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1978; 137 (137) 227-234
• 19 Beris AE, Soucacos PN, Touliatos AS. Experimental evaluation of the length of microvenous grafts under normal tension. Microsurgery 1992; 13 (4) 195-199
• 20 Adcock Jr OT, Adcock GLD, Wheeler JR, Gregory RT, Snyder Jr SO, Gayle RG. Optimal techniques for harvesting and preparation of reversed autogenous vein grafts for use as arterial substitutes: a review. Surgery 1984; 96 (5) 886-894
• 21 Bayramiçli M. Microvascular reconstruction of composite cranial defects. J Reconstr Microsurg 2010; 26 (9) 567-576
• 22 Park CW, Kim YH, Hwang KT, Kim JT. Reconstruction of a severely crushed leg with interpositional vessel grafts and latissimus dorsi flap. Arch Plast Surg 2012; 39 (4) 417-421
• 23 Bayramiçli M, Tetik C, Sönmez A, Gürünlüoğlu R, Baltaci F. Reliability of primary vein grafts in lower extremity free tissue transfers. Ann Plast Surg 2002; 48 (1) 21-29