Download PDF
Endoscopy 2014; 46(04): 318-321
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1365292
Endoscopy essentials
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Colonoscopy, tumors

James E. East
1   Translational Gastroenterology Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
,
Simon J. Leedham
1   Translational Gastroenterology Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
2   Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
12 March 2014 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints
Endoscopy Essentials

Reviews in the Endoscopy Essentials series cite publications from the past year which, in the authors’ opinion, reflect the state-of-the-art in endoscopy. Alongside a short summary of each paper, authors explain why they consider their selected articles to be of importance.

 

  • References

  • 1 De Sousa E, Melo F, Wang X et al. Poor-prognosis colon cancer is defined by a molecularly distinct subtype and develops from serrated precursor lesions. Nat Med 2013; 19: 614-618
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Sadanandam A, Lyssiotis CA, Homicsko K et al. A colorectal cancer classification system that associates cellular phenotype and responses to therapy. Nat Med 2013; 19: 619-625
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Marisa L, de Reyniès A, Duval A et al. Gene expression classification of colon cancer into molecular subtypes: characterization, validation, and prognostic value. PLoS Med 2013; 10: e1001453
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Pohl H, Srivastava A, Bensen SP et al. Incomplete polyp resection during colonoscopy – results of the complete adenoma resection (CARE) study. Gastroenterology 2013; 144: 74-80
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology 2012; 143: 844-857
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Hassan C, Quintero E, Dumonceau JM et al. Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 842-851
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Metz AJ, Moss A, McLeod D et al. A blinded comparison of the safety and efficacy of hot biopsy forceps electrocauterization and conventional snare polypectomy for diminutive colonic polypectomy in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 484-490
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Gilbert DA, DiMarino AJ, Jensen DM et al. Status evaluation: hot biopsy forceps. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Technology Assessment Committee. . Gastrointest Endosc 1992; 38: 753-756
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Riley SA. Colonoscopic polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection: a practical guide. 2008 Available from: http://www.bsg.org.uk/images/stories/docs/sections/endo/polypectomy_08.pdf Accessed: 12 February 2014
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Repici A, Hassan C, Vitetta E et al. Safety of cold polypectomy for <10 mm polyps at colonoscopy: a prospective multicenter study. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 27-31
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Ladabaum U, Fioritto A, Mitani A et al. Real-time optical biopsy of colon polyps with narrow band imaging in community practice does not yet meet key thresholds for clinical decisions. Gastroenterology 2013; 144: 81-89
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Schachschal G, Mayr M, Treszl A et al. Endoscopic versus histological characterisation of polyps during screening colonoscopy. Gut 2014; 63: 458-465
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Wanders LK, East JE, Uitentuis SE et al. Diagnostic performance of narrowed spectrum endoscopy, autofluorescence imaging, and confocal laser endomicroscopy for optical diagnosis of colonic polyps: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 2013; 14: 1337-1347
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Ignjatovic A, East JE, Suzuki N et al. Optical diagnosis of small colorectal polyps at routine colonoscopy (Detect InSpect ChAracterise Resect and Discard; DISCARD trial): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2009; 10: 1171-1178
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Lee TJ, Rees CJ, Blanks RG et al. Colonoscopic factors associated with adenoma detection in a national colorectal cancer screening program. Endoscopy 2014; [Epub ahead of print] DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1358831.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Corte C, Dahlenburg L, Selby W et al. Hyoscine butylbromide administered at the cecum increases polyp detection: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 917-922
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 de Brouwer EJ, Arbouw ME, van der Zwet WC et al. Hyoscine N-butylbromide does not improve polyp detection during colonoscopy: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 835-840
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Rondonotti E, Radaelli F, Paggi S et al. Hyoscine N-butylbromide for adenoma detection during colonoscopy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Dig Liver Dis 2013; 45: 663-668
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Plumb AA, Halligan S, Nickerson C et al. Use of CT colonography in the English Bowel Cancer Screening Programme. Gut 2013; [Epub ahead of print] DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013–304697.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Pickhardt PJ, Hassan C, Halligan S et al. Colorectal cancer: CT colonography and colonoscopy for detection – systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology 2011; 259: 393-405
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology 2008; 134: 1570-1595
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Atkin W, Dadswell E, Wooldrage K et al. Computed tomographic colonography versus colonoscopy for investigation of patients with symptoms suggestive of colorectal cancer (SIGGAR): a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 2013; 381: 1194-1202
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar