PDF herunterladen
Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2014; 18(01): 045-053
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1365834
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Variants and Pitfalls in MR Imaging of Knee Injuries

Hsien Khai Tan
1   Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Alexandra Health, Singapore
,
Mohammad M. Bakri
2   Department of Radiology, Kajang Hospital, Kajang, Malaysia
,
Wilfred C.G. Peh
1   Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Alexandra Health, Singapore
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
10. Februar 2014 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

MR imaging is an established tool for the detection and diagnosis of various injuries and internal derangements of the knee, enabling excellent anatomical visualization and producing good soft tissue contrast and characterization. However, numerous normal variants and potential pitfalls may lead to diagnostic errors. Understanding the basic MR imaging principles, applying the correct technique, knowing the normal anatomy and variants, recognizing artifacts, and assuring good clinical and radiographic correlation helps avoid these potential pitfalls.

Keywords

diagnostic errors - knee normal variants - knee pseudolesions - MR imaging pitfalls
 

  • References

  • 1 Mesgarzadeh M, Moyer R, Leder DS , et al. MR imaging of the knee: expanded classification and pitfalls to interpretation of meniscal tears. Radiographics 1993; 13 (3) 489-500
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Roychowdhury S, Fitzgerald SW, Sonin AH, Peduto AJ, Miller FH, Hoff FL. Using MR imaging to diagnose partial tears of the anterior cruciate ligament: value of axial images. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168 (6) 1487-1491
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Peh WCG, Chan JHM. Artifacts in musculoskeletal magnetic resonance imaging: identification and correction. Skeletal Radiol 2001; 30 (4) 179-191
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Ramnath RR, Magee T, Wasudev N, Murrah R. Accuracy of 3-T MRI using fast spin-echo technique to detect meniscal tears of the knee. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187 (1) 221-225
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Magee T, Williams D. 3.0-T MRI of meniscal tears. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187 (2) 371-375
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Helms CA. The meniscus: recent advances in MR imaging of the knee. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 179 (5) 1115-1122
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Escobedo EM, Hunter JC, Zink-Brody GC, Wilson AJ, Harrison SD, Fisher DJ. Usefulness of turbo spin-echo MR imaging in the evaluation of meniscal tears: comparison with a conventional spin-echo sequence. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 167 (5) 1223-1227
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Cheung LP, Li KCP, Hollett MD, Bergman AG, Herfkens RJ. Meniscal tears of the knee: accuracy of detection with fast spin-echo MR imaging and arthroscopic correlation in 293 patients. Radiology 1997; 203 (2) 508-512
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Delfaut EM, Beltran J, Johnson G , et al. Fat suppression in MR imaging: technique and pitfalls. Radiographics 1999; 19: 373-382
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Disler DG, Peters TL, Muscoreil SJ , et al. Fat-suppressed spoiled GRASS imaging of knee hyaline cartilage: technique optimization and comparison with conventional MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994; 163 (4) 887-892
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Peh WCG, Chan JHM. The magic angle phenomenon in tendons: effect of varying the MR echo time. Br J Radiol 1998; 71 (841) 31-36
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Erickson SJ, Cox IH, Hyde JS, Carrera GF, Strandt JA, Estkowski LD. Effect of tendon orientation on MR imaging signal intensity: a manifestation of the “magic angle” phenomenon. Radiology 1991; 181 (2) 389-392
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Snoeckx A, Vanhoenacker FM, Gielen JL, Van Dyck P, Parizel PM. Magnetic resonance imaging of variants of the knee. Singapore Med J 2008; 49 (9) 734-744
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Watanabe AT, Carter BC, Teitelbaum GP, Seeger LL, Bradley Jr WG. Normal variations in MR imaging of the knee: appearance and frequency. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989; 153 (2) 341-344
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Shankman S, Beltran J, Melamed E, Rosenberg ZS. Anterior horn of the lateral meniscus: another potential pitfall in MR imaging of the knee. Radiology 1997; 204 (1) 181-184
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Andrews CL. From the RSNA Refresher Courses. Radiological Society of North America. Evaluation of the marrow space in the adult hip. Radiographics 2000; 20 (Spec No): S27-S42
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Arndt III WF, Truax AL, Barnett FM, Simmons GE, Brown DC. MR diagnosis of bone contusions of the knee: comparison of coronal T2-weighted fast spin-echo with fat saturation and fast spin-echo STIR images with conventional STIR images. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 166 (1) 119-124
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Bredella MA, Stoller DW. Marrow imaging. In: Stoller DW, , ed. Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Orthopedics and Sport Medicine. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007: 1978-1982
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Moore SG, Dawson KL. Red and yellow marrow in the femur: age-related changes in appearance at MR imaging. Radiology 1990; 175 (1) 219-223
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Peh WCG. Modern imaging of the musculoskeletal system: is there still a role for radiography?. Singapore Med J 2002; 43 (8) 385-386
    PubMedGoogle Scholar