Key words
ablation procedures - experimental study - radiofrequency (RF) ablation - technical
aspects
Introduction
Radiofrequency (RF) ablation is increasingly used to treat primary and inoperable
secondary lesions of the liver [1]
[2]
[3], and is additionally gaining significance in the treatment of malignancies in other
organs [4]
[5]
[6]. The advantages of this treatment method include potential curative effects, lessened
rate of complications, reduced loss of healthy tissue and short patient hospitalization
time. Although the local recurrence rate in the case of small tumor size is quite
encouraging, treatment of tumors greater than 3 cm in diameter is frequently associated
with high local recurrence rates [7]
[8]
[9]
[10]. Tumors with greater diameters extend beyond the limits of clinically used ablation
systems, since a sufficient safety margin in the area around the tumors must be obtained.
In addition to repositioning applicators to achieve overlapping ablation zones, various
other strategies are employed to enlarge the short axis diameter of the ablation zone
(orthogonally to the axis of the applicator), including expandable, multipolar and
cluster systems with several parallel applicators [11]
[12]. Internal applicator cooling has additionally shown itself to be efficient, since
it reduces tissue carbonization while minimizing loss of electrical conductivity of
the tissue [13]
[14]. In addition to internal water cooling, CO2-based, gas-cooled cryo applicators with greater cooling capacity have been used [15]. It has been shown that such systems result in an optimal expansion of the ablation
zone using the highest possible electrical output [16]. This was based on continuous energy delivery and cooling, whereas in water-cooled
systems it has been demonstrated that pauses in energy delivery have a positive impact
on the ablation zone [17]
[18]. Using an ex vivo bovine liver model, this study investigates how a pulsed or impedance-dependent
energy application affects the results of the ablation.
Materials and Methods
Ablation Probe and Generator
The tests were performed using monopolar cryo-RF ablation probes (ERBE, Tübingen,
Germany) with an active electrode length of 3 cm and a diameter of 1.8 mm ([Fig. 1]). Cooling used the Joule-Thompson principle [15]: compressed CO2 gas is fed to the ablation probe via a high-pressure system; the gas then flows via
throttle jets into an expansion chamber at the tip of the probe. Pressure loss during
passage of the gas into the expansion chamber results in the cooling effect. Gas pressure
in the high-pressure system was controlled with a pressure regulator (GMH 3155, Greisinger
Elektronic, Regenstauf, Germany), and was maintained at a constant 600 psi. Energy
was applicated via a high-frequency generator (VIO300 D, ERBE, Tübingen, Germany),
with an operating frequency of 350 MHz, and maximum output of 300 W.
Fig. 1 Scheme of the cryo-RF applicator. Compressed CO2 from the high pressure system reaches
the expansion chamber at the active tip of the RF applicator. Based on the Joule-Thomson-effect,
the expansion of the pressurized gas cools the applicator.
Ablation Parameters
Three different ablation modes were employed ([Fig. 2]): continuous energy delivery (A); pulsed energy application with reduced ablation
current during ablation pauses (B); and impedance-dependent energy delivery (C).
Continuous energy delivery used a constant current Ic under continuous CO2 cooling. The tests were performed using various constant currents (IC = 1000, 1200, 1400 mA).
Fig. 2 Scheme of the three ablation modes: continuous energy delivery a, pulsed energy delivery with reduced current during ablation pause b and impedance-dependent energy delivery c.
During pulsed energy delivery (B), there was an ablation cycle with two intervals:
one 90 second interval (tHF high) using high ablation current Ihigh = 1500 mA, followed by an interval (tHF low) with lower current Ilow. Cooling was active only during the tHF high interval. In order to determine the optimum ablation parameters, the interval duration
tHF low and current Ilow were varied (THF low = 15, 30, 45 min.; Ilow = 400, 800, 1200 mA).
One cycle of impedance-dependent ablation (C) likewise consisted of two intervals.
The first interval (ton) used CO2 cooling with an ablation current Ion and impedance-dependent duration. During ablation, the parameters, including tissue
impedance Z were monitored and recorded (VioDocu, ERBE). When impedance increased
by 30 %, energy delivery was interrupted. During the following pause interval (tpause, Ipause = 0 mA) CO2 cooling was stopped. The parameters Ion und tpause were varied (Ion = 1200, 1400, 1600 mA; tpause = 30, 60, 90 s).
During all tests, the maximum ablation time was 20 minutes. The ablation cycles were
repeated and the ablation continued until the maximum ablation time was reached, or
until an irreversible increase in tissue impedance made additional ablation impossible.
Experiments
The ablation experiments were performed ex vivo on 12 fresh bovine livers provided
by a local abattoir. At the time of testing, the tissue temperature lay between 21.5
and 23.0 °C. For each combination of parameters n ≥ 4 ablation tests were performed,
for a total of 108 tests. After each ablation the short axis (SA) and long axis (LA)
diameters were measured with a vernier caliper; measurement was related to the white
portion of the ablation zone [19] ([Fig. 3]). The ablation volume was calculated using the volume formula for ellipsoids (V = π/6 × (LA × SA²))
and the sphericity of the ablation zone was determined using the sphericity index
R = SA/LA. Ablation time in the event of early termination was documented. An ablation
was repeated if the ablation reached the liver capsule or if it passed through a blood
vessel.
Fig. 3 Coagulation zone after cryo-cooled RF ablation with impedance-dependent energy delivery
(Ion = 1400 mA; tpause = 60 s) with short axis and long axis diameter (SA, LA).
Statistical Analysis
For each ablation mode, the parameter combinations leading to the ablation zone with
the greatest short axis diameter were determined. The result was investigated for
significance using the analysis of variance (ANOVA). Employing ANOVA and the Tukey-Kramer HSD (Honestly Significant Difference) test, the three ablation modes were compared with
respect to the ablation zones acquired using the most favorable combination of parameters.
The average times of the three ablation modes were compared, and the influence of
time upon the short axis diameter was investigated using the linear regression method.
Statistical evaluation was performed using the JMP statistical software program (Version
9.0.0, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, USA). A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically
significant. Results were stated with standard deviation (± SD).
Results
Under continuous ablation (A) the greatest short axis diameter (44.4 mm ± SD 4.1)
was achieved with Ic = 1200 mA. Using pulsed energy delivery (B), the ablation zone with the greatest
short axis diameter (46.1 mm ± SD 5.6) was achieved with Ilow = 800mA and tHF low = 30 s. Under impedance-controlled ablation (C) the greatest short axis diameter
(51.1 mm ± SD 2.3) was generated with tpause = 60 s and Ion = 1400 mA. However, the ablation results with the optimum parameters do not differ
statistically from the other ablation results within the groups (A), (B) and (C) (p = 0.40
(A), p = 0.53 (B); p = 0.25 (C)).
Compared to the other ablation modes, impedance-controlled ablation (C) achieved zones
with significantly greater short axis diameters (51.1 mm ± SD 2.3; p = 0.01). A statistically
significant difference between continuous (A) and pulsed energy delivery (B) was not
evident in this regard (p = 0.75) ([Fig. 4]).
Fig. 4 Ablation zone with significantly largest short axis diameter was reached with impedance-dependent
energy delivery (51.1 mm ± SD 2.3; p = 0.01). Pulsed energy delivery: 46.1 mm ± SD
5.6. Continuous energy delivery: 44.4 mm ± SD 4.1.
The maximum ablation time of 20 minutes was achieved using continuous energy delivery
(A) in 16.7 % of tests, 12.5 % using pulsed energy output (B) and in 64.6 % of tests
using impedance-dependent energy delivery (C). The significantly longest mean ablation
time was reached using impedance-dependent delivery (1061.6 s ± SD 42.4 p = 0.01).
The mean ablation times using continuous energy delivery (715.3 s ± SD 82.2) and pulsed
delivery (815.7 s ± 41.3) did not differ significantly (p = 0.93). A moderately positive
linear correlation with a correlation index of R = 0.70 and R = 0.64 was determined
between the short axis diameter and ablation volume and the ablation time ([Fig. 5]).
Fig. 5 Ablation was terminated before maximum ablation time of 20 min in 69/108 experiments
as further energy delivery was impossible due to a significant increase of tissue
impedance. Linear correlation with an intermediate correlation coefficient was determined
between ablation duration and short axis diameter (R = 0.70) and ablation duration
and ablation volume (R = 0.64).
The test results including diameter, volume and sphericity index are summarized in
[Table 1].
Table 1
Summary of results.
|
Mode
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ic
|
1000 mA
|
SA = 39.2 mm ± SD 5.7
|
|
|
LA = 50.1 mm ± SD 5.4
|
|
V = 40.6 cm³ ± SD 16.7
|
|
R = 0.79 ± SD 0.19
|
|
|
1200 mA
|
SA = 44.4 mm ± SD 4.1
|
|
|
LA = 52.8 mm ± SD 1.9
|
|
V = 54.7 cm³ ± SD 10.2
|
|
R = 0.84 ± SD 0.08
|
|
|
1400 mA
|
SA = 41.4 mm ± SD 5.6
|
|
|
LA = 51.8 mm ± SD 2.3
|
|
V = 46.9 cm³ ± SD 10.3
|
|
R = 0.80 ± SD 0.06
|
|
|
|
tHF low
|
|
|
B
|
|
15 s
|
30 s
|
45 s
|
|
Ilow
|
400 mA
|
SA = 42.8 mm ± SD 9.3
|
SA = 39.6 mm ± SD 7.6
|
SA = 42.9 mm ± SD 1.5
|
|
LA = 51.1 mm ± SD 6.8
|
LA = 51.4 mm ± SD 1.7
|
LA = 50.9 mm ± SD 2.4
|
|
V = 52.6 cm³ ± SD 25.6
|
V = 43.5 cm³ ± SD 17.0
|
V = 49.0 cm³ ± SD 4.5
|
|
R = 0.83 ± SD 0.08
|
R = 0.77 ± SD 0.14
|
R = 0.84 ± SD 0.05
|
|
|
800 mA
|
SA = 42.4 mm ± SD 4.0
|
SA = 46.1 mm ± SD 5.6
|
SA = 40.2 mm ± SD 4.2
|
|
LA = 51.3 mm ± SD 1.1
|
LA = 54.8 mm ± SD 4.1
|
LA = 49.8 mm ± SD 4.6
|
|
V = 48.5 cm³ ± SD 8.1
|
V = 62.4 cm³ ± SD 18.2
|
V = 43.0 cm³ ± SD 12.7
|
|
R = 0.83 ± SD 0.09
|
R = 0.84 ± SD 0.08
|
R = 0.81 ± SD 0.02
|
|
|
1200 mA
|
SA = 40.3 mm ± SD 7.7
|
SA = 41.9 mm ± SD 7.0
|
SA = 42.6 mm ± SD 6.4
|
|
LA = 50.1 mm ± SD 5.1
|
LA = 52.3 mm ± SD 1.1
|
LA = 57.4 mm ± SD 6.5
|
|
V = 45.0 cm³ ± SD 20.5
|
V = 48.9 cm³ ± SD 1.5
|
V = 55.7 cm³ ± SD 18.3
|
|
R = 0.80 ± SD 0.07
|
R = 0.80 ± SD 0.14
|
R = 0.75 ± SD 0.12
|
|
|
|
tpause
|
|
|
C
|
|
30 s
|
60 s
|
90 s
|
|
Ion
|
1200 mA
|
SA = 45.8 mm ± SD 4.5
|
SA = 46.1 mm ± SD 4.5
|
SA = 49.2 mm ± SD 3.1
|
|
LA = 52.4 mm ± SD 4.2
|
LA = 53.9 mm ± SD 3.6
|
LA = 56.8 mm ± SD 5.1
|
|
V = 57.5 cm³ ± SD 9.5
|
V = 60.2 cm³ ± SD 14.9
|
V = 71.8 cm³ ± SD 13.3
|
|
R = 0.88 ± SD 0.13
|
R = 0.85 ± SD 0.04
|
R = 0.87 ± SD 0.07
|
|
|
1400 mA
|
SA = 46.8 mm ± SD 6.6
|
SA = 51.7 mm ± SD 2.3
|
SA = 49.8 mm ± SD 6.2
|
|
LA = 55.0 mm ± SD 4.9
|
LA = 56.0 mm ± SD 3.1
|
LA = 57.3 mm ± SD 2.2
|
|
V = 64.9 cm³ ± SD 21.8
|
V = 78.3 cm³ ± SD 8.1
|
V = 75.8 cm³ ± SD 20.4
|
|
R = 0.85 ± SD 0.08
|
R = 0.93 ± SD 0.07
|
R = 0.87 ± SD 0.10
|
|
|
1600 mA
|
SA = 45.5 mm ± SD 4.0
|
SA = 50.6 mm ± SD 7.6
|
SA = 49.9 mm ± SD 0.1
|
|
LA = 57.5 mm ± SD 2.0
|
LA = 61.7 mm ± SD 5.4
|
LA = 57.6 mm ± SD 5.6
|
|
V = 62.7 cm³ ± SD 13.2
|
V = 85.0 cm³ ± SD 27.3
|
V = 79.5 cm³ ± SD 40.4
|
|
R = 0.70 ± SD 0.05
|
R = 0.82 ± SD 0.10
|
R = 0.86 ± SD 0.12
|
SA = short axis diameter, LA = long axis diameter, V = volume, sphericity index R = SA/LA.
Discussion
Whereas the long axis of ablation zones can be affected by the length of the active
applicator tip, the short axis represents the primary limitation to obtaining larger
ablation zones. As the diameter of the ablation zone increases, the contact area to
the surrounding tissue increases, resulting in increased energy loss during ablation
which can only be offset with a higher application of energy. To make this possible,
the contact surface between the electrode and tissues can be increased, such as through
the utilization of several or three-dimensional applicators, such as cluster electrodes
[12]
[20]. Another approach involves improving the electrical conductivity of the tissue bordering
on the electrode. A few studies showed that cooling the applicators results in enlargement
of the ablation zone, since the tissue in contact with the electrode loses less fluid,
thus delaying an increase in tissue impedance [14]. In addition, continuous application of lower outputs can hinder rapid drying of
the zones while preventing an increase in impedance; however this does not result
in an enlargement of the short axis diameter [21]. Due to the risk of incompletely ablated areas in the interior of the ablation zone,
the combination of low output with intensive cooling should be considered as problematic
[16]. Thus, most currently available RF ablation systems utilize sufficient cooling with
the highest possible output energy [22]. Water cooling is the most common method used to reduce ablation probe temperature;
it was shown, however, that more powerful gas-based systems provide greater energy
delivery, thus allowing larger ablation zones [15]
[16]
[23]. Although in those studies ablation was performed under continuous energy delivery,
i. e. constant output, the goal of this investigation was to examine the effect of
modified energy delivery on the ablation zone – particularly upon the short axis diameter.
Although higher output resulting from gas cooling is considered determinative for
larger ablation zones, this study shows that a brief interruption of energy input
at least at the onset of the increase of impedance (ablation mode C) can increase
the short axis of the ablation zone. This can be best explained by a limited effect
of cooling on the boundary surface between the tissue and applicator, which diminishes
with greater output and longer duration of ablation, even using gas cooling. Interruption
of energy input clearly allows regeneration of the number of available charge carriers.
This also explains why, when using impedance-controlled energy delivery, the longest
significant ablations were acquired before the increase in impedance of the tissue
bordering on the electrode resulted in termination of the ablation. In ablation mode
B, ablation was interrupted for a specific amount of time, and reduced ablation current
maintained with cooling switched off. The basic idea behind reduced current during
the pause in ablation is to reduce cooling off of the ablation zone during the pause.
However, in the ex vivo model, this mode was not shown to be advantageous, since ablation
results lay in the range of continuous ablation (mode A).
The primary limitation of our study was the performance of trials on an ex vivo bovine
liver. Due to absent micro-and macro perfusion, the results cannot be unconditionally
applied to in vivo ablation [24]
[25]. First, it should be anticipated that blood flow in larger vessels would lead to
a diffusion of heat energy, and thus result in a change of the ablation zone shape.
Second, it should be expected that micro-perfusion would delay drying out of the ablation
zone, thus retarding an increase in impedance. Further, all ablations were performed
at room temperature in order to achieve the most comparable test conditions. However,
it should be assumed that deviations in tissue temperature would likewise influence
the results of ablation.
In summary, this ex vivo study was able to demonstrate that by using cryo-cooled RF
applicators, zones with the greatest short axis diameters could be created if the
ablation is briefly interrupted as soon as there is an increase in tissue impedance.
In addition, when cryo-cooled RF applicators are employed using impedance-controlled
energy delivery, ablation interruption due to loss of tissue conductivity occurs later
than when continuous energy delivery is applied. A positive effect of reduced cutoff
current during pauses in ablation could not be supported.
Clinical Relevance of the Study
-
Impedance-dependent energy delivery during RF ablation using cryo probes prevents
premature termination due to loss of tissue conductivity.
-
Impedance-dependent energy delivery is superior to continuous energy output with respect
to the size of the ablation zone.
-
Reduced current during pauses in ablation does not have a positive effect on the size
of the ablation zone.