Download PDF
Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2014; 139(20): 1039-1045
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1369879
Originalarbeit | Original article
Kardiologie, Epidemiologie
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Perkutane Koronarintervention zusätzlich zu optimaler medikamentöser Therapie bei stabiler koronarer Herzkrankheit

Eine systematische Übersicht und Meta-AnalysePercutaneous coronary intervention in addition to optimal medical therapy for stabile coronary artery disease – A systematic review and meta-analysis
V. Gorenoi
1   Institut für Epidemiologie, Sozialmedizin und Gesundheitssystemforschung, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
,
A. Hagen
1   Institut für Epidemiologie, Sozialmedizin und Gesundheitssystemforschung, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

02 May 2013

19 October 2013

Publication Date:
06 May 2014 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Fragestellung: Die vorliegende Arbeit untersucht den Stellenwert einer perkutanen Koronarintervention (PCI) zusätzlich zu optimaler medikamentöser Therapie bei stabiler koronarer Herzkrankheit (KHK).

Methodik: Es wurden eine systematische Literaturrecherche in Onlinedatenbanken MEDLINE, EMBASE etc. im Juni 2010, eine Update-Recherche in MEDLINE im Februar 2013 und eine Handsuche durchgeführt. Randomisierte kontrollierte Studien (RCT) und systematische Übersichten von RCT zum Vergleich PCI vs. keine PCI bei stabiler KHK wurden identifiziert und ausgewertet. Ergebnisse für Tod, Myokardinfarkt sowie Angina Pectoris aus den RCT mit Anwendung einer optimalen medikamentösen Therapie wurden mithilfe einer Meta-Analyse für das relative Risiko (RR) zusammengefasst. Die Aussagekraft der Evidenz wurde in Anlehnung an GRADE bewertet.

Ergebnisse: Nach Bewertung von 7 systematischen Übersichten und 23 RCT wurden 4 RCT mit Anwendung einer optimalen medikamentösen Therapie (Beta-Blocker, ASS, Statine bei über 80% sowie ACE-Hemmer bei über 50% der Patienten in der Studie) identifiziert. Das Risiko für Tod und das Risiko für Myokardinfarkt waren bis 5 Jahre nach Therapiebeginn nicht signifikant unterschiedlich zwischen den Alternativen. PCI reduzierte den Anteil von Patienten mit Angina-Pectoris-Anfällen bis 3 Jahre nach Therapiebeginn (RR  0,81; 95 %-KI 0,71–0,92). Die Aussagekraft der Evidenz wurde als moderat eingestuft.

Folgerung: Eine PCI zusätzlich zur optimalen medikamentösen Therapie bei stabiler KHK sollte zur Reduktion des Anteils von Patienten mit Angina-Pectoris-Anfällen bis 3 Jahre nach Therapiebeginn führen.

Abstract

Objective: We evaluated the effect of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in addition to optimal medical therapy in stable coronary artery disease (CAD).

Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in the online databases MEDLINE, EMBASE etc. in June 2010, updated in February 2013 in MEDLINE and completed by a hand search. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) and systematic reviews of RCT comparing PCI vs. no PCI in stable CAD  were identified and evaluated. Results for death, myocardial infarction and angina pectoris of the RCTs using optimal medical therapy were combined with meta-analysis for relative risk (RR). The strength of the evidence was appraised based on GRADE.

Results: After evaluation of 7 systematic reviews and 23 RCT 4 RCTs using optimal medical therapy (Betablockers, ASS, Statins in more than 80% and ACE-Inhibitors in more than 50% of patients the study) were identified. No significant difference was found for the risks of death and of myocardial infarction between the alternatives up to 5 years after beginning the therapy. The PCI reduced the proportion of patients with angina pectoris attacks up to 3 years after beginning the therapy, RR = 0,81 (95 % CI: 0,71 to 0,92). The strength of the evidence was appraised as moderate.

Conclusion: The use of PCI in addition to optimal medical therapy in stable CAD  may reduce the proportion of patients with angina pectoris attacks up to 3 years after beginning the therapy.

Schlüsselwörter

stabile koronare Herzkrankheit - perkutane Koronarintervention - optimale medikamentöse Therapie - systematische Übersicht - Meta-Analyse

Keywords

stable coronary artery disease - percutaneous coronary intervention - optimal medical therapy - systematic review - meta-analysis
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 BÄK KA. Nationale VersorgungsLeitlinie "Chronische KHK". Version 1.13. 2012. www.versorgungsleitlinien.de/themen/khk/pdf/nvl_khk_lang.pdf (4.12.2012).
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Bari 2D Study Group. A Randomized Trial of Therapies for Type 2 Diabetes and Coronary Artery Disease. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 2503-2515
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Boden WE, O'Rourke RA, Teo KK et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 1503-1516
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Boden WE, O'Rourke RA, Teo KK et al. Impact of optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention on long-term cardiovascular end points in patients with stable coronary artery disease (from the COURAGE Trial). Am J Cardiol 2009; 104: 1-4
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Bruckenberger E. 23. Herzbericht 2010. Hannover: 2012. www.bruckenberger.de/pdf/hzb23_10auszug.pdf (8.12.2012).
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Bucher HC, Hengstler P, Schindler C et al. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus medical treatment for non-acute coronary heart disease: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2000; 321: 73-77
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Chaitman BR, Hardison RM, Adler D et al. The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes randomized trial of different treatment strategies in type 2 diabetes mellitus with stable ischemic heart disease: impact of treatment strategy on cardiac mortality and myocardial infarction. Circulation 2009; 120: 2529-2540
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Dagenais GR, Lu J, Faxon DP et al. Effects of optimal medical treatment with or without coronary revascularization on angina and subsequent revascularizations in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and stable ischemic heart disease. Circulation 2011; 123: 1492-1500
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Dakik HA, Kleiman NS, Farmer JA et al. Intensive medical therapy versus coronary angioplasty for suppression of myocardial ischemia in survivors of acute myocardial infarction: a prospective, randomized pilot study. Circulation 1998; 98: 2017-2023
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 De Luca G, Dirksen MT, Spaulding C et al. Drug-eluting vs bare-metal stents in primary angioplasty: a pooled patient-level meta-analysis of randomized trials. Arch Intern Med 2012; 172: 611-21
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 De BB, Pijls NH, Kalesan B et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 991-1001
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Dzavik V, Beanlands DS, Davies RF et al. Effects of late percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty of an occluded infarct-related coronary artery on left ventricular function in patients with a recent (< 6 weeks) Q-wave acute myocardial infarction (Total Occlusion Post-Myocardial Infarction Intervention Study [TOMIIS] – a pilot study). Am J Cardiol 1994; 73: 856-861
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Dzavik V, Buller CE, Lamas GA et al. Randomized trial of percutaneous coronary intervention for subacute infarct-related coronary artery occlusion to achieve long-term patency and improve ventricular function: the Total Occlusion Study of Canada (TOSCA)-2 trial. Circulation 2006; 114: 2449-2457
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Ellis SG, Mooney MR, George BS et al. Randomized trial of late elective angioplasty versus conservative management for patients with residual stenoses after thrombolytic treatment of myocardial infarction. Treatment of Post-Thrombolytic Stenoses (TOPS) Study Group. Circulation 1992; 86: 1400-1406
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Erne P, Schoenenberger AW, Burckhardt D et al. Effects of percutaneous coronary interventions in silent ischemia after myocardial infarction: the SWISSI II randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2007; 297: 1985-1991
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Falk E, Shah PK, Fuster V. Coronary Plaque Disruption. Circulation 1995; 92: 657-671
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Fihn SD, Gardin JM, Abrams J et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease. Circulation 2012; 126: 3097-3137
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Gorenoi V, Schönermark MP, Hagen A. Perkutane Koronarinterventionen zusätzlich zur optimalen medikamentösen Therapie bei stabiler Angina Pectoris. . Band 115. Köln: Schriftenreihe des Deutschen Instituts für Medizinische Dokumentation und Information; 2011
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA et al. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol 2011; 64: 383-394
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Hambrecht R, Walther C, Mobius-Winkler S et al. Percutaneous coronary angioplasty compared with exercise training in patients with stable coronary artery disease: a randomized trial. Circulation 2004; 109: 1371-1378
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Hartigan PM, Giacomini JC, Folland ED et al. Two- to three-year follow-up of patients with single-vessel coronary artery disease randomized to PTCA or medical therapy (results of a VA cooperative study). Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program ACME Investigators. Angioplasty Compared to Medicine. Am J Cardiol 1998; 82: 1445-1450
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Henderson RA, Pocock SJ, Clayton TC et al. Seven-year outcome in the RITA-2 trial: coronary angioplasty versus medical therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 42: 1161-1170
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Hink U, Münzel T. Medikamentöse Therapie beim Patienten mit stabiler Angina pectoris. HÄB 2004; 9: 386-391
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Hochman JS, Lamas GA, Buller CE et al. Coronary intervention for persistent occlusion after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 2395-2407
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Hochman JS, Reynolds HR, Dzavik V et al. Long-term effects of percutaneous coronary intervention of the totally occluded infarct-related artery in the subacute phase after myocardial infarction. Circulation 2011; 124: 2320-2328
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Horie H, Takahashi M, Minai K et al. Long-term beneficial effect of late reperfusion for acute anterior myocardial infarction with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Circulation 1998; 98: 2377-2382
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Hueb WA, Bellotti G, de Oliveira SA et al. The Medicine, Angioplasty or Surgery Study (MASS): a prospective, randomized trial of medical therapy, balloon angioplasty or bypass surgery for single proximal left anterior descending artery stenoses. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 26: 1600-1605
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Hueb W, Soares PR, Gersh BJ et al. The medicine, angioplasty, or surgery study (MASS-II): a randomized, controlled clinical trial of three therapeutic strategies for multivessel coronary artery disease: One-year results. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43: 1743-1751
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Ioannidis JP, Katritsis DG. Percutaneous coronary intervention for late reperfusion after myocardial infarction in stable patients. Am Heart J 2007; 154: 1065-1071
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Katritsis DG, Ioannidis JP. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus conservative therapy in nonacute coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. Circulation 2005; 111: 2906-2912
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Nishigaki K, Yamazaki T, Kitabatake A et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention plus medical therapy reduces the incidence of acute coronary syndrome more effectively than initial medical therapy only among patients with low-risk coronary artery disease a randomized, comparative, multicenter study. JACC Cardiovascular interventions 2008; 1: 469-479
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Pijls NH, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49: 2105-2111
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Pitt B, Waters D, Brown WV et al. Aggressive lipid-lowering therapy compared with angioplasty in stable coronary artery disease. Atorvastatin versus Revascularization Treatment Investigators. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 70-76
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Pursnani S, Korley F, Gopaul R et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus optimal medical therapy in stable coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2012; 5: 476-490
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2012 Update. Circulation 2012; 125: e2-e220
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Sechtem U. [Therapy of chronic stable angina]. Internist (Berl) 2008; 49: 57-66
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Sievers N, Hamm CW, Herzner A et al. Medical therapy versus PTCA: a prospective, randomized trial in patients with asymptomatic coronary single-vessel disease (abstr). Circulation 1993; 88 (Suppl. 01) I297
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Silva JC, Rochitte CE, Junior JS et al. Late coronary artery recanalization effects on left ventricular remodelling and contractility by magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Heart J 2005; 26: 36-43
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Statistisches Bundesamt. Gesundheitsberichterstattung für Deutschland. 2012. www.destatis.de (18.12.2012).
    Google Scholar
  • 40 Steg PG, Thuaire C, Himbert D et al. DECOPI (DEsobstruction COronaire en Post-Infarctus): a randomized multi-centre trial of occluded artery angioplasty after acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2004; 25: 2187-2194
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Stergiopoulos K, Brown DL. Initial coronary stent implantation with medical therapy vs medical therapy alone for stable coronary artery disease: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med 2012; 172: 312-319
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Trikalinos TA, sheikh-Ali AA, Tatsioni A et al. Percutaneous coronary interventions for non-acute coronary artery disease: a quantitative 20-year synopsis and a network meta-analysis. Lancet 2009; 373: 911-918
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 WHO, World Heart Federation, World Stroke Organization. Global atlas on cardiovascular disease prevention and control. 2011. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2011/9789241564373_eng.pdf (18.10.2012).
    Google Scholar
  • 44 Wijeysundera HC, Nallamothu BK, Krumholz HM et al. Meta-analysis: effects of percutaneous coronary intervention versus medical therapy on angina relief. Ann Intern Med 2010; 152: 370-379
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Yousef ZR, Redwood SR, Bucknall CA et al. Late intervention after anterior myocardial infarction: effects on left ventricular size, function, quality of life, and exercise tolerance: results of the Open Artery Trial (TOAT Study). J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40: 869-876
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Zeymer U, Uebis R, Vogt A et al. Randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and medical therapy in stable survivors of acute myocardial infarction with single vessel disease. Circulation 2003; 108: 1324-1328
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar