Download PDF
Gesundheitswesen 2015; 77(03): 168-177
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1377033
Übersichtsarbeit
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Ambulant-sensitive Krankenhausfälle: Eine inter­nationale Übersicht mit Schlussfolgerungen für einen deutschen Katalog

Ambulatory Care-Sensitive Conditions: An International Overview with Conclusions for a German Catalogue
C. Faisst
1   Fachgebiet Management im Gesundheitswesen, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin
,
L. Sundmacher
2   Fachbereich Health Services Management, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
26 August 2014 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Ziel der Studie: Ambulant-sensitive Krankenhausfälle (ASK) dienen der Qualitätsmessung im ambulanten Sektor. Ziel dieses Reviews ist es, einen Überblick über existierende ASK-Kataloge zu erstellen und daraus Erkenntnisse für die geplante Ausarbeitung eines Katalogs für Deutschland abzuleiten.

Methodik: Dieser Artikel nimmt eine Systematisierung der Diskussion zu ASK vor, indem der ­Begriff von den verwandten Themen der vermeidbaren Krankenhausfälle und vermeidbaren Krankheiten abgegrenzt wird. Auf Grundlage dieser Systematisierung werden eine für den deutschen Kontext gültige Definition des ASK-Begriffs entwickelt, eine Empfehlung für die Zusammenstellung adäquater Diagnosen gegeben sowie Anwendungsbereiche eines für Deutschland spezifischen ASK-Katalogs vorgeschlagen. Ein tabellarischer Überblick über neun zentrale Artikel, die die Ausarbeitung von ASK-Katalogen in anderen Ländern beschreiben, sowie ein erster Überblick über die darin enthaltenen Diagnosen dienen dabei als zentraler Leitfaden.

Ergebnisse und Schlussfolgerung: Die Erstellung eines für den deutschen Kontext angepassten ASK-Katalogs ist notwendig, um den lokalen Gegebenheiten des deutschen Gesundheitssystems Rechnung zu tragen und so die Validität des Qualitätsindikators sicherzustellen. Ein solcher Ergebnisindikator für den ambulanten Sektor kann einen Schritt hin zu einer stärker ergebnis­orientierten Versorgung bedeuten und helfen, die Qualität im Gesundheitswesen sicher zu stellen.

Abstract

Objective: Ambulatory care-sensitive conditions (ACSC) foster to quality measurement in the ambulatory sector. The objective of this review is to provide an overview of existing catalogues of ACSC and to derive insights that support the plan­ned development of an ACSC catalogue for Germany.

Methods: This article attempts to systemise the discussion on ACSC by delimiting the term from the related concepts of avoidable hospitalisations and avoidable diseases. Based on that, this article develops a definition of ACSC that is valid for the German context, makes a suggestion for the compilation of adequate diagnoses, and proposes how to apply an ACSC catalogue that is specific to Germany. An overview of nine central ­articles describing the elaboration of ACSC catalogues in other countries and a first view of the diagnoses they comprise serve as a guidance.

Results and Conclusion: The composition of an ACSC catalogue, that is adapted to the German context, is required to account for the local specifics of the German health-care system in order to ensure validity of the quality indicator. Such an outcome indicator for the ambulatory sector may mean a step towards a more outcome-oriented provision of care and may help ensure the quality of the German health-care system.

Schlüsselwörter

ambulant-sensitive ­Krankenhausfälle (ASK) - vermeidbare ­Krankenhausfälle - Qualität der ambulanten Versorgung - Literaturüberblick - Deutschland

Keywords

ambulatory care-sensitive conditions (ACSC) - avoidable hospitalization - quality of ambulatory care - literature review - Germany
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Billings J, Zeitel L, Lukomnik J et al. Impact of socioeconomic status on hospital use in New York City. Health Affairs 1993; 12: 162-173
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Weissman JS, Gatsonis C, Epstein AM. Rates of avoidable hospitalization by insurance status in Massachusetts and Maryland. JAMA: the journal of the American Medical Association 1992; 268: 2388-2394
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Sanderson C, Dixon J. Conditions for which onset or hospital admission is potentially preventable by timely and effective ambulatory care. Journal of health services research & policy 2000; 5: 222-230
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Caminal J, Starfield B, Sánchez E et al. The role of primary care in preventing ambulatory care sensitive conditions. European journal of public health 2004; 14: 246-251
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Brown AD, Goldacre MJ, Hicks N et al. Hospitalization for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions: a method for comparative access and quality studies using routinely collected statistics. Canadian journal of public health 2001; 92: 155-159
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Basu J, Friedman B, Burstin H. Primary care, HMO enrollment, and hospitalization for ambulatory care sensitive conditions: a new approach. Medical care 2002; 40: 1260-1269
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Laditka JN, Laditka SB, Probst JC. More may be better: evidence of a negative relationship between physician supply and hospitalization for ambulatory care sensitive conditions. Health services research 2005; 40: 1148-1166
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Ansari Z, Laditka JN, Laditka SB. Access to health care and hospitalization for ambulatory care sensitive conditions. Medical care research and review: MCRR 2006; 63: 719-741
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Purdy S, Griffin T, Salisbury C et al. Ambulatory care sensitive conditions: terminology and disease coding need to be more specific to aid policy makers and clinicians. Public health 2009; 123: 169-173
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der Entwicklung im Gesundheitswesen . Wettbewerb an der Schnittstelle zwischen ambulanter und stationärer Gesundheitsversorgung. Bonn: 2012
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Mendonça CS, Harzheim E, Duncan BB et al. Trends in hospitalizations for primary care sensitive conditions following the implementation of Family Health Teams in Belo Horizonte, Brazil. Health policy and planning 2012; 27: 348-355
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Millman ML. Access to health care in America. Washington DC: ­Na­tional Academy Press; 1993
    Google Scholar
  • 13 DeLia D. Distributional issues in the analysis of preventable hospitalizations. Health services research 2003; 38: 1761-1780
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Page A, Ambrose S, Glover J et al. Atlas of avoidable hospitalisations in Australia: ambulatory care-sensitive conditions. Adelaide: Public Health Information Development Unit, The University of Adelaide; 2007
    Google Scholar
  • 15 National Institutes of Health U.S. National Library of Medicine. Im Internet: www.nlm.nih.gov Stand: 22.05.2013
    PubMed
  • 16 Caminal J, Casanova C. La evaluación de la atención primaria y las hospitalizaciones por ambulatory care sensitive conditions. Marco conceptual. Atención Primaria 2003; 31: 61-65
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Rosano A, Abo Loha C, Falvo R et al. The relationship between avoidable hospitalization and accessibility to primary care: a systematic review. European journal of public health. 2013 23. 356-360
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Starfield B, Shi L, Macinko J. Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. The Milbank quarterly 2005; 83: 457-502
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Giuffrida A, Gravelle H, Roland M. Measuring quality of care with routine data: avoiding confusion between performance indicators and health outcomes. BMJ: British Medical Journal 1999; 319: 94-98
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Barnett R, Malcolm L. Practice and ethnic variations in avoidable hospital admission rates in Christchurch, New Zealand. Health & place 2010; 16: 199-208
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Saxena S, George J, Barber J et al. Association of population and practice factors with potentially avoidable admission rates for chronic diseases in London: cross sectional analysis. JRSM 2006; 90: 81-89
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Freund T, Campbell SM, Geissler S et al. Strategies for reducing potentially avoidable hospitalizations for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions. Annals of family medicine 2013; 11: 363-370
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Laditka JN, Laditka SB, Probst JC. Health care access in rural areas: evidence that hospitalization for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions in the United States may increase with the level of rurality. Health & place 2009; 15: 731-740
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Sundmacher L, Busse R. Der Einfluss der Ärztedichte auf ambulant-sensitive Krankenhausfälle. In: Klauber J, Geraedts M, Friedrich J, Wasem J. Hrsg Krankenhaus-Report 2012. Schwerpunkt: Regionalität. Stuttgart: Schattauer; 2011: 183-202
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Laditka JN. Physician supply, physician diversity, and outcomes of primary health care for older persons in the United States. Health & place 2004; 10: 231-244
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Magán P, Alberquilla Á, Otero Á et al. Hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions and quality of primary care. Medical Care 2011; 49: 17-23
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Niti M, Ng TP. Avoidable hospitalisation rates in Singapore, 1991–1998: assessing trends and inequities of quality in primary care. Journal of epidemiology and community health 2003; 57: 17-22
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Bindman AB, Chattopadhyay A, Osmond DH et al. The impact of Medicaid managed care on hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions. Health services research 2005; 40: 19-38
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Victorian Government Department of Human Services The Victorian ambulatory care sensitive conditions study: Preliminary analyses. Melbourne Victoria: 2001; Im Internet: www.health.vic.gov.au Stand: 22.05.2013
    PubMed
  • 30 Ministry of Health of New Zealand Our Health, Our Future: The Health of New Zealanders. Wellington: 1999; Im Internet: www.moh.govt.nz Stand: 22.05.2013
    PubMed
  • 31 Solberg LI, Peterson KE, Ellis RW et al. The Minnesota Project: a focused approach to ambulatory quality assessment. Inquiry 1990; 27: 359-367
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Alfradique M, Bonolo P. Ambulatory care sensitive hospitalizations: elaboration of Brazilian list as a tool for measuring health system performance. Cadernos de Saúde 2009; 25: 1337-1349
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Ministério de Saúde Brasil Lista Brasileira de Internações por Condições Sensíveis à Atenção Primária, Portaria n. 221. Brasilia 2008. Im Internet: www.saude.pr.gov.br/ Stand 22.05.2013
    PubMed
  • 34 Boing AF, Vicenzi RB, Magajewski F et al. Reduction of ambulatory care sensitive conditions in Brazil between 1998 and 2009. Revista de saúde pública 2012; 46: 359-366
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Refinement of the HCUP Quality Indicators. 2001. Im Internet: www.qualityindicators.ahrq.gov/Modules/pqi_resources.aspx Stand: 22.05.2013
    PubMed
  • 36 VStG Gesetz zur Verbesserung der Versorgungsstrukturen in der gesetzlichen Krankenversicherung (GKV-Versorgungsstrukturgesetz – GKV-VStG) 2011: 2983-3022
    PubMed