Synthesis 2015; 47(01): 95-107
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1379143
paper
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Base-Catalyzed Domino Double Michael Reactions of 1-Hydroxy-1,4-dien-3-ones and 2-Alkylidenemalononitriles: A Diastereoselective Route to Polysubstituted 3-Alkanoyl-4-hydroxycyclohex-3-enes

Yeong-Jiunn Jang
a   Department of Chemistry, National Taiwan Normal University, No. 88, Sec. 4, Tingchow Road, Taipei, Taiwan 11677, R.O.C.   Fax: +886(2)29324249   eMail: wenweilin@ntnu.edu.tw
b   School of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, China Medical University, No. 91 Hsueh-Shih Road, Taichung, Taiwan 40402, R.O.C.
c   Chinese Medicine Research and Development Center, China Medical University Hospital, No. 2 Yuh-Der Road, Taichung, Taiwan 40447, R.O.C.
,
Yu-Shan Chen
a   Department of Chemistry, National Taiwan Normal University, No. 88, Sec. 4, Tingchow Road, Taipei, Taiwan 11677, R.O.C.   Fax: +886(2)29324249   eMail: wenweilin@ntnu.edu.tw
,
Chia-Jui Lee
a   Department of Chemistry, National Taiwan Normal University, No. 88, Sec. 4, Tingchow Road, Taipei, Taiwan 11677, R.O.C.   Fax: +886(2)29324249   eMail: wenweilin@ntnu.edu.tw
,
Chi-Han Chen
a   Department of Chemistry, National Taiwan Normal University, No. 88, Sec. 4, Tingchow Road, Taipei, Taiwan 11677, R.O.C.   Fax: +886(2)29324249   eMail: wenweilin@ntnu.edu.tw
,
Wenwei Lin*
a   Department of Chemistry, National Taiwan Normal University, No. 88, Sec. 4, Tingchow Road, Taipei, Taiwan 11677, R.O.C.   Fax: +886(2)29324249   eMail: wenweilin@ntnu.edu.tw
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Received: 30. Juni 2014

Accepted after revision: 24. August 2014

Publikationsdatum:
29. September 2014 (online)

 


Abstract

The diastereoselective synthesis of 2,6-disubstituted 3-alkanoyl-4-hydroxycyclohex-3-ene-1,1-dicarbonitriles has been developed through domino double Michael addition of 1,5-disubstituted 1-hydroxy-1,4-dien-3-ones to 2-alkylidenemalononitriles catalyzed by triethylamine. This simple domino process affords a variety of highly functionalized 3-alkanoyl-4-hydroxycyclohex-3-enes, some of which are not easily accessible using other methodologies, in moderate to good yields and excellent diastereoselectivity (dr > 95:5). Thus, the generality of this process and feasibility of introducing bioactive moieties make this reaction highly valuable in synthetic and medicinal chemistry.


#

The construction of suitably functionalized cyclohexanones and related cyclohexanol skeletons plays a central role in many natural product syntheses due to their significant biological and pharmaceutical importance.[1] In literature reports, many methods for the synthesis of substituted cyclohexanones have arisen from different approaches, such as [4+2] cycloaddition,[2] rhodium(I)-catalyzed Pauson–Khand reaction,[3] palladium-catalyzed intramolecular hydroalkylation,[4] organocatalyzed domino annulation,[5] and reductive tandem double Michael cascade,[6a] highlighting the continued interest in these frameworks from the synthetic community. In particular, domino processes are a powerful strategy for the construction of complex molecular skeletons by simultaneous formation of two or more bonds from simple materials in a one-pot manner.[7] These benefits are of particular interest in pharmaceutical research for the construction of libraries of biologically active compounds. Therefore, developing novel domino reactions for the preparation of structurally diverse chemical libraries of polyfunctional compounds remains an interest for synthetic chemists. In this field, the usefulness of sequential Michael additions has been demonstrated,[8] and domino Michael reactions have especially emerged as one of the most potent tools for the synthesis of various important cyclic building blocks during recent decades.

It is well documented that the Michael reaction of chalcones containing an activated alkene, such as nitroolefins and 1,5-disubstituted penta-1,4-dien-3-ones, with active methylene substrates, such as malononitrile and 1,3-dicarbonyl compounds, can be employed to prepare highly substituted cyclohexanones, while chalcones can serve both as the starting Michael donor and ending acceptor in domino double Michael reactions (Scheme [1], type 1) and bischalcones as the Michael acceptors twice in the reaction course (type 2). Recently, curcumin and its derivatives, also bischalcones, are reported to have chalcone-like behavior and they have been used to build substituted cyclohexanones with nitroolefins and chalcones (type 3).[6b] [c] Although, there are several reports of the use of δ-aryl-β-oxo-γ,δ-unsaturated esters,[9] to the best of our knowledge there are no reports in the literature of the highly functionalized syntheses of 3-alkanoyl-4-hydroxycyclohex-3-enes using 1-hydroxy-1,4-dien-3-ones as both the starting Michael­ donor and ending acceptor in domino double Michael­ reactions (type 4).

Zoom Image
Scheme 1 Domino double Michael reactions for the construction of cyclohexanones

Herein, we disclose that only trans-isomers of 2,6-disubstituted 3-alkanoyl-4-hydroxycyclohex-3-ene-1,1-dicarbonitriles 3 are obtained in an efficient synthesis in good yields with excellent diastereoselectivity through the domino Michael addition of 1-hydroxy-1,4-dien-3-ones 1 with 2-alkylidenemalononitriles 2 catalyzed by triethylamine.

The starting materials, 1-hydroxy-1,4-dien-3-ones 1, were readily prepared by benzoylation of methyl vinyl ketones and acid chlorides with lithium diisopropylamide.[10a] Initially, to identify the optimal reaction conditions, a representative reaction affording 3aaa was investigated in the presence of different bases in dichloromethane at 30 °C. First of all, the reaction of 1aa with 1.2 equivalents of 2-benzylidenemalononitrile (2a), in the presence of piperidine as base catalyst (20 mol%) for two days, afforded an 85% NMR yield of 3aaa (Table [1], entry 1). The reaction was then performed in the presence of pyrrolidine and 4-(dimethylamino)pyridine, which led to a noticeable decrease in the yield of 3aaa to 72% and 70%, respectively, with 11% remaining of 1aa (entries 2 and 3). The reaction completely failed to occur when pyridine was used as the base (entry 4). The representative reaction was then carried out in the presence of triethylamine which led to slight enhancement in the yield to 91% with no remaining 1aa after 22 hours (entry 5). DABCO gave a moderate yield (69%), whereas a very poor yield was observed with 4-methylmorpholine (NMM) (entries 6 and 7). From these results, triethylamine emerged as the best choice of base for the domino reaction.[11] Having determined the optimal base for the reaction, investigating the choice of a suitable solvent was performed. From the results in Table [1], dichloromethane was the best solvent giving the maximum yield of the product (entries 8–15 vs. 5). Incidentally, using a higher temperature (60 °C) in 1,2-dichloroethane or toluene resulted in a somewhat faster reaction rate or higher yield and this shows the low level of temperature dependence of the reactions (entries 10 vs. 9 or 14 vs. 13). The ideal conditions thus established were then applied to the synthesis of a library of novel 2,6-disubstituted 3-alkanoyl-4-hydroxycyclohex-3-ene-1,1-dicarbonitriles 3 via the domino double Michael reactions of 1-hydroxy-1,4-dien-3-ones 1 and 2-alkylidenemalononitriles 2.

Table 1 Condition Screening for the Formation of Cyclohexanone 3 via Domino Double Michael Reactions of 1aa and 2a a

Entry

Catalyst

Solvent

Temp (°C)

Time

Yieldb (%)

3aaa

1aa

 1

piperidine

CH2Cl2

30

2 d

85

 0

 2

pyrrolidine

CH2Cl2

30

2 d

72

11

 3

DMAP

CH2Cl2

30

2 d

70

11

 4

pyridine

CH2Cl2

30

1 d

c

 –c

 5

Et3N

CH2Cl2

30

22 h

91

 0

 6

NMM

CH2Cl2

30

2 d

8

82

 7

DABCO

CH2Cl2

30

2 d

69

13

 8

Et3N

CHCl3

30

1 d

74

11

 9

Et3N

DCE

30

1 d

79

 2

10

Et3N

DCE

60

18 h

79

 2

11

Et3N

THF

30

1 d

58

11

12

Et3N

MeCN

30

1 d

80

 0

13

Et3N

toluene

30

1 d

20

68

14

Et3N

toluene

60

1 d

26

51

15

Et3N

xylenes

30

1 d

21

66

a Reaction conditions: 1aa (0.25 mmol), 2a (0.3 mmol, 1.2 equiv), catalyst (20 mol%), ACS-grade solvent (2 mL), 30 °C.

b NMR analysis: a known amount of Ph3CH was added to the crude products and used as internal reference for determination of yields of products and remaining starting materials.

c No reaction.

Table 2 Domino Double Michael Reactions of 1aa and R1-Substituted 2 a

Entry

R1 (2)

Time (h)

Yieldb,c (%)

 1

Ph (2a)

 22

3aaa, 87

 2

1-naphthyl (2b)

 24

3aab, 85

 3

2-naphthyl (2c)

 16

3aac, 77

 4

4-ClC6H4 (2d)

 16

3aad, 80

 5

4-BrC6H4 (2e)

 16

3aae, 77

 6

2-ClC6H4 (2f)

 24

3aaf, 76

 7

2-BrC6H4 (2g)

  9

3aag, 75

 8d

4-MeOC6H4 (2h)

 96

3aah, 74

 9

2-thienyl (2i)

 96

3aai, 79

10

2-furyl (2j)

 72

3aaj, 60

11

3-pyridyl (2k)

  9

3aak, 72

12

(2l)

 48

3aal, 62

13

(2m)

 48

3aam, 60

14

i-Pr (2n)

 72

3aan, 20

15

t-Bu (2o)

144

3aao-keto, 37

16

(2p)

 24

3aap, 66

a Reaction conditions: 1aa (0.25 mmol), 2 (0.3 mmol, 1.2 equiv), Et3N (20 mol%), CH2Cl2 (2 mL), 30 °C.

b Diastereomeric ratio (dr) measured by 1H NMR analysis of the crude reaction mixture.

c Isolated yield.

d Reaction conditions: 1aa (0.3 mmol, 1.2 equiv), 2h (0.25 mmol), Et3N (20 mol%), CH2Cl2 (2 mL), 30 °C.

With the optimum conditions in hand, we explored the scope and limitation of this route to highly functionalized 3-alkanoyl-4-hydroxycyclohex-3-enes 3 by changing the substitution pattern of the R1 group in the methylenemalononitrile 2 to modify the nature of the double bond. The reactions proceeded with excellent diastereoselectivity, leading to the formation of the corresponding compound 3 as a single diastereomer. The trans configuration of the 2,6-disubstitution of 3aaa was confirmed by X-ray crystallography.[12] These results are depicted in Table [2]. Various electron-poor and electron-rich R1 substituents on 2-methylenemalonitriles 2 were well-tolerated in the reaction with 1aa. In general, reactions when R1 is an ortho- or para-electron-withdrawing group substituted phenyl (entries 4–7) or when R1 is a steric hindered naphthyl substituent (entries 2 and 3) all give similar results to that of the unsubstituted 2-benzylidenemalononitrile (2a; entry 1). However, when R1 was a para-electron-donating group substituted phenyl stoichiometric 2h was consumed by excess 1aa (entry 8). Heteroaryl motifs in 2ik were successfully incorporated, and the products were obtained in 60–79% yields within nine hours to four days (entries 9–11). Additionally, it should be noted that indoles and coumarins are valuable building blocks found in numerous biologically active natural products and pharmacologically relevant therapeutic agents.[13] [14] [15] Molecules containing these scaffolds exhibit a broad range of bioactivity, therefore, they were also used in our method to expand the library of 3. Remarkably, indole- and coumarin-substituted methylenemalononitriles were used successfully in the reaction to give 3aal, 3aam, and 3aap in 60–66 % yields (entries 12, 13, and 16); these compounds have a high possibility of having interesting bioactivity. However, other attempts to react alkylidenemalononitriles under the standard conditions gave unsatisfied results, even after prolonged reaction times (entries 14 and 15). Furthermore, only the keto form product (entry 15)[16] was surprisingly generated without any enol product when R1 = tert-butyl (i.e., 2o) because the intramolecular hydrogen bonding of keto and enol residues was twisted and corrupted due to the steric hindrance between R1 (tert-butyl) and R2 (phenyl) groups in the product. Obviously, the substituent R1 and interactions between R1 and R2 have a large influence on not only the yield and rate, but also on the product distribution.

Table 3 Domino Double Michael Reactions of 2a and R2-Substituted 1 a

Entry

R2 (1)

Time (h)

Yieldb,c (%)

1

4-ClC6H4 (1ab)

24

3aba, 77

2

4-BrC6H4 (1ac)

24

3aca, 78

3

4-MeOC6H4 (1ad)

24

3ada, 39

4

2-thienyl (1ae)

12

3aea, 81

5

2-furyl (1af)

 8

3afa, 85

6

Et (1ag)

 8

3aga, 88

7

i-Pr (1ah)

13

3aha, 94

8

t-Bu (1ai)

48

3aia-enol, 18

3aia-keto, 55

a Reaction conditions: 1 (0.25 mmol), 2a (0.3 mmol, 1.2 equiv), Et3N (20 mol%), CH2Cl2 (2 mL), 30 °C.

b Diastereomeric ratio (dr) measured by 1H NMR analysis of crude reaction mixture.

c Isolated yield.

Under the optimized conditions, the scope of this new domino double Michael reaction was next examined using various 1-R2-5-phenyl-substituted 1, prepared from benzylideneacetone and various readily available acid chlorides (Table [3]),[10] and 2-benzylidenemalononitrile (2a). It was pleasing to find that most reactions afforded the corresponding products in good yields and with excellent diastereoselectivities. When the R2 functionality was an electron-withdrawing group containing phenyl group in 1ab and 1ac, the desired products were achieved with good efficiency, relatively higher yields, while in the case of an electron-donating group containing phenyl group in 1ad only a moderate yield was observed as it inactivated the nucleophilic enolate (Scheme [2], intermediate I) and therefore retarded the first addition step (entries 1 and 2 vs. 3). These results indicated that the electronic properties of R2 play an important role in this process and they are especially beneficial to the first Michael reaction. Furthermore, heteroaryl motifs such as 1aeaf were successfully incorporated, and in similar results 3aea and 3afa were obtained in 81–85% yields (entries 4 and 5). The reactions of aliphatic R2 were also examined (entries 6 and 7), and the corresponding products were produced smoothly with a significant increase both in yields and reaction rates while steric effects were not involved. On the other hand, when a sterically hindered R2 was investigated (entry 8), a noticeable decrease in reaction rate and yield was found in comparison with electron-withdrawing group substituted phenyls (entries 8 vs. 1 and 2), but remarkably it was still better than that of electron-donating group substituted phenyls (entries 8 vs. 3). It is interesting that electronic effects at R2 have a larger influence on the yield and rate than steric effects. Similarly, it was found that the keto-form product was predominates when R2 = tert-butyl (entry 8),[17] and it resulted from the steric hindrance between R2 = tert-butyl and R1 = phenyl groups in the product, which are reversed substituents compared with 3aao (Table [2], entry 15).

Table 4 Domino Double Michael Reactions of 2a and R3-Substituted 1 a

Entry

R3 (1)

Time (h)

Yieldb,c (%)

1

4-ClC6H4 (1ba)

12

3baa, 68

2

4-BrC6H4 (1ca)

12

3caa, 75

3

4-MeOC6H4 (1da)

12

3daa, 72

4

2-thienyl (1ea)

14

3eaa, 66

5

2-furyl (1fa)

24

3faa, 65

6

3-pyridyl (1ga)

12

3gaa, 59

7

(1ha)

24

3haa, 70

8

(1ia)

24

3iaa, 66

a Reaction conditions: 1 (0.25 mmol), 2a (0.3 mmol, 1.2 equiv), Et3N (20 mol%), CH2Cl2 (2 mL), 30 °C.

b Diastereomeric ratio (dr) measured by 1H NMR analysis of crude reaction mixture.

c Isolated yield.

Zoom Image
Scheme 2 Proposed mechanism for the formation of 3 from 1

To thoroughly extend the generality of this method, 1-phenyl-5-R3-substituted 1, synthesized from benzoyl chloride and methyl vinyl ketones readily prepared through the Aldol condensation or the Wittig reaction, were reacted with 2-benzylidenemalononitrile (2a) and the results are summarized in Table [4]. To our delight, a wide variety of functionalized 3 were obtained in medium to good yields and with excellent diastereoselectivity. Similar yields and rates were afforded no matter if electron-rich- or electron-poor-substituted phenyl, or heteroaryl motifs were involved. This suggests that 5-R3 substituents on 1 have less influence on the overall reactivity as compared with R1 and R2 substituents and the second addition step on the conjugated ketone was too fast to be retarded by R3 substituents due to intramolecular addition. Inspired by ideas in Table [2], indolyl motifs were also successfully introduced and provided similar results to other heteroaryl motifs in this position (entries 7 and 8 vs. 4–6).

Zoom Image
Scheme 3 Preparation of 3aaa from benzaldehyde and malononitrile in a one-pot manner. Reagents and conditions: 1aa (0.25 mmol), benzaldehyde (1.2 equiv), malononitrile (1.2 equiv), Et3N (20 mol%), CH2Cl2 (2 mL), 30 °C. Isolated yield, dr measured by 1H NMR analysis of crude reaction mixture.

In addition, the scope of the work was further extended to the one-pot reaction due to the easy and mild preparation of 2. To study this proposal, 1aa was treated with benzaldehyde and malononitrile in the presence of triethylamine under similar conditions, and it is pleasing to find that the corresponding product 3aaa was obtained as the sole diastereomer in similar yield to that obtained in a stepwise reaction, although a prolonged reaction time was necessary (Scheme [3] vs. Table [2], entry 1). On the other hand, it is worthy of note that such highly functional products 3 were conveniently generated for the first time from commercially available materials in a one-pot reaction comparing to literature reports.[2] [3] [4] [5] [6]

Pleased by our results so far, we turned our attention to synthetic applications related to the introduction of more functionalities on the carbocycles, and it would be definitely attractive to apply our method to compounds existing in nature or that have interesting bioactivity. For this purpose, curcumin-related derivatives 4a and 4b were prepared for the reaction with 2a under typical conditions.[10b] To our delight, our method can be used directly as expected and gave very highly functionalized 6-aryl-3-(3-arylpropenoyl)-4-hydroxy-2-phenylcyclohex-3-ene-1,1-dicarbonitriles 5aa (65%) and 5ba (75%) with excellent diastereoselectivity in 12 hours (Scheme [4]). Moreover, as chalcones are an important and enormous class of natural compounds that display interesting biological activity, and recent research suggests that the development of hybrid compounds through the combination of different pharmacophores may lead to molecules with interesting profiles. Based on these criteria, our methodology allowed practical and versatile functionalization, which makes it attractive from a medicinal chemistry point of view.

Zoom Image
Scheme 4 Domino double Michael reactions on curcumin-related derivatives 4a and 4b

In summary, we have developed a novel domino method to construct highly functionalized cyclohexanone derivatives via a double Michael reaction of 1-hydroxy-1,4-dien-3-ones and 2-alkylidenemalononitriles. The attractive features of this process are the practicability and the mild reaction conditions, which provide a series of cyclohexanone derivatives in moderate to good yields with extremely high diastereoselectivity. In addition, considering the high functional group tolerance of our method, this protocol should also offer an efficient and stereoselective entry to structurally more diverse, bioactive, and potentially pharmacological compounds. Current efforts are focused in two categories in order to: (1) broaden the substrate scope and study substrates other than methylenemalononitriles such as α-cyanocinnamates, and (2) develop new applications for this versatile methodology especially for the asymmetric synthesis of valuable compounds. Further investigations in these areas will be reported in due course.[18]

All reactions were carried out under an ordinary atmosphere in glass vials, unless otherwise noted. Reagents were purchased at the highest commercial quality and used without further purification, unless otherwise stated. Yields refer to isolated yields of compounds estimated to be > 95% pure as determined by 1H NMR. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were generally recorded on Bruker AV-400 or AV-500 spectrometers using CDCl3 as solvent at 400 or 500 and 100 or 125 MHz, respectively. Chemical shifts are reported in ppm relative to CDCl3 (δ = 7.26 ppm) in indicated cases. Analytical thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was performed using Merck 60 F254 precoated silica gel plates (0.2 mm thickness). Flash chromatography was performed using Merck silica gel 60. Key experimental procedures as well as spectroscopic data of products are summarized in the following experimental section.


#

2,6-Disubstituted 3-Alkanoyl-4-hydroxycyclohex-3-ene-1,1-dicarbonitriles 3 or 5; General Procedure

In an ordinary vial equipped with a magnetic stirring bar, compound 1 or 4 (0.25 mmol), 2 (0.3 mmol, 1.2 equiv), and Et3N (0.05 mmol, 20 mol%) were dissolved in CH2Cl2 (2.0 mL) and stirred at 30 °C. After the completion of the reaction, the mixture was subjected directly to flash column chromatography (silica gel) to give the corresponding products 3 or 5.


#

One-Pot Procedure for 3aa

In an ordinary vial equipped with a magnetic stirring bar, compound 1aa (0.25 mmol), benzaldehyde (0.3 mmol, 1.2 equiv), malononitrile (0.3 mmol, 1.2 equiv), and Et3N (20 mol%) were dissolved in CH2Cl2 (2.0 mL) and stirred at 30 °C. After completion of the reaction (36 h), the mixture was subjected directly to flash column chromatography (silica gel) to give the corresponding product 3aaa.


#

3aaa

White solid; yield: 87.9 mg (87%); Rf = 0.21 (CH2Cl2–hexanes, 2:3); 100% enol form; mp 248.3–249.2 °C.

IR (KBr): 3448 (s), 3059 (w), 2374 (w), 1608 (s), 1458 (w), 1240 (m), 702 cm–1 (s).

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 16.41 (s, 1 H), 7.44–7.34 (m, 7 H), 7.34–7.29 (m, 2 H), 7.30 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2 H), 7.16–7.09 (m, 2 H), 7.01 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2 H), 4.52 (s, 1 H), 3.47 (dd, J = 11.7, 6.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.32 (dd, J = 19.7, 11.7 Hz, 1 H), 3.10 (dd, J = 19.6, 6.2 Hz, 1 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 196.7, 182.3, 136.5, 135.9, 135.0, 130.7, 130.2, 129.5, 129.3, 129.2, 128.9, 128.32, 128.3, 126.1, 114.4, 113.1, 105.4, 49.1, 44.4, 40.2, 34.7.

MS (70 eV, EI): m/z (%) = 404 [M]+ (10), 250 (30), 232 (15), 155 (18), 105 (100), 77 (70).

HRMS (APCI-TOF): m/z [M + Na]+ calcd for C27H20N2O2Na: 427.1422; found: 427.1415.


#

3aab

White solid; yield: 96.5 mg (85%); Rf = 0.18 (CH2Cl2–hexanes, 2:3); 100% enol form; mp 152.9–153.8 °C.

IR (KBr): 3448 (s), 3055 (w), 2369 (w), 1598 (s), 1406 (m), 1295 (m), 701 cm–1 (s).

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 16.21 (s, 1 H), 7.88 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1 H), 7.80 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1 H), 7.60 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1 H), 7.53 (t, J = 7.68 Hz, 1 H), 7.46–7.37 (m, 2 H), 7.37–7.29 (m, 6 H), 7.09 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1 H), 6.94 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 2 H), 6.83 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2 H), 5.55 (s, 1 H), 3.73 (dd, J = 11.8, 6.1 Hz, 1 H), 3.39 (dd, J = 19.8, 11.9 Hz, 1 H), 3.16 (dd, J = 19.8, 6.1 Hz, 1 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 198.0, 180.6, 136.6, 135.0, 133.7, 132.7, 131.7, 130.3, 130.0, 129.5, 129.1, 128.8, 128.7, 128.4, 128.2, 126.4, 126.3, 125.5, 124.5, 122.8, 114.8, 112.9, 106.8, 43.2, 43.1, 40.5, 34.2.

MS (70 eV, EI): m/z (%) = 454 [M]+ (45), 205 (40), 105 (100), 77 (50).

HRMS (ESI-TOF): m/z [M + Na]+ calcd for C31H22N2O2Na: 477.1579; found: 477.1581.


#

3aac

Yellow solid; yield: 87.5 mg (77%); Rf = 0.41 (CH2Cl2–hexanes, 1:1); 100% enol form; mp 193.6–194.4 °C.

IR (KBr): 3448 (s), 3055 (w), 2369 (w), 1612 (s), 1413 (w), 1241 (s), 700 cm–1 (s).

1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 16.54 (s, 1 H), 7.88 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1 H), 7.85 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2 H), 7.61 (s, 1 H), 7.60–7.54 (m, 2 H), 7.40–7.32 (m, 4 H), 7.32–7.27 (m, 2 H), 7.25–7.20 (m, 3 H), 7.00 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2 H), 4.87 (s, 1 H), 3.54 (dd, J = 11.7, 6.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.37 (dd, J = 19.9, 11.7 Hz, 1 H), 3.18 (dd, J = 19.9, 6.4 Hz, 1 H).

13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 196.6, 182.6, 136.4, 134.9, 133.6, 133.4, 132.9, 130.8, 129.9, 129.5, 129.2, 128.8, 128.4, 128.33, 128.28, 127.8, 127.3, 127.2, 126.9, 126.2, 114.4, 113.2, 105.5, 49.2, 44.4, 40.4, 34.8.

MS (70 eV, EI): m/z (%) = 454 [M]+ (40), 205 (15), 105 (100), 77 (95).

HRMS (ESI-TOF): m/z [M – H] calcd for C31H21N2O2: 453.1603; found: 453.1594.


#

3aad

White solid; yield: 87.8 mg (80%); Rf = 0.43 (CH2Cl2–hexanes, 1:1); 100% enol form; mp 153.4–154.2 °C.

IR (KBr): 3702 (w), 2923 (m), 2358 (m), 2328 (m), 1596 (s), 1489 (m), 1234 (m), 697 cm–1 (s).

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 16.35 (s, 1 H), 7.45–7.37 (m, 4 H), 7.37–7.28 (m, 6 H), 7.04 (dd, J = 11.6, 8.6 Hz, 4 H), 4.51 (s, 1 H), 3.42–3.27 (m, 2 H), 3.10 (dd, J = 18.4, 4.9 Hz, 1 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 196.9, 182.0, 136.4, 135.5, 134.7, 134.5, 131.4, 130.8, 129.6, 129.3, 129.1, 128.5, 128.3, 126.0, 114.2, 113.0, 105.2, 48.2, 44.3, 40.2, 34.5.

MS (70 eV, EI): m/z (%) = 438 [M]+ (50), 440 [M + 2]+ (17), 249 (85), 189 (20), 105 (100), 77 (70).

HRMS (ESI-TOF): m/z [M – H] calcd for C27H18N2O2Cl: 437.1057; found: 437.1063.


#

3aae

White solid; yield: 93.0 mg (77%); Rf = 0.56 (CH2Cl2–hexanes, 1:1); 100% enol form; mp 259.9–260.7 °C.

IR (KBr): 3448 (s), 3063 (w), 2369 (w), 1618 (s), 1413 (s), 1239 (s), 702 cm–1 (s).

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 16.35 (s, 1 H), 7.50 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2 H), 7.46–7.37 (m, 4 H), 7.36–7.28 (m, 4 H), 7.02 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2 H), 6.99 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2 H), 4.49 (s, 1 H), 3.42–3.26 (m, 2 H), 3.10 (dd, J = 18.2, 4.8 Hz, 1 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 196.8, 182.0, 136.4, 135.0, 134.7, 132.1, 131.6, 130.8, 129.6, 129.3, 128.5, 128.3, 126.0, 123.8, 114.1, 113.0, 105.1, 48.6, 44.2, 40.2, 34.5.

MS (70 eV, EI): m/z (%) = 484 [M]+ (10), 484 [M + 2]+ (10), 249 (60), 105 (100), 77 (50).

HRMS (ESI-TOF): m/z [M – H] calcd for C27H18N2O2Br: 481.0552; found: 481.0545.


#

3aaf

White solid; yield: 83.4 mg (76%); Rf = 0.57 (CH2Cl2–hexanes, 1:1); 100% enol form; mp 213.9–214.7 °C.

IR (KBr): 3442 (w), 3059 (w), 2243 (w), 1618 (s), 1406 (w), 1268 (m), 702 cm–1 (s).

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 16.15 (s, 1 H), 7.46–7.32 (m, 7 H), 7.32–7.21 (m, 5 H), 6.96 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2 H), 5.28 (s, 1 H), 3.54 (dd, J = 12.0, 5.8 Hz, 1 H), 3.36 (dd, J = 19.5, 12.0 Hz, 1 H), 3.09 (dd, J = 19.6, 5.8 Hz, 1 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 198.5, 180.5, 136.7, 136.3, 134.7, 134.1, 131.1, 130.44, 130.42, 129.6, 129.3, 128.6, 128.5, 127.0, 125.4, 114.3, 112.3, 105.8, 44.6, 42.8, 40.5, 34.1.

MS (70 eV, EI): m/z (%) = 438 [M]+ (18), 440 [M + 2]+ (6), 403 (20), 249 (60), 105 (100), 77 (70).

HRMS (ESI-TOF): m/z [M – H] calcd for C27H18N2O2Cl: 437.1057; found: 437.1055.


#

3aag

White solid; yield: 90.6 mg (75%); Rf = 0.57 (CH2Cl2–hexanes, 1:1); 100% enol form; mp 208.1–209.0 °C.

IR (KBr): 3435 (m), 3025 (w), 2369 (w), 1618 (s), 1405 (s), 1269 (s), 764 cm–1 (s).

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 16.12 (s, 1 H), 7.45 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.42–7.32 (m, 7 H), 7.30 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2 H), 7.25–7.16 (m, 2 H), 6.96 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2 H), 5.26 (s, 1 H), 3.54 (dd, J = 12.0, 5.8 Hz, 1 H), 3.36 (dd, J = 19.6, 12.0 Hz, 1 H), 3.09 (dd, J = 19.6, 5.8 Hz, 1 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 198.7, 180.3, 136.8, 135.6, 134.7, 133.9, 131.2, 130.5, 130.4, 129.6, 129.2, 128.7, 128.5, 127.6, 127.5, 125.5, 114.2, 112.3, 105.9, 47.0, 42.7, 40.4, 34.0.

MS (70 eV, EI): m/z (%) = 483 [M]+ (5), 485 [M + 2]+ (5), 403 (50), 249 (70), 105 (100), 77 (70).

HRMS (ESI-TOF): m/z [M – H] calcd for C27H18N2O2Br: 481.0552; found: 481.0555.


#

3aah

White solid; yield: 80.4 mg (74%); Rf = 0.28 (CH2Cl2–hexanes, 1:1); 100% enol form; mp 209.0–209.3 °C.

IR (KBr): 3448 (s), 3059 (w), 2374 (w), 1608 (s), 1458 (w), 1240 (m), 702 cm–1 (s).

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 16.42 (s, 1 H), 7.44–7.36 (m, 4 H), 7.35–7.27 (m, 4 H), 7.04 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 4 H), 6.89 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2 H), 4.47 (s, 1 H), 3.84 (s, 3 H), 3.44 (dd, J = 11.8, 6.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.30 (dd, J = 19.7, 11.9 Hz, 1 H), 3.08 (dd, J = 19.8, 6.3 Hz, 1 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 196.8, 182.0, 160.2, 136.6, 135.1, 131.4, 130.7, 129.5, 129.2, 128.32, 128.30, 127.8, 126.1, 114.5, 114.2, 113.3, 105.7, 55.3, 48.5, 44.6, 40.1, 34.7.

MS (70 eV, EI): m/z (%) = 434 [M]+ (30), 262 (70), 249 (60), 105 (100), 77 (100).

HRMS (ESI-TOF): m/z [M – H] calcd for C28H21N2O3: 433.1552; found: 433.1551.


#

3aai

Yellow solid; yield: 81.1 mg (79%); Rf = 0.59 (CH2Cl2–hexanes, 1:1); 100% enol form; mp 231.7–232.6 °C.

IR (KBr): 3424 (w), 2921 (m), 2369 (w), 1608 (s), 1411 (s), 1238 (s), 700 cm–1 (s).

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 16.41 (s, 1 H), 7.48–7.32 (m, 9 H), 7.15 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2 H), 7.05 (t, J = 4.3 Hz, 1 H), 6.95 (d, J = 3.3 Hz, 1 H), 4.83 (s, 1 H), 3.59 (dd, J = 11.8, 6.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.29 (dd, J = 19.7, 11.8 Hz, 1 H), 3.07 (dd, J = 19.8, 6.4 Hz, 1 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 196.4, 182.2, 140.5, 136.3, 135.0, 130.9, 129.6, 129.31, 129.29, 128.6, 128.3, 128.2, 127.7, 126.2, 114.0, 113.5, 107.0, 44.9, 44.5, 40.8, 34.6.

MS (70 eV, EI): m/z (%) = 410 [M]+ (10), 326 (25), 256 (30), 161 (18), 105 (100), 77 (90).

HRMS (ESI-TOF): m/z [M – H] calcd for C25H17N2O2S: 409.1011; found: 409.1007.


#

3aaj

Yellow solid; yield: 59.2 mg (60%); Rf = 0.45 (CH2Cl2–hexanes, 1:1); 100% enol form; mp 230.5.4–231.4 °C.

IR (KBr): 3448 (s), 3122 (w), 2374 (w), 1609 (s), 1414 (s), 1272 (s), 701 cm–1 (s).

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 16.44 (s, 1 H), 7.48 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 2 H), 7.43–7.35 (m, 7 H), 7.16 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2 H), 6.41 (dd, J = 3.1, 1.8 Hz, 1 H), 6.21 (d, 1 H), 4.66 (s, 1 H), 3.53 (dd, J = 11.7, 6.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.27 (dd, J = 19.7, 11.8 Hz, 1 H), 3.06 (dd, J = 19.7, 6.4 Hz, 1 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 195.3, 183.6, 149.3, 144.2, 136.1, 135.1, 131.0, 129.6, 129.3, 128.6, 128.3, 126.2, 113.7, 113.1, 112.4, 111.2, 103.7, 43.7, 43.5, 41.6, 34.9.

MS (70 eV, EI): m/z (%) = 394 [M]+ (10), 240 (40), 105 (100), 77 (90).

HRMS (ESI-TOF): m/z [M – H] calcd for C25H17N2O3: 393.1239; found: 393.1239.


#

3aak

White solid; yield: 73.0 mg (72%); Rf = 0.62 (EtOAc–hexanes, 1:1); 100% enol form; mp 251.0–251.9 °C.

IR (KBr): 3448 (m), 2922 (m), 2254 (w), 1576 (s), 1414 (s), 1272 (s), 698 cm–1 (s).

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 16.29 (s, 1 H), 8.63 (s, 1 H), 8.38 (s, 1 H), 7.46–7.37 (m, 5 H), 7.37–7.27 (m, 5 H), 7.02 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2 H), 4.57 (s, 1 H), 3.44–3.30 (m, 2 H), 3.21–3.08 (m, 1 H).

13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 197.0, 181.8, 150.9, 150.4, 137.7, 136.4, 134.4, 132.0, 130.9, 129.8, 129.4, 128.6, 128.3, 125.8, 123.5, 114.0, 112.9, 104.4, 47.1, 44.1, 40.4, 34.4.

MS (70 eV, EI): m/z (%) = 405 [M]+ (30), 251 (95), 105 (100), 77 (90).

HRMS (ESI-TOF): m/z [M – H] calcd for C26H18N3O2: 404.1399); found: 404.1400.


#

3aal

Yellow solid; yield: 84.9 mg (62%); Rf = 0.20 (CH2Cl2–hexanes, 1:1); 100% enol form; mp 227.1–228.0 °C.

IR (KBr): 3725 (w), 3053 (w), 2947 (w), 2359 (w), 1695 (m), 1600 (m), 1448 (m), 1349 (s), 697 cm–1 (s).

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 16.25 (s, 1 H), 8.28 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1 H), 7.71–7.67 (m, 3 H), 7.49 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2 H), 7.38–7.25 (m, 9 H), 7.18 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2 H), 7.09 (s, 1 H), 7.03 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2 H), 4.78 (s, 1 H), 3.69 (dd, J = 11.2, 6.0 Hz, 1 H), 3.35 (dd, J = 11.5, 19.7 Hz, 1 H), 3.10 (dd, J = 19.8, 5.8 Hz, 1 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 196.9, 180.9, 168.1, 136.5, 136.3, 134.9, 133.5, 132.6, 130.5, 129.5, 129.2, 129.1, 128.9, 128.3, 128.1, 125.7, 124.3, 119.1, 117.3, 116.3, 114.1, 113.6, 105.4, 44.5, 41.9, 41.4, 34.4.

MS (70 eV, EI): m/z (%) = 547 [M]+ (6), 105 (100), 77 (70).

HRMS (MALDI-TOF): m/z [M + Na]+ calcd for C36H25N3O3Na: 570.1794; found: 570.1812.


#

3aam

Yellow solid; yield: 89.7 mg (60%); Rf = 0.45 (CH2Cl2–hexanes, 2:1); 100% enol form; mp 260.1–261.0 °C.

IR (KBr): 3688 (w), 3057 (w), 2920 (w), 2357 (w), 1595 (s), 1444 (s), 1172 (s), 672 cm–1 (s).

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 16.15 (s, 1 H), 7.99 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1 H), 7.77 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2 H), 7.45 (s, 1 H), 7.39–7.28 (m, 4 H), 7.25 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 4 H), 7.22–7.09 (m, 3 H), 6.94 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 2 H), 6.76 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 H), 4.82 (s, 1 H), 3.56 (dd, J = 11.8, 6.0 Hz, 1 H), 3.34 (dd, J = 19.7, 11.9 Hz, 1 H), 3.11 (dd, J = 19.7, 6.0 Hz, 1 H), 2.34 (s, 3 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 197.5, 180.2, 145.6, 136.3, 135.0, 134.9, 134.7, 130.4, 129.5, 129.2, 129.0, 128.21, 128.17, 127.9, 126.8, 125.7, 125.6, 123.6, 120.1, 119.6, 114.1, 113.7, 113.2, 106.0, 43.3, 41.1, 40.8, 34.0, 21.5.

HRMS (MALDI-TOF): m/z [M + Na]+ calcd for C36H27N3O4SNa: 620.1620; found: 620.1641.


#

3aan

White solid; yield: 18.5 mg (20%); Rf = 0.61 (CH2Cl2–hexanes, 1:1); 100% enol form; mp 211.8–212.5 °C.

IR (CH2Cl2): 3328 (m), 2962 (m), 2244 (w), 1589 (s), 1265 (s), 708 cm–1 (s).1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 16.12 (s, 1 H), 7.59–7.51 (m, 5 H), 7.51–7.42 (m, 5 H), 3.64 (d, J = 3.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.52 (dd, J = 11.7, 6.7 Hz, 1 H), 3.21 (dd, J = 19.7, 11.8 Hz, 1 H), 2.94 (dd, J = 19.8, 6.7 Hz, 1 H), 2.08 (m, 1 H), 0.85 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3 H), 0.62 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 193.7, 184.3, 136.6, 135.4, 131.2, 129.6, 129.4, 128.9, 128.2, 127.6, 114.6, 114.2, 105.0, 47.7, 43.9, 40.8, 35.3, 32.4, 24.0, 21.8.

MS (70 eV, EI): m/z (%) = 370 [M]+ (6), 327 (40), 223 (85), 105 (100), 77 (65).

HRMS (MALDI-TOF): m/z [M + Na]+ calcd for C24H22N2O2Na: 393.1579; found: 393.1596.


#

3aao-keto

Yellow solid; yield: 35.6 mg (37%); Rf = 0.63 (CH2Cl2–hexanes, 1:1); 100% keto form; mp 214.2–215.1 °C.

IR (KBr): 2962 (m), 2359 (w), 1707 (s), 1672 (s), 1592 (w), 1486 (w), 1261 (m), 697 cm–1 (m).

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.29–8.12 (m, 2 H), 7.66 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1 H), 7.48–7.60 (m, 4 H), 7.48–7.36 (m, 3 H), 4.98 (d, J = 3.5 Hz, 1 H), 4.18 (dd, J = 12.3, 6.9 Hz, 1 H), 3.51 (d, J = 4.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.01 (ddd, J = 19.2, 12.4, 1.5 Hz, 1 H), 2.79 (dd, J = 19.2, 6.9 Hz, 1 H), 1.21 (s, 9 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 200.4, 192.9, 135.3, 134.7, 134.3, 129.9, 129.5, 129.09, 129.07, 128.8, 115.8, 113.8, 61.6, 53.8, 46.5, 41.2, 40.1, 36.2, 28.3.

MS (70 eV, EI): m/z (%) = 384 [M]+ (10), 250 (10), 105 (100), 77 (65).

HRMS (EI-magnetic sector): m/z [M]+ calcd for C25H24N2O2: 384.1838; found: 384.1841.


#

3aap

Yellow solid; yield: 83.6 mg (66%); Rf = 0.24 (CH2Cl2–hexanes, 1:1); 100% enol form; mp 201.6–202.3 °C.

IR (KBr): 3710 (w), 3038 (m), 2916 (m), 2351 (m), 1714 (m), 1604 (m), 1482 (w), 1288 (m), 705 cm–1 (m).

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 16.51 (s, 1 H), 7.73 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.65 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1 H), 7.48–7.32 (m, 8 H), 7.28 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2 H), 7.20 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 2 H), 5.26 (s, 1 H), 4.00 (dd, J = 10.2, 7.3 Hz, 1 H), 3.32–3.14 (m, 2 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 191.7, 188.5, 158.9, 152.7, 152.1, 135.4, 135.2, 134.0, 130.2, 129.4, 129.1, 128.9, 128.5, 126.8, 126.0, 125.3, 120.3, 117.2, 116.6, 113.9, 112.9, 102.0, 44.9, 43.4, 43.1, 36.8.

MS (70 eV, EI): m/z (%) = 506 [M]+ (30), 311 (30), 105 (100), 77 (70).

HRMS (ESI-TOF): m/z [M + Na]+ calcd for C30H19N2O4ClNa: 529.0931; found: 529.0923.


#

3aba

White solid; yield: 84.5 mg (77%); Rf = 0.59 (CH2Cl2–hexanes, 1:1); 100% enol form; mp 234.2–235.1 °C.

IR (KBr): 3448 (m), 3060 (w), 2369 (w), 1608 (s), 1413 (s), 1274 (s), 703 cm–1 (s).

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 16.39 (s, 1 H), 7.46–7.36 (m, 6 H), 7.34–7.29 (m, 4 H), 7.28–7.24 (m, 2 H), 7.16 (t, J = 3.7 Hz, 2 H), 4.46 (s, 1 H), 3.46 (dd, J = 11.6, 6.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.32 (dd, J = 20.0, 11.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.12 (dd, J = 19.6, 6.4 Hz, 1 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 195.4, 182.7, 137.1, 135.8, 134.9, 134.8, 130.2, 129.54, 129.48, 129.3, 129.0, 128.7, 128.3, 127.7, 114.3, 113.0, 105.4, 49.1, 44.4, 40.2, 34.7.

MS (70 eV, EI): m/z (%) = 438 [M]+ (15), 440 [M + 2]+ (5), 284 (40), 139 (100), 77 (20).

HRMS (ESI-TOF): m/z [M – H] calcd for C27H18N2O2Cl: 437.1057; found: 437.1057.


#

3aca

White solid; yield: 94.3 mg (78%); Rf = 0.57 (CH2Cl2–hexanes, 1:1); 100% enol form; mp 242.4–243.2 °C.

IR (KBr): 3448 (m), 3054 (w), 2374 (w), 1592 (s), 1414 (s), 1275 (s), 703 cm–1 (s).

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 16.34 (s, 1 H), 7.45–7.35 (m, 8 H), 7.34–7.28 (m, 2 H), 7.20–7.12 (m, 2 H), 6.88 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2 H), 4.46 (s, 1 H), 3.45 (dd, J = 11.6, 6.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.31 (dd, J = 19.7, 11.7 Hz, 1 H), 3.11 (dd, J = 19.7, 6.3 Hz, 1 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 195.4, 182.7, 135.8, 135.2, 134.8, 131.6, 130.2, 129.52, 129.47, 129.2, 129.0, 128.3, 127.8, 125.4, 114.3, 113.0, 105.4, 49.0, 44.3, 40.2, 34.7.

MS (70 eV, EI): m/z (%) = 482 [M]+ (10), 484 [M + 2]+ (10), 330 (55), 312 (30), 182 (100), 155 (100), 104 (70), 77 (50).

HRMS (ESI-TOF): m/z [M – H] calcd for C27H18N2O2Br: 481.0552; found: 481.0558.


#

3ada

White solid; yield: 42.4 mg (39%); Rf = 0.36 (CH2Cl2–hexanes, 1:1); 100% enol form; mp 205.4–206.4 °C.

IR (CH2Cl2): 3313 (w), 3038 (w), 2969 (w), 2351 (s), 1596 (s), 1413 (m), 1303 (s), 1259 (s), 701 cm–1 (m).

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 16.76 (s, 1 H), 7.45–7.39 (m, 3 H), 7.39–7.35 (m, 3 H), 7.34–7.27 (m, 2 H), 7.25–7.20 (m, 2 H), 7.09 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2 H), 6.79 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2 H), 4.64 (s, 1 H), 3.81 (s, 3 H), 3.45 (dd, J = 11.6, 6.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.30 (dd, J = 20.0, 11.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.10 (dd, J = 19.8, 6.5 Hz, 1 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 195.0, 182.9, 161.8, 136.1, 135.1, 130.2, 129.4, 129.3, 129.2, 129.0, 128.8, 128.7, 128.3, 114.4, 113.7, 113.3, 105.2, 55.4, 49.1, 44.5, 40.4, 35.0.

MS (70 eV, EI): m/z (%) = 434 [M]+ (20), 280 (55), 172 (75), 134 (100), 104 (50), 77 (60).

HRMS (MALDI-TOF): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C28H23N2O3: 435.1708; found: 435.1717.


#

3aea

White solid; yield: 83.1 mg (81%); Rf = 0.31 (CH2Cl2–hexanes, 1:1); 100% enol form; mp 243.5–244.2 °C.

IR (KBr): 3448 (m), 2920 (w), 2375 (w), 1592 (s), 1413 (s), 1239 (s), 702 cm–1 (s).

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 17.51 (s, 1 H), 7.59 (d, J = 4.8 Hz, 1 H), 7.54–7.42 (m, 5 H), 7.42–7.34 (m, 3 H), 7.33–7.24 (m, 3 H), 7.00 (t, J = 4.4 Hz, 1 H), 5.01 (s, 1 H), 3.48–3.24 (m, 2 H), 3.11 (dd, J = 19.2, 6.0 Hz, 1 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 184.8, 184.5, 139.6, 135.4, 135.1, 133.5, 132.2, 130.4, 129.7, 129.5, 129.2, 128.3, 128.1, 114.3, 113.4, 103.7, 48.5, 44.8, 40.1, 35.5.

MS (70 eV, EI): m/z (%) = 410 [M]+ (10), 256 (15), 172 (45), 111 (100), 105, 77 (20).

HRMS (ESI-TOF): m/z [M – H] calcd for C25H17N2O2S: 409.1011; found: 409.1012.


#

3afa

Yellow solid; yield: 83.8 mg (85%); Rf = 0.34 (CH2Cl2–hexanes, 1:1); 100% enol form; mp 241.8–242.6 °C.

IR (KBr): 3436 (m), 2922 (m), 2244 (w), 1591 (s), 1411 (s), 1246 (m), 704 cm–1 (s).

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 17.36 (s, 1 H), 7.52 (s, 1 H), 7.47–7.35 (m, 8 H), 7.34–7.29 (m, 2 H), 7.25 (d, J = 3.4 Hz, 1 H), 6.48 (q, J = 1.6 Hz, 1 H), 5.48 (s, 1 H), 3.47 (dd, J = 12.0, 6.0 Hz, 1 H), 3.33 (dd, J = 19.5, 12.0 Hz, 1 H), 3.07 (dd, J = 19.6, 6.1 Hz, 1 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 184.2, 178.7, 150.4, 146.8, 136.4, 135.2, 130.3, 129.4, 129.2, 129.1, 128.6, 128.3, 120.5, 114.6, 113.5, 112.7, 103.4, 47.5, 44.6, 39.5, 35.3.

MS (70 eV, EI): m/z (%) = 394 [M]+ (35), 239 (25), 159 (30), 95 (100), 77 (40).

HRMS (ESI-TOF): m/z [M – H] calcd for C25H17N2O3: 393.1239; found: 393.1238.


#

3aga

White solid; yield: 78.4 mg (88%); Rf = 0.45 (CH2Cl2–hexanes, 1:1); 100% enol form; mp 171.5–172.0 °C.

IR (KBr): 3448 (m), 2938 (m), 2374 (w), 1618 (s), 1414 (s), 1212 (s), 704 cm–1 (s).

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 16.13 (s, 1 H), 7.52–7.45 (m, 3 H), 7.43–7.35 (m, 5 H), 7.33–7.27 (m, 2 H), 4.58 (s, 1 H), 3.41 (dd, J = 12.3, 6.8 Hz, 1 H), 3.25 (dd, J = 19.4, 12.3 Hz, 1 H), 2.96 (dd, J = 19.4, 5.9 Hz, 1 H), 2.47 (dq, J = 17.1, 5.9 Hz, 1 H), 1.95 (dq, J = 17.1, 5.9 Hz, 1 H), 0.95 (t, J =7.2 Hz, 3 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 203.8, 176.6, 135.3, 135.0, 130.2, 129.7, 129.5, 129.2, 129.1, 128.3, 114.5, 113.2, 104.9, 48.6, 44.4, 39.7, 33.5, 30.9, 7.6.

MS (70 eV, EI): m/z (%) = 356 [M]+ (70), 223 (30), 202 (60), 155 (100), 77 (70), 57 (80).

HRMS (ESI-TOF): m/z [M – H] calcd for C23H19N2O2: 355.1447; found: 355.1448.


#

3aha

White solid; yield: 87.1 mg (94%); Rf = 0.51 (CH2Cl2–hexanes, 1:1); 100% enol form; mp 224.5–225.1 °C.

IR (KBr): 3449 (m), 2962 (m), 2244 (w), 1618 (s), 1412 (s), 1213 (m), 704 cm–1 (s).

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 16.64 (s, 1 H), 7.52–7.42 (m, 3 H), 7.42–7.34 (m, 5 H), 7.33–7.27 (m, 2 H), 4.63 (s, 1 H), 3.42 (dd, J = 12.3, 5.9 Hz, 1 H), 3.25 (dd, J = 19.5, 12.3 Hz, 1 H), 2.97 (dd, J = 19.5, 5.9 Hz, 1 H), 2.57 (sept, J = 6.7 Hz, 1 H), 1.60 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3 H), 0.64 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 206.9, 179.4, 135.7, 135.0, 130.2, 129.6, 129.4, 129.2, 129.0, 128.2, 114.4, 113.2, 104.1, 48.5, 44.5, 39.7, 34.0, 33.9, 19.7, 17.9.

MS (70 eV, EI): m/z (%) = 370 [M]+ (60), 327 (15), 223 (60), 216 (65), 155 (100), 105 (60), 77 (40).

HRMS (ESI-TOF): m/z [M – H] calcd for C24H21N2O2: 369.1603; found: 369.1599.


#

3aia-enol

White solid; yield: 17.3 mg (18%); Rf = 0.49 (CH2Cl2–hexanes, 1:1); 100% enol form; mp 182.6–183.6 °C.

IR (KBr): 3443 (w), 2962 (m), 2252 (w), 1726 (s), 1699 (s), 1596 (w), 1478 (s), 1283 (m), 693 cm–1 (s).

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 17.19 (s, 1 H), 7.51–7.42 (m, 3 H), 7.41–7.31 (m, 5 H), 7.31–7.26 (m, 2 H), 5.05 (s, 1 H), 3.31–3.16 (m, 2 H), 3.08–2.94 (m, 1 H), 1.15 (s, 9 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 207.2, 181.0, 135.8, 135.2, 130.3, 129.4, 129.3, 129.2, 129.0, 128.3, 114.3, 113.8, 104.5, 47.7, 44.4, 43.1, 40.0, 34.7, 27.8.

MS (70 eV, EI): m/z (%) = 384 [M]+ (10), 327 (30), 223 (40), 83 (100), 57 (15).

HRMS (FAB-magnetic sector): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C25H25N2O2: 385.1916; found: 385.1917.


#

3aia-keto

White solid; yield: 52.9 mg (55%); Rf = 0.33 (CH2Cl2–hexanes, 1:1); 100% keto form; mp 201.1–202.0 °C.

IR (KBr): 3695 (m), 2962 (s), 2358 (s), 1585 (s), 1455 (s), 1166 (s), 705 cm–1 (s).

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.52–7.43 (m, 3 H), 7.42–7.26 (m, 7 H), 4.74 (d, J = 12.5 Hz, 1 H), 4.18–4.02 (m, 2 H), 3.41 (dd, J = 16.7, 7.1 Hz, 1 H), 3.02 (d, J = 16.7 Hz, 1 H), 0.89 (s, 9 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 210.6, 203.5, 134.7, 134.0, 129.7, 129.6, 129.2, 129.1, 128.9, 115.3, 112.8, 59.1, 48.1, 45.8, 44.9, 44.0, 42.3, 25.7.

MS (70 eV, EI): m/z (%) = 384 [M]+ (10), 146 (100), 131 (30), 57 (15).

HRMS (FAB-magnetic sector): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C25H25N2O2: 385.1916; found: 385.1915.


#

3baa

White solid; yield: 74.6 mg (68%); Rf = 0.27 (CH2Cl2–hexanes, 1:1); 100% enol form; mp 204.5–205.3 °C.

IR (KBr): 3432 (m), 3063 (w), 2369 (w), 1610 (s), 1413 (w), 1237 (m), 702 cm–1 (s).

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 16.44 (s, 1 H), 7.47–7.31 (m, 6 H), 7.30–7.22 (m, 4 H), 7.11 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 2 H), 7.00 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2 H), 4.52 (s, 1 H), 3.45 (dd, J = 11.7, 6.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.26 (dd, J = 19.7, 11.7 Hz, 1 H), 3.08 (dd, J = 19.7, 6.4 Hz, 1 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 196.6, 181.9, 136.3, 135.8, 135.6, 133.4, 130.7, 130.1, 129.6, 129.43, 129.35, 128.9, 128.3, 126.1, 114.1, 113.0, 105.3, 48.9, 44.2, 39.7, 34.5.

MS (70 eV, EI): m/z (%) = 438 [M]+ (40), 440 [M + 2]+ (15), 250 (80), 232 (75), 155 (70), 145 (60), 105 (100), 77 (85).

HRMS (EI-magnetic sector): m/z [M]+ calcd for C27H19N2O2Cl: 438.1135; found: 438.1137.


#

3caa

White solid; yield: 90.6 mg (75%); Rf = 0.25 (CH2Cl2–hexanes, 1:1); 100% enol form; mp 227.3–228.2 °C.

IR (KBr): 3435 (m), 3062 (w), 2369 (w), 1611 (s), 1414 (s), 1236 (s), 702 cm–1 (s).

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 16.43 (s, 1 H), 7.50 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2 H), 7.44–7.34 (m, 4 H), 7.27 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2 H), 7.19 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2 H), 7.14–7.08 (m, 2 H), 7.00 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2 H), 4.52 (s, 1 H), 3.43 (dd, J = 11.7, 6.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.25 (dd, J = 19.7, 11.7 Hz, 1 H), 3.08 (dd, J = 19.7, 6.4 Hz, 1 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 196.6, 181.9, 136.3, 135.8, 134.0, 132.4, 130.7, 130.1, 129.9, 129.4, 128.9, 128.4, 126.1, 123.8, 114.1, 113.0, 105.3, 49.0, 44.2, 39.8, 34.5.

MS (70 eV, EI): m/z (%) = 482 [M]+ (10), 484 [M + 2]+ (10), 250 (55), 155 (25), 145 (20), 105 (100), 77 (75).

HRMS (ESI-TOF): m/z [M – H] calcd for C27H18N2O2Br: 481.0552; found: 481.0546.


#

3daa

White solid; yield: 78.2 mg (72%); Rf = 0.47 (CH2Cl2–hexanes, 1:1); 100% enol form; mp 207.8–208.4 °C.

IR (KBr): 3439 (m), 2836 (w), 2244 (w), 1616 (s), 1406 (s), 1258 (s), 700 cm–1 (s).

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 16.42 (s, 1 H), 7.46–7.32 (m, 4 H), 7.25 (dd, J = 17.5, 8.3 Hz, 4 H), 7.14–7.08 (m, 2 H), 7.00 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2 H), 6.88 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2 H), 4.50 (s, 1 H), 3.78 (s, 3 H), 3.43 (dd, J = 11.6, 6.3 Hz, 1 H), 3.28 (dd, J = 19.7, 11.7 Hz, 1 H), 3.07 (dd, J = 19.6, 6.2 Hz, 1 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 196.6, 182.4, 160.3, 136.5, 136.0, 130.6, 130.2, 129.5, 129.2, 128.8, 128.3, 126.8, 126.1, 114.53, 114.46, 113.3, 105.4, 55.3, 49.0, 44.8, 39.5, 34.8.

MS (70 eV, EI): m/z (%) = 434 [M]+ (50), 250 (60), 155 (35), 104 (100), 77 (80).

HRMS (ESI-TOF): m/z [M – H] calcd for C28H21N2O3: 433.1552; found: 433.1556.


#

3eaa

White solid; yield: 67.7 mg (66%); Rf = 0.32 (CH2Cl2–hexanes, 1:1); 100% enol form; mp 220.1–221.0 °C.

IR (KBr): 3448 (m), 3055 (w), 2375 (w), 1602 (s), 1416 (s), 1256 (s), 747 cm–1 (s).

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 16.34 (s, 1 H), 7.44–7.30 (m, 5 H), 7.29–7.22 (m, 2 H), 7.14–7.06 (m, 3 H), 7.04–6.96 (m, 3 H), 4.52 (s, 1 H), 3.82 (t, J = 8.8 Hz, 1 H), 3.26 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 196.7, 181.2, 137.5, 136.5, 135.8, 130.7, 130.1, 129.3, 128.9, 128.3, 127.8, 127.4, 126.3, 126.0, 114.1, 113.1, 105.4, 48.7, 45.3, 36.5, 36.4.

MS (70 eV, EI): m/z (%) = 410 [M]+ (15), 250 (35), 105 (100), 77 (90).

HRMS (ESI-TOF): m/z [M – H] calcd for C25H17N2O2S: 409.1011; found: 409.1017.


#

3faa

Yellow solid; yield: 64.1 mg (65%); Rf = 0.36 (CH2Cl2–hexanes, 1:1); 100% enol form; mp 215.7–216.6 °C.

IR (KBr): 3449 (m), 3056 (m), 2236 (w), 1603 (s), 1412 (s), 1251 (s), 702 cm–1 (s).

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 16.41 (s, 1 H), 7.50–7.32 (m, 5 H), 7.27 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 H), 7.16–7.06 (m, 2 H), 7.00 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2 H), 6.34 (d, J = 14.2 Hz, 2 H), 4.49 (s, 1 H), 3.67 (dd, J = 11.3, 6.5 Hz, 1 H), 3.31 (dd, J = 19.8, 11.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.12 (dd, J = 19.8, 6.5 Hz, 1 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 196.5, 181.7, 148.5, 143.7, 136.4, 135.8, 130.8, 130.1, 129.4, 129.0, 128.4, 126.2, 113.9, 113.2, 110.9, 109.7, 105.4, 48.6, 43.1, 34.9, 33.2.

MS (70 eV, EI): m/z (%) = 394 [M]+ (15), 250 (70), 155 (20), 145 (15), 105 (100), 77 (60).

HRMS (ESI-TOF): m/z [M – H] calcd for C25H17N2O3: 393.1239; found: 393.1244.


#

3gaa

Yellow solid; yield: 59.8 mg (59%); Rf = 0.24 (CH2Cl2–EtOAc–hexanes, 1:2:3); 100% enol form; mp 231.7–232.5 °C.

IR (KBr): 3448 (m), 3060 (w), 2246 (w), 1604 (s), 1412 (s), 1254 (s), 704 cm–1 (s).1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 16.44 (s, 1 H), 8.64 (s, 1 H), 8.47 (s, 1 H), 7.79 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.45–7.35 (m, 5 H), 7.28 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2 H), 7.17–7.08 (m, 2 H), 7.01 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2 H), 4.56 (s, 1 H), 3.51 (dd, J = 11.7, 6.5 Hz, 1 H), 3.29 (dd, J = 19.7, 11.7 Hz, 1 H), 3.11 (dd, J = 19.7, 6.5 Hz, 1 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 196.5, 181.6, 150.9, 150.0, 136.2, 135.6, 135.2, 130.9, 130.8, 130.1, 129.5, 129.0, 128.3, 126.1, 123.9, 114.0, 112.8, 105.3, 48.8, 44.0, 38.0, 34.3.

MS (70 eV, EI): m/z (%) = 405 [M]+ (10), 300 (100), 156 (40), 105 (80), 77 (60).

HRMS (EI-magnetic sector): m/z [M]+ calcd for C26H19N3O2: 405.1477; found: 405.1469.


#

3haa

Yellow solid; yield: 95.8 mg (70%); Rf = 0.27 (CH2Cl2–hexanes, 1:1); 100% enol form; mp 258.9–259.8 °C.

IR (KBr): 3664 (s), 3092 (w), 2359 (w), 1684 (w), 1600 (w), 1455 (w), 1082 (s), 700 cm–1 (s).

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 16.44 (s, 1 H), 8.35 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1 H), 7.77 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2 H), 7.63 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1 H), 7.57 (s, 1 H), 7.54 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2 H), 7.46–7.32 (m, 5 H), 7.28 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 2 H), 7.22–7.16 (m, 3 H), 7.07 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1 H), 7.02 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2 H), 4.55 (s, 1 H), 3.96 (dd, J = 11.1, 7.1 Hz, 1 H), 3.24–3.06 (m, 2 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 196.5, 182.0, 168.3, 136.3, 136.0, 133.7, 132.5, 130.8, 130.7, 129.5, 129.0, 128.8, 128.4, 126.1, 126.04, 125.95, 124.0, 118.3, 116.7, 116.5, 114.5, 113.5, 105.3, 48.7, 44.2, 35.1, 31.4.

MS (70 eV, EI): m/z (%) = 547 [M]+ (10), 105 (100), 77 (30).

HRMS (MALDI-TOF): m/z [M + Na]+ calcd for C36H25N3O3Na: 570.1794; found: 570.1814.


#

3iaa

Yellow solid; yield: 88.0 mg (66%); Rf = 0.49 (CH2Cl2–hexanes, 1:1); 100% enol form; mp 222.4–223.2 °C.

IR (KBr): 3748 (w), 3031 (w), 2916 (w), 2359 (w), 1726 (w), 1592 (s), 1474 (m), 1467 (m), 1230 (m), 697 cm–1 (s).

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 16.46 (s, 1 H), 7.47–7.37 (m, 4 H), 7.34 (s, 1 H), 7.32–7.21 (m, 6 H), 7.21–7.16 (m, 3 H), 7.14 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1 H), 7.07 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 2 H), 7.02 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 3 H), 5.31 (d, J = 4.2 Hz, 2 H), 4.54 (s, 1 H), 4.02 (dd, J = 11.1, 6.9 Hz, 1 H), 3.29 (dd, J = 20.0, 11.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.21 (dd, J = 20.0, 6.9 Hz, 1 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 196.7, 182.6, 136.7, 136.6, 136.3, 136.2, 130.6, 130.2, 129.2, 128.9, 128.3, 127.8, 127.0, 126.73, 126.66, 126.1, 122.7, 120.0, 118.5, 115.0, 113.8, 110.2, 110.1, 105.6, 50.3, 48.8, 45.1, 35.9, 32.1.

MS (70 eV, EI): m/z (%) = 534 [M]+ (15), 207 (10), 115 (5), 105 (40), 92 (100), 77 (25).

HRMS (EI-magnetic sector): m/z [M]+ calcd for C36H27N3O2: 533.2103; found: 533.2099.


#

5aa

Yellow solid; yield: 70.0 mg (65%); Rf = 0.50 (CH2Cl2–hexanes, 1:1); 100% enol form; mp 235.5–236.3 °C.

IR (KBr): 3702 (w), 3030 (m), 2358 (w), 1733 (w), 1627 (s), 1451 (s), 1204 (m), 701 cm–1 (s).

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 17.19 (s, 1 H), 7.74 (d, J = 15.4 Hz, 1 H), 7.52–7.41 (m, 5 H), 7.40–7.29 (m, 10 H), 6.59 (d, J = 15.4 Hz, 1 H), 4.79 (s, 1 H), 3.50 (dd, J = 12.3, 5.8 Hz, 1 H), 3.30 (dd, J = 19.5, 12.3 Hz, 1 H), 3.03 (dd, J = 19.5, 5.9 Hz, 1 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 186.8, 183.7, 145.0, 136.3, 135.1, 134.3, 130.9, 130.1, 129.7, 129.4, 129.25, 129.21, 129.0, 128.5, 128.2, 119.0, 114.4, 113.2, 104.8, 48.5, 44.6, 39.9, 35.2.

MS (70 eV, EI): m/z (%) = 430 [M]+ (40), 276 (20), 172 (20), 154 (25), 131 (70), 105 (70), 103 (100), 77 (90).

HRMS (EI-magnetic sector): m/z [M]+ calcd for C29H22N2O2: 430.1684; found: 430.1681.


#

5ba

Yellow solid; yield: 135.3 mg (75%); Rf = 0.39 (EtOAc–CH2Cl2–hexanes, 1:1:4); 100% enol form; mp 153.9–154.3 °C.

IR (KBr): 3336 (w), 2977 (w), 2351 (w), 1764 (s), 1600 (m), 1512 (m), 1253 (s), 1145 (s), 743 cm–1 (w).

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 17.11 (s, 1 H), 7.66 (d, J = 15.3 Hz, 1 H), 7.55–7.40 (m, 5 H), 7.10 (t, J = 8.3 Hz, 2 H), 6.98–6.90 (m, 2 H), 6.88–6.80 (m, 2 H), 6.48 (d, J = 15.3 Hz, 1 H), 4.77 (s, 1 H), 3.83 (s, 6 H), 3.48 (dd, J = 12.0, 5.9 Hz, 1 H), 3.25 (dd, J = 19.5, 12.1 Hz, 1 H), 3.04 (dd, J = 19.5, 5.9 Hz, 1 H), 1.54 (d, J = 3.0 Hz, 18 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 186.7, 183.1, 151.7, 151.5, 151.1, 150.9, 144.1, 142.3, 141.0, 136.3, 133.7, 133.1, 130.1, 129.7, 129.3, 123.1, 123.0, 121.7, 120.7, 119.3, 114.4, 113.0, 112.0, 111.4, 104.8, 83.8, 83.6, 56.1, 55.8, 48.4, 44.4, 39.8, 35.3, 27.5.

MS (70 eV, EI): m/z (%) = 522 [M – 200]+ (100), 177 (60), 150 (100), 135 (60), 77 (20).

HRMS (ESI-TOF): m/z [M + Na]+ calcd for C41H42N2O10Na: 745.2737; found: 745.2728.


#

Deprotection of 5ba with TFA

A dry and nitrogen-flushed 10 mL Schlenk flask, equipped with a magnetic stirring bar and a septum, was sequentially charged with a solution of 5ba (0.3 mmol) and trifluoroacetic acid (30 vol%) in anhyd CH2Cl2 (3 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred for 3 h at 0 °C. Thereafter, the solvent was removed by evaporation in vacuo. Purification by flash chromatography (CH2Cl2–hexanes, 2:1) furnished 6 as a yellow solid; 52.3 mg (quant.). Rf = 0.35 (CH2Cl2–hexanes, 2:1); 100% enol form; mp 147.9–148.8 °C.

IR (KBr): 3466 (s), 3382 (m), 3191 (w), 2962 (w), 2200 (w), 1581 (s), 1451 (m), 1272 (s), 777 cm–1 (w).

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 17.24 (s, 1 H), 7.67 (d, J = 15.2 Hz, 1 H), 7.52–7.41 (m, 5 H), 6.93 (dd, J = 8.2, 2.2 Hz, 1 H), 6.87 (dd, J = 8.2, 2.2 Hz, 3 H), 6.80–6.74 (m, 2 H), 6.39 (d, J = 15.2 Hz, 1 H), 5.94 (br s, 1 H), 5.71 (br s, 1 H), 4.76 (s, 1 H), 3.88 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 6 H), 3.43 (dd, J = 12.1, 5.9 Hz, 1 H), 3.24 (dd, J = 19.4, 12.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.02 (dd, J = 19.4, 5.9 Hz, 1 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 187.0, 182.9, 148.8, 146.9, 146.8, 146.6, 145.2, 136.6, 130.2, 129.6, 129.2, 127.0, 129.9, 123.9, 121.8, 116.7, 114.9, 114.8, 114.7, 113.4, 110.1, 109.6, 104.5, 56.1, 55.8, 48.5, 45.0, 39.8, 35.4.

MS (70 eV, EI): m/z (%) = 522 [M]+ (40), 367 (25), 190 (30), 177 (100), 150 (60), 77 (30).

HRMS (MALDI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C31H27N2O6: 523.1869; found: 523.1888.


#
#

Acknowledgment

We thank the Ministry of Science and Technology of the Republic of China (NSC 101-2113-M-003-001-MY3) for financial support.

Supporting Information

  • References

    • 1a Jiang J, Bunda JL, Doss GA, Chicchi GG, Kurtz MM, Tsao K.-LC, Tong X, Zheng S, Upthagrove A, Samuel K, Tschirret-Guth R, Kumar S, Wheeldon A, Carlson EJ, Hargreaves R, Burns D, Hamill T, Ryan C, Krause SM, Eng W, DeVita RJ, Mills SG. J. Med. Chem. 2009; 52: 3039
    • 1b Bui T, Barbas III CF. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000; 41: 6951
    • 1c Ciochina R, Grossman RB. Chem. Rev. 2006; 106: 3963
    • 2a Kim WH, Lee JH, Danishefsky SJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009; 131: 12576
    • 2b Nakashima D, Yamamoto H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006; 128: 9626
    • 3a Jiao L, Lin M, Zhuo L.-G, Yu Z.-X. Org. Lett. 2010; 12: 2528
    • 3b Taber DF, Paquette CM, Gu P, Tian W. J. Org. Chem. 2013; 78: 9772
  • 4 Wang X, Pei T, Han X, Widenhoefer RA. Org. Lett. 2003; 5: 2699
    • 5a Pulkkinen J, Aburel PS, Halland N, Jørgensen KA. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2004; 346: 1077
    • 5b Wang J, Ma A, Ma D. Org. Lett. 2008; 10: 5425
    • 5c Hayashi Y, Toyoshima M, Gotoh H, Ishikawa H. Org. Lett. 2009; 11: 45
    • 5d Cui H.-F, Yang Y.-Q, Chai Z, Li P, Zheng C.-W, Zhu S.-Z, Zhao G. J. Org. Chem. 2010; 75: 117
    • 5e He P, Liu X, Shi J, Lin L, Feng X. Org. Lett. 2011; 13: 936
    • 5f Wang L.-L, Peng L, Bai J.-F, Jia L.-N, Luo X.-Y, Huang Q.-C, Xu X.-Y, Wang L.-X. Chem. Commun. 2011; 47: 5593
    • 6a Kamenecka TM, Overman LE, Ly Sakata SK. Org. Lett. 2002; 4: 79
    • 6b Ayyagari N, Josea D, Mobinb SM, Namboothiri IN. N. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011; 52: 258
    • 6c Ayyagari N, Mehta A, Gopi E, Deb I, Mobinb SM, Namboothiri IN. N. Tetrahedron 2013; 69: 5973

      Reviews on domino reaction, see:
    • 7a Tietze LF. Chem. Rev. 1996; 96: 115
    • 7b Pellissier H. Chem. Rev. 2013; 113: 442

    • Reviews on domino reactions in total synthesis, see:
    • 7c Nicolaou KC, Edmonds DJ, Bulger PG. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006; 45: 7134
    • 7d Tietze LF, Brasche G, Gericke K. Domino Reactions in Organic Synthesis . Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2006: 160
    • 7e Volla CM. R, Atodiresei I, Rueping M. Chem. Rev. 2014; 114: 2390
    • 8a Yin G, Ren T, Rao Y, Zhou Y, Li Z, Shu W, Wu A. J. Org. Chem. 2013; 78: 3132
    • 8b Chittiboyina AG, Peddikotla P, Avery MA, Khan IA. J. Org. Chem. 2013; 78: 9223
    • 8c Wzorek JS, Knöpfel TF, Sapountzis I, Evans DA. Org. Lett. 2012; 14: 5840
    • 9a Hoashi Y, Yabuta T, Takemoto Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004; 45: 9185
    • 9b Hoashi Y, Yabuta T, Yuan P, Miyabe H, Takemoto Y. Tetrahedron 2006; 62: 365
    • 9c Wei Q, Gong L.-Z. Org. Lett. 2010; 12: 1008
    • 10a MacDonald FK, Burnell DJ. J. Org. Chem. 2009; 74: 6973 ; all the starting materials, 1-hydroxy-1,4-dien-3-ones 1, were readily prepared according to the protocol mentioned in this article, and 1aeag, 1ca, and 1gaia were new compounds
    • 10b Qiu X, Liu Z, Shao W.-Y, Liu X, Jing D.-P, Yu Y.-J, An L.-K, Huang S.-L, Bu X.-Z, Huang Z.-S, Gu L.-Q. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2008; 16: 8035 ; starting materials, curcumin-related derivatives 4a and 4b, were prepared according to this article, and 4b was a new compound
  • 11 This reaction was carried out using 1aa (0.25 mmol) and 2a (0.3 mmol, 1.2 equiv) in the absence of an added base in MeOH (10.5 mL, much more solvent than before due to the low solubility of 1aa in MeOH) at 30 °C for 1d. After purification as usual, only 14% of product was obtained. It indicated that an added base was necessary for acceptable results although the reaction could occur via enol very slowly.
  • 12 The structure of 3aaa was determined by X-ray crystal structure analysis (CCDC number: 940043), and further information is provided in the Supporting Information.

    • For selected reviews and monographs on indole related compounds, see:
    • 13a Ishikura M, Yamada K. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2009; 26: 803
    • 13b Walker SR, Carter EJ, Huff BC, Morris JC. Chem. Rev. 2009; 109: 3080
    • 13c Higuchi K, Kawasaki T. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2007; 24: 843 ; and the previous reports of the series cited therein

      For representative reports detailing the biological importance of indoles, see:
    • 14a Patil SA, Patil R, Miller DD. Curr. Med. Chem. 2009; 16: 2531
    • 14b de Sá Alves FR. Barreiro E. J, Fraga CA. M. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2009; 9: 782
    • 14c Sarkar FH, Li Y. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2009; 35: 597

      For selected reviews on coumarin-related compounds, see:
    • 15a Riveiro ME, De Kimpe N, Moglioni A, Vázquez R, Monczor F, Shayo C, Davio C. Curr. Med. Chem. 2010; 17: 1325
    • 15b Wu L, Wang X, Xu W, Farzaneh F, Xu R. Curr. Med. Chem. 2009; 16: 4236
    • 15c O’Kennedy R, Thornes RD. Coumarins: Biology, Applications, and Mode of Action . J. Wiley & Sons; Chichester: 1997: 1
  • 16 The structure of 3aao-keto was determined by NMR analysis, and more information is provided in the Supporting Information.
  • 17 The structures of 3aia were determined by X-ray crystal structure analysis (CCDC number for 3aia-enol: 940045; for 3aia-keto: 940044), and more information is provided in the Supporting Information.
  • 18 Our reaction was not only suitable for 2-alkylidenemalono-nitriles, but can also be employed using substrates such as α-cyanocinnamates and β-nitrostyrenes. In fact, we already have some results from these substrates and believe further results under investigation in these areas will be reported in due course.

  • References

    • 1a Jiang J, Bunda JL, Doss GA, Chicchi GG, Kurtz MM, Tsao K.-LC, Tong X, Zheng S, Upthagrove A, Samuel K, Tschirret-Guth R, Kumar S, Wheeldon A, Carlson EJ, Hargreaves R, Burns D, Hamill T, Ryan C, Krause SM, Eng W, DeVita RJ, Mills SG. J. Med. Chem. 2009; 52: 3039
    • 1b Bui T, Barbas III CF. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000; 41: 6951
    • 1c Ciochina R, Grossman RB. Chem. Rev. 2006; 106: 3963
    • 2a Kim WH, Lee JH, Danishefsky SJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009; 131: 12576
    • 2b Nakashima D, Yamamoto H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006; 128: 9626
    • 3a Jiao L, Lin M, Zhuo L.-G, Yu Z.-X. Org. Lett. 2010; 12: 2528
    • 3b Taber DF, Paquette CM, Gu P, Tian W. J. Org. Chem. 2013; 78: 9772
  • 4 Wang X, Pei T, Han X, Widenhoefer RA. Org. Lett. 2003; 5: 2699
    • 5a Pulkkinen J, Aburel PS, Halland N, Jørgensen KA. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2004; 346: 1077
    • 5b Wang J, Ma A, Ma D. Org. Lett. 2008; 10: 5425
    • 5c Hayashi Y, Toyoshima M, Gotoh H, Ishikawa H. Org. Lett. 2009; 11: 45
    • 5d Cui H.-F, Yang Y.-Q, Chai Z, Li P, Zheng C.-W, Zhu S.-Z, Zhao G. J. Org. Chem. 2010; 75: 117
    • 5e He P, Liu X, Shi J, Lin L, Feng X. Org. Lett. 2011; 13: 936
    • 5f Wang L.-L, Peng L, Bai J.-F, Jia L.-N, Luo X.-Y, Huang Q.-C, Xu X.-Y, Wang L.-X. Chem. Commun. 2011; 47: 5593
    • 6a Kamenecka TM, Overman LE, Ly Sakata SK. Org. Lett. 2002; 4: 79
    • 6b Ayyagari N, Josea D, Mobinb SM, Namboothiri IN. N. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011; 52: 258
    • 6c Ayyagari N, Mehta A, Gopi E, Deb I, Mobinb SM, Namboothiri IN. N. Tetrahedron 2013; 69: 5973

      Reviews on domino reaction, see:
    • 7a Tietze LF. Chem. Rev. 1996; 96: 115
    • 7b Pellissier H. Chem. Rev. 2013; 113: 442

    • Reviews on domino reactions in total synthesis, see:
    • 7c Nicolaou KC, Edmonds DJ, Bulger PG. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006; 45: 7134
    • 7d Tietze LF, Brasche G, Gericke K. Domino Reactions in Organic Synthesis . Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2006: 160
    • 7e Volla CM. R, Atodiresei I, Rueping M. Chem. Rev. 2014; 114: 2390
    • 8a Yin G, Ren T, Rao Y, Zhou Y, Li Z, Shu W, Wu A. J. Org. Chem. 2013; 78: 3132
    • 8b Chittiboyina AG, Peddikotla P, Avery MA, Khan IA. J. Org. Chem. 2013; 78: 9223
    • 8c Wzorek JS, Knöpfel TF, Sapountzis I, Evans DA. Org. Lett. 2012; 14: 5840
    • 9a Hoashi Y, Yabuta T, Takemoto Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004; 45: 9185
    • 9b Hoashi Y, Yabuta T, Yuan P, Miyabe H, Takemoto Y. Tetrahedron 2006; 62: 365
    • 9c Wei Q, Gong L.-Z. Org. Lett. 2010; 12: 1008
    • 10a MacDonald FK, Burnell DJ. J. Org. Chem. 2009; 74: 6973 ; all the starting materials, 1-hydroxy-1,4-dien-3-ones 1, were readily prepared according to the protocol mentioned in this article, and 1aeag, 1ca, and 1gaia were new compounds
    • 10b Qiu X, Liu Z, Shao W.-Y, Liu X, Jing D.-P, Yu Y.-J, An L.-K, Huang S.-L, Bu X.-Z, Huang Z.-S, Gu L.-Q. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2008; 16: 8035 ; starting materials, curcumin-related derivatives 4a and 4b, were prepared according to this article, and 4b was a new compound
  • 11 This reaction was carried out using 1aa (0.25 mmol) and 2a (0.3 mmol, 1.2 equiv) in the absence of an added base in MeOH (10.5 mL, much more solvent than before due to the low solubility of 1aa in MeOH) at 30 °C for 1d. After purification as usual, only 14% of product was obtained. It indicated that an added base was necessary for acceptable results although the reaction could occur via enol very slowly.
  • 12 The structure of 3aaa was determined by X-ray crystal structure analysis (CCDC number: 940043), and further information is provided in the Supporting Information.

    • For selected reviews and monographs on indole related compounds, see:
    • 13a Ishikura M, Yamada K. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2009; 26: 803
    • 13b Walker SR, Carter EJ, Huff BC, Morris JC. Chem. Rev. 2009; 109: 3080
    • 13c Higuchi K, Kawasaki T. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2007; 24: 843 ; and the previous reports of the series cited therein

      For representative reports detailing the biological importance of indoles, see:
    • 14a Patil SA, Patil R, Miller DD. Curr. Med. Chem. 2009; 16: 2531
    • 14b de Sá Alves FR. Barreiro E. J, Fraga CA. M. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2009; 9: 782
    • 14c Sarkar FH, Li Y. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2009; 35: 597

      For selected reviews on coumarin-related compounds, see:
    • 15a Riveiro ME, De Kimpe N, Moglioni A, Vázquez R, Monczor F, Shayo C, Davio C. Curr. Med. Chem. 2010; 17: 1325
    • 15b Wu L, Wang X, Xu W, Farzaneh F, Xu R. Curr. Med. Chem. 2009; 16: 4236
    • 15c O’Kennedy R, Thornes RD. Coumarins: Biology, Applications, and Mode of Action . J. Wiley & Sons; Chichester: 1997: 1
  • 16 The structure of 3aao-keto was determined by NMR analysis, and more information is provided in the Supporting Information.
  • 17 The structures of 3aia were determined by X-ray crystal structure analysis (CCDC number for 3aia-enol: 940045; for 3aia-keto: 940044), and more information is provided in the Supporting Information.
  • 18 Our reaction was not only suitable for 2-alkylidenemalono-nitriles, but can also be employed using substrates such as α-cyanocinnamates and β-nitrostyrenes. In fact, we already have some results from these substrates and believe further results under investigation in these areas will be reported in due course.

Zoom Image
Scheme 1 Domino double Michael reactions for the construction of cyclohexanones
Zoom Image
Scheme 2 Proposed mechanism for the formation of 3 from 1
Zoom Image
Scheme 3 Preparation of 3aaa from benzaldehyde and malononitrile in a one-pot manner. Reagents and conditions: 1aa (0.25 mmol), benzaldehyde (1.2 equiv), malononitrile (1.2 equiv), Et3N (20 mol%), CH2Cl2 (2 mL), 30 °C. Isolated yield, dr measured by 1H NMR analysis of crude reaction mixture.
Zoom Image
Scheme 4 Domino double Michael reactions on curcumin-related derivatives 4a and 4b