Synlett 2015; 26(11): 1533-1536
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1380359
letter
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Rhodium(I)-Catalyzed Cycloisomerization of 1,6-Enynes

Yuji Matsushima
a   Department of Chemistry, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA, Email: jonathan.ellman@yale.edu
,
Eric M. Phillips
a   Department of Chemistry, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA, Email: jonathan.ellman@yale.edu
,
Robert G. Bergman
b   Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and Department of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
,
Jonathan A. Ellman*
a   Department of Chemistry, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA, Email: jonathan.ellman@yale.edu
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 21 January 2015

Accepted after revision: 23 February 2015

Publication Date:
27 February 2015 (online)


This manuscript is dedicated to Peter Vollhardt, who launched SYNLETT 25 years ago and since that time has continuously served in a number of important editorial capacities.

Abstract

A new and unexpected rhodium(I)-catalyzed cycloisomerization of 1,6-enynes is reported. Several different alkyne substitution patterns were evaluated under the reaction conditions, including a deuterated derivative that provides some insight into the reaction mechanism.

Supporting Information

 
  • References and Notes

    • 1a Colby DA, Bergman RG, Ellman JA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008; 130: 3645
    • 1b For a general review on the synthesis and further elaboration of 1,2-dihydropyridines prepared by C–H bond functionalization–electrocyclization cascades, see: Mesganaw T, Ellman JA. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2014; 18: 1097
  • 3 Martin RM, Bergman RG, Ellman JA. J. Org. Chem. 2012; 77: 2501
  • 6 Martin RM, Bergman RG, Ellman JA. Org. Lett. 2013; 15: 444
  • 7 Ischay MA, Takase MK, Bergman RG, Ellman JA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013; 135: 2478
  • 8 Yotphan S, Bergman RG, Ellman JA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008; 130: 2452
  • 9 Experimental Procedures for the Generation of Imines and Rhodium-Catalyzed Cycloisomerization(Z)-2-(2-Methylcyclohex-2-en-1-ylidene)acetaldehyde (10a)In an inert atmosphere box, to the solution of 7a (86 mg, 0.63 mmol) in toluene (3 mL) was added benzylamine (68 mg, 0.63 mmol) and 3 Å MS (800 mg). The flask was removed from the box, and the mixture was stirred at r.t. for 3 h. The 3 Å MS were removed via filtration over Celite, which was washed with toluene (8 mL). The filtrate was degassed and brought into an inert atmosphere box. To the solution was added a solution of [RhCl(coe)2]2 (23 mg, 0.031 mmol) and Me2NPhPEt2 (13 mg, 0.62 mmol) in toluene (2 mL), and the mixture was stirred at 75 °C for 1 h. After removal of the solvent, the residual oil was purified by column chromatography on grade III Al2O3 (hexanes–EtOAc, 100:0 to 99:1,) to afford 10a (Z/E = 6.7:1) as colorless oil (41 mg, 0.30 mmol, 48% yield). Rf = 0.70 (hexanes–EtOAc. 4:1). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 10.23 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1 H), 6.11 (ddd, J = 5.4, 2.7, 1.3 Hz, 1 H), 5.81 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1 H), 2.44 (ddd, J = 6.5, 4.3, 1.2 Hz, 2 H), 2.30–2.20 (m, 2 H), 2.17 (dd, J = 3.3, 1.8 Hz, 3 H), 1.84–1.74 (m, 2 H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 192.28, 156.42, 138.87, 131.95, 127.42, 35.59, 26.55, 26.04, 22.34. IR (thin film): 2927, 2867, 2834, 1653, 1615, 1580, 1448, 1406, 1223, 1178, 1149, 1130, 1101, 1025, 948 cm–1. MS (EI): m/z [M]+ calcd for C9H12O+: 136.09; found: 136.10.(Z)-2-[2-(Methyl-d 3)cyclohex-2-en-1-ylidene]acetaldehyde (10b)Compound 10b was synthesized according to the procedure used for compound 10a. From 80 mg (0.57 mmol) of 7b was obtained 39 mg (0.28 mmol, 49% yield) of 10b (Z/E = 6.7:1) as colorless oil after purification by column chromatography on grade III Al2O3 eluting with hexanes–EtOAc (100:0 to 99:1). Rf = 0.70 (hexanes–EtOAc. 4:1). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 10.21 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1 H), 6.11 (td, J = 4.2, 1.3 Hz, 1 H), 5.81 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1 H), 2.48–2.40 (m, 2 H), 2.29–2.21 (m, 2 H), 1.83–1.74 (m, 2 H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 192.28, 156.44, 138.87, 131.89, 127.46, 35.60, 26.57, 22.38. IR (thin film): 3009, 2926, 1651, 1611, 1580, 1406, 1230, 1156, 1137, 1096, 1051, 974 cm–1. MS (EI): m/z [M]+ calcd for C9H9D3O+: 139.11; found: 139.15.(Z)-2-(2-Ethylcyclohex-2-en-1-ylidene)acetaldehyde (10c)Compound 10c was synthesized according to the procedure used for compound 10a. From 40 mg (0.27 mmol) of 7c was obtained 18 mg (0.12 mmol, 45% yield) of 10c (Z/E = 20:1) as colorless oil after purification by column chromatography on grade III Al2O3 eluting with hexanes–EtOAc (100:0 to 99:1). Rf = 0.70 (hexanes–EtOAc. 4:1). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 10.11 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1 H), 6.08 (ddd, J = 5.4, 2.8, 1.3 Hz, 1 H), 5.76 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1 H), 2.53–2.44 (m, 2 H), 2.44–2.37 (m, 2 H), 2.30–2.22 (m, 2 H), 1.84–1.75 (m, 2 H), 1.11 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3 H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 192.40, 156.54, 138.12, 135.90, 126.41, 36.28, 30.99, 26.52, 22.88, 13.16. IR (thin film): 2966, 2928, 2876, 1660, 1617, 1583, 1453, 1409, 1222, 1174, 1150, 1127, 1107, 1081cm–1. MS (EI): m/z [M]+ calcd for C10H14O+: 150.10; found: 150.10.(Z)-2-(2-Benzylcyclohex-2-en-1-ylidene)acetaldehyde (10d)Compound 10d was synthesized according to the procedure used for compound 10a. From 63 mg (0.30 mmol) of 7d was obtained 32 mg (0.15 mmol, 51% yield) of 10d (Z/E = 15.5:1) as colorless oil after purification by column chromatography on grade III Al2O3 eluting with hexanes–EtOAc (100:0 to 99:1). Rf = 0.70 (hexanes–EtOAc. 4:1). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 10.04 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1 H), 7.29 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2 H), 7.21 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1 H), 7.13 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 2 H), 6.01 (td, J = 4.0, 1.0 Hz, 1 H), 5.73 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.83 (s, 2 H), 2.50–2.43 (m, 2 H), 2.32 (ddd, J = 6.0, 5.1, 2.0 Hz, 2 H), 1.90–1.82 (m, 2 H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 192.10, 155.61, 140.14, 138.71, 135.05, 128.58, 128.55, 126.66, 126.41, 44.05, 36.22, 26.72, 22.65. IR (thin film): 3025, 2925, 2862, 1688, 1653, 1616, 1582, 1495, 1453, 1405, 1223, 1147, 1124, 978 cm–1. MS (EI): m/z [M]+ calcd for C15H16O+: 212.12; found: 212.10.(E)-2-(2-Methylcyclohex-2-en-1-ylidene)acetaldehyde (11a)To a solution of 10a (40 mg, 0.29 mmol) in THF (2 mL) was added a 1 M aqueous solution of HCl (1 mL, 1 mmol), and the mixture was stirred at r.t. for 18 h. After being neutralized with aq Na2CO3, the aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 5 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with H2O and brine and dried over with MgSO4. After filtration, the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The residual oil was purified by column chromatography on silica gel (33:1, pentane–Et2O) to afford 11a as a colorless oil (36 mg, 0.26 mmol, 89% yield). Rf = 0.70 (hexanes–EtOAc. 4:1). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 10.15 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1 H), 6.18 (t, J = 4.3 Hz, 1 H), 5.93 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1 H), 2.95–2.86 (m, 2 H), 2.26 (dtd, J = 7.8, 4.1, 1.9 Hz, 2 H), 1.85 (dd, J = 3.1, 1.7 Hz, 3 H), 1.80 (dt, J = 12.5, 6.2 Hz, 2 H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 191.49, 157.28, 138.03, 132.99, 122.62, 26.32, 25.82, 22.26, 19.65. IR (thin film): 2924, 2860, 1663, 1622, 1591, 1455, 1435, 1401, 1386, 1370, 1177, 1145, 1087, 1048 cm–1. MS (EI): m/z [M]+ calcd for C9H12O+: 136.09; found: 136.00.
  • 10 For an unusual rhodium-catalyzed intramolecular trans hydroacylation of an alkyne, see: Tanaka K, Fu GC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001; 123: 11492
  • 11 In previous studies on rhodium-catalyzed β-alkylation of α,β-unsaturated imines with alkenes, we observed >95:5 Z/E selectivity for rhodium-catalyzed alkylation, but this Z/E ratio degraded by as much as 5–15% during alumina-mediated imine hydrolysis. This loss in stereochemical purity was dependent upon the structure of the imine. Colby DA, Bergman RG, Ellman JA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006; 128: 5604
  • 13 Nieto-Oberhuber C, Munoz MP, Lopez S, Jiminez-Nunez E, Nevado C, Herrero-Gomez E, Raducan M, Echavarren AM. Chem. Eur. J. 2006; 12: 1677

    • For leading references on rhodium-catalyzed cycloisomerizations that proceed by ene-type pathways, see:
    • 15a Okazaki E, Okamoto R, Shibata Y, Noguchi K, Tanaka K. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012; 51: 6722
    • 15b Okamoto R, Okazaki E, Noguchi K, Tanaka K. Org. Lett. 2011; 13: 4894