Verbesserung von Aufklärung, Wissen und Stigmatisierung psychischer Erkrankungen in der Hamburger Bevölkerung

Zusammenfassung

Studien zeigen, dass ein unzureichendes Wissen über psychische Erkrankungen und Stigmatisierungen negative Konsequenzen für die mentale Gesundheit haben. Jedoch sind Studien zu deren Verbesserung in Methodik und Ergebnis oftmals heterogen. Die Hamburger psychenet-Kampagne entstand in Zusammenarbeit mit Betroffenen und Angehörigen und umfasste eine multimodale Intervention zur Förderung von Wissen und Kontakt zu Betroffenen. Ziele waren die Verbesserung von Aufklärung, Wissen und Stigmatisierung sowie die Verstetigung innerhalb des Hamburger Versorgungssystems.

Abstract

Evidence shows that poor mental health literacy and stigmatization have negative consequences on mental health. However, studies on interventions to improve both are often heterogenic in methodology and results. The psychenet-campaign in Hamburg was developed and implemented in collaboration with patients and relatives and comprised multidimensional interventions focusing on education and contact to patients. The main goals were the improvement of mental health literacy and destigmatization and the long-term implementation within Hamburg’s mental health care system.

Schlüsselwörter

Aufklärung - Bildung - Stigmatisierung - Kampagne - Trialog - psychenet

Keywords

Mental Health Literacy - stigma - campaign - awareness - trialogue - psychenet

• Literatur

• 1 Jorm AF. Mental health literacy: empowering the community to take action for better mental health. Am Psychol 2012; 67: 231-243
• 2 Rüsch N, Angermeyer MC, Corrigan PW. The stigma of mental illness: concepts, forms, and consequences. Psychiat Prax 2005; 32: 221-232
• 3 Jorm AF, Korten AE, Jacomb PA et al. „Mental health literacy“: A survey oft he public’s ability to recognize mental disorders and their beliefs about the effectiveness of treatment. Med J Aus 1997; 166: 182-186
• 4 Thornicroft G, Rose D, Kassam A et al. Stigma: ignorance, prejudice or discrimination?. Br J Psychiatry 2007; 190: 192-203
• 5 Gerlinger G, Hauser M, De Hert M et al. Personal stigma in schizophrenia spectrum disorders: a systematic review of prevalence rates, correlates, impact and interventions. World Psychiatry 2013; 12: 155-164
• 6 Ellison N, Mason O, Scior K. Bipolar disorder and stigma: a systematic review of the literature. J Affect Disord 2013; 151: 805-820
• 7 Latalova K, Kamaradova D, Prasko J. Perspectives on perceived stigma and self-stigma in adult male patients with depression. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2014; 10: 1399-1405
• 8 Batterham PJ, Griffiths KM, Barney LJ et al. Predictors of Generalized Anxiety Disorder stigma. Psychiatry Res 2013; 206: 282-286
• 9 Ebneter DS, Latner JD. Stigmatizing attitudes differ across mental health disorders: a comparison of stigma across eating disorders, obesity, and major depressive disorder. J Nerv Ment Dis 2013; 201: 281-285
• 10 Clement S, Schauman O, Graham T et al. What is the impact of mental health-related stigma on help-seeking? A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies. Psychol Med 2015; 45: 11-27
• 11 Livingston JD, Boyd JE. Correlates and consequences of internalized stigma for people living with mental illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Soc Sci Med 2010; 71: 2150-2161
• 12 Härter M, Kentgens M, Brandes A et al. Rationale and content of psychenet: the Hamburg Network for Mental Health. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2012; 262 (Suppl. 02) 57-63
• 13 Sartorius N, Gaebel W, Cleveland HR et al. WPA guidance on how to combat stigmatization of psychiatry and psychiatrists. World Psychiatry 2010; 9: 131-144
• 14 Sartorius N. Lessons from a 10-year global programme against stigma and discrimination because of an illness. Psychol Health Med 2006; 11: 383-388
• 15 Bock T, Naber D. Antistigmakampagne von unten – Erfahrungen der Initiative „Irre menschlich Hamburg“ an Schulen. Psych Praxis 2003; 30: 402-408
• 16 Dorner R, Sander A, Bock T. Psychiatrie macht Schule – Beitrag zur Prävention (Tag der offenen Tür für Schüler). Praxis wissen psychosozial Heft 2014; 18: 11-18
• 17 Bock T, Urban A, Schulz G et al. Antistigmaarbeit und Prävention. In: Schimmelmann BG, Resch F, Hrsg. Psychosen in der Adoleszenz: Entwicklungspsychopathologie, Früherkennung und Behandlung. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer; 2013: 185-202
• 18 Bock T. Krankheitsverständnis – zwischen Stigmatisierung und Empowerment. Schweiz Arch Neurol Psych 2012; 163: 138-144
• 19 Bock T. Wird die Menschheit kränker oder die Krankheit menschlicher?. Psychiat Prax 2014; 41: 121-123
• 20 Bock T. Partizipation in Klinischer und Sozial-Psychiatrie – Impulse aus dem Trialog. In: Rosenbrock R, Hartung S. Handbuch Partizipation im Gesundheitswesen. Berlin: Vincentz-Verlag; 2012: 18-24
• 21 Liebherz S, Härter M, Dirmaier J et al. Information and Decision-Making Needs Among People with Anxiety Disorders: Results of an Online Survey. Patient DOI: 10.1007/s40271-015-0116-1.
• 22 Tlach L, Wüsten C, Daubmann A et al. Information and decision-making needs among people with mental disorders: a systematic review of the literature. Health Expect 2014; DOI: 10.1111/hex.12251.
• 23 von dem Knesebeck O, Mnich E, Daubmann A et al. Socioeconomic status and beliefs about depression, schizophrenia and eating disorders. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2013; 48: 775-782
• 24 von dem Knesebeck O, Mnich E, Kofahl C et al. Estimated prevalence of mental disorders and the desire for social distance – Results from population surveys in two large German cities. Psychiatry Res 2013; 209: 670-674
• 25 Mnich E, Makowski AC, Lambert M et al. Beliefs about depression and attitudes towards people with depression – does affliction matter?. J Affective Dis 2014; 164: 28-32