Entwicklung und Evaluation des Webportals www.psychenet.de für das Hamburger Netz psychische Gesundheit

Zusammenfassung

Ziel des Projekts war es, ein nutzerorientiertes Webportal zum Empowerment bei psychischen Erkrankungen zu entwickeln.

Methodik: Mixed-Methods-Design zur Entwicklung von evidenzbasierten, nutzerrelevanten Inhalten, Evaluation mittels Webanalyse und Nutzerbefragungen.

Ergebnisse: psychenet.de informiert über psychische Störungen und Behandlungsmöglichkeiten. Die gut besuchte Webseite wird von 73 % der Befragten als „sehr gut“ oder „gut“ bewertet.

Schlussfolgerung: Die Nutzung des Portals kann helfen, Betroffene über psychische Erkrankungen aufzuklären, zu informieren und in den Behandlungsprozess einzubeziehen.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this project was to develop a user-centered web-portal for empowerment in mental disorders.

Methods: The development of the portal included mixed-methods techniques for needs assessment to identify user-relevant content. Exposure and use of the portal was investigated as part of a process evaluation.

Results: psychenet.de informs about mental disorders and treatment option. Results of the process evaluation showed a highly accessed website, the portal was assessed as “good” or “very good” by 73 % of the respondents.

Discussion: Using psychenet.de attempts to raise awareness, to inform about mental disorders, and to engage patients in the course of their treatment.

Schlüsselwörter

E-Mental-Health - Online-Interventionen - Prozessevaluation - psychenet - psychische Gesundheit

Keywords

e-mental health - Internet interventions - process evaluation - psychenet - mental health

• Literatur

• 1 Dirmaier J, Liebherz S, Sänger S et al. Psychenet.de: development and process evaluation of an e-mental health portal. Inform Health Soc Care DOI: 10.3109/17538157.2015.1008486.
• 2 Liebherz S, Tlach L, Härter M et al. Information and decision-making needs among people with affective disorders – results of an online-survey. Patient Prefer Adherence [in press]
• 3 Liebherz S, Härter M, Dirmaier J et al. Information and decision-making needs among people with axiety disorders – results of an online-survey. Patient DOI: 10.1007/s40271-015-0116-1.
• 4 Kushniruk AW, Patel VL. Cognitive and usability engineering methods for the evaluation of clinical information systems. J Biomed Inform 2004; 37: 56-76
• 5 Abbott VP. Web page quality: can we measure it and what do we find? A report of exploratory findings. J Public Health Med 2000; 22: 191-197
• 6 Khazaal Y, Chatton A, Cochand S et al. Brief DISCERN, six questions for the evaluation of evidence-based content of health-related websites. Patient Educ Couns 2009; 77: 33-37
• 7 Tlach L, Wüsten C, Daubmann A et al. Information and decision-making needs among people with mental disorders: a systematic review of the literature. Health Expect DOI: 10.1111/hex.12251.
• 8 Klemperer D, Lang B, Koch K et al. Die Gute Praxis Gesundheitsforum. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes 2010; 104: 66-68
• 9 Elwyn G, O'Connor A, Stacey D et al. Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: Online international Delphi consensus process. BMJ 2006; 333: 417-419
• 10 Löwe B, Unützer J, Callahan CM et al. Monitoring depression treatment outcomes with the patient health questionnaire-9. Med Care 2004; 42: 1194-1201
• 11 Löwe B, Decker O, Müller S et al. Validation and standardization of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7) in the general population. Med Care 2008; 46: 266-274
• 12 Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-15: validity of a new measure for evaluating the severity of somatic symptoms. Psychosom Med 2002; 64: 258-266
• 13 Berger U, Wick K, Hölling H et al. Screening riskanten Essverhaltens bei 12-jährigen Mädchen und Jungen: psychometrischer Vergleich der deutschsprachigen Versionen von SCOFF und EAT-26. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol 2011; 61: 311-318
• 14 Hirschfeld RM, Holzer C, Calabrese JR et al. Validity of the mood disorder questionnaire: a general population study. Am J Psychiatry 2003; 160: 178-180
• 15 Berner MM, Kriston L, Bentele M et al. The alcohol use disorders identification test for detecting at-risk drinking: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 2007; 68: 461-473
• 16 Leavy JE, Rosenberg M, Barnes R et al. Would you Find Thirty online? Website use in a Western Australian physical activity campaign. Health Promot J Aust 2013; 24: 118-125
• 17 Crutzen R, Roosjen JL, Poelman J. Using Google Analytics as a process evaluation method for Internet-delivered interventions: an example on sexual health. Health Promot Int 2013; 28: 36-42
• 18 Hausen A, Glaeske G. Die Bedeutung einer frühzeitigen Evaluation der ambulanten psychiatrischen integrierten Versorgung für die Entwicklung von Indikatoren am Beispiel der Patientenwartezeit. Psychiat Prax 2014; 41: 101-103