Three-Dimensional Venous Visualization with Phase-Lag Computed Tomography Angiography for Reconstructive Microsurgery

Abstract

Background Most free flap reconstruction complications involve vascular compromise. Evaluation of vascular anatomy provides considerable information that can potentially minimize these complications. Previous reports have shown that contrast-enhanced computed tomography is effective for understanding three-dimensional arterial anatomy. However, most vascular complications result from venous thromboses, making imaging of venous anatomy highly desirable.

Methods The phase-lag computed tomography angiography (pl-CTA) technique involves 64-channel (virtually, 128-channel) multidetector CT and is used to acquire arterial images using conventional CTA. Venous images are three-dimensionally reconstructed using a subtraction technique involving combined venous phase and arterial phase images, using a computer workstation.

Results This technique was used to examine 48 patients (12 lower leg reconstructions, 34 head and neck reconstructions, and 2 upper extremity reconstructions) without complications. The pl-CTA technique can be used for three-dimensional visualization of peripheral veins measuring approximately 1 mm in diameter.

Conclusion The pl-CTA information was especially helpful for secondary free flap reconstructions in the head and neck region after malignant tumor recurrence. In such cases, radical dissection of the neck was performed as part of the first operation, and many vessels, including veins, were resected and used in the first free-tissue transfer. The pl-CTA images also allowed visualization of varicose changes in the lower leg region and helped us avoid selecting those vessels for anastomosis. Thus, the pl-CTA-derived venous anatomy information was useful for exact evaluations during the planning of free-tissue transfers.

Keywords

phase-lag computed tomography angiography - computed tomography angiography - venous anatomy - venous imaging

• References

• 1 Knobloch K, Redeker J, Vogt PM. Preoperative imaging for perforator flaps: a quality-improving measure?. J ReconstrMicrosurg 2011; 27 (1) 75-76 , author reply 77–78
• 2 Klein S, Hoving S, Werker P, Russell N. Is there an indication for digital subtraction angiography in the assessment of irradiation-induced vascular damage before free flap surgery by the means of the internal mammary vessels?. J ReconstrMicrosurg 2014; 30 (1) 47-52
• 3 Onoda S, Azumi S, Hasegawa K, Kimata Y. Preoperative identification of perforator vessels by combining MDCT, doppler flowmetry, and ICG fluorescent angiography. Microsurgery 2013; 33 (4) 265-269
• 4 Ensat F, Babl M, Conz C , et al. The efficacy of color duplex sonography in preoperative assessment of anterolateral thigh flap. Microsurgery 2012; 32 (8) 605-610
• 5 Clavero JA, Masia J, Larrañaga J , et al. MDCT in the preoperative planning of abdominal perforator surgery for postmastectomy breast reconstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 191 (3) 670-676
• 6 Hamdi M, Van Landuyt K, Ulens S, Van Hedent E, Roche N, Monstrey S. Clinical applications of the superior epigastric artery perforator (SEAP) flap: anatomical studies and preoperative perforator mapping with multidetector CT. J Plast ReconstrAesthetSurg 2009; 62 (9) 1127-1134
• 7 Hijjawi JB, Blondeel PN. Advancing deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstruction through multidetector row computed tomography: an evolution in preoperative imaging. J ReconstrMicrosurg 2010; 26 (1) 11-20
• 8 Karunanithy N, Rose V, Lim AK, Mitchell A. CT angiography of inferior epigastric and gluteal perforating arteries before free flap breast reconstruction. Radiographics 2011; 31 (5) 1307-1319
• 9 Masia J, Clavero JA, Larrañaga J, Vives L, Pons G. Preoperative planning of the abdominal perforator flap with multidetector row computed tomography: 3 years of experience. Plast ReconstrSurg 2008; 122 (2) 80e-81e
• 10 Masia J, Larrañaga J, Clavero JA, Vives L, Pons G, Pons JM. The value of the multidetector row computed tomography for the preoperative planning of deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap: our experience in 162 cases. Ann Plast Surg 2008; 60 (1) 29-36
• 11 Mathes DW, Neligan PC. Current techniques in preoperative imaging for abdomen-based perforator flap microsurgical breast reconstruction. J ReconstrMicrosurg 2010; 26 (1) 3-10
• 12 Nagamatsu S, Nakagawa M, Kayano S , et al. Clinical application of 320-row multidetector computed tomography for a dynamic three-dimensional vascular study: imaging findings and initial experience. J Plast ReconstrAesthetSurg 2010; 63 (10) 1736-1739
• 13 Teunis T, Heerma van Voss MR, Kon M, van Maurik JF. CT-angiography prior to DIEP flap breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Microsurgery 2013; 33 (6) 496-502
• 14 Bui DT, Cordeiro PG, Hu QY, Disa JJ, Pusic A, Mehrara BJ. Free flap reexploration: indications, treatment, and outcomes in 1193 free flaps. Plast ReconstrSurg 2007; 119 (7) 2092-2100
• 15 Novakovic D, Patel RS, Goldstein DP, Gullane PJ. Salvage of failed free flaps used in head and neck reconstruction. Head Neck Oncol 2009; 1: 33
• 16 Sakakibara S, Onishi H, Nomura T, Hashikawa K, Terashi H. Evaluation of Venous Anatomy with Phase-lag CTA(pl-CTA) [in Japanese]. Keisei Geka 2013; 56: 1271-1280
• 17 Masia J, Kosutic D, Cervelli D, Clavero JA, Monill JM, Pons G. In search of the ideal method in perforator mapping: noncontrast magnetic resonance imaging. J ReconstrMicrosurg 2010; 26 (1) 29-35
• 18 Agrawal MD, Thimmappa ND, Vasile JV , et al. Autologous breast reconstruction: preoperative magnetic resonance angiography for perforator flap vessel mapping. J ReconstrMicrosurg 2014;
• 19 Hattori Y, Doi K, Sakamoto S, Satbhai N. Anatomic variations in branching patterns of the axillary artery: a multidetector-row computed tomography angiography study. J ReconstrMicrosurg 2013; 29 (8) 531-536
• 20 Lin J, Zhou KR, Chen ZW, Wang JH, Yan ZP, Wang YX. Vena cava 3D contrast-enhanced MR venography: a pictorial review. CardiovascInterventRadiol 2005; 28 (6) 795-805
• 21 Tanju S, Sancak T, Düşünceli E, Yağmurlu B, Erden I, Sanlidilek U. Direct contrast-enhanced 3D MR venography evaluation of upper extremity deep venous system. DiagnIntervRadiol 2006; 12 (2) 74-79
• 22 Spritzer CE. Progress in MR imaging of the venous system. PerspectVascSurg Endovasc Ther 2009; 21 (2) 105-116
• 23 Ruehm SG, Wiesner W, Debatin JF. Pelvic and lower extremity veins: contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR venography with a dedicated vascular coil-initial experience. Radiology 2000; 215 (2) 421-427
• 24 Rozen WM, Pan WR, Le Roux CM, Taylor GI, Ashton MW. The venous anatomy of the anterior abdominal wall: an anatomical and clinical study. Plast ReconstrSurg 2009; 124 (3) 848-853
• 25 Betsou S, Efstathopoulos EP, Katritsis D, Faulkner K, Panayiotakis G. Patient radiation doses during cardiac catheterization procedures. Br J Radiol 1998; 71 (846) 634-639
• 26 Siebert E, Bohner G, Dewey M , et al. 320-slice CT neuroimaging: initial clinical experience and image quality evaluation. Br J Radiol 2009; 82 (979) 561-570