Isolated Tricuspid Valve Surgery: A Single Institutional Experience with the Technique of Minimally Invasive Surgery via Right Minithoracotomy

Abstract

Background Minimally invasive cardiac surgery via right lateral minithoracotomy is a well-described approach. However, reports on isolated tricuspid valve surgery (TVS) in this technique are rare. Therefore, we like to give a contribution by reporting our experience.

Methods We retrospectively reviewed 25 tricuspid valve operations via right lateral minithoracotomy with femoral cannulation between August 2009 and September 2013 (18 repairs, 7 replacements, and 72% repair rate). Three patients (12%) presented for a re-do operation, and nine patients (36%) suffered from active endocarditis at admission. All patients underwent TVS as single valve procedure. Ten patients received additional procedures such as removal of infected leads, resection of atrial tumors, or closure of atrial septal defects. An annuloplasty ring was inserted in 12 cases. We investigated the short-term morbidity and mortality with regard to the surgical procedure.

Results Repair rate was 72%. Thirty-day and 1-year mortality were 4 and 20%, respectively. The only patient with early mortality received the surgical procedure on the tricuspid valve as fourth cardiac-related surgery and postoperative mortality was due to intracranial air embolism. Perioperative morbidity included reoperation for bleeding (8%) and stroke (4%). No disturbance of wound healing occurred. Durations of intensive care unit stay and hospital stay were 2.3 ± 2.4 and 17.4 ± 13.1 days, respectively. Endocarditis-caused surgery did not reveal any significant difference in the intra- or perioperative course compared with other indications.

Conclusion Minimally invasive TVS via right lateral minithoracotomy is feasible with good results. Even in a cohort of patients suffering from elevated rate of active endocarditis, a high repair rate can be achieved.

Keywords

minimally invasive approach - minithoracotomy - tricuspid valve surgery - endocarditis

• References

• 1 Mohr FW, Falk V, Diegeler A, Walther T, van Son JA, Autschbach R. Minimally invasive port-access mitral valve surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998; 115 (03) 567-574 , discussion 574–576
• 2 Mohr FW, Onnasch JF, Falk V. , et al. The evolution of minimally invasive valve surgery—2 year experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999; 15 (03) 233-238 , discussion 238–239
• 3 Grossi EA, LaPietra A, Ribakove GH. , et al. Minimally invasive versus sternotomy approaches for mitral reconstruction: comparison of intermediate-term results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001; 121 (04) 708-713
• 4 Grossi EA, Galloway AC, LaPietra A. , et al. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a 6-year experience with 714 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 74 (03) 660-663 , discussion 663–664
• 5 Casselman FP, Van Slycke S, Wellens F. , et al. Mitral valve surgery can now routinely be performed endoscopically. Circulation 2003; 108 (Suppl. 01) II48-II54
• 6 Filsoufi F, Anyanwu AC, Salzberg SP, Frankel T, Cohn LH, Adams DH. Long-term outcomes of tricuspid valve replacement in the current era. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 80 (03) 845-850
• 7 Iscan ZH, Vural KM, Bahar I, Mavioglu L, Saritas A. What to expect after tricuspid valve replacement? Long-term results. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2007; 32 (02) 296-300
• 8 Moraca RJ, Moon MR, Lawton JS. , et al. Outcomes of tricuspid valve repair and replacement: a propensity analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 87 (01) 83-88 , discussion 88–89
• 9 Staab ME, Nishimura RA, Dearani JA. Isolated tricuspid valve surgery for severe tricuspid regurgitation following prior left heart valve surgery: analysis of outcome in 34 patients. J Heart Valve Dis 1999; 8 (05) 567-574
• 10 Lee TC, Desai B, Glower DD. Results of 141 consecutive minimally invasive tricuspid valve operations: an 11-year experience. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 88 (06) 1845-1850
• 11 Seeburger J, Borger MA, Passage J. , et al. Minimally invasive isolated tricuspid valve surgery. J Heart Valve Dis 2010; 19 (02) 189-192 , discussion 193
• 12 Pfannmüller B, Moz M, Misfeld M. , et al. Isolated tricuspid valve surgery in patients with previous cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 146 (04) 841-847
• 13 Ricci D, Boffini M, Barbero C, El Qarra S, Marchetto G, Rinaldi M. Minimally invasive tricuspid valve surgery in patients at high risk. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 147 (03) 996-1001
• 14 Seeburger J, Borger MA, Falk V. , et al. Minimal invasive mitral valve repair for mitral regurgitation: results of 1339 consecutive patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008; 34 (04) 760-765
• 15 Salinas GE, Ramchandani M. Tricuspid valve replacement on a beating heart via a right minithoracotomy. Multimed Man Cardiothorac Surg 2013; 2013: mmt006
• 16 Li JS, Sexton DJ, Mick N. , et al. Proposed modifications to the Duke criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis. Clin Infect Dis 2000; 30 (04) 633-638
• 17 Zhuang Y, Zhou J, Xiao M. , et al. Clinical results of tricuspid valve replacement - a 21-case report. J Biomed Res 2010; 24 (01) 73-76
• 18 Cao C, Gupta S, Chandrakumar D. , et al. A meta-analysis of minimally invasive versus conventional mitral valve repair for patients with degenerative mitral disease. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2013; 2 (06) 693-703
• 19 Chiu KM, Chen RJ, Lin TY. , et al. Right mini-parasternotomy may be a good minimally invasive alternative to full sternotomy for cardiac valve operations-a propensity-adjusted analysis. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2014 (epub ahead of print)
• 20 Guenther T, Noebauer C, Mazzitelli D, Busch R, Tassani-Prell P, Lange R. Tricuspid valve surgery: a thirty-year assessment of early and late outcome. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008; 34 (02) 402-409 , discussion 409