Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1549019
A Simple Radiographic Sign of Vertical Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tunnel Placement
Publication History
15 July 2014
11 January 2015
Publication Date:
18 April 2015 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/jks/201505/lookinside/thumbnails/10-1055-s-0035-1549019_140039oa-1.jpg)
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to describe a novel radiographic sign indicative of vertical tunnel placement following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. We reviewed 190 consecutive ACL reconstructions. Operative records, patient charts, arthroscopic images, and preoperative and postoperative orthogonal plain radiographic images were reviewed. We made special note of the operative technique. Note was made of tunnel position and whether the posterior (proximal) aspect of Blumensaat line was violated on standard lateral knee radiographic images. Of 190 patients, 17 patients did not have postoperative imaging and were excluded. Of the 173 remaining knees, 163 were primary ACL reconstructions and 10 were revision ACL reconstructions. We found that no anatomically placed ACL femoral tunnel violated Blumensaat line. In all revision cases exhibiting violation of Blumensaat line, a new femoral tunnel was able to be drilled while completely avoiding the previously placed, nonanatomic ACL femoral tunnel. The principal findings of our study demonstrate that violation of Blumensaat line following ACL reconstruction is an indicator of vertical, nonanatomic femoral tunnel placement. Furthermore, presence of this radiographic sign indicates that an anatomically placed femoral tunnel may be drilled while completely avoiding the existing femoral tunnel during cases of revision ACL reconstruction.
-
References
- 1 Howe JG, Johnson RJ, Kaplan MJ, Fleming B, Jarvinen M. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using quadriceps patellar tendon graft. Part I. Long-term followup. Am J Sports Med 1991; 19 (5) 447-457
- 2 Kaplan MJ, Howe JG, Fleming B, Johnson RJ, Jarvinen M. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using quadriceps patellar tendon graft. Part II. A specific sport review. Am J Sports Med 1991; 19 (5) 458-462
- 3 Kornblatt I, Warren RF, Wickiewicz TL. Long-term followup of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the quadriceps tendon substitution for chronic anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. Am J Sports Med 1988; 16 (5) 444-448
- 4 Allum R. Complications of arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003; 85 (1) 12-16
- 5 Fu FH, Bennett CH, Ma CB, Menetrey J, Lattermann C. Current trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Part II. Operative procedures and clinical correlations. Am J Sports Med 2000; 28 (1) 124-130
- 6 Loh JC, Fukuda Y, Tsuda E, Steadman RJ, Fu FH, Woo SL. Knee stability and graft function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison between 11 o'clock and 10 o'clock femoral tunnel placement. 2002 Richard O'Connor Award paper. Arthroscopy 2003; 19 (3) 297-304
- 7 Lee MC, Seong SC, Lee S , et al. Vertical femoral tunnel placement results in rotational knee laxity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2007; 23 (7) 771-778
- 8 Odensten M, Gillquist J. Functional anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament and a rationale for reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985; 67 (2) 257-262
- 9 Markolf KL, Hame S, Hunter DM , et al. Effects of femoral tunnel placement on knee laxity and forces in an anterior cruciate ligament graft. J Orthop Res 2002; 20 (5) 1016-1024
- 10 Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33 (1) 159-174
- 11 Norwood Jr LA, Cross MJ. The intercondylar shelf and the anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 1977; 5 (4) 171-176
- 12 Howell SM, Taylor MA. Failure of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament due to impingement by the intercondylar roof. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993; 75 (7) 1044-1055
- 13 Kieffer DA, Curnow RJ, Southwell RB, Tucker WF, Kendrick KK. Anterior cruciate ligament arthroplasty. Am J Sports Med 1984; 12 (4) 301-312
- 14 Arnold MP, Kooloos J, van Kampen A. Single-incision technique misses the anatomical femoral anterior cruciate ligament insertion: a cadaver study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2001; 9 (4) 194-199
- 15 Giron F, Cuomo P, Edwards A, Bull AM, Amis AA, Aglietti P. Double-bundle “anatomic” anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaveric study of tunnel positioning with a transtibial technique. Arthroscopy 2007; 23 (1) 7-13
- 16 Kaseta MK, DeFrate LE, Charnock BL, Sullivan RT, Garrett Jr WE. Reconstruction technique affects femoral tunnel placement in ACL reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008; 466 (6) 1467-1474
- 17 Rue JP, Ghodadra N, Bach Jr BR. Femoral tunnel placement in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaveric study relating transtibial lateralized femoral tunnel position to the anteromedial and posterolateral bundle femoral origins of the anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 2008; 36 (1) 73-79
- 18 Farrow LD, Gillespie RJ, Victoroff BN, Cooperman DR. Radiographic location of the lateral intercondylar ridge: its relationship to Blumensaat's line. Am J Sports Med 2008; 36 (10) 2002-2006
- 19 Bernard M, Hertel P, Hornung H, Cierpinski T. Femoral insertion of the ACL. Radiographic quadrant method. Am J Knee Surg 1997; 10 (1) 14-21 , discussion 21–22
- 20 Bernard M, Hertel P. [Intraoperative and postoperative insertion control of anterior cruciate ligament-plasty. A radiologic measuring method (quadrant method)]. Unfallchirurg 1996; 99 (5) 332-340
- 21 Henckel J, Richards R, Lozhkin K , et al. Very low-dose computed tomography for planning and outcome measurement in knee replacement. The imperial knee protocol. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006; 88 (11) 1513-1518
- 22 Dawson P. Patient dose in multislice CT: why is it increasing and does it matter?. Br J Radiol 2004; 77 (Spec No 1) S10-S13