Download PDF
manuelletherapie 2015; 19(02): 71-75
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1552883
Schwerpunkt Screening in der Manuellen Therapie
Vertiefung
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Screening-Prozedere: Gefahrensituationen bei Patienten mit HWS-Symptomen

Kerstin Lüdtke
1   Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf; Institut für systemische Neurowissenschaften, Haus W 34; Martinistraße 52; 20251 Hamburg
,
Lucia Grauel
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
19 May 2015 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Bei einem Patienten mit Nackenschmerzen ist drei Behandlungen lang alles in Ordnung. Ab der vierten Behandlung treten zunehmend bilaterale Parästhesien auf. Beide, Therapeut und Arzt, erkennen das Warnsignal. Ein weiteres MRT wird veranlasst. Trotz ausgeprägter Symptomatik sieht auf dem neuen Bild niemand das verengte Rückenmark. Stattdessen folgt eine neue Verordnung – mit Konsequenzen für den Patienten.

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Emery SE. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: Diagnosis and treatment. The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 2001; 9 (6) 376-388
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Fehlings MG, Skaf G. A review of the pathophysiology of cervical spondylotic myelopathy with insights for potential novel mechanisms drawn from traumatic spinal cord injury. Spine 1998; 23 (24) 2730-2737
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Henschke N, Maher CG, Refshauge KM et al. Prevalence of and screening for serious spinal pathology in patients presenting to primary care settings with acute low back pain. Arthritis and Rheumatism 2009; 60 (10) 3072-3080
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Huisstede BMA, Miedema HS, Verhagen AP et al. Multidisciplinary consensus on the terminology and classification of complaints of the arm, neck and/or shoulder. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2007; 64 (5) 313-319
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Karadimas SK, Erwin WM, Ely CG et al. Pathophysiology and natural history of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 2013; 38 (22) (Suppl. 01) S21-36
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Kempster PA, Rollinson RD. The Lhermitte phenomenon: Variant forms and their significance. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience 2008; 15 (4) 379-381
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Kendall NA. Psychosocial approaches to the prevention of chronic pain: The low back paradigm. Baillière’s best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology 1999; 13 (3) 545-554
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Michaleff ZA, Maher CG, Verhagen AP et al. Accuracy of the Canadian C-spine rule and NEXUS to screen for clinically important cervical spine injury in patients following blunt trauma: A systematic review. CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal 2012; 184 (16) E867-876
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Mitchell J, Keene D, Dyson C et al. Is cervical spine rotation, as used in the standard vertebrobasilar insufficiency test, associated with a measureable change in intracranial vertebral artery blood flow?. Manual Therapy 2004; 9 (4) 220-227
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Nagata K, Yoshimura N, Hashizume H et al. The prevalence of cervical myelopathy among subjects with narrow cervical spinal canal in a population-based magnetic resonance imaging study: The Wakayama Spine Study. The Spine Journal 2014; 14: 2811-2817
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Osti OL, Gun RT, Abraham G et al. Potential risk factors for prolonged recovery following whiplash injury. European Spine Journal 2005; 14 (1) 90-94
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Rąpała K, Walczak P, Truszczyńska A et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic problems of back pain syndromes and their distribution according to a colour coding system of flags. Ortopedia, Traumatologia, Rehabilitacja 2012; 14 (3) 215-227
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Rivett DA. Adverse events and the vertebral artery: Can they be averted?. Man Ther 2006; 11 (4) 241-242
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Salvi FJ, Jones JC, Weigert BJ. The assessment of cervical myelopathy. The Spine Journal 2006; 6 (Suppl. 06) 182S-189S
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Shaw WS, van der Windt DA, Main CJ et al. Early patient screening and intervention to address individual-level occupational factors („blue flags”) in back disability. Journal of occupational rehabilitation 2009; 19 (1) 64-80
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Sung WS, Sung MJ, Chan JH et al. Intramedullary spinal cord metastases: A 20-year institutional experience with a comprehensive literature review. World Neurosurgery 2013; 79 (3-4) 576-584
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Yarbrough CK, Murphy RKJ, Ray WZ et al. The natural history and clinical presentation of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Advances in Orthopedics 2012; 480643
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Young WB. The clinical diagnosis of myelopathy. Seminars in ultrasound, CT and MR 1994; 15 (3) 250-254
    PubMedGoogle Scholar